GH Moderation: The concept of "Home Turf"


Recommended Posts

I have planted the concept of "Home Turf" into the heads of some of the new GH and Global moderators.

Basically it means that the Sony Console forum is the home turf of Neowin's PS3 owners and that the Microsoft Console forum is the home turf of Neowin's X360 owners. I suppose you can figure out the rest.

If a PS3 owner is going to say something rude/disrespectful about another console (say the Xbox) it would be best if they did not do that in the home territory of that console (in this case the Microsoft Console forum).

Likewise, if a X360 owner is going to say something rude/disrespectful about another console (say the PS3) it would be best if they did not do that in the home territory of that console (in this case the Sony Console forum).

Again, the same applies to Nintendo and others.

Why?

The home turf of a console should be a place where the owners of that hardware can relax and discuss the merits of their console free of overt trolls. If that person chooses to leave the sanctuary of their own home turf then they should be prepared to read more negative stuff about what they own. Their cloak of protection +1 no longer applies. This effort is specifically engineered to reduce wandering trolls from entering into hostile lands and then picking fights with the local denizens.

That doesn't mean that you can never be caught trolling on your own home turf (even with a cloak of protection you can still be hit on a natural 20) and that you can't ever say anything remotely negative but the criteria will be stronger in some cases than in others and that will depend on whether you are in your home turf or not.

This is a bit of an experiment and I'd like to hear some useful feedback on this. If your feedback is more critical then send it to me as a PM and I'll post it in the moderation forum (that way you don't need to hold back).

Edit:

To be clear, this doesn't mean that you could never say anything negative about another console. It just means that you would need to try to be slightly more polite and respectful when visiting somebody else's home turf than you could get away with at home.

Edited by Fred Derf

As much as you are entitled to your own opinion, i entirely disagree with your logic. It allows for biased, one-sided views and that is not good for any debate. It almost renders Neowin's forums entirely pointless.

For Example; A Playstation owner complains about the Other OS Fiasco. Where shall i go now?

Another Example; A Guest or member wishes to see the opinions of others on for example 'An Xbox 360'. Where will this person go? To the Xbox 360 forum. On visiting the Xbox 360 Neowin Forum he discovers that there is no issues with the console, nobody dislikes it and the prices are perfect.

Sounds like a good idea to me. Where does the PC stand in this since all owners of Nintendo, PS3 and XBOX360's will have PCs ?

I suppose it would be neutral ground for most. If there are evangelical PC gamers then that would be their home turf. To be honest, I'm not sure that evangelical PC gamers are often discussed as a problem group.

Not too fond of this, I think moderators just need to be harder around this section rather than just cleaning up arguments and/or ignoring them with little punishment.

Also instead of just bumping warning ratings as well, lengthy post suspensions go down a treat in here, it's the only way to really make anyone learn outside of outright banning.

As much as you are entitled to your own opinion, i entirely disagree with your logic. It allows for biased, one-sided views and that is not good for any debate. It almost renders Neowin's forums entirely pointless.

For Example; A Playstation owner complains about the Other OS Fiasco. Where shall i go now?

Well, Neowin was not designed to be a no-holds-barred survival of the fittest forum (although Gamers Hangout does seem to get like that from time to time). We would like to encourage respectful discussion and as long as people are afraid of starting topics because they might get attacked by the haters then we can't do what we want to do.

A Playstation owner that wants to discuss the Other OS Fiasco could leave their home turf and post in the forum of another console but they would need to be slightly more polite and respectful there then they could get away with at home.

Not too fond of this, I think moderators just need to be harder around this section rather than just cleaning up arguments and/or ignoring them with little punishment.

Also instead of just bumping warning ratings as well, lengthy post suspensions go down a treat in here, it's the only way to really make anyone learn outside of outright banning.

The problem with this approach is staff burnout in GH is enormous. I'm trying to make moderation of GH easier. Currently it is one of the hardest areas of the site to moderate. While I don't spend much time here myself because I don't know much about consoles and the PC games that I play are often 5 years obsolete I do have a fairly go idea what they go through based on my experiences moderating RWI (the other hard to moderate section of Neowin).

As I said before:

"It's one of those jobs that you only know you're doing well when both groups hate you for opposite reasons."

If we could make GH easier to moderate then we'd get more consistent moderation. Then we could do those suspensions or whatever is required.

Well, Neowin was not designed to be a no-holds-barred survival of the fittest forum (although Gamers Hangout does seem to get like that from time to time). We would like to encourage respectful discussion and as long as people are afraid of starting topics because they might get attacked by the haters then we can't do what we want to do.

A Playstation owner that wants to discuss the Other OS Fiasco could leave their home turf and post in the forum of another console but they would need to be slightly more polite and respectful there then they could get away with at home.

I think you are missing me point. Anybody with a good level of maturity should be able to debate something properly without resorting to personal remarks. Granted, this is a skill that some clearly lack, but that is not the problem of the majority of good members here who can discuss things properly. I actually enjoy a good debate, i think it is healthy and should be encouraged. There is not enough of it in this world.

If i choose to discuss the Other OS fiasco, i should be entitled to do so in the Playstation forum and in such a scenario i would hope to hear the opinions of my fellow playstation owners and the non owners alike. If the majority of comments regarding this were positive, i think i'd be very suprised.

This effort is specifically engineered to reduce wandering trolls from entering into hostile lands and then picking fights with the local denizens.

vadernooooo.jpg

Can I troll everyone then?

*runs*

If we could make GH easier to moderate then we'd get more consistent moderation. Then we could do those suspensions or whatever is required.

Follow the gaf example. Troll and get kick/banned for a week. Shouldn't need this segregation because some need to defend their console like it was their woman.

I think you are missing me point. Anybody with a good level of maturity should be able to debate something properly without resorting to personal remarks. Granted, this is a skill that some clearly lack, but that is not the problem of the majority of good members here who can discuss things properly. I actually enjoy a good debate, i think it is healthy and should be encouraged. There is not enough of it in this world.

If i choose to discuss the Other OS fiasco, i should be entitled to do so in the Playstation forum and in such a scenario i would hope to hear the opinions of my fellow members ranging from positive ones to negative.

This new approach would not affect you then. Anyone who can participate in a healthy respectful debate should have nothing to fear. This is really aimed at wandering trolls. I'm talking about raising the bar for trolling behaviour only slightly and only when they leave their home turf.

Having just read a lengthy report comparing the current US Afghan initiative (COIN) to the Star Wars universe, I'm looking forward to the rebels who'll put aside this concept of home turf co-habitation and strike out at the console death star which will end the security imbalance once and for all.

Or maybe I should simply stop reading sci-fi political reports which mirror modern affairs like those found on Neowin :p

So I own all 3 consoles, add a custom built PC just for gaming, and as such I feel at any time I should be able to say whatever I want, even if it is negative, about any of the consoles I own.

The way I see it, I can talk negatively about a console, as long as I do so in a respectful manner towards others. I honestly feel it should be irrelevant if I am "disrespectful" towards a piece of plastic with components in it. Translation: If people cannot take something negative being said about their preferred console of choice, than I believe the issue resolves around their allegiance to said console, not what may or may not be said about it. IMO they are taking it to far. Meaning I just do not see how or why they would take it personal if and when someone talks about "their" console. They did not make the console, they just own it.

So while I more than anyone understand why this experiment is being implemented, I just feel it is catering to those few people who confuse something negative being said about their console as something negative being said about them. I feel it is unfair to the rest of us who realize that a console is just indeed a console and it does not define us as individuals.

Now with that said, I do know there are some individuals who have made a name for themselves so to speak for being a crusader of one console or the other. I guess that is their right, but at the same time why should other members suffer for their actions is the way I see it.

So while I more than anyone understand why this experiment is being implemented, I just feel it is catering to those few people who confuse something negative being said about their console as something negative being said about them. I feel it is unfair to the rest of us who realize that a console is just indeed a console and it does not define us as individuals.

Now with that said, I do know there are some individuals who have made a name for themselves so to speak for being a crusader of one console or the other. I guess that is their right, but at the same time why should other members suffer for their actions is the way I see it.

This is more about giving moderators another tool against the crusaders and allowing the normal members to just enjoy the site. Usually it is pretty easy to spot the crusaders.

This new approach would not affect you then. Anyone who can participate in a healthy respectful debate should have nothing to fear. This is really aimed at wandering trolls. I'm talking about raising the bar for trolling behaviour only slightly and only when they leave their home turf.

That is not what you have said.

If a PS3 owner is going to say something negative about another console (say the Xbox) it would be best if they did not do that in the home territory of that console (in this case the Microsoft Console forum).

It doesnt sound like a troll only rule to me. That however is just my opinion. The reason i am making a 'fuss' is because Neowin is one of the best forums there is and this rule will only serve to damage it.

This new approach would not affect you then. Anyone who can participate in a healthy respectful debate should have nothing to fear. This is really aimed at wandering trolls. I'm talking about raising the bar for trolling behaviour only slightly and only when they leave their home turf.

So in essence we are creating a database from the larger Neowin database of known GH trolls who, if in restricted (without visas, ie a registered console) area can be pulled over and asked for official papers (console gamertag) by local officials and arrested (banned)? Sounds a bit like Arizona; illegal consol-ites are not welcome!

Sorry Fred, today I can't help it. The parallels are to entertaining! Ok, going outside to catch some sun.

That is not what you have said.

I should re-write that then. I didn't mean for it to be so strongly worded. I'm thinking on the fly here (although I've been mulling over the concept for the past few days).

Edit:

I don't want to give the idea that you are free to say something rude/disrespectful about another console in your own home turf but something slightly trollish would be better there than in somebody else's home turf.

So in essence we are creating a database from the larger Neowin database of known GH trolls who, if in restricted (without visas, ie a registered console) area can be pulled over and asked for official papers (console gamertag) by local officials and arrested (banned)? Sounds a bit like Arizona; illegal consol-ites are not welcome!

Sorry Fred, today I can't help it. The parallels are to entertaining! Ok, going outside to catch some sun.

Yes, these are not the forum trolls you are looking for. I get it.

Well I therefore think a better idea would be to restrict certain members to certain forums, rather than every member worry about where they stick their feet. If the rule is indeed to weed out trolls, not those just wanting a respectful discussion.

This is more about giving moderators another tool against the crusaders and allowing the normal members to just enjoy the site. Usually it is pretty easy to spot the crusaders.

Fair enough. If that is the ultimate goal, then I can only see it being a good thing. I just hope people do not start pointing towards this initiative when it is uncalled for, as I can see this being misinterpreted by certain people and them crying foul whenever something is said they may not like for whatever reason. So I just hope it is not abused is all, as if it is, it has the potential to really stifle conversation.

I, along with others, do know first hand sometimes there are pages and pages of off topic conversation based on one or two people coming in and specifically looking to cause a ruckus, so if this prevents that, that could only be a good thing.

Well I therefore think a better idea would be to restrict certain members to certain forums, rather than every member worry about where they stick their feet. If the rule is indeed to weed out trolls, not those just wanting a respectful discussion.

Yeah, that a good idea too but there are technical reasons why this is difficult. We already have a Restricted (Gamers) Mask and, in theory, we could create one for every subforum but this adds to the complexity of the administration.

Fair enough. If that is the ultimate goal, then I can only see it being a good thing. I just hope people do not start pointing towards this initiative when it is uncalled for, as I can see this being misinterpreted by certain people and them crying foul whenever something is said they may not like for whatever reason. So I just hope it is not abused is all, as if it is, it has the potential to really stifle conversation.

I, along with others, do know first hand sometimes there are pages and pages of off topic conversation based on one or two people coming in and specifically looking to cause a ruckus, so if this prevents that, that could only be a good thing.

If it stifles discussions then we'll have to tweak, modify or scrap this initiative because that is the opposite to our goal.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Again, this is an irrelevant attempt to attack the messenger. The truth does not require any justification.
    • Removed the blue and underline as you did not post a link. This would also  be considered spamming.
    • Why it's almost impossible to produce a smartphone in the United States by Hamid Ganji If you look at the back of some Apple products, you can see the famous phrase “Designed by Apple in California, Assembled in China.” This phrase appears on products from one of the largest smartphone brands in the United States. These products are designed in the U.S., but their manufacturing takes place in China, India, Vietnam, or even Brazil. But why can’t Apple, as one of the largest American tech companies, produce its iPhones on U.S. soil? The idea for this topic came to me after the Trump Foundation launched a smartphone called the T1 and claimed that it was designed and built with American values in mind. However, this claim did not last long, as it was revealed that Trump’s phone was actually a rebranded HTC U24 Pro, with only a gold case and minor internal component changes. You see? Even a phone that is supposed to represent American values is manufactured in China. With a gross domestic product (GDP) exceeding $32 trillion, the United States is currently the world’s largest economy, while China ranks second with around $20 trillion. On the other hand, the United States is by a wide margin the global leader in various technological fields, and American companies spend hundreds of billions of dollars annually on research and development. From Apple and Google to Microsoft, Lockheed Martin, Boeing, and others, American tech and industrial giants lead their foreign competitors in many sectors. The United States also has no shortage of smartphone brands. Apple, Google, and Motorola are among the major brands in the smartphone market, collectively holding a significant share. However, the vast majority of their products are manufactured outside the United States. So why is it that the world’s largest economy, home to the most advanced technology companies and industrial powers, cannot produce a smartphone on its own soil? Let’s explore this question together. Even threats to impose tariffs won’t work After Trump entered the White House as the 47th President of the United States, his administration adopted strict tariff policies. One of these policies was the imposition of a 25% tariff on smartphones manufactured outside the United States. Trump said he “had a little problem” with Apple CEO Tim Cook over producing smartphones outside the U.S. So he thought that threatening a 25% tax on imported phones might force Apple to bring manufacturing back to the United States. “I have long ago informed Tim Cook of Apple that I expect their iPhones that will be sold in the United States of America will be manufactured and built in the United States, not India, or anyplace else,” Trump wrote on Truth Social. Image via The White House Although Apple currently manufactures some of the iPhone’s chips in the United States with TSMC's help, it still shows no willingness to shift full iPhone production to the country. At the time, renowned Apple supply chain analyst Ming-Chi Kuo wrote on X, “In terms of profitability, it’s way better for Apple to take the hit of a 25% tariff on iPhones sold in the US market than to move iPhone assembly lines back to the US.” However, manufacturing a smartphone in the United States is not as easy as it might seem, and many technical and economic barriers are involved. The lack of necessary manufacturing hubs There is a clear reason why many companies prefer to manufacture their products in China. China has established itself as the main global manufacturing hub for international companies, and over the past few decades, large contract manufacturers have emerged there, allowing companies like Apple to outsource production. One such example is Foxconn, which also manufactures some Apple products in India. Building the infrastructure required to produce smartphones in the United States would require tens of billions of dollars in new investment. Factories would need to be built, essential manufacturing equipment would have to be installed, and, most importantly, a skilled workforce capable of operating these systems would need to be recruited and trained. The United States currently lacks the core infrastructure needed to manufacture smartphones, and for this reason, many companies prefer to outsource production to Chinese contractors rather than spend tens of billions of dollars to build that infrastructure, which is significantly more economically efficient. Additionally, building such infrastructure in the United States could take up to a decade, ultimately leading to a significant increase in the product's final price for consumers. Shortage of trained labor in the U.S. compared to China Decades of serving as a global manufacturing hub have allowed China to build a massive talent pool in the production sector that is almost unmatched worldwide. Today, if a company chooses to manufacture its products in China, it can be confident that the workers involved in production have years of experience in their respective roles and are capable of producing high-quality goods with minimal errors. Even if we assume that tens of billions of dollars were invested in building smartphone manufacturing infrastructure in the United States, finding skilled workers would remain highly challenging. Apple CEO Tim Cook visiting the iPhone 6 assembly line in China in 2014. Image: Tim Cook on X In a 2015 interview on CBS’s 60 Minutes, Tim Cook said the main reason Apple isn’t producing in the US is a lack of skills. "China put an enormous focus on manufacturing, in what you and I would call vocational kind of skills. The US over time began to stop having as many vocational kinds of skills. I mean you could take every tool and die maker in the United States and probably put them in the room that we're currently sitting in. In China you would have to have multiple football fields,” Cook said. Also, in 2017, at the Fortune Global Forum in Guangzhou, Cook once again emphasized the importance of highly skilled Chinese workers. “China has moved into very advanced manufacturing, so you find in China the intersection of craftsman kind of skill, and sophisticated robotics and the computer science world. That intersection, which is very rare to find anywhere, that kind of skill, is very important to our business because of the precision and quality level that we like. The thing that most people focus on if they’re a foreigner coming to China is the size of the market, and obviously, it’s the biggest market in the world in so many areas. But for us, the number one attraction is the quality of the people,” Apple CEO said. Higher labor costs in the United States Producing almost any product in the United States is more expensive than in many other countries, and one of the main reasons is the higher cost of labor in the U.S. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, median weekly earnings of full-time workers in the United States were $1,235 in the first quarter of 2026. Meanwhile, the average annual salary in China's private sector in 2025 was RMB 71,590 (US$9,961). In many parts of the world, the weekly wage of an American worker is equivalent to several months of income. Another important factor to consider is that in the United States, the workforce capable of working on a smartphone assembly line is highly specialized and therefore commands higher-than-average wages. According to an estimate by Bank of America, producing an iPhone in the U.S. is technically possible, but “iPhone cost can increase 25% purely on higher labor cost in the U.S.” However, this 25% increase applies only if final assembly is performed in the United States while components are still sourced from China or elsewhere. In this case, the price of a base iPhone would rise from $799 to around $1,000. But in another scenario, if Apple were to produce the required components for the iPhone within the United States, production costs could increase by more than 90%. Trump’s dream for a “Made in the USA” iPhone might never come true In a free-market capitalist economy, one of the primary responsibilities of any CEO is to maximize profit. Using Apple as an example, Tim Cook’s role is to maximize the company’s profits so that it can fund research and development for new products and invest in areas such as artificial intelligence, while also keeping shareholders satisfied. Therefore, it is entirely understandable that Apple would choose not to bring its manufacturing back to the United States and instead keep production in countries where labor is cheaper, and products can be manufactured at a lower cost, thereby maximizing its profit margins. What is your opinion about manufacturing smartphones in the United States? If you are an American citizen, would you be willing to pay hundreds of dollars more for a smartphone made domestically in the USA? Let us know in the comments.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      jessse3334 earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Reacting Well
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      506
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      196
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      153
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      72
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      65
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!