GH Moderation: The concept of "Home Turf"


Recommended Posts

I have planted the concept of "Home Turf" into the heads of some of the new GH and Global moderators.

Basically it means that the Sony Console forum is the home turf of Neowin's PS3 owners and that the Microsoft Console forum is the home turf of Neowin's X360 owners. I suppose you can figure out the rest.

If a PS3 owner is going to say something rude/disrespectful about another console (say the Xbox) it would be best if they did not do that in the home territory of that console (in this case the Microsoft Console forum).

Likewise, if a X360 owner is going to say something rude/disrespectful about another console (say the PS3) it would be best if they did not do that in the home territory of that console (in this case the Sony Console forum).

Again, the same applies to Nintendo and others.

Why?

The home turf of a console should be a place where the owners of that hardware can relax and discuss the merits of their console free of overt trolls. If that person chooses to leave the sanctuary of their own home turf then they should be prepared to read more negative stuff about what they own. Their cloak of protection +1 no longer applies. This effort is specifically engineered to reduce wandering trolls from entering into hostile lands and then picking fights with the local denizens.

That doesn't mean that you can never be caught trolling on your own home turf (even with a cloak of protection you can still be hit on a natural 20) and that you can't ever say anything remotely negative but the criteria will be stronger in some cases than in others and that will depend on whether you are in your home turf or not.

This is a bit of an experiment and I'd like to hear some useful feedback on this. If your feedback is more critical then send it to me as a PM and I'll post it in the moderation forum (that way you don't need to hold back).

Edit:

To be clear, this doesn't mean that you could never say anything negative about another console. It just means that you would need to try to be slightly more polite and respectful when visiting somebody else's home turf than you could get away with at home.

Edited by Fred Derf

As much as you are entitled to your own opinion, i entirely disagree with your logic. It allows for biased, one-sided views and that is not good for any debate. It almost renders Neowin's forums entirely pointless.

For Example; A Playstation owner complains about the Other OS Fiasco. Where shall i go now?

Another Example; A Guest or member wishes to see the opinions of others on for example 'An Xbox 360'. Where will this person go? To the Xbox 360 forum. On visiting the Xbox 360 Neowin Forum he discovers that there is no issues with the console, nobody dislikes it and the prices are perfect.

Sounds like a good idea to me. Where does the PC stand in this since all owners of Nintendo, PS3 and XBOX360's will have PCs ?

I suppose it would be neutral ground for most. If there are evangelical PC gamers then that would be their home turf. To be honest, I'm not sure that evangelical PC gamers are often discussed as a problem group.

Not too fond of this, I think moderators just need to be harder around this section rather than just cleaning up arguments and/or ignoring them with little punishment.

Also instead of just bumping warning ratings as well, lengthy post suspensions go down a treat in here, it's the only way to really make anyone learn outside of outright banning.

As much as you are entitled to your own opinion, i entirely disagree with your logic. It allows for biased, one-sided views and that is not good for any debate. It almost renders Neowin's forums entirely pointless.

For Example; A Playstation owner complains about the Other OS Fiasco. Where shall i go now?

Well, Neowin was not designed to be a no-holds-barred survival of the fittest forum (although Gamers Hangout does seem to get like that from time to time). We would like to encourage respectful discussion and as long as people are afraid of starting topics because they might get attacked by the haters then we can't do what we want to do.

A Playstation owner that wants to discuss the Other OS Fiasco could leave their home turf and post in the forum of another console but they would need to be slightly more polite and respectful there then they could get away with at home.

Not too fond of this, I think moderators just need to be harder around this section rather than just cleaning up arguments and/or ignoring them with little punishment.

Also instead of just bumping warning ratings as well, lengthy post suspensions go down a treat in here, it's the only way to really make anyone learn outside of outright banning.

The problem with this approach is staff burnout in GH is enormous. I'm trying to make moderation of GH easier. Currently it is one of the hardest areas of the site to moderate. While I don't spend much time here myself because I don't know much about consoles and the PC games that I play are often 5 years obsolete I do have a fairly go idea what they go through based on my experiences moderating RWI (the other hard to moderate section of Neowin).

As I said before:

"It's one of those jobs that you only know you're doing well when both groups hate you for opposite reasons."

If we could make GH easier to moderate then we'd get more consistent moderation. Then we could do those suspensions or whatever is required.

Well, Neowin was not designed to be a no-holds-barred survival of the fittest forum (although Gamers Hangout does seem to get like that from time to time). We would like to encourage respectful discussion and as long as people are afraid of starting topics because they might get attacked by the haters then we can't do what we want to do.

A Playstation owner that wants to discuss the Other OS Fiasco could leave their home turf and post in the forum of another console but they would need to be slightly more polite and respectful there then they could get away with at home.

I think you are missing me point. Anybody with a good level of maturity should be able to debate something properly without resorting to personal remarks. Granted, this is a skill that some clearly lack, but that is not the problem of the majority of good members here who can discuss things properly. I actually enjoy a good debate, i think it is healthy and should be encouraged. There is not enough of it in this world.

If i choose to discuss the Other OS fiasco, i should be entitled to do so in the Playstation forum and in such a scenario i would hope to hear the opinions of my fellow playstation owners and the non owners alike. If the majority of comments regarding this were positive, i think i'd be very suprised.

This effort is specifically engineered to reduce wandering trolls from entering into hostile lands and then picking fights with the local denizens.

vadernooooo.jpg

Can I troll everyone then?

*runs*

If we could make GH easier to moderate then we'd get more consistent moderation. Then we could do those suspensions or whatever is required.

Follow the gaf example. Troll and get kick/banned for a week. Shouldn't need this segregation because some need to defend their console like it was their woman.

I think you are missing me point. Anybody with a good level of maturity should be able to debate something properly without resorting to personal remarks. Granted, this is a skill that some clearly lack, but that is not the problem of the majority of good members here who can discuss things properly. I actually enjoy a good debate, i think it is healthy and should be encouraged. There is not enough of it in this world.

If i choose to discuss the Other OS fiasco, i should be entitled to do so in the Playstation forum and in such a scenario i would hope to hear the opinions of my fellow members ranging from positive ones to negative.

This new approach would not affect you then. Anyone who can participate in a healthy respectful debate should have nothing to fear. This is really aimed at wandering trolls. I'm talking about raising the bar for trolling behaviour only slightly and only when they leave their home turf.

Having just read a lengthy report comparing the current US Afghan initiative (COIN) to the Star Wars universe, I'm looking forward to the rebels who'll put aside this concept of home turf co-habitation and strike out at the console death star which will end the security imbalance once and for all.

Or maybe I should simply stop reading sci-fi political reports which mirror modern affairs like those found on Neowin :p

So I own all 3 consoles, add a custom built PC just for gaming, and as such I feel at any time I should be able to say whatever I want, even if it is negative, about any of the consoles I own.

The way I see it, I can talk negatively about a console, as long as I do so in a respectful manner towards others. I honestly feel it should be irrelevant if I am "disrespectful" towards a piece of plastic with components in it. Translation: If people cannot take something negative being said about their preferred console of choice, than I believe the issue resolves around their allegiance to said console, not what may or may not be said about it. IMO they are taking it to far. Meaning I just do not see how or why they would take it personal if and when someone talks about "their" console. They did not make the console, they just own it.

So while I more than anyone understand why this experiment is being implemented, I just feel it is catering to those few people who confuse something negative being said about their console as something negative being said about them. I feel it is unfair to the rest of us who realize that a console is just indeed a console and it does not define us as individuals.

Now with that said, I do know there are some individuals who have made a name for themselves so to speak for being a crusader of one console or the other. I guess that is their right, but at the same time why should other members suffer for their actions is the way I see it.

So while I more than anyone understand why this experiment is being implemented, I just feel it is catering to those few people who confuse something negative being said about their console as something negative being said about them. I feel it is unfair to the rest of us who realize that a console is just indeed a console and it does not define us as individuals.

Now with that said, I do know there are some individuals who have made a name for themselves so to speak for being a crusader of one console or the other. I guess that is their right, but at the same time why should other members suffer for their actions is the way I see it.

This is more about giving moderators another tool against the crusaders and allowing the normal members to just enjoy the site. Usually it is pretty easy to spot the crusaders.

This new approach would not affect you then. Anyone who can participate in a healthy respectful debate should have nothing to fear. This is really aimed at wandering trolls. I'm talking about raising the bar for trolling behaviour only slightly and only when they leave their home turf.

That is not what you have said.

If a PS3 owner is going to say something negative about another console (say the Xbox) it would be best if they did not do that in the home territory of that console (in this case the Microsoft Console forum).

It doesnt sound like a troll only rule to me. That however is just my opinion. The reason i am making a 'fuss' is because Neowin is one of the best forums there is and this rule will only serve to damage it.

This new approach would not affect you then. Anyone who can participate in a healthy respectful debate should have nothing to fear. This is really aimed at wandering trolls. I'm talking about raising the bar for trolling behaviour only slightly and only when they leave their home turf.

So in essence we are creating a database from the larger Neowin database of known GH trolls who, if in restricted (without visas, ie a registered console) area can be pulled over and asked for official papers (console gamertag) by local officials and arrested (banned)? Sounds a bit like Arizona; illegal consol-ites are not welcome!

Sorry Fred, today I can't help it. The parallels are to entertaining! Ok, going outside to catch some sun.

That is not what you have said.

I should re-write that then. I didn't mean for it to be so strongly worded. I'm thinking on the fly here (although I've been mulling over the concept for the past few days).

Edit:

I don't want to give the idea that you are free to say something rude/disrespectful about another console in your own home turf but something slightly trollish would be better there than in somebody else's home turf.

So in essence we are creating a database from the larger Neowin database of known GH trolls who, if in restricted (without visas, ie a registered console) area can be pulled over and asked for official papers (console gamertag) by local officials and arrested (banned)? Sounds a bit like Arizona; illegal consol-ites are not welcome!

Sorry Fred, today I can't help it. The parallels are to entertaining! Ok, going outside to catch some sun.

Yes, these are not the forum trolls you are looking for. I get it.

Well I therefore think a better idea would be to restrict certain members to certain forums, rather than every member worry about where they stick their feet. If the rule is indeed to weed out trolls, not those just wanting a respectful discussion.

This is more about giving moderators another tool against the crusaders and allowing the normal members to just enjoy the site. Usually it is pretty easy to spot the crusaders.

Fair enough. If that is the ultimate goal, then I can only see it being a good thing. I just hope people do not start pointing towards this initiative when it is uncalled for, as I can see this being misinterpreted by certain people and them crying foul whenever something is said they may not like for whatever reason. So I just hope it is not abused is all, as if it is, it has the potential to really stifle conversation.

I, along with others, do know first hand sometimes there are pages and pages of off topic conversation based on one or two people coming in and specifically looking to cause a ruckus, so if this prevents that, that could only be a good thing.

Well I therefore think a better idea would be to restrict certain members to certain forums, rather than every member worry about where they stick their feet. If the rule is indeed to weed out trolls, not those just wanting a respectful discussion.

Yeah, that a good idea too but there are technical reasons why this is difficult. We already have a Restricted (Gamers) Mask and, in theory, we could create one for every subforum but this adds to the complexity of the administration.

Fair enough. If that is the ultimate goal, then I can only see it being a good thing. I just hope people do not start pointing towards this initiative when it is uncalled for, as I can see this being misinterpreted by certain people and them crying foul whenever something is said they may not like for whatever reason. So I just hope it is not abused is all, as if it is, it has the potential to really stifle conversation.

I, along with others, do know first hand sometimes there are pages and pages of off topic conversation based on one or two people coming in and specifically looking to cause a ruckus, so if this prevents that, that could only be a good thing.

If it stifles discussions then we'll have to tweak, modify or scrap this initiative because that is the opposite to our goal.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I notice how you dodged the questions I had about the racism shown by ignorant, gullible, cowardly people when the Poles, like your partner, were the immigrants. Ahem. I wonder how you'd feel if native born Brits suddenly treated you as "dirty crooked immigrant" for being half Trump-American? If they ordered you to leave and "go back to your corrupt country" (on the other side of the Atlantic), would you go? The truth is based on facts as supported by evidence. As requested in your previous posts, I have used the facts in your own post to show everyone the truth.
    • US citizens are paying to their government, who could use that to fund healthcare and tuition and relieve the costs of these for citizens instead of making tax breaks that overwhelmingly favor the rich. I'm not saying that tariffs are the correct solution, but what else would they be used for? What else could Trump have in mind for wanting them, if he hasn't figured out that labor costs are higher in the US?
    • I’m in need of a new chair and it sounds like the backrest cannot be locked? I also sat on a Herman miller and was devastated that it couldn’t be locked also, what is going on with chairs. I want to be able to lock the backrest into any position but not even the Herman’s do that
    • Sihoo Doro C300 Pro V2 Ergonomic Office Chair review: The Ikea of chairs by Steven Parker I've reviewed a few gaming chairs over the past three years or so and generally found them to score well in our reviews. SIHOO reached out asking if I was interested in taking a look at their flagship chair, the Doro C300 Pro V2. I never got the chance to check out its predecessor, but the V2 is described as an "Adaptive Ergonomic Chair." It became available to buy in April of this year. Let's get things rolling with a closer look at the specifications and features. Specifications Doro C300 Pro V2 Model Ergonomic Materials Mesh Back and Seat; Soft PU Coated Armrests Height adjustability 45.5 - 53 cm / 17.5" - 20.9" Seat (w+d) 52 x 43 - 47 cm / 20.5" x 16.9" - 18.5" (adjustable) Backrest 52 – 60 cm / 20.5" - 23.6" (adjustable) Lumbar support Mesh built-in (adjustable) Armrest adjustability 8D Bionic Armrests Rocking angle 105°, 120°, 135° (fixed) Neck support Mesh built-in (adjustable) Net weight 27.3 kg / 59.64 lbs Weight support 150 kg / 330 lbs Colors Black, White Warranty 5 years (upon registering) Price $499.99, $539.99 Introduction At first glance, it looks like a chair that in another life wants to be a Herman Miller; It certainly looks like my Aeron Remastered, but the Doro C300 Pro V2 has quite a few more features and costs quite a bit less. SIHOO says that it is made up of a "DynaCore" system that tracks your movement and synchronizes the headrest, backrest, lumbar support, and armrests as you shift, twist, or recline. They also say that the "SyncroFlex Backrest" molds to your spine, which kind of describes how the mesh fabric works in most ergonomic chairs, but anyway. Below are the meat and potatoes measurements for the chair. Here is the same tech sheet, but in inches. Durability I would be remiss to not talk about the various durability testing this chair underwent before coming to market, as this is claimed on the product page. First of all, the chair is BIFMA-, SGS-, and TÜV-certified. As for durability, the tests undergone were: 100,000 Castor cycles tested 120,000 Armrest cycles tested 120,000 Recline cycles tested 120,000 Gas lift cycles tested 60,000 Armrest durability cycles tested 120,000 Rotation cycles tested Nothing about weights testing, though. Now that's all disclosed, now onto my own personal findings. Assembly The Doro C300 Pro V2 came in two large boxes (1) (2), and everything was packed very well, protecting the different parts of the chair. In the box, there is a folded sheet that explains the 12 steps to assemble it; they are: Remove the bottom cover on the aluminum base; Insert the five legs into the aluminum base and use ten screws to fasten them; Insert the castors into the legs; Replace the bottom cover on the bottom of the aluminum base; Place the Class 4 Hydraulics gas cylinder into the aluminum base; Screw the bottom part of the arm rests, taking care of the orientation using two screws on each side; Use three torx screws to fasten the footrest to the bottom of the seat; Fasten the backrest to the seat using four torx bolts; Fasten the armrests to the backrest using four Torx bolts (two on each side), taking care to note the orientation; Place the chair onto the Class 4 Hydraulics gas cylinder; Insert the headrest into the top of the backrest; Use two torx screws to fasten the headrest to the backrest. There's also an online guide you can refer to. Carefully unpacking the two boxes took around 15 minutes because almost everything is wrapped in plastic and protective foam; the chair assembly itself took around an hour. I say in the above assembly steps to take note of the orientation, because it's not obvious which way around the bottom portion of the armrests go, and although there is an L and R on the bottom of the armrests, it also wasn't clear from the instructions which was actually left or right, facing the chair, or in the seated down orientation? Anyway, I ended up putting the bottom portions on the wrong sides, and after securing one of the armrests, I discovered that although it was on the correct side, the armrest base could rotate a full 360°, but not when bolted to the chair, so I had to remove it, rotate it, and then bolt it back on. Truly an Ikea experience! Also, to complicate things further, although all the parts are labeled from A to X (yes, that's 24 parts) unhelpfully, these letters do not appear on the parts themselves or the package with the bolts, screws, and washers. There's also a pair of protective gloves in the box, but I think they were made for much smaller hands than I have. Even my friend, who is 5.1, had difficulty putting them on. Once assembled, I needed to sit down. Anyway, as I said, it looks quite similar to my Herman Miller. And here is the back of it. If you look at the product page and on Amazon, it seems like a lot of thought has gone into the chair itself and what it's capable of, but there is no mention at all about the castors, and this is an area where I think the chair trips up quite quickly. I found it difficult to move the chair in any direction. I asked a friend who came to visit me earlier this week to test my findings, and she said that the wheels were "no good," so it definitely isn't just me. I am 6'2 myself and a big guy, I work from home and gained a few pounds from mostly staying in and the hell away from other people. However, the Doro C300 Pro V2 is rated for up to 150kg (330lbs), which in my case is used well within its max rating. Ergonomics The number of adjustments you can make, right up to setting it in nap mode — which I haven't fully tested yet — is what you'd expect from a premium chair. Yes, you can go up and down (max 7.5 cm adjustment), rock back and forth (with tilt adjustment), and lock the chair between three stages of 105°, 120°, 135°, which is not quite as flat as the AndaSeat I tested at 160°. Some thought has also gone into the "8D" armrests, too, which are cushioned but quite firm; you'll only know it if you press hard into the PU-covered tops, which give about half a centimeter, but it's enough to ensure your skin won't get awkwardly stuck to it in warmer (or sweatier) conditions. It almost feels like plastic and is very easy to keep clean. However, the armrest positions move far too easily, and I am not sure what that "elbow" function is. Maybe it is good for a short person with short arms, anyway, I never used it and kept it flat at all times. There are eight levels of adjustment for the armrests, they are: backwards, forwards, swing left/right, height up and down, tilt, and 360° rotation, which can be handy for desk clearance. As I said, the armrest pads shift far too easily, which could give off an ergonomic vibe, but who wants the armrest sliding when you are shifting weight? The height adjustability does lock into place when lifting and adjusting. Comfort This is ultimately what it boils down to at the end of the day, right? Quite a lot of reviews praise the comfort of this chair, and I don't disagree that the mesh seating is quite comfortable. I am used to the material from my daily Herman Miller. However, the backrest cannot be locked into place, and this is actually a feature; as you shift or recline yourself on the chair, the backrest moves with your body. It took some getting used to. The lumbar gives ample support, but I would have preferred an adjustable one built into the seat base, as this causes the backrest to move up and down at will. Again, as with my previous chair review, this chair is also rated for tall people, but nowhere in the product documentation does it say how tall. Being 6'2 myself, I'm happy to say that the backrest is tall and wide enough, and thought has been given to being able to adjust the neck rest, but as others have mentioned in their reviews, people as tall as 6.2ft is about the limit for the neckrest. Conclusion What I didn't like The footrest is rated for 15kg (33 lbs), which to me seems a bit light, and after looking online, it seems like a chair footrest for adults must be at least twice that rating. In all honesty, they are just hollow metal tubes, so it is not recommended to let a kid sit on them. I also feel like it doesn't really go out far enough for my height, so that kind of puts the dampener on me being able to use it regularly. I'll just have to continue to use my subwoofer as a footrest! I do not like the armrests being able to shift around as easily as they can, and they are a little too forward-positioned in the chair to comfortably sit close to my desk, because even in the lowest height position, they don't allow me to go under the desk like is possible with my Herman Miller. I also feel like this chair could have been delivered partially constructed, especially the armrests on the seat, and why the aluminum base wasn't already pre-constructed (without the castors) is baffling, considering it would have fit in one of the two boxes that way. The instructions also need to be clearer. On the pamphlet, there's an A to X listing (which is also used in the steps), but none of the physical parts use this lettering system! What I did like I'll be honest, I haven't used it for very long, just one week, and seating comfort is subjective after all! Any spills wiped straight off it, the stitching, and the lines look great, not a fray to be seen or stitch out of place. It looks kind of cool, too. My favorite feature of these seats is the nap mode. While you're not lying completely flat, it leans far back enough to make you easily doze off after a heavy gaming or working session. Overall, this chair offers plenty of comfort features. The MSRP does vary quite a bit depending on the region, at £549.99 in the UK, and €580 in Europe, and $599 before tax in the U.S. However, shipping is free, which is a bonus for such a heavy item. Is it worth it, though? At three years' warranty, I think it's a decent deal. Another firm out of Germany sent me a free replacement hydraulic gas spring for a chair that failed after almost four years, so it was well outside its two-year warranty. My advice is to always try, as you might have the same luck I did. If I could fault it at all, it would be the constant shifting of the armrests and backrest. Where to buy Although the footrest variant normally costs $539.99, it has been discounted to $469.99 on the official website in Black or White. In fact, the non-footrest variant is only $40 cheaper. On Amazon, it currently costs more at $499.99 links below. Sihoo Doro C300 Pro V2 for $469.99 (official website) Sihoo Doro C300 Pro V2 for $499.99 at Amazon US SIHOO provided a free sample without any review or pre-approval. Good to know This Amazon link is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      jessse3334 earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Reacting Well
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      506
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      207
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      151
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      73
    5. 5
      macoman
      62
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!