GH Moderation: The concept of "Home Turf"


Recommended Posts

Why not force members with a history of conflicts on each others ignore list and enforce it; no speaking or contacting each other. That means we won't have to tread lightly all of a sudden in sub-forums for consoles we actually own

and we might bring down all the bickering and pointless arguments. I mean, this is for the 'heavy hitter' cases so to speak, not something that should be flung around.

Technically you would have to troll the Xbox 360 Forums twice as much as the Playstation 3 ones.

Ugh, sounds like more work! :p

Yeah, that a good idea too but there are technical reasons why this is difficult. We already have a Restricted (Gamers) Mask and, in theory, we could create one for every subforum but this adds to the complexity of the administration.

It may well do that but how many minutes of the day do you think you are going to loose with this rather open ended system? I'm all for cleaning up neowin, because if we're being honest. The GH has been rather stagnant of new members for some time. The last new member we received in here, from what I remember, was back in Nov? Since then the forum has slowly started to turn in to what feels like a selective RSS news feed with occasional official topics. It's kind of depressing flicking between GAF and here.

Now while I believe this is somewhat the fault so some inconsistent moderation- I'm still on 0% and I believe there have been some moments in the past when I've been a right dick and deserved a warning. As well as some people on here who should have been banned years ago. We go to the other end of the spectrum where Andrew and I will start being abrasive with each other, always with a wink and a nod. Then we refresh the page and see "Thread Cleaned".

Now it's not fair to blame this all on the mods. We don't expect you to know everyones traits and the cliques. A community is only as good as the sum of it's parts and in that respect we've been a bit limp. We're not exactly friendly to junior members and it all goes a bit deliverance in here when we see someone new. It goes to my previous points before, often we can go for a week with only very flame bait news posts on the front page and bumped official threads which aren't exactly easy to jump in to for new members. With opinions already made and a full debate underway on the pros and cons of game mechanics.

I know I've gone off on a MASSIVE tangent. But what I'm trying to say in around about way is: Unless we agree to some massive foundation shaking changes-old habits will continue to surface and die hard. We could at least do with limiting certain members to only reply to threads in sub forums. As I'm often seeing some truly bonfire-esq news links being posted in Microsoft/Sony/Ninty sub forums which only need a spark before the thing needs an entire fire crew to put out.

Disclaimer: I'm not singling this post out to attack anyone. It's critical of everyone, even my self! So don't take it personally.

edit: Expanded on a few points.

So wait... then what about news? Negative PS3 news goes into the 360 section? This is just promoting anti-X console behavior rather than having these just segregated subjects. On top of it this will confuse newer members. I don't like this at all.

  • Like 2

Sounds like an all right idea, if it works out in the end and doesn't just stifle perfectly valid opinions, I don't even like coming in here most of the time because some people can't get along some of the time.

Just because people have a preference doesn't mean they automatically hate on a different platform, and as I have always said, its not about what is being said, but the way some people go around with their opinions assuming they are right, but also knowingly writing something that will start a conflict with some members.

You can get a point across just as well but by writing it respectfully towards others.

This "subliminally" just suggests that somebody not on their "own turf" knows nothing about what they are discussing. Hence giving people on that "home turf" a reason to jump down their throat and discard their opinion

Yeah I know it's not meant to be that way, but everybody here KNOWS that's how it will be.

Segregation is never a good thing... There is A LOT more bad that can come of this than good.

@Escelade_GT: I agree completely. This will just make "territory" for both sides and basically separate the two communities in a way that makes their own forum "more important" than the other. Anything post in there that is negative in the slightest of ways will be jumped on and flamed because they can be less wary" in their "home turf".

As much as you are entitled to your own opinion, i entirely disagree with your logic. It allows for biased, one-sided views and that is not good for any debate. It almost renders Neowin's forums entirely pointless.

For Example; A Playstation owner complains about the Other OS Fiasco. Where shall i go now?

Another Example; A Guest or member wishes to see the opinions of others on for example 'An Xbox 360'. Where will this person go? To the Xbox 360 forum. On visiting the Xbox 360 Neowin Forum he discovers that there is no issues with the console, nobody dislikes it and the prices are perfect.

I agree with what you are saying in principle, but in practice, Fred Derf has the right idea.

The same should be applied to the Apple, Windows, and Linux forums as well IMO.

...

We go to the other end of the spectrum where Andrew and I will start being abrasive with each other, always with a wink and a nod. Then we refresh the page and see "Thread Cleaned".

...

A lot of things appear differently to people out of the loop. Unless those friendly jibes between buddies are clearly marked with emoticons or something similar we'll tend to clean them out so as to not give other members the wrong idea. It would be easy for casual readers to think that we're allowing personal attacks and that may encourage them to post their own personal attacks on members who they are not on friendly terms with.

So wait... then what about news? Negative PS3 news goes into the 360 section? This is just promoting anti-X console behavior rather than having these just segregated subjects. On top of it this will confuse newer members. I don't like this at all.

News about a PS3 (negative or not) should go in the Sony Console setting. Just be advised that there will be a lower threshold of trolling allowed so keep it respectful.

The same should be applied to the Apple, Windows, and Linux forums as well IMO.

I invoked the Home Turf rule in this thread just prior to me writing up this thread:

https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/896168-this-is-outrageous-and-simply-out-of-order/page__view__findpost__p__592555054

I am completely confused about the home turf concept.. unsure.gif I only own an Xbox 360 and my GH history probably has ample proof to show that. In GH, I post mostly in Xbox 360 section with occasional posts under Sony/Main GH. Does this make 360 as my Home turf? If I criticize anything in PS3 section, am I immediately up for a warn?

News about a PS3 (negative or not) should go in the Sony Console setting. Just be advised that there will be a lower threshold of trolling allowed so keep it respectful.

Just to clarify my own understanding - if I criticize Sony in PS3 section (360 being my Home turf) - such as in recent case of the PS3 Move ad, does that automatically make me borderline troll?

p.s. on a lighter note :p when do we start playing CTF and Territories around here?

Well, Neowin was not designed to be a no-holds-barred survival of the fittest forum (although Gamers Hangout does seem to get like that from time to time). We would like to encourage respectful discussion and as long as people are afraid of starting topics because they might get attacked by the haters then we can't do what we want to do.

A Playstation owner that wants to discuss the Other OS Fiasco could leave their home turf and post in the forum of another console but they would need to be slightly more polite and respectful there then they could get away with at home.

No. :no: Why have two separate discussions about a certain thing in different parts of the forum.

In one forum and topic you have will have *EXAMPLE* Sony fanboys saying that removing OtherOS was a thing that Sony has the right to do and we should just follow what they have done. In the other forum and in a different topic you will have *EXAMPLE* an XBot (XBOX fanboy :) ) going on about how Sony is stupid and why they are the worst company in the world.

This would not work because then if someone goes into the "enemy" teritory and say how they don't like the fact that Sony removed the feature then they will be warnerd/banned for voicing the opinion. This just creates confusion and unnecessary change that is just going to make it more complicated and it removes healthy discussion.

Now, if I was a moderator of the forum, then what I would do is keep the whole forum in check. Bickering back and forth is a GOOD thing! It allows for discussion on a subject that is big and it allows for people to see both sides of the story and what people like and don't like. Where it gets BAD is when members attack each other because of their opinion. I have seen countless of times where AB was being attacked by a couple of other forum members (not going to mention names) because of his opinion. Instead of going through all of this trouble to create "turfs" you should be watching the personal attacks by the forum members because of another persons valid opinion.

Just like to add my thoughts.

I don't think this is a great idea. I don't like the idea of having to know how to use a forum, knowing about the silly little rules that're forum specific instead of global specific. It's not obvious and even if there's a sticky people will overlook it so people not entirely familar will stumble into "enemy territory" so to speak. It also sounds like it'll segreate the community, promoting people to stick to their own camp and not venture to neighboring ones.

Also, I've only got a laptop to game on and it's not exactly a "gaming rig". Where's my "home turf"? Why can't I express my opinions (negative or otherwise) about a particular console and where do I have the most freedom to do that in?

I'm still waiting for GH to get better btw.

A lot of things appear differently to people out of the loop. Unless those friendly jibes between buddies are clearly marked with emoticons or something similar we'll tend to clean them out so as to not give other members the wrong idea. It would be easy for casual readers to think that we're allowing personal attacks and that may encourage them to post their own personal attacks on members who they are not on friendly terms with.

Fair enough I guess, goes back to my previous point of us making the forum a tad more friendly for new members.

I like the idea behind this, but the execution isn't to my liking to be honest - it seems like it'll create more animosity between each of the sections' regular members rather then creating universal harmony across all of the boards which should be the main goal. At the end of the day, there's always a clear line between maturely "attacking" a console, disagreeing with a member's opinion of a console and attacking the member him/herself.

As for the line about the burnout rate of GH Mods, I'd be willing to lend a helping hand as I've been in situations where I need to whip a particular section into shape (it was a spamming minefield) and come out alive on other forums - after doing the job for 3 and a half years I'm fairly certain I'm immune to burnout ;) Just leaving it out there for consideration... :)

No. :no: Why have two separate discussions about a certain thing in different parts of the forum.

In one forum and topic you have will have *EXAMPLE* Sony fanboys saying that removing OtherOS was a thing that Sony has the right to do and we should just follow what they have done. In the other forum and in a different topic you will have *EXAMPLE* an XBot (XBOX fanboy :) ) going on about how Sony is stupid and why they are the worst company in the world.

This would not work because then if someone goes into the "enemy" teritory and say how they don't like the fact that Sony removed the feature then they will be warnerd/banned for voicing the opinion. This just creates confusion and unnecessary change that is just going to make it more complicated and it removes healthy discussion.

Now, if I was a moderator of the forum, then what I would do is keep the whole forum in check. Bickering back and forth is a GOOD thing! It allows for discussion on a subject that is big and it allows for people to see both sides of the story and what people like and don't like. Where it gets BAD is when members attack each other because of their opinion. I have seen countless of times where AB was being attacked by a couple of other forum members (not going to mention names) because of his opinion. Instead of going through all of this trouble to create "turfs" you should be watching the personal attacks by the forum members because of another persons valid opinion.

Maybe I've been confused by this OtherOS example.

Threads primarily about the PS3/PSP should stay in the Sony Console forum. Threads primarily about the Xbox should stay in the Microsoft Console forum. Same with Wiis/DSes and Nintendo.

If someone who is a known supporter of the Xbox wants to start a PS3 thread in the Sony Console they can still do so but with some care that the thread isn't designed to troll and insult PS3 owners (as with everything else, the opposite examples work just as well).

I do NOT want to see two discussions about a Wii system update (one in the Wii forum and an thread in somebody else's home turf that discusses what a mess Nintendo made). If you want to post that the Nintendo upgrade was a mess then go to the Nintendo forum and say that in a respectable way without adding "Haha, you shouldn't have bought such a loser console!" to the end of your post.

I like the idea behind this, but the execution isn't to my liking to be honest

There are well establishes clichés of "The devil is in the details" and "The road to hell is paved with good intentions" for a reason. It will likely be less drastic than some members reading this thread think it will be. Most members will never notice any difference. It just gives our mods one more tool in their Batman utility belt. If someone is a known crusader who is posting stuff outside of their home turf and it appears to be for the intention of causing trouble then we're going to go after that.

Prior to this we sometimes had situations where we're not sure if people are intentionally trolling or if they are just being blunt and obtuse. This will help make our decision. If they are in their home turf we'll likely assume they are blunt and obtuse and lack social skills. If they are outside their home turf we'll decide that they are doing it for the purpose of annoying other members.

There are well establishes clichés of "The devil is in the details" and "The road to hell is paved with good intentions" for a reason. It will likely be less drastic than some members reading this thread think it will be. Most members will never notice any difference. It just gives our mods one more tool in their Batman utility belt. If someone is a known crusader who is posting stuff outside of their home turf and it appears to be for the intention of causing trouble then we're going to go after that.

Prior to this we sometimes had situations where we're not sure if people are intentionally trolling or if they are just being blunt and obtuse. This will help make our decision. If they are in their home turf we'll likely assume they are blunt and obtuse and lack social skills. If they are outside their home turf we'll decide that they are doing it for the purpose of annoying other members.

Okay, fair enough, but what happens when we get mods who don't usually visit the GH and don't always know the cliqs and the regulars of certain groups? For example, my most visited forum according to the stats is the Sony Console section - but if anything I'd say have a particular leaning towards Nintendo, but what would happen if I said something that could be misconstrued as trolling, when it's just me voicing an opinion? I'd say the GH as a whole is "my home turf" rather then one particular section of it - the fact that it's at the very top of my "Favourite Forums" list shows this.

I'm not intentionally trying to go against the grain with this system, I love the fact that you're all trying new initiatives to keep this place better, I'm just worried there are certain points that need to be ironed out/explained in more detail now rather then it all get explained later in a "Surprise! You've got a 20% warn!" PM.

Like you said previously, it's more for the obvious crusaders then someone like me who just enjoys posting here, but I don't fancy being treated differently in one forum over the next because <insert staff member here> believes I have a particular preference for a console and getting slammed in once place but not another when keeping the exact same tone to my posts.

[snip]

Like you said previously, it's more for the obvious crusaders then someone like me who just enjoys posting here, but I don't fancy being treated differently in one forum over the next because <insert staff member here> believes I have a particular preference for a console and getting slammed in once place but not another when keeping the exact same tone to my posts.

Every mod won't know whos alliance falls where, however we all communicate alot and consider things like warnings before hand. At the end of the day we don't want members to troll/flamebait but we do want intelligent discussions going on in GH. Your Sony fans don't tend to have much of a hatred towards each other as towards a member from the Microsoft camp coming along and flaming. That is when the problems arise and we will moderate it carefully. Trust us :)

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Simple answer is yes, you will still get the Windows updates and as long as browser is up to date, you will be good. Only thing secure boot does is protect you against boot level threats and make it harder to install other OS's. I've been looking into this pretty thoroughly lately myself as wifes computer has secure boot disabled plus my other, older computers that run Linux, don't have secure boot enabled. Have seen all kinds of questions about this on the Linux Mint and MX Linux forums. Just don't suddenly enable secure boot now.
    • How many other companies will follow Ford's lead? Or, have they already gotten lazy and become enslaved to AI--and now can't figure out how to get out of that mess.
    • Why would any self-respecting intelligent person follow any recommendation by Donald's GOP administration? With almost two years of fabrications, deceit, and blatantly illegal behavior, why believe them now? They had best be gone after the November 2026 election, so we'll wait and see.
    • AltSendme 0.4.1 by Razvan Serea AltSendme is a minimal, cross-platform application designed for fast, secure, and private peer-to-peer file transfers. It allows users to send files or entire directories directly between devices without relying on cloud servers, accounts, or any personal information. Everything is encrypted end-to-end using modern protocols like QUIC and TLS 1.3, ensuring both strong security and low-latency performance. Transfers are verified with BLAKE3 for data integrity, and interrupted downloads automatically resume, making the experience reliable even on unstable connections. You can transfer anything—images, videos, documents, and more. Integrity checks are performed on both ends, so your files are automatically verified for correctness during both sending and receiving. AltSendme works seamlessly across local networks or long-distance links, capable of saturating multi-gigabit connections for extremely fast delivery. With built-in NAT traversal and encrypted relay fallback, it connects devices almost anywhere. The app integrates with the Sendme CLI and will soon support mobile and web platforms. Fully free and open-source, AltSendme offers a lightweight, privacy-first alternative to traditional cloud-based services, removing size limits, upload costs, and unnecessary data exposure. AltSendme 0.4.1 changelog: Release Highlights Self-hosted relays: Run your own iroh relay so transfers don't rely on public infrastructure. Includes a full deployment template in deploy/relay/ with Docker Compose for a VPS and configuration examples for production use. Fly.io support: One-click deploy template for Fly.io, including a quick-start config (fly.dev.toml) for testing without a custom domain, plus production setup with Let's Encrypt and your own hostname. Relay settings UI: New Settings → Network panel to choose how AltSendme connects: automatic public relays, custom self-hosted URLs (with optional auth token), or disabled. Test connections, verify latency, and see live relay status in the footer. Disable relays: Turn off relay servers entirely when you only need same-network transfers (e.g. LAN). Direct connections only. No relay hop required when devices can reach each other. Android graduates from beta: Android is now part of the regular release cycle alongside desktop. APKs ship with each version (universal, arm64, and armv7). Other improvements Private relay access control via shared auth token Relay fallback notifications when a custom relay is unreachable Broadcast mode toggle in sharing settings Android release build fixes (split-per-ABI APKs, universal APK preservation) UI polish: mobile safe-area insets, dropzone layout, transfer progress animation Bug fixes for minification-related serialization issues and system tray icon loading What's Changed feat(relay): add relay status functionality and settings UI (a120cdf) feat(relay): implement custom relay server configuration and verification (51276c7) feat(relay): add configuration for private relay access and enhance observability features (48fbabf) feat(relay): enhance relay URL validation, display connection status (d4fffa0) feat(relay): add RelayChangeGuard component and enhance relay-related translations (16ba514) feat(broadcast): add toggle setting for broadcast mode in sharing UI (ca6d977) fix(relay): correct QUIC discovery port, pin image, templatize fly.dev (52a2ba5) fix: More broken serialization due to minification (67491a9) fix(android): preserve true universal APK across per-ABI builds (e9f256f) fix(ui): conditional safe-area insets padding on mobile (1182f0e) refactor(transfer): CircularRing component animation fix (944572b) chore(android): drop x86 and x86_64 release APKs, keep universal+arm64+armv7 (34ada0b) Download: AltSendme 0.4.1 | ARM64 | ~9.0 MB (Open Source) Download: AltSendme for MacOS | Android Links: AltSendme Home Page | GitHub | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • You are mostly right about the ephemeral nature of it. As I mention in the article, if you dont add a second device or take a backup of your account before uninstalling it, then yes you will lose access to your account. That said, in terms of actual user experience when you sync multiple devices your message history carries across and there's also a Saved Messages chat like there is on Telegram to send messages and attachments between your installs. But yh, what you point out are correct and its not trying to emulate Messenger or Telegram.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Woland13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Woland13 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      495
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      225
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      149
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      75
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!