GH Moderation: The concept of "Home Turf"


Recommended Posts

Why not force members with a history of conflicts on each others ignore list and enforce it; no speaking or contacting each other. That means we won't have to tread lightly all of a sudden in sub-forums for consoles we actually own

and we might bring down all the bickering and pointless arguments. I mean, this is for the 'heavy hitter' cases so to speak, not something that should be flung around.

Technically you would have to troll the Xbox 360 Forums twice as much as the Playstation 3 ones.

Ugh, sounds like more work! :p

Yeah, that a good idea too but there are technical reasons why this is difficult. We already have a Restricted (Gamers) Mask and, in theory, we could create one for every subforum but this adds to the complexity of the administration.

It may well do that but how many minutes of the day do you think you are going to loose with this rather open ended system? I'm all for cleaning up neowin, because if we're being honest. The GH has been rather stagnant of new members for some time. The last new member we received in here, from what I remember, was back in Nov? Since then the forum has slowly started to turn in to what feels like a selective RSS news feed with occasional official topics. It's kind of depressing flicking between GAF and here.

Now while I believe this is somewhat the fault so some inconsistent moderation- I'm still on 0% and I believe there have been some moments in the past when I've been a right dick and deserved a warning. As well as some people on here who should have been banned years ago. We go to the other end of the spectrum where Andrew and I will start being abrasive with each other, always with a wink and a nod. Then we refresh the page and see "Thread Cleaned".

Now it's not fair to blame this all on the mods. We don't expect you to know everyones traits and the cliques. A community is only as good as the sum of it's parts and in that respect we've been a bit limp. We're not exactly friendly to junior members and it all goes a bit deliverance in here when we see someone new. It goes to my previous points before, often we can go for a week with only very flame bait news posts on the front page and bumped official threads which aren't exactly easy to jump in to for new members. With opinions already made and a full debate underway on the pros and cons of game mechanics.

I know I've gone off on a MASSIVE tangent. But what I'm trying to say in around about way is: Unless we agree to some massive foundation shaking changes-old habits will continue to surface and die hard. We could at least do with limiting certain members to only reply to threads in sub forums. As I'm often seeing some truly bonfire-esq news links being posted in Microsoft/Sony/Ninty sub forums which only need a spark before the thing needs an entire fire crew to put out.

Disclaimer: I'm not singling this post out to attack anyone. It's critical of everyone, even my self! So don't take it personally.

edit: Expanded on a few points.

So wait... then what about news? Negative PS3 news goes into the 360 section? This is just promoting anti-X console behavior rather than having these just segregated subjects. On top of it this will confuse newer members. I don't like this at all.

  • Like 2

Sounds like an all right idea, if it works out in the end and doesn't just stifle perfectly valid opinions, I don't even like coming in here most of the time because some people can't get along some of the time.

Just because people have a preference doesn't mean they automatically hate on a different platform, and as I have always said, its not about what is being said, but the way some people go around with their opinions assuming they are right, but also knowingly writing something that will start a conflict with some members.

You can get a point across just as well but by writing it respectfully towards others.

This "subliminally" just suggests that somebody not on their "own turf" knows nothing about what they are discussing. Hence giving people on that "home turf" a reason to jump down their throat and discard their opinion

Yeah I know it's not meant to be that way, but everybody here KNOWS that's how it will be.

Segregation is never a good thing... There is A LOT more bad that can come of this than good.

@Escelade_GT: I agree completely. This will just make "territory" for both sides and basically separate the two communities in a way that makes their own forum "more important" than the other. Anything post in there that is negative in the slightest of ways will be jumped on and flamed because they can be less wary" in their "home turf".

As much as you are entitled to your own opinion, i entirely disagree with your logic. It allows for biased, one-sided views and that is not good for any debate. It almost renders Neowin's forums entirely pointless.

For Example; A Playstation owner complains about the Other OS Fiasco. Where shall i go now?

Another Example; A Guest or member wishes to see the opinions of others on for example 'An Xbox 360'. Where will this person go? To the Xbox 360 forum. On visiting the Xbox 360 Neowin Forum he discovers that there is no issues with the console, nobody dislikes it and the prices are perfect.

I agree with what you are saying in principle, but in practice, Fred Derf has the right idea.

The same should be applied to the Apple, Windows, and Linux forums as well IMO.

...

We go to the other end of the spectrum where Andrew and I will start being abrasive with each other, always with a wink and a nod. Then we refresh the page and see "Thread Cleaned".

...

A lot of things appear differently to people out of the loop. Unless those friendly jibes between buddies are clearly marked with emoticons or something similar we'll tend to clean them out so as to not give other members the wrong idea. It would be easy for casual readers to think that we're allowing personal attacks and that may encourage them to post their own personal attacks on members who they are not on friendly terms with.

So wait... then what about news? Negative PS3 news goes into the 360 section? This is just promoting anti-X console behavior rather than having these just segregated subjects. On top of it this will confuse newer members. I don't like this at all.

News about a PS3 (negative or not) should go in the Sony Console setting. Just be advised that there will be a lower threshold of trolling allowed so keep it respectful.

The same should be applied to the Apple, Windows, and Linux forums as well IMO.

I invoked the Home Turf rule in this thread just prior to me writing up this thread:

https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/896168-this-is-outrageous-and-simply-out-of-order/page__view__findpost__p__592555054

I am completely confused about the home turf concept.. unsure.gif I only own an Xbox 360 and my GH history probably has ample proof to show that. In GH, I post mostly in Xbox 360 section with occasional posts under Sony/Main GH. Does this make 360 as my Home turf? If I criticize anything in PS3 section, am I immediately up for a warn?

News about a PS3 (negative or not) should go in the Sony Console setting. Just be advised that there will be a lower threshold of trolling allowed so keep it respectful.

Just to clarify my own understanding - if I criticize Sony in PS3 section (360 being my Home turf) - such as in recent case of the PS3 Move ad, does that automatically make me borderline troll?

p.s. on a lighter note :p when do we start playing CTF and Territories around here?

Well, Neowin was not designed to be a no-holds-barred survival of the fittest forum (although Gamers Hangout does seem to get like that from time to time). We would like to encourage respectful discussion and as long as people are afraid of starting topics because they might get attacked by the haters then we can't do what we want to do.

A Playstation owner that wants to discuss the Other OS Fiasco could leave their home turf and post in the forum of another console but they would need to be slightly more polite and respectful there then they could get away with at home.

No. :no: Why have two separate discussions about a certain thing in different parts of the forum.

In one forum and topic you have will have *EXAMPLE* Sony fanboys saying that removing OtherOS was a thing that Sony has the right to do and we should just follow what they have done. In the other forum and in a different topic you will have *EXAMPLE* an XBot (XBOX fanboy :) ) going on about how Sony is stupid and why they are the worst company in the world.

This would not work because then if someone goes into the "enemy" teritory and say how they don't like the fact that Sony removed the feature then they will be warnerd/banned for voicing the opinion. This just creates confusion and unnecessary change that is just going to make it more complicated and it removes healthy discussion.

Now, if I was a moderator of the forum, then what I would do is keep the whole forum in check. Bickering back and forth is a GOOD thing! It allows for discussion on a subject that is big and it allows for people to see both sides of the story and what people like and don't like. Where it gets BAD is when members attack each other because of their opinion. I have seen countless of times where AB was being attacked by a couple of other forum members (not going to mention names) because of his opinion. Instead of going through all of this trouble to create "turfs" you should be watching the personal attacks by the forum members because of another persons valid opinion.

Just like to add my thoughts.

I don't think this is a great idea. I don't like the idea of having to know how to use a forum, knowing about the silly little rules that're forum specific instead of global specific. It's not obvious and even if there's a sticky people will overlook it so people not entirely familar will stumble into "enemy territory" so to speak. It also sounds like it'll segreate the community, promoting people to stick to their own camp and not venture to neighboring ones.

Also, I've only got a laptop to game on and it's not exactly a "gaming rig". Where's my "home turf"? Why can't I express my opinions (negative or otherwise) about a particular console and where do I have the most freedom to do that in?

I'm still waiting for GH to get better btw.

A lot of things appear differently to people out of the loop. Unless those friendly jibes between buddies are clearly marked with emoticons or something similar we'll tend to clean them out so as to not give other members the wrong idea. It would be easy for casual readers to think that we're allowing personal attacks and that may encourage them to post their own personal attacks on members who they are not on friendly terms with.

Fair enough I guess, goes back to my previous point of us making the forum a tad more friendly for new members.

I like the idea behind this, but the execution isn't to my liking to be honest - it seems like it'll create more animosity between each of the sections' regular members rather then creating universal harmony across all of the boards which should be the main goal. At the end of the day, there's always a clear line between maturely "attacking" a console, disagreeing with a member's opinion of a console and attacking the member him/herself.

As for the line about the burnout rate of GH Mods, I'd be willing to lend a helping hand as I've been in situations where I need to whip a particular section into shape (it was a spamming minefield) and come out alive on other forums - after doing the job for 3 and a half years I'm fairly certain I'm immune to burnout ;) Just leaving it out there for consideration... :)

No. :no: Why have two separate discussions about a certain thing in different parts of the forum.

In one forum and topic you have will have *EXAMPLE* Sony fanboys saying that removing OtherOS was a thing that Sony has the right to do and we should just follow what they have done. In the other forum and in a different topic you will have *EXAMPLE* an XBot (XBOX fanboy :) ) going on about how Sony is stupid and why they are the worst company in the world.

This would not work because then if someone goes into the "enemy" teritory and say how they don't like the fact that Sony removed the feature then they will be warnerd/banned for voicing the opinion. This just creates confusion and unnecessary change that is just going to make it more complicated and it removes healthy discussion.

Now, if I was a moderator of the forum, then what I would do is keep the whole forum in check. Bickering back and forth is a GOOD thing! It allows for discussion on a subject that is big and it allows for people to see both sides of the story and what people like and don't like. Where it gets BAD is when members attack each other because of their opinion. I have seen countless of times where AB was being attacked by a couple of other forum members (not going to mention names) because of his opinion. Instead of going through all of this trouble to create "turfs" you should be watching the personal attacks by the forum members because of another persons valid opinion.

Maybe I've been confused by this OtherOS example.

Threads primarily about the PS3/PSP should stay in the Sony Console forum. Threads primarily about the Xbox should stay in the Microsoft Console forum. Same with Wiis/DSes and Nintendo.

If someone who is a known supporter of the Xbox wants to start a PS3 thread in the Sony Console they can still do so but with some care that the thread isn't designed to troll and insult PS3 owners (as with everything else, the opposite examples work just as well).

I do NOT want to see two discussions about a Wii system update (one in the Wii forum and an thread in somebody else's home turf that discusses what a mess Nintendo made). If you want to post that the Nintendo upgrade was a mess then go to the Nintendo forum and say that in a respectable way without adding "Haha, you shouldn't have bought such a loser console!" to the end of your post.

I like the idea behind this, but the execution isn't to my liking to be honest

There are well establishes clichés of "The devil is in the details" and "The road to hell is paved with good intentions" for a reason. It will likely be less drastic than some members reading this thread think it will be. Most members will never notice any difference. It just gives our mods one more tool in their Batman utility belt. If someone is a known crusader who is posting stuff outside of their home turf and it appears to be for the intention of causing trouble then we're going to go after that.

Prior to this we sometimes had situations where we're not sure if people are intentionally trolling or if they are just being blunt and obtuse. This will help make our decision. If they are in their home turf we'll likely assume they are blunt and obtuse and lack social skills. If they are outside their home turf we'll decide that they are doing it for the purpose of annoying other members.

There are well establishes clichés of "The devil is in the details" and "The road to hell is paved with good intentions" for a reason. It will likely be less drastic than some members reading this thread think it will be. Most members will never notice any difference. It just gives our mods one more tool in their Batman utility belt. If someone is a known crusader who is posting stuff outside of their home turf and it appears to be for the intention of causing trouble then we're going to go after that.

Prior to this we sometimes had situations where we're not sure if people are intentionally trolling or if they are just being blunt and obtuse. This will help make our decision. If they are in their home turf we'll likely assume they are blunt and obtuse and lack social skills. If they are outside their home turf we'll decide that they are doing it for the purpose of annoying other members.

Okay, fair enough, but what happens when we get mods who don't usually visit the GH and don't always know the cliqs and the regulars of certain groups? For example, my most visited forum according to the stats is the Sony Console section - but if anything I'd say have a particular leaning towards Nintendo, but what would happen if I said something that could be misconstrued as trolling, when it's just me voicing an opinion? I'd say the GH as a whole is "my home turf" rather then one particular section of it - the fact that it's at the very top of my "Favourite Forums" list shows this.

I'm not intentionally trying to go against the grain with this system, I love the fact that you're all trying new initiatives to keep this place better, I'm just worried there are certain points that need to be ironed out/explained in more detail now rather then it all get explained later in a "Surprise! You've got a 20% warn!" PM.

Like you said previously, it's more for the obvious crusaders then someone like me who just enjoys posting here, but I don't fancy being treated differently in one forum over the next because <insert staff member here> believes I have a particular preference for a console and getting slammed in once place but not another when keeping the exact same tone to my posts.

[snip]

Like you said previously, it's more for the obvious crusaders then someone like me who just enjoys posting here, but I don't fancy being treated differently in one forum over the next because <insert staff member here> believes I have a particular preference for a console and getting slammed in once place but not another when keeping the exact same tone to my posts.

Every mod won't know whos alliance falls where, however we all communicate alot and consider things like warnings before hand. At the end of the day we don't want members to troll/flamebait but we do want intelligent discussions going on in GH. Your Sony fans don't tend to have much of a hatred towards each other as towards a member from the Microsoft camp coming along and flaming. That is when the problems arise and we will moderate it carefully. Trust us :)

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Onkyo Dolby Atmos AV receivers are really solid deals by Sayan Sen Recently we covered great deals on several soundbar models from the likes of Sony, JBL, Samsung and others for really good prices (the lowest in several months). Aside from that we also reported on the Edifier S3000MKII, a hi-fi two-way bookshelf monitor that's available for only $800. Today we bring a list of AV receivers from Onkyo that are available at great prices including the Onkyo NR7100, RZ30, and 8470 (purchase links under the specs table down below). The Onkyo TX-NR7100 and Onkyo TX-RZ30 are both 9.2-channel AV receivers designed for immersive home theater setups but they occupy slightly different tiers within Onkyo’s lineup with the RZ30 positioned as the more advanced model. The TX-NR7100 is a THX Certified 9.2-channel receiver offering up to 100 W per channel (8 ohms, 2 channels driven). It supports Dolby Atmos, DTS:X, and IMAX Enhanced formats, with flexible configurations such as 5.1.4 or 7.1.2 speaker layouts. A key highlight is its built-in Dirac Live Room Correction which should help optimize sound based on your room and its acoustics. In comparison, both models share several core capabilities though the RZ30 is geared toward enthusiasts seeking more precise calibration and system flexibility, while the NR7100 is positioned as a slightly more accessible, value-focused option with strong all-round performance. The technical specs of the RZ30 and NR7100 9.2 AVRs are given in the table below: Specification Onkyo TX-RZ30 Onkyo TX-NR7100 Power Output (FTC, 2ch driven) ~100 W/ch (8Ω, 20Hz–20kHz, 0.08% THD) 100 W/ch (8Ω, 20Hz–20kHz, 0.08% THD) Dynamic / Peak Power 9 × 170 W (6Ω, 1kHz, 1% THD, 1ch driven) 220 W/ch (6Ω, 1kHz, 10% THD, 1ch driven) Frequency Response 5 Hz – 100 kHz (+1/-3 dB) 10 Hz – 100 kHz (+1/-3 dB) THD 0.08% 0.08% Room Correction Dirac Live (full bandwidth) Dirac Live (with AccuReflex support) Immersive Audio Dolby Atmos, DTS:X, IMAX Enhanced Dolby Atmos, DTS:X, IMAX Enhanced Speaker Layout Support Up to 7.2.2 / 5.2.4 / 9.2 processing Up to 7.2.4 / 5.2.4 / 9.2 processing HDMI Inputs / Outputs 6 inputs / 2 outputs (eARC) 6 inputs / 2 outputs (Main + Sub/Zone 2) HDMI 2.1 Support 8K/60, 4K/120, VRR, ALLM, QFT, DSC, eARC 8K/60, 4K/120, VRR, ALLM, QFT, DSC, eARC Video Formats HDR10+, Dolby Vision, HDCP 2.3 HDR10+, Dolby Vision, HDCP 2.3 Streaming / Network Wi-Fi, AirPlay 2, Chromecast, Bluetooth, DTS Play-Fi Wi-Fi, AirPlay 2, Chromecast, Bluetooth, DTS Play-Fi Get them at the links below: Onkyo TX-RZ30 9.2-Channel AV Receiver: $797.00 (Sold and shipped by Electronic Expo) Onkyo TX-NR7100 9.2-Channel AV Receiver: $699.00 (Sold and shipped by Adorma) Onkyo TX-8470 2 Ch Stereo Receiver: $449.00 (Sold and Shipped by Adorma) Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links or authorized dealer links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from such links only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • A different thing with Russia. When you say is it better, depends on things. It is better that we don't have the E.U making rules and laws that have nothing to do with them. Is the trading part better? No, that is really mucked up, but then we knew that was going to happen and we would have make agreements, like we do with other parts of the world. Freedom of movement is certainly better, but could be improved, we still need more control over our borders. do you live in the U.K?
    • So what am I quoting from them? I never listened to what Farage or his cronies said. I wanted the U.K to leave the E.u years before the referendum and it had nothing to do with Farage and his cronies. So what country do you live in? Did we work much better together? We were always at logger heads with the E.U because we disagreed with them so much. Maggie was always on at them. I would have thought the E.U was glad to get rid of us as we stopped the integration or made it a two tier. Now without us they can integrate more. I would not have voted out if it was just a trading block and we can still work together on somethings.
    • MPC-BE 1.9.0 by Razvan Serea Media Player Classic - BE is a free and open source audio and video player for Windows. Media Player Classic - BE is based on the original "Media Player Classic" project (Gabest) and "Media Player Classic Home Cinema" project (Casimir666), contains additional features and bug fixes. The BE mod (Black Edition Mod) is a skinned version of Media Player Classic Home Cinema, much better looking than the plain old MPC. MPC-BE 1.9.0 changelog: Splitters Fixed crashes in some situations. AudioSplitter Added support for the RF64 format. Fixed reading of channel layout for some WavPack files. Added support for ID3 tags for Wave64 files. Unknown Wave64 chunks are now ignored. AviSplitter Added support for 'y408' video. Improved support for 'HEVC' video. FLVSplitter Added support for VVC video. MP4Splitter Improved handling of corrupted files. MatroskaSplitter Expanded support for V_UNCOMPRESSED video codecs. Fixed support for frame rotation (ProjectionPoseRoll). Improved support for "V_MS/VFW/FOURCC / HEVC". MpcDvdVideoDecoder Fixed conversion to YUY2. Fixed display of menus for some DVD-Videos. RoQVideoDecoder Output in NV12 and YV12 formats is allowed. Full range is used. MPC Video Decoder RGB32 format will be output as a top-down bitmap by default. Added support for the "IID_MediaSideDataDOVIMetadataV2" interface. Removed support for the deprecated "IID_MediaSideDataDOVIMetadata" interface. Fixed retrieving the name of the video adapter when using NVDEC. Fixed crashes in some situations. MPC Video Converter Added support for AYUV video format. MpcAudioRenderer Improved input format validation. Optimized retrieval of supported formats for exclusive mode. Added the "Keep audio device active when paused" setting. Fixed crashes and freezes in various situations. Subtitles Added the ability to open the properties of an external subtitle renderer in the "Subtitles" settings panel. Fixed external subtitle connections for VSFilter. Fixed a crash when rendering PGS/SUP subtitles when using AVX2. YouTube Improved support for yt-dlp. The built-in YouTube parser is no longer used. Player The HTTP read strategy has been changed. If the playlist contains one entry, more key combinations can be used to control the player (jump through chapters, adjust volume). Improved support for reading ASX playlists. The translation of the MediaInfo report for Chinese, Korean and Japanese has been removed. Added blocking of 32-bit filter "PICVideo Lossless JPEG Decompressor" (pvljpg20.dll), because it crashes. Added blocking of the system filter "AVI Decompressor", which will eliminate the crash of VFW codecs. Fixed a rare crash when using the "/slave" key. Fixed a crash when getting a list of fonts for OSD. Added the ability to load an external audio file using hotkeys. Fixed opening a network path starting with \?\UNC. The "Determine duration when adding" playlist setting now works for YouTube video URLs. The "Online media services" settings panel has been redesigned. Added a "Merge files using FFmpeg" option to the file saving dialog. This option is activated when playing multiple streams obtained using yt-dlp. Added loading of local .dpl playlists ("DAUMPLAYLIST"). Fixed a hang when the user closes the player during the URL opening process. Various interface fixes. Installer Updated MPC Video Renderer 0.10.5. Updated MPC Script Source 0.2.17. Added MPC Image Source 0.3.6. Translations Updated Japanese translation (by tsubasanouta). Updated Chinese (Traditional) and Dutch translation (by beter). Updated Romanian translation (by Andrei Miloiu). Updated Hungarian translation (by mickey). Updated Turkish translation (by cmhrky). Updated German translation (by Klaus1189). Updated Chinese (Simplified) translation (by wushantao). Updated Italian translation (by mapi68). Updated Korean translation (by Hackjjang). Updated Chinese (Traditional) (by udfbe). Updated libraries dav1d 1.5.3-6-g04b69f9; ffmpeg n8.2-dev-1857-g4653e68aab; libpng git-v1.6.55-9-g7d52a8087; Little-CMS git-lcms2.18-26-gf739cda; MediaInfo git-v26.05-38-g702c9b7fd; ZenLib git-v0.4.41-91-g073f297; zlib 1.3.2. Download: MPC-BE 64-bit | Portable MPC-BE 64-bit | ~20.0 MB (Open Source) Download: MPC-BE 32-bit | Portable MPC-BE 32-bit Link: Media Player Classic - BE Home Page Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Apple reportedly looks to blacklisted Chinese memory chips as RAM prices climb by Karthik Mudaliar Image via Apple Apple is reportedly trying to get a clearance from the Trump administration to buy memory from ChangXin Memory Technologies (CXMT) to get some relief from soaring DRAM prices. As per a report by the Financial Times, Apple approached the Commerce Department more than a month ago and also spoke to other officials and allies in Washington. For starters, CXMT is a company that's already been placed on the Pentagon's list of Chinese military companies. The Chinese company is the country's top DRAM maker. For Apple, the timing is certainly awkward but not surprising. Tim Cook had recently warned that Apple would have to raise prices because AI companies are buying up large amounts of memory for data centers, and just like that, Apple raised MacBook and iPad prices. Micron also recently revealed that customers have committed billions of dollars to secure memory supply years in advance, which shows us how aggressive securing infrastructure has become. This gives suppliers such as Samsung, SK Hynix, and Micron more leverage, while pushing hardware makers to look for alternatives. CXMT is one of those alternatives, but not the simplest one. Apple has spent many years trying to diversify parts of its supply chain away from China, especially for final assembly, while still depending heavily on Chinese manufacturing and suppliers. Even domestic brands from China are moving towards CXMT and YMTC instead of relying on Samsung, Micron, and SK Hynix. For Apple, though, it would invite more scrutiny than local Chinese companies. For now, this is more like a lobbying effort rather than a confirmed supply deal. There's no official statement from either of the parties. What is clearer, though, is the pressure behind such a request. AI demand has certainly made hardware a bottleneck, and companies are trying everything they can to bring things back to normal, even if that means making politically sensitive choices. Source: Financial Times
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Woland13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Woland13 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      493
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      227
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      148
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      75
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!