GH Moderation: The concept of "Home Turf"


Recommended Posts

Why not force members with a history of conflicts on each others ignore list and enforce it; no speaking or contacting each other. That means we won't have to tread lightly all of a sudden in sub-forums for consoles we actually own

and we might bring down all the bickering and pointless arguments. I mean, this is for the 'heavy hitter' cases so to speak, not something that should be flung around.

Technically you would have to troll the Xbox 360 Forums twice as much as the Playstation 3 ones.

Ugh, sounds like more work! :p

Yeah, that a good idea too but there are technical reasons why this is difficult. We already have a Restricted (Gamers) Mask and, in theory, we could create one for every subforum but this adds to the complexity of the administration.

It may well do that but how many minutes of the day do you think you are going to loose with this rather open ended system? I'm all for cleaning up neowin, because if we're being honest. The GH has been rather stagnant of new members for some time. The last new member we received in here, from what I remember, was back in Nov? Since then the forum has slowly started to turn in to what feels like a selective RSS news feed with occasional official topics. It's kind of depressing flicking between GAF and here.

Now while I believe this is somewhat the fault so some inconsistent moderation- I'm still on 0% and I believe there have been some moments in the past when I've been a right dick and deserved a warning. As well as some people on here who should have been banned years ago. We go to the other end of the spectrum where Andrew and I will start being abrasive with each other, always with a wink and a nod. Then we refresh the page and see "Thread Cleaned".

Now it's not fair to blame this all on the mods. We don't expect you to know everyones traits and the cliques. A community is only as good as the sum of it's parts and in that respect we've been a bit limp. We're not exactly friendly to junior members and it all goes a bit deliverance in here when we see someone new. It goes to my previous points before, often we can go for a week with only very flame bait news posts on the front page and bumped official threads which aren't exactly easy to jump in to for new members. With opinions already made and a full debate underway on the pros and cons of game mechanics.

I know I've gone off on a MASSIVE tangent. But what I'm trying to say in around about way is: Unless we agree to some massive foundation shaking changes-old habits will continue to surface and die hard. We could at least do with limiting certain members to only reply to threads in sub forums. As I'm often seeing some truly bonfire-esq news links being posted in Microsoft/Sony/Ninty sub forums which only need a spark before the thing needs an entire fire crew to put out.

Disclaimer: I'm not singling this post out to attack anyone. It's critical of everyone, even my self! So don't take it personally.

edit: Expanded on a few points.

So wait... then what about news? Negative PS3 news goes into the 360 section? This is just promoting anti-X console behavior rather than having these just segregated subjects. On top of it this will confuse newer members. I don't like this at all.

  • Like 2

Sounds like an all right idea, if it works out in the end and doesn't just stifle perfectly valid opinions, I don't even like coming in here most of the time because some people can't get along some of the time.

Just because people have a preference doesn't mean they automatically hate on a different platform, and as I have always said, its not about what is being said, but the way some people go around with their opinions assuming they are right, but also knowingly writing something that will start a conflict with some members.

You can get a point across just as well but by writing it respectfully towards others.

This "subliminally" just suggests that somebody not on their "own turf" knows nothing about what they are discussing. Hence giving people on that "home turf" a reason to jump down their throat and discard their opinion

Yeah I know it's not meant to be that way, but everybody here KNOWS that's how it will be.

Segregation is never a good thing... There is A LOT more bad that can come of this than good.

@Escelade_GT: I agree completely. This will just make "territory" for both sides and basically separate the two communities in a way that makes their own forum "more important" than the other. Anything post in there that is negative in the slightest of ways will be jumped on and flamed because they can be less wary" in their "home turf".

As much as you are entitled to your own opinion, i entirely disagree with your logic. It allows for biased, one-sided views and that is not good for any debate. It almost renders Neowin's forums entirely pointless.

For Example; A Playstation owner complains about the Other OS Fiasco. Where shall i go now?

Another Example; A Guest or member wishes to see the opinions of others on for example 'An Xbox 360'. Where will this person go? To the Xbox 360 forum. On visiting the Xbox 360 Neowin Forum he discovers that there is no issues with the console, nobody dislikes it and the prices are perfect.

I agree with what you are saying in principle, but in practice, Fred Derf has the right idea.

The same should be applied to the Apple, Windows, and Linux forums as well IMO.

...

We go to the other end of the spectrum where Andrew and I will start being abrasive with each other, always with a wink and a nod. Then we refresh the page and see "Thread Cleaned".

...

A lot of things appear differently to people out of the loop. Unless those friendly jibes between buddies are clearly marked with emoticons or something similar we'll tend to clean them out so as to not give other members the wrong idea. It would be easy for casual readers to think that we're allowing personal attacks and that may encourage them to post their own personal attacks on members who they are not on friendly terms with.

So wait... then what about news? Negative PS3 news goes into the 360 section? This is just promoting anti-X console behavior rather than having these just segregated subjects. On top of it this will confuse newer members. I don't like this at all.

News about a PS3 (negative or not) should go in the Sony Console setting. Just be advised that there will be a lower threshold of trolling allowed so keep it respectful.

The same should be applied to the Apple, Windows, and Linux forums as well IMO.

I invoked the Home Turf rule in this thread just prior to me writing up this thread:

https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/896168-this-is-outrageous-and-simply-out-of-order/page__view__findpost__p__592555054

I am completely confused about the home turf concept.. unsure.gif I only own an Xbox 360 and my GH history probably has ample proof to show that. In GH, I post mostly in Xbox 360 section with occasional posts under Sony/Main GH. Does this make 360 as my Home turf? If I criticize anything in PS3 section, am I immediately up for a warn?

News about a PS3 (negative or not) should go in the Sony Console setting. Just be advised that there will be a lower threshold of trolling allowed so keep it respectful.

Just to clarify my own understanding - if I criticize Sony in PS3 section (360 being my Home turf) - such as in recent case of the PS3 Move ad, does that automatically make me borderline troll?

p.s. on a lighter note :p when do we start playing CTF and Territories around here?

Well, Neowin was not designed to be a no-holds-barred survival of the fittest forum (although Gamers Hangout does seem to get like that from time to time). We would like to encourage respectful discussion and as long as people are afraid of starting topics because they might get attacked by the haters then we can't do what we want to do.

A Playstation owner that wants to discuss the Other OS Fiasco could leave their home turf and post in the forum of another console but they would need to be slightly more polite and respectful there then they could get away with at home.

No. :no: Why have two separate discussions about a certain thing in different parts of the forum.

In one forum and topic you have will have *EXAMPLE* Sony fanboys saying that removing OtherOS was a thing that Sony has the right to do and we should just follow what they have done. In the other forum and in a different topic you will have *EXAMPLE* an XBot (XBOX fanboy :) ) going on about how Sony is stupid and why they are the worst company in the world.

This would not work because then if someone goes into the "enemy" teritory and say how they don't like the fact that Sony removed the feature then they will be warnerd/banned for voicing the opinion. This just creates confusion and unnecessary change that is just going to make it more complicated and it removes healthy discussion.

Now, if I was a moderator of the forum, then what I would do is keep the whole forum in check. Bickering back and forth is a GOOD thing! It allows for discussion on a subject that is big and it allows for people to see both sides of the story and what people like and don't like. Where it gets BAD is when members attack each other because of their opinion. I have seen countless of times where AB was being attacked by a couple of other forum members (not going to mention names) because of his opinion. Instead of going through all of this trouble to create "turfs" you should be watching the personal attacks by the forum members because of another persons valid opinion.

Just like to add my thoughts.

I don't think this is a great idea. I don't like the idea of having to know how to use a forum, knowing about the silly little rules that're forum specific instead of global specific. It's not obvious and even if there's a sticky people will overlook it so people not entirely familar will stumble into "enemy territory" so to speak. It also sounds like it'll segreate the community, promoting people to stick to their own camp and not venture to neighboring ones.

Also, I've only got a laptop to game on and it's not exactly a "gaming rig". Where's my "home turf"? Why can't I express my opinions (negative or otherwise) about a particular console and where do I have the most freedom to do that in?

I'm still waiting for GH to get better btw.

A lot of things appear differently to people out of the loop. Unless those friendly jibes between buddies are clearly marked with emoticons or something similar we'll tend to clean them out so as to not give other members the wrong idea. It would be easy for casual readers to think that we're allowing personal attacks and that may encourage them to post their own personal attacks on members who they are not on friendly terms with.

Fair enough I guess, goes back to my previous point of us making the forum a tad more friendly for new members.

I like the idea behind this, but the execution isn't to my liking to be honest - it seems like it'll create more animosity between each of the sections' regular members rather then creating universal harmony across all of the boards which should be the main goal. At the end of the day, there's always a clear line between maturely "attacking" a console, disagreeing with a member's opinion of a console and attacking the member him/herself.

As for the line about the burnout rate of GH Mods, I'd be willing to lend a helping hand as I've been in situations where I need to whip a particular section into shape (it was a spamming minefield) and come out alive on other forums - after doing the job for 3 and a half years I'm fairly certain I'm immune to burnout ;) Just leaving it out there for consideration... :)

No. :no: Why have two separate discussions about a certain thing in different parts of the forum.

In one forum and topic you have will have *EXAMPLE* Sony fanboys saying that removing OtherOS was a thing that Sony has the right to do and we should just follow what they have done. In the other forum and in a different topic you will have *EXAMPLE* an XBot (XBOX fanboy :) ) going on about how Sony is stupid and why they are the worst company in the world.

This would not work because then if someone goes into the "enemy" teritory and say how they don't like the fact that Sony removed the feature then they will be warnerd/banned for voicing the opinion. This just creates confusion and unnecessary change that is just going to make it more complicated and it removes healthy discussion.

Now, if I was a moderator of the forum, then what I would do is keep the whole forum in check. Bickering back and forth is a GOOD thing! It allows for discussion on a subject that is big and it allows for people to see both sides of the story and what people like and don't like. Where it gets BAD is when members attack each other because of their opinion. I have seen countless of times where AB was being attacked by a couple of other forum members (not going to mention names) because of his opinion. Instead of going through all of this trouble to create "turfs" you should be watching the personal attacks by the forum members because of another persons valid opinion.

Maybe I've been confused by this OtherOS example.

Threads primarily about the PS3/PSP should stay in the Sony Console forum. Threads primarily about the Xbox should stay in the Microsoft Console forum. Same with Wiis/DSes and Nintendo.

If someone who is a known supporter of the Xbox wants to start a PS3 thread in the Sony Console they can still do so but with some care that the thread isn't designed to troll and insult PS3 owners (as with everything else, the opposite examples work just as well).

I do NOT want to see two discussions about a Wii system update (one in the Wii forum and an thread in somebody else's home turf that discusses what a mess Nintendo made). If you want to post that the Nintendo upgrade was a mess then go to the Nintendo forum and say that in a respectable way without adding "Haha, you shouldn't have bought such a loser console!" to the end of your post.

I like the idea behind this, but the execution isn't to my liking to be honest

There are well establishes clichés of "The devil is in the details" and "The road to hell is paved with good intentions" for a reason. It will likely be less drastic than some members reading this thread think it will be. Most members will never notice any difference. It just gives our mods one more tool in their Batman utility belt. If someone is a known crusader who is posting stuff outside of their home turf and it appears to be for the intention of causing trouble then we're going to go after that.

Prior to this we sometimes had situations where we're not sure if people are intentionally trolling or if they are just being blunt and obtuse. This will help make our decision. If they are in their home turf we'll likely assume they are blunt and obtuse and lack social skills. If they are outside their home turf we'll decide that they are doing it for the purpose of annoying other members.

There are well establishes clichés of "The devil is in the details" and "The road to hell is paved with good intentions" for a reason. It will likely be less drastic than some members reading this thread think it will be. Most members will never notice any difference. It just gives our mods one more tool in their Batman utility belt. If someone is a known crusader who is posting stuff outside of their home turf and it appears to be for the intention of causing trouble then we're going to go after that.

Prior to this we sometimes had situations where we're not sure if people are intentionally trolling or if they are just being blunt and obtuse. This will help make our decision. If they are in their home turf we'll likely assume they are blunt and obtuse and lack social skills. If they are outside their home turf we'll decide that they are doing it for the purpose of annoying other members.

Okay, fair enough, but what happens when we get mods who don't usually visit the GH and don't always know the cliqs and the regulars of certain groups? For example, my most visited forum according to the stats is the Sony Console section - but if anything I'd say have a particular leaning towards Nintendo, but what would happen if I said something that could be misconstrued as trolling, when it's just me voicing an opinion? I'd say the GH as a whole is "my home turf" rather then one particular section of it - the fact that it's at the very top of my "Favourite Forums" list shows this.

I'm not intentionally trying to go against the grain with this system, I love the fact that you're all trying new initiatives to keep this place better, I'm just worried there are certain points that need to be ironed out/explained in more detail now rather then it all get explained later in a "Surprise! You've got a 20% warn!" PM.

Like you said previously, it's more for the obvious crusaders then someone like me who just enjoys posting here, but I don't fancy being treated differently in one forum over the next because <insert staff member here> believes I have a particular preference for a console and getting slammed in once place but not another when keeping the exact same tone to my posts.

[snip]

Like you said previously, it's more for the obvious crusaders then someone like me who just enjoys posting here, but I don't fancy being treated differently in one forum over the next because <insert staff member here> believes I have a particular preference for a console and getting slammed in once place but not another when keeping the exact same tone to my posts.

Every mod won't know whos alliance falls where, however we all communicate alot and consider things like warnings before hand. At the end of the day we don't want members to troll/flamebait but we do want intelligent discussions going on in GH. Your Sony fans don't tend to have much of a hatred towards each other as towards a member from the Microsoft camp coming along and flaming. That is when the problems arise and we will moderate it carefully. Trust us :)

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Why it's almost impossible to produce a smartphone in the United States by Hamid Ganji If you look at the back of some Apple products, you can see the famous phrase “Designed by Apple in California, Assembled in China.” This phrase appears on products from one of the largest smartphone brands in the United States. These products are designed in the U.S., but their manufacturing takes place in China, India, Vietnam, or even Brazil. But why can’t Apple, as one of the largest American tech companies, produce its iPhones on U.S. soil? The idea for this topic came to me after the Trump Foundation launched a smartphone called the T1 and claimed that it was designed and built with American values in mind. However, this claim did not last long, as it was revealed that Trump’s phone was actually a rebranded HTC U24 Pro, with only a gold case and minor internal component changes. You see? Even a phone that is supposed to represent American values is manufactured in China. With a gross domestic product (GDP) exceeding $32 trillion, the United States is currently the world’s largest economy, while China ranks second with around $20 trillion. On the other hand, the United States is by a wide margin the global leader in various technological fields, and American companies spend hundreds of billions of dollars annually on research and development. From Apple and Google to Microsoft, Lockheed Martin, Boeing, and others, American tech and industrial giants lead their foreign competitors in many sectors. The United States also has no shortage of smartphone brands. Apple, Google, and Motorola are among the major brands in the smartphone market, collectively holding a significant share. However, the vast majority of their products are manufactured outside the United States. So why is it that the world’s largest economy, home to the most advanced technology companies and industrial powers, cannot produce a smartphone on its own soil? Let’s explore this question together. Even threats to impose tariffs won’t work After Trump entered the White House as the 47th President of the United States, his administration adopted strict tariff policies. One of these policies was the imposition of a 25% tariff on smartphones manufactured outside the United States. Trump said he “had a little problem” with Apple CEO Tim Cook over producing smartphones outside the U.S. So he thought that threatening a 25% tax on imported phones might force Apple to bring manufacturing back to the United States. “I have long ago informed Tim Cook of Apple that I expect their iPhones that will be sold in the United States of America will be manufactured and built in the United States, not India, or anyplace else,” Trump wrote on Truth Social. Image via The White House Although Apple currently manufactures some of the iPhone’s chips in the United States with TSMC's help, it still shows no willingness to shift full iPhone production to the country. At the time, renowned Apple supply chain analyst Ming-Chi Kuo wrote on X, “In terms of profitability, it’s way better for Apple to take the hit of a 25% tariff on iPhones sold in the US market than to move iPhone assembly lines back to the US.” However, manufacturing a smartphone in the United States is not as easy as it might seem, and many technical and economic barriers are involved. The lack of necessary manufacturing hubs There is a clear reason why many companies prefer to manufacture their products in China. China has established itself as the main global manufacturing hub for international companies, and over the past few decades, large contract manufacturers have emerged there, allowing companies like Apple to outsource production. One such example is Foxconn, which also manufactures some Apple products in India. Building the infrastructure required to produce smartphones in the United States would require tens of billions of dollars in new investment. Factories would need to be built, essential manufacturing equipment would have to be installed, and, most importantly, a skilled workforce capable of operating these systems would need to be recruited and trained. The United States currently lacks the core infrastructure needed to manufacture smartphones, and for this reason, many companies prefer to outsource production to Chinese contractors rather than spend tens of billions of dollars to build that infrastructure, which is significantly more economically efficient. Additionally, building such infrastructure in the United States could take up to a decade, ultimately leading to a significant increase in the product's final price for consumers. Shortage of trained labor in the U.S. compared to China Decades of serving as a global manufacturing hub have allowed China to build a massive talent pool in the production sector that is almost unmatched worldwide. Today, if a company chooses to manufacture its products in China, it can be confident that the workers involved in production have years of experience in their respective roles and are capable of producing high-quality goods with minimal errors. Even if we assume that tens of billions of dollars were invested in building smartphone manufacturing infrastructure in the United States, finding skilled workers would remain highly challenging. Apple CEO Tim Cook visiting the iPhone 6 assembly line in China in 2014. Image: Tim Cook on X In a 2015 interview on CBS’s 60 Minutes, Tim Cook said the main reason Apple isn’t producing in the US is a lack of skills. "China put an enormous focus on manufacturing, in what you and I would call vocational kind of skills. The US over time began to stop having as many vocational kinds of skills. I mean you could take every tool and die maker in the United States and probably put them in the room that we're currently sitting in. In China you would have to have multiple football fields,” Cook said. Also, in 2017, at the Fortune Global Forum in Guangzhou, Cook once again emphasized the importance of highly skilled Chinese workers. “China has moved into very advanced manufacturing, so you find in China the intersection of craftsman kind of skill, and sophisticated robotics and the computer science world. That intersection, which is very rare to find anywhere, that kind of skill, is very important to our business because of the precision and quality level that we like. The thing that most people focus on if they’re a foreigner coming to China is the size of the market, and obviously, it’s the biggest market in the world in so many areas. But for us, the number one attraction is the quality of the people,” Apple CEO said. Higher labor costs in the United States Producing almost any product in the United States is more expensive than in many other countries, and one of the main reasons is the higher cost of labor in the U.S. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, median weekly earnings of full-time workers in the United States were $1,235 in the first quarter of 2026. Meanwhile, the average annual salary in China's private sector in 2025 was RMB 71,590 (US$9,961). In many parts of the world, the weekly wage of an American worker is equivalent to several months of income. Another important factor to consider is that in the United States, the workforce capable of working on a smartphone assembly line is highly specialized and therefore commands higher-than-average wages. According to an estimate by Bank of America, producing an iPhone in the U.S. is technically possible, but “iPhone cost can increase 25% purely on higher labor cost in the U.S.” However, this 25% increase applies only if final assembly is performed in the United States while components are still sourced from China or elsewhere. In this case, the price of a base iPhone would rise from $799 to around $1,000. But in another scenario, if Apple were to produce the required components for the iPhone within the United States, production costs could increase by more than 90%. Trump’s dream for a “Made in the USA” iPhone might never come true In a free-market capitalist economy, one of the primary responsibilities of any CEO is to maximize profit. Using Apple as an example, Tim Cook’s role is to maximize the company’s profits so that it can fund research and development for new products and invest in areas such as artificial intelligence, while also keeping shareholders satisfied. Therefore, it is entirely understandable that Apple would choose not to bring its manufacturing back to the United States and instead keep production in countries where labor is cheaper, and products can be manufactured at a lower cost, thereby maximizing its profit margins. What is your opinion about manufacturing smartphones in the United States? If you are an American citizen, would you be willing to pay hundreds of dollars more for a smartphone made domestically in the USA? Let us know in the comments.
    • Cheers everyone for the replies. It's been very useful. 👍
    • Compared to the 7735HS it is around 25-30% slower in multi-threaded tasks (according to Google search) I did a review of the 7735HS Beelink SER6 Max in 2023, but thinking about it, it's not comparable to the 7730U. For the example you gave about how it will be used, the 7730U is actually an excellent choice for its power and battery efficiency.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Woland13 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      503
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      194
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      151
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      71
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!