Recommended Posts

Hmm do you know what page it is off hand? Closest thing I found was on page 8, but it made them exactly like the active tabs.

#TabsToolbar > .toolbarbutton-1:not(#alltabs-button):not(#new-tab-button) {
  -moz-appearance: none !important;
  margin: 0 !important;
  padding: 0 !important;
  background-repeat: no-repeat !important;
  background-size: 200% !important;
  -moz-border-image: url("chrome://browser/skin/tabbrowser/tab.png") 4 5 3 6 / 4px 5px 3px 6px !important;
  -moz-border-radius: 10px 8px 0 0 !important;
}

.tabbrowser-tab:not([selected="true"]),
.tabs-newtab-button,
#TabsToolbar > .toolbarbutton-1:not(#alltabs-button):not(#new-tab-button)  {
  background-position: -5px -2px !important;
  background-image: -moz-linear-gradient(top,#D2D2D2,
                                   rgba(151,160,172,.70)),
                    -moz-linear-gradient(bottom, rgba(0,0,0,.6) 25%, rgba(0,0,0,0) 75%) !important;
}

.tabbrowser-tab:not([selected="true"]):hover,
.tabs-newtab-button:hover,
#TabsToolbar > .toolbarbutton-1:not(#alltabs-button):not(#new-tab-button):hover {
  background-image: -moz-linear-gradient(top,rgba(198,201,206,.8),
                                   rgba(100,100,100,.8)),
                    -moz-linear-gradient(bottom, rgba(0,0,0,.8) 20%, rgba(0,0,0,0) 60%) !important;
}

.tabbrowser-tab:not([selected="true"]) {
  text-shadow: 0 1px 0 rgba(255,255,255,0.3) !important;
}

#TabsToolbar > .toolbarbutton-1:not(#alltabs-button):not(#new-tab-button) {
  -moz-appearance: none !important;
  margin: 0 !important;
  padding: 0 !important;
  background-repeat: no-repeat !important;
  background-size: 200% !important;
  -moz-border-image: url("chrome://browser/skin/tabbrowser/tab.png") 4 5 3 6 / 4px 5px 3px 6px !important;
  -moz-border-radius: 10px 8px 0 0 !important;
}

.tabbrowser-tab:not([selected="true"]),
.tabs-newtab-button,
#TabsToolbar > .toolbarbutton-1:not(#alltabs-button):not(#new-tab-button)  {
  background-position: -5px -2px !important;
  background-image: -moz-linear-gradient(top,#D2D2D2,
                                   rgba(151,160,172,.70)),
                    -moz-linear-gradient(bottom, rgba(0,0,0,.6) 25%, rgba(0,0,0,0) 75%) !important;
}

.tabbrowser-tab:not([selected="true"]):hover,
.tabs-newtab-button:hover,
#TabsToolbar > .toolbarbutton-1:not(#alltabs-button):not(#new-tab-button):hover {
  background-image: -moz-linear-gradient(top,rgba(198,201,206,.8),
                                   rgba(100,100,100,.8)),
                    -moz-linear-gradient(bottom, rgba(0,0,0,.8) 20%, rgba(0,0,0,0) 60%) !important;
}

.tabbrowser-tab:not([selected="true"]) {
  text-shadow: 0 1px 0 rgba(255,255,255,0.3) !important;
}

Thank you so much! Now I really like Firefox Beta, as I couldn't stand the transparent inactive tabs (so hard to read em).

I was also wondering is Firefox beta2 going slow for anyone? It seems to respond pretty slow. I assume this is because it's just beta and has lots of bugs to work out. Just seems very "bloated" atm.

Thank you so much! Now I really like Firefox Beta, as I couldn't stand the transparent inactive tabs (so hard to read em).

I was also wondering is Firefox beta2 going slow for anyone? It seems to respond pretty slow. I assume this is because it's just beta and has lots of bugs to work out. Just seems very "bloated" atm.

Don't say thanks , after all its Friendship day :)

Hmm , don't know why its slow @ that end , btw you are comparing it with 3.6 or chrome or beta 1? Definitely its slower than chrome , and not significantly faster than beta 1 (might be bit slower). Anyways , try a fresh profile or try "safemode" to detect the culprit addons

1. How come some add on downloads give me a connection failure error? Is it because they aren't compatible with beta 2? I have the compatibility reporter add on installed.

For me I have Flashgot and IDM, when I go into the addon page I force download the file onto my computer with Flashgot, rather than letting Firefox do it, then I double click on the downloaded file, and Firefox accepts it this way. Works for me.

Don't say thanks , after all its Friendship day :)

Hmm , don't know why its slow @ that end , btw you are comparing it with 3.6 or chrome or beta 1? Definitely its slower than chrome , and not significantly faster than beta 1 (might be bit slower). Anyways , try a fresh profile or try "safemode" to detect the culprit addons

Well 3.6 even seems to seem more "snappy" in terms of how the back/forward buttons work etc. I'm not going to compare it to chrome as that's blazing fast atm.

Is there a timeline for when everything will start reacting faster on the browser? Just seems to be very slow atm. :(

EDIT: After running safemode, it definitely seems to be going a lot faster.

Not sure what would be causing it though... I have 4 add-ons. Feedback (disabled), Firesizer (disabled), Stylish, and Firefox Sync. Is it possible Sync is slowing it down? It seems to be going slightly faster since I disabled it for now.

Well 3.6 even seems to seem more "snappy" in terms of how the back/forward buttons work etc. I'm not going to compare it to chrome as that's blazing fast atm.

Is there a timeline for when everything will start reacting faster on the browser? Just seems to be very slow atm. :(

EDIT: After running safemode, it definitely seems to be going a lot faster.

Not sure what would be causing it though... I have 4 add-ons. Feedback (disabled), Firesizer (disabled), Stylish, and Firefox Sync.

Hmm , can't help @ this. But yeah , after beta 5/6 (sept), D2D , Jaeger Monkey and other performance improvements will land , which will definitely make it super fast!?

Hmm , can't help @ this. But yeah , after beta 5/6 (sept), D2D , Jaeger Monkey and other performance improvements will land , which will definitely make it super fast!?

Yeah, I can't wait for Jaeger Monkey. I am eagerly waiting for those. :)

I think it's just me being used to Chrome for so long and needing to adjust to Firefox again, as it won't be very fast until those land like you said.

I have a annoying problem with the 4.x Minefields that persisted since the first build I used way before Beta 1. I started with a fresh profile so it can't be due to some FF 3.6 quirks.

Basically my toolbar layout resets itself every second launch. I would like to have my Stop/Reload buttons on the right side of the URL bar, if I move them there and close Minefield and open it again they stay where I moved them, if I close and relaunch Minefield a second time the Stop/Reload buttons move itself back to the left side :blink:

Anybody got a idea what's going on?^^

I have a annoying problem with the 4.x Minefields that persisted since the first build I used way before Beta 1. I started with a fresh profile so it can't be due to some FF 3.6 quirks.

Basically my toolbar layout resets itself every second launch. I would like to have my Stop/Reload buttons on the right side of the URL bar, if I move them there and close Minefield and open it again they stay where I moved them, if I close and relaunch Minefield a second time the Stop/Reload buttons move itself back to the left side :blink:

Anybody got a idea what's going on?^^

I had a problem like that, where my Firefox was resetting everything I did a couple of months ago. What I ended up doing is completely restore windows back to it's original state and that fixed the problem for me. I tried everything, and it came down to that. :(

Does anyone know if there is a userscript to move the bookmarks star to the spot where the favicon is shown on the address bar?

I had a problem like that, where my Firefox was resetting everything I did a couple of months ago. What I ended up doing is completely restore windows back to it's original state and that fixed the problem for me. I tried everything, and it came down to that. :(

Does anyone know if there is a userscript to move the bookmarks star to the spot where the favicon is shown on the address bar?

Well I would rather live with my toolbar resetting then to reset Windows :p I only have to figure out how to move them via Stylish and problem solved^^

has something changed with cookies in the last couple of nightlies? I have had endless troubles logging into websites, I keep having to clear my cookies as after a while the websites I set to remember my login wont log in. or I try to log in places but all I get is a loop, I log in (it says I logged in successfully) I then continue and find out I have been instantly logged out.

Now one site is telling me my browser doesn't support cookies and to enable them. it was ok on Friday but Saturdays and Sundays builds have been crazy!

wondering if I might need a new profile :s

has something changed with cookies in the last couple of nightlies? I have had endless troubles logging into websites, I keep having to clear my cookies as after a while the websites I set to remember my login wont log in. or I try to log in places but all I get is a loop, I log in (it says I logged in successfully) I then continue and find out I have been instantly logged out.

Now one site is telling me my browser doesn't support cookies and to enable them. it was ok on Friday but Saturdays and Sundays builds have been crazy!

wondering if I might need a new profile :s

You have to clear your cookies to get rid of the problem, at least to get rid of it for some time.

I don't think this has been backed out yet for some odd reason.

4.0b2

Getting this error on start up

typeerror: componants.classes['@softage.ru/skype/skypeffextension;1'] is undefined

I do have skype installed, but I don't recall ever installing any skype add-ons, or being asked during the skype install. There is nothing about skype in the add-ons manager or in about:config

help :(

Can anyone confirm this, on 7 when I type in "firefox.exe -profile" into the search box and press enter. It gives me a profile missing message. But the profile is intact.

Not missing for me

4.0b2

Getting this error on start up

typeerror: componants.classes['@softage.ru/skype/skypeffextension;1'] is undefined

I do have skype installed, but I don't recall ever installing any skype add-ons, or being asked during the skype install. There is nothing about skype in the add-ons manager or in about:config

help :(

It's maybe listed under plugins. You could always try uninstalling and reinstalling skype, might reinstall the plugin.

It's maybe listed under plugins. You could always try uninstalling and reinstalling skype, might reinstall the plugin.

Sorry, I did check plugins too, no mention of it there either. I'll give reinstalling it a shot.

Do you get any message. Mine just says "Your Firefox profile is either missing or unavailable." or whatever. Only when using Beta 2 though.

You're talking about any windows search box, right? I click start and paste firefox.exe -profile in there, and it shows up in the list, no message.

Well it's not highlighted in the list, so hitting enter does nothing, but if I click firefox.exe -profile in the list my skype error pops up again lol and then a new firefox window opens when I click OK to dismiss the error

So obviously the reinstall didn't work, even though I deselected the ff and ie plugin options, fingers crossed uninstalling first will work.

EDIT: Ah Ha!!! Just seen Skype Toolbars in Programs and Features.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I really hope the author's health is ok. Squirreling away a official backup of this software. Looks like the internet archive already cached a copy as well - https://web.archive.org/web/20...ldbit-soft.fi/software.html
    • AMD is supported out of the box in linux because of their open source driver. Nvidia does not. All my systems are amd and all of them work nicely on linux arch without doing anything.
    • Never had a problem with TPM and started using that many years ago in Win10. Through several motherboards and OS versions, it just does what it does without complaint. My games library doesn't even know it's there. Secure boot does a lot more than support anti-cheat, as it came along long before anti-cheat software. I've used it religiously since before I started using TPM, and I always liked it for being able to nullify virus contagions that try their best to come in underneath the firmware during boot, so that the OS doesn't see them, etc. That is its purpose, imo. I'll never understand why people who elect to use another OS feel compelled to run down Windows... I guess they need to do that to feel secure about their choices? I run Windows because it supports all the software (including games) natively that I want to buy, and I've never had to run down another OS to make me feel better about it. (Although it's certainly possible to do that, of course...) Win10 is on a ventilator atm, and Win11 is very close to being free, and I finally got to stop running StartAllBack as I moved to the Experimental/Dev channel and my 26300.8553 build supports the moveable taskbar and it's running fine at the top of the screen! Finally, my last major dislike of Win11 is being rectified! So, I'm not at all surprised to see Win11's share of the Steam survey hitting 70%.
    • I can answer about the Linux bit. I only used AMD GPUs. I currently have a 9060XT (8GB) that fits my needs, I'm not a gamer, so I don't need that much GDDR. But lately, NVIDIA has grown a lot in the recent years. Oh, the horrors of NVIDIA drivers not working. But they have been getting better. I know a lot of members onm here that are running cachyOS and other distros, and are fine with a 4090/5090 variants. Really, though, I would stick with AMD variants.
    • Everything they say you can already do yourself on the registry by changing some things.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dedicated
      Conjor earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Dedicated
      Mark Spruce earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Collaborator
      conkir earned a badge
      Collaborator
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      479
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      252
    3. 3
      Steven P.
      71
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      69
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      68
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!