Recommended Posts

Hmm do you know what page it is off hand? Closest thing I found was on page 8, but it made them exactly like the active tabs.

#TabsToolbar > .toolbarbutton-1:not(#alltabs-button):not(#new-tab-button) {
  -moz-appearance: none !important;
  margin: 0 !important;
  padding: 0 !important;
  background-repeat: no-repeat !important;
  background-size: 200% !important;
  -moz-border-image: url("chrome://browser/skin/tabbrowser/tab.png") 4 5 3 6 / 4px 5px 3px 6px !important;
  -moz-border-radius: 10px 8px 0 0 !important;
}

.tabbrowser-tab:not([selected="true"]),
.tabs-newtab-button,
#TabsToolbar > .toolbarbutton-1:not(#alltabs-button):not(#new-tab-button)  {
  background-position: -5px -2px !important;
  background-image: -moz-linear-gradient(top,#D2D2D2,
                                   rgba(151,160,172,.70)),
                    -moz-linear-gradient(bottom, rgba(0,0,0,.6) 25%, rgba(0,0,0,0) 75%) !important;
}

.tabbrowser-tab:not([selected="true"]):hover,
.tabs-newtab-button:hover,
#TabsToolbar > .toolbarbutton-1:not(#alltabs-button):not(#new-tab-button):hover {
  background-image: -moz-linear-gradient(top,rgba(198,201,206,.8),
                                   rgba(100,100,100,.8)),
                    -moz-linear-gradient(bottom, rgba(0,0,0,.8) 20%, rgba(0,0,0,0) 60%) !important;
}

.tabbrowser-tab:not([selected="true"]) {
  text-shadow: 0 1px 0 rgba(255,255,255,0.3) !important;
}

#TabsToolbar > .toolbarbutton-1:not(#alltabs-button):not(#new-tab-button) {
  -moz-appearance: none !important;
  margin: 0 !important;
  padding: 0 !important;
  background-repeat: no-repeat !important;
  background-size: 200% !important;
  -moz-border-image: url("chrome://browser/skin/tabbrowser/tab.png") 4 5 3 6 / 4px 5px 3px 6px !important;
  -moz-border-radius: 10px 8px 0 0 !important;
}

.tabbrowser-tab:not([selected="true"]),
.tabs-newtab-button,
#TabsToolbar > .toolbarbutton-1:not(#alltabs-button):not(#new-tab-button)  {
  background-position: -5px -2px !important;
  background-image: -moz-linear-gradient(top,#D2D2D2,
                                   rgba(151,160,172,.70)),
                    -moz-linear-gradient(bottom, rgba(0,0,0,.6) 25%, rgba(0,0,0,0) 75%) !important;
}

.tabbrowser-tab:not([selected="true"]):hover,
.tabs-newtab-button:hover,
#TabsToolbar > .toolbarbutton-1:not(#alltabs-button):not(#new-tab-button):hover {
  background-image: -moz-linear-gradient(top,rgba(198,201,206,.8),
                                   rgba(100,100,100,.8)),
                    -moz-linear-gradient(bottom, rgba(0,0,0,.8) 20%, rgba(0,0,0,0) 60%) !important;
}

.tabbrowser-tab:not([selected="true"]) {
  text-shadow: 0 1px 0 rgba(255,255,255,0.3) !important;
}

Thank you so much! Now I really like Firefox Beta, as I couldn't stand the transparent inactive tabs (so hard to read em).

I was also wondering is Firefox beta2 going slow for anyone? It seems to respond pretty slow. I assume this is because it's just beta and has lots of bugs to work out. Just seems very "bloated" atm.

Thank you so much! Now I really like Firefox Beta, as I couldn't stand the transparent inactive tabs (so hard to read em).

I was also wondering is Firefox beta2 going slow for anyone? It seems to respond pretty slow. I assume this is because it's just beta and has lots of bugs to work out. Just seems very "bloated" atm.

Don't say thanks , after all its Friendship day :)

Hmm , don't know why its slow @ that end , btw you are comparing it with 3.6 or chrome or beta 1? Definitely its slower than chrome , and not significantly faster than beta 1 (might be bit slower). Anyways , try a fresh profile or try "safemode" to detect the culprit addons

1. How come some add on downloads give me a connection failure error? Is it because they aren't compatible with beta 2? I have the compatibility reporter add on installed.

For me I have Flashgot and IDM, when I go into the addon page I force download the file onto my computer with Flashgot, rather than letting Firefox do it, then I double click on the downloaded file, and Firefox accepts it this way. Works for me.

Don't say thanks , after all its Friendship day :)

Hmm , don't know why its slow @ that end , btw you are comparing it with 3.6 or chrome or beta 1? Definitely its slower than chrome , and not significantly faster than beta 1 (might be bit slower). Anyways , try a fresh profile or try "safemode" to detect the culprit addons

Well 3.6 even seems to seem more "snappy" in terms of how the back/forward buttons work etc. I'm not going to compare it to chrome as that's blazing fast atm.

Is there a timeline for when everything will start reacting faster on the browser? Just seems to be very slow atm. :(

EDIT: After running safemode, it definitely seems to be going a lot faster.

Not sure what would be causing it though... I have 4 add-ons. Feedback (disabled), Firesizer (disabled), Stylish, and Firefox Sync. Is it possible Sync is slowing it down? It seems to be going slightly faster since I disabled it for now.

Well 3.6 even seems to seem more "snappy" in terms of how the back/forward buttons work etc. I'm not going to compare it to chrome as that's blazing fast atm.

Is there a timeline for when everything will start reacting faster on the browser? Just seems to be very slow atm. :(

EDIT: After running safemode, it definitely seems to be going a lot faster.

Not sure what would be causing it though... I have 4 add-ons. Feedback (disabled), Firesizer (disabled), Stylish, and Firefox Sync.

Hmm , can't help @ this. But yeah , after beta 5/6 (sept), D2D , Jaeger Monkey and other performance improvements will land , which will definitely make it super fast!?

Hmm , can't help @ this. But yeah , after beta 5/6 (sept), D2D , Jaeger Monkey and other performance improvements will land , which will definitely make it super fast!?

Yeah, I can't wait for Jaeger Monkey. I am eagerly waiting for those. :)

I think it's just me being used to Chrome for so long and needing to adjust to Firefox again, as it won't be very fast until those land like you said.

I have a annoying problem with the 4.x Minefields that persisted since the first build I used way before Beta 1. I started with a fresh profile so it can't be due to some FF 3.6 quirks.

Basically my toolbar layout resets itself every second launch. I would like to have my Stop/Reload buttons on the right side of the URL bar, if I move them there and close Minefield and open it again they stay where I moved them, if I close and relaunch Minefield a second time the Stop/Reload buttons move itself back to the left side :blink:

Anybody got a idea what's going on?^^

I have a annoying problem with the 4.x Minefields that persisted since the first build I used way before Beta 1. I started with a fresh profile so it can't be due to some FF 3.6 quirks.

Basically my toolbar layout resets itself every second launch. I would like to have my Stop/Reload buttons on the right side of the URL bar, if I move them there and close Minefield and open it again they stay where I moved them, if I close and relaunch Minefield a second time the Stop/Reload buttons move itself back to the left side :blink:

Anybody got a idea what's going on?^^

I had a problem like that, where my Firefox was resetting everything I did a couple of months ago. What I ended up doing is completely restore windows back to it's original state and that fixed the problem for me. I tried everything, and it came down to that. :(

Does anyone know if there is a userscript to move the bookmarks star to the spot where the favicon is shown on the address bar?

I had a problem like that, where my Firefox was resetting everything I did a couple of months ago. What I ended up doing is completely restore windows back to it's original state and that fixed the problem for me. I tried everything, and it came down to that. :(

Does anyone know if there is a userscript to move the bookmarks star to the spot where the favicon is shown on the address bar?

Well I would rather live with my toolbar resetting then to reset Windows :p I only have to figure out how to move them via Stylish and problem solved^^

has something changed with cookies in the last couple of nightlies? I have had endless troubles logging into websites, I keep having to clear my cookies as after a while the websites I set to remember my login wont log in. or I try to log in places but all I get is a loop, I log in (it says I logged in successfully) I then continue and find out I have been instantly logged out.

Now one site is telling me my browser doesn't support cookies and to enable them. it was ok on Friday but Saturdays and Sundays builds have been crazy!

wondering if I might need a new profile :s

has something changed with cookies in the last couple of nightlies? I have had endless troubles logging into websites, I keep having to clear my cookies as after a while the websites I set to remember my login wont log in. or I try to log in places but all I get is a loop, I log in (it says I logged in successfully) I then continue and find out I have been instantly logged out.

Now one site is telling me my browser doesn't support cookies and to enable them. it was ok on Friday but Saturdays and Sundays builds have been crazy!

wondering if I might need a new profile :s

You have to clear your cookies to get rid of the problem, at least to get rid of it for some time.

I don't think this has been backed out yet for some odd reason.

4.0b2

Getting this error on start up

typeerror: componants.classes['@softage.ru/skype/skypeffextension;1'] is undefined

I do have skype installed, but I don't recall ever installing any skype add-ons, or being asked during the skype install. There is nothing about skype in the add-ons manager or in about:config

help :(

Can anyone confirm this, on 7 when I type in "firefox.exe -profile" into the search box and press enter. It gives me a profile missing message. But the profile is intact.

Not missing for me

4.0b2

Getting this error on start up

typeerror: componants.classes['@softage.ru/skype/skypeffextension;1'] is undefined

I do have skype installed, but I don't recall ever installing any skype add-ons, or being asked during the skype install. There is nothing about skype in the add-ons manager or in about:config

help :(

It's maybe listed under plugins. You could always try uninstalling and reinstalling skype, might reinstall the plugin.

It's maybe listed under plugins. You could always try uninstalling and reinstalling skype, might reinstall the plugin.

Sorry, I did check plugins too, no mention of it there either. I'll give reinstalling it a shot.

Do you get any message. Mine just says "Your Firefox profile is either missing or unavailable." or whatever. Only when using Beta 2 though.

You're talking about any windows search box, right? I click start and paste firefox.exe -profile in there, and it shows up in the list, no message.

Well it's not highlighted in the list, so hitting enter does nothing, but if I click firefox.exe -profile in the list my skype error pops up again lol and then a new firefox window opens when I click OK to dismiss the error

So obviously the reinstall didn't work, even though I deselected the ff and ie plugin options, fingers crossed uninstalling first will work.

EDIT: Ah Ha!!! Just seen Skype Toolbars in Programs and Features.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I wonder if "put it back the way it was for decades" ever crossed their minds? 🤣
    • Rescind the stupid "Show more options" in context menus and just give us the full menu instead of adding more steps to get to what we want. The "simpler by default" makes me think they'll go in the opposite direction. Every context menu should have a configure button so you can pick and choose what options should be shown, I know you can do that with some registry fu but that shouldn't be required.
    • This is why competition must exist. Finally, pressure is mounting on Microsoft to move in the right direction.
    • Microsoft is making Windows 11's context menus faster, simpler, and configurable by Taras Buria Five years ago, Windows 11 introduced redesigned context menus, offering users a simpler, more modern design. However, customers quickly discovered that the new menus leave a lot to be desired. Many are unhappy with performance (they are really slow), while others dislike the double-layed design, where many options are hidden behind the "Show more options" button. In addition, over the years, menus became cluttered and overloaded. While Microsoft has already fixed plenty of pain points across Windows 11, context menus remain mostly unchanged. Fortunately, Microsoft is finally listening. Marcus Ash, Design and Research Lead for Windows at Microsoft, responded to a tweet on X, confirming that the company is working on fixing Windows 11's context menus. Reworked context menus are supposed to be faster, simpler by default, and "configurable to what you use most." What the latter means is unknown, just like whether Microsoft plans to keep the classic menu alongside the modern one, but according to Marcus, the wait should finally be over soon, as he promised to "share our approach soon." Improved context menus will most likely appear first in Windows 11 preview builds in the Experimental Channel. While we wait for Microsoft to release them, you can try fixing context menus on your PC with a simple tool called Windows 11 Context Menu Manager. It lets you disable entries you do not need, not only cleaning up context menus, but also making them significantly faster. Microsoft has already improved Windows 11's Start menu and taskbar, so hopefully it will address user criticism of the context menu as well. Stay tuned for new Windows 11 preview builds, which usually arrive every Friday.
    • If the drive/memory is soldered to the board, which it probably is, then it's a no from me
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      Carru_123 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Dr Jared Dental Studio earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      RG INVESTMENT GROUP earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Very Popular
      The Norwegian Drone Pilot earned a badge
      Very Popular
    • Very Popular
      s0nic69 earned a badge
      Very Popular
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      472
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      251
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      79
    4. 4
      FloatingFatMan
      67
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      60
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!