Recommended Posts

Sunspider

FF 4.0b7pre - 323ms

Chrome 7.0.517.8 - 275.6ms

V8 benchmark

FF 4.0b7pre - 2093

Chrome 7.0.517.8 - 6663

Kraken benchmark

FF 4.0b7pre - 8332.8ms

Chrome 7.0.517.8 - 15594.5ms

Thats like

1.17 times slower on SunSpider

3.18 times slower on v8

1.87 times faster on Kraken

Feels nice :D

What's the status of beta 7? There haven't been any updates on beta 7 since the 15th.

https://wiki.mozilla.org/Releases/Firefox_4.0b7

https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/buglist.cgi?quicksearch=blocking2.0:beta7+

37 blockers remain :wacko: i doubt we will see beta 7 before september is over..

https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/buglist.cgi?quicksearch=blocking2.0:beta7+

37 blockers remain :wacko: i doubt we will see beta 7 before september is over..

Given that the overall number of blockers to final is over 700 (which I believe is quite normal - many bugs are quick fixes), I don't think 37 (now 35) is a huge issue. Still have a week for it to go down (or they may just reassign some bug priorities).

I'm starting to wonder if Mozilla shouldn't delay the final release of Firefox 4.0 (planned for November) for another month or two. Neither the current beta nor the trunk builds are anywhere near the quality you'd expect the product to have 2 months before the scheduled release date.

OK this is strange and annoying. Some websites "can't be found" (eg: https://mijnzakelijk.ing.nl/internetbankieren/) but it loads fine in Chrome.

I've had this with various sites and a refresh or "try again" sometimes fixes the issue, but this is pretty flakey for the preb7 beta.

I ended up doing my payments using Chrome :/

OK this is strange and annoying. Some websites "can't be found" (eg: https://mijnzakelijk.ing.nl/internetbankieren/) but it loads fine in Chrome.

I've had this with various sites and a refresh or "try again" sometimes fixes the issue, but this is pretty flakey for the preb7 beta.

I ended up doing my payments using Chrome :/

I get there just fine, but I am using the nightly builds.

FF 23/09/2010

V8 - 2988

Sunspider 272ms

Kraken - 7273

It would be useful to include your previous results:

Sunspider

FF 4.0b7pre - 323ms

Chrome 7.0.517.8 - 275.6ms

V8 benchmark

FF 4.0b7pre - 2093

Chrome 7.0.517.8 - 6663

Kraken benchmark

FF 4.0b7pre - 8332.8ms

Chrome 7.0.517.8 - 15594.5ms

Seems like a pretty good improvement.

Have another look ! :)

Anything wrong? its 1.8714...

New results :

Sunspider

FF 4.0b7pre - 272ms

Chrome 7.0.517.8 - 275.6ms

V8 benchmark

FF 4.0b7pre - 2988

Chrome 7.0.517.8 - 6663

Kraken benchmark

FF 4.0b7pre - 7273ms

Chrome 7.0.517.8 - 15594.5ms

Thats like :

1.01 faster on SunSpider

2.29 slower on V8

2.14 faster on Kraken

Awesomer :D

Is it me or does most add-ons not display in the new "add on bar"? (used to be status bar).

No, it is not you. You can however drag and drop any thing to that bar by using customize. I do not like it as I can't see when my downloads are finished and some extensions rely on the status bar.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I really hope the author's health is ok. Squirreling away a official backup of this software. Looks like the internet archive already cached a copy as well - https://web.archive.org/web/20...ldbit-soft.fi/software.html
    • AMD is supported out of the box in linux because of their open source driver. Nvidia does not. All my systems are amd and all of them work nicely on linux arch without doing anything.
    • Never had a problem with TPM and started using that many years ago in Win10. Through several motherboards and OS versions, it just does what it does without complaint. My games library doesn't even know it's there. Secure boot does a lot more than support anti-cheat, as it came along long before anti-cheat software. I've used it religiously since before I started using TPM, and I always liked it for being able to nullify virus contagions that try their best to come in underneath the firmware during boot, so that the OS doesn't see them, etc. That is its purpose, imo. I'll never understand why people who elect to use another OS feel compelled to run down Windows... I guess they need to do that to feel secure about their choices? I run Windows because it supports all the software (including games) natively that I want to buy, and I've never had to run down another OS to make me feel better about it. (Although it's certainly possible to do that, of course...) Win10 is on a ventilator atm, and Win11 is very close to being free, and I finally got to stop running StartAllBack as I moved to the Experimental/Dev channel and my 26300.8553 build supports the moveable taskbar and it's running fine at the top of the screen! Finally, my last major dislike of Win11 is being rectified! So, I'm not at all surprised to see Win11's share of the Steam survey hitting 70%.
    • I can answer about the Linux bit. I only used AMD GPUs. I currently have a 9060XT (8GB) that fits my needs, I'm not a gamer, so I don't need that much GDDR. But lately, NVIDIA has grown a lot in the recent years. Oh, the horrors of NVIDIA drivers not working. But they have been getting better. I know a lot of members onm here that are running cachyOS and other distros, and are fine with a 4090/5090 variants. Really, though, I would stick with AMD variants.
    • Everything they say you can already do yourself on the registry by changing some things.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dedicated
      Conjor earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Dedicated
      Mark Spruce earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Collaborator
      conkir earned a badge
      Collaborator
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      479
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      252
    3. 3
      Steven P.
      71
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      69
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      68
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!