Recommended Posts

mozilla is planning on changing there development process!

http://etherpad.mozi...process-minutes

its about time some changes be made. the slow development cycle needs to be taken care of.

we are going to follow about:flags kinda mechanism , and face more of "chrome copy" :p

I have to say, and I hate that I have to say this, Firefox has finally failed me.

This browser, the same browser I've been using since before it was rechristened "Firefox", has been in development for almost 6 months now (more if you're counting the nightlies) and I've just grown so tired of waiting. I've repeatedly tried my hardest to stick with Firefox but it just isn't what it used to be anymore. It used to be THE browser to use, the one that you could use and laugh at all the people still using IE for, the browser that had all the addons, and all the other crazy cool features. But seeing as my needs of computing seem to be ever increasinly revolving around the web and webapps, I need my web browser to be as fast and stable as I feel my computer is, and Firefox just isn't cuttiing it. In the time it's taken Firefox 4 to get to its 7th beta, Opera has pushed itself through to version 11, and I'm sad to say (and happy, to an extent) that Opera has blown my expectations from a web browser out of the water. It's fast to start, renders lightning quick, and is smooth. Firefox used to be the real deal for me, the epitome of customization, but now, it's the slowest of the pack. Promises of speed and theoretical benchmark tests (some designed to score high with Firefox) don't really mean anything to me anymore.

Perhaps when Firefox finally hits stable (or, at the rate it's going, when it finally hits Beta 8), I'll find that familiar web experience in it. But until those, those of you who are tired of waiting and not getting results, I urge you to give Opera 11 a shot. It might be hard to adjust to at first, but you'll find those adjustments come well worth the change. Opera is rapidly picking up in the popularity that it deserves, I realize now how little credit I've been giving it all these years, and with its addon platforms, might even become as customizable as Firefox. Without wishing to upset anyone or start a flamewar, these are just my findings and my experiences, and if you want these Webkit-speed loading times (yes, I know Opera isn't a WebKit browser, it's not the point, Presto is also extremely fast) that everyone is talking about, give one of the other browsers a shot.

At the risk of sounding melodramatic, I'm clicking the "Stop watching topic" button now, and I'm probably never going to come back.

I have to say, and I hate that I have to say this, Firefox has finally failed me.

This browser, the same browser I've been using since before it was rechristened "Firefox", has been in development for almost 6 months now (more if you're counting the nightlies) and I've just grown so tired of waiting. I've repeatedly tried my hardest to stick with Firefox but it just isn't what it used to be anymore. It used to be THE browser to use, the one that you could use and laugh at all the people still using IE for, the browser that had all the addons, and all the other crazy cool features. But seeing as my needs of computing seem to be ever increasinly revolving around the web and webapps, I need my web browser to be as fast and stable as I feel my computer is, and Firefox just isn't cuttiing it. In the time it's taken Firefox 4 to get to its 7th beta, Opera has pushed itself through to version 11, and I'm sad to say (and happy, to an extent) that Opera has blown my expectations from a web browser out of the water. It's fast to start, renders lightning quick, and is smooth. Firefox used to be the real deal for me, the epitome of customization, but now, it's the slowest of the pack. Promises of speed and theoretical benchmark tests (some designed to score high with Firefox) don't really mean anything to me anymore.

Perhaps when Firefox finally hits stable (or, at the rate it's going, when it finally hits Beta 8), I'll find that familiar web experience in it. But until those, those of you who are tired of waiting and not getting results, I urge you to give Opera 11 a shot. It might be hard to adjust to at first, but you'll find those adjustments come well worth the change. Opera is rapidly picking up in the popularity that it deserves, I realize now how little credit I've been giving it all these years, and with its addon platforms, might even become as customizable as Firefox. Without wishing to upset anyone or start a flamewar, these are just my findings and my experiences, and if you want these Webkit-speed loading times (yes, I know Opera isn't a WebKit browser, it's not the point, Presto is also extremely fast) that everyone is talking about, give one of the other browsers a shot.

At the risk of sounding melodramatic, I'm clicking the "Stop watching topic" button now, and I'm probably never going to come back.

I'm not sure if it's worth replying to if he's, "Never going to come back." :laugh: .

Basically, use what works best for you.

At the risk of sounding melodramatic, I'm clicking the "Stop watching topic" button now, and I'm probably never going to come back.

Never say never ;) yea yea, people are bitching and whining at the ultra slow dev @ mozilla because in this ultra fast world, everything should be instant. But when FF4 is actually released, never is an impossibility. If you can't be a proper beta tester, then don't be a beta tester. People are just mad over this. Now take a break from those nightlies and 'browse' the web normally, heck there is nothing wrong with 3.6. LOL try out Opera if you must, it's the new thing I heard.

Mozilla apparently want to move to a month long release cycle, but I have my concerns with that (similar to my concerns over Chrome)

But, if they're smart on implementing new features, then maybe they won't have the same issues that Chrome run into.

I have to say, and I hate that I have to say this, Firefox has finally failed me.

This browser, the same browser I've been using since before it was rechristened "Firefox", has been in development for almost 6 months now (more if you're counting the nightlies) and I've just grown so tired of waiting. I've repeatedly tried my hardest to stick with Firefox but it just isn't what it used to be anymore. It used to be THE browser to use, the one that you could use and laugh at all the people still using IE for, the browser that had all the addons, and all the other crazy cool features. But seeing as my needs of computing seem to be ever increasinly revolving around the web and webapps, I need my web browser to be as fast and stable as I feel my computer is, and Firefox just isn't cuttiing it. In the time it's taken Firefox 4 to get to its 7th beta, Opera has pushed itself through to version 11, and I'm sad to say (and happy, to an extent) that Opera has blown my expectations from a web browser out of the water. It's fast to start, renders lightning quick, and is smooth. Firefox used to be the real deal for me, the epitome of customization, but now, it's the slowest of the pack. Promises of speed and theoretical benchmark tests (some designed to score high with Firefox) don't really mean anything to me anymore.

Perhaps when Firefox finally hits stable (or, at the rate it's going, when it finally hits Beta 8), I'll find that familiar web experience in it. But until those, those of you who are tired of waiting and not getting results, I urge you to give Opera 11 a shot. It might be hard to adjust to at first, but you'll find those adjustments come well worth the change. Opera is rapidly picking up in the popularity that it deserves, I realize now how little credit I've been giving it all these years, and with its addon platforms, might even become as customizable as Firefox. Without wishing to upset anyone or start a flamewar, these are just my findings and my experiences, and if you want these Webkit-speed loading times (yes, I know Opera isn't a WebKit browser, it's not the point, Presto is also extremely fast) that everyone is talking about, give one of the other browsers a shot.

At the risk of sounding melodramatic, I'm clicking the "Stop watching topic" button now, and I'm probably never going to come back.

Yes it is long wait. And even though i am still using Firefox myself. I agree with you on all point. Opera is properly the best browser out there technologies wise and deserve much more credit. And that is not just version 11 which somehow seems to be getting so much attention lately for NO reason. Opera has been good, since literally the very beginning!

The only problem with Opera, however is its marketing, and UI.

In my opinion, Firefox still gets the best balances Browser UI out there. ( Apart from moving the stupid Refresh button at the right recently ) And AwesomeBar is simply something i can not live without now. The speed and time saving advantage of awesomebar generally replaces any speed advantage i get with Opera or Chrome. Yes, being so much of a geek i actually timed it out, AwesomeBar saves me tones of time compare to the ms of Rendering and JavaScript.

And Firefox 4 is still the most memory efficient browsers with Multiple tabs opened. Considering version 4 actually had few bugs that increase its memory usage 100% compare to Firefox 3.6. With Those bugs fixed its advantage would be even clearer.

I dont know what happen with Firefox 4 beta 1 - 7, But if i call Firefox 4 beta 7 as Firefox 4 final, Firefox 4 beta 8 would be like Firefox 4.5 or Firefox 5. It feels so much different.

Yes Firefox Dev is Slow, but hopefully beta 8 will shine enough to change your opinion.

Hey guys, I have a few questions. Is Firefox Sync supposed to work with two different versions? (say one's running a beta and another pc is running Minefield or the final version, when that happens)

Also, if I delete settings and profiles while upgrading (I like to keep it clean between betas), would that clean up the sync? or would I be able to "get back" my settings, bookmarks, etc?

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I think it depends on what you're looking for to do, and the time you have to spare. With my Dwarf 3, I easily spend 3-4 hour sessions; half an hour driving to an un-light polluted place, another half hour unpacking and setting up the smart scope + tripod for equatorial tracking, then 15 more minutes mucking around with settings and shooting calibration frames, spending a few hours shooting, merging with past photo sessions, etc. It's crazy how time flies and I often get home later than I expected. It's something I still need to set aside a good part of an evening to do, all in all. For one session, where you often need like four for best results when it comes to deep space objects. Even with a smart scope like Dwarf 3, regular non-astro photography is still way more approachable to people getting into photography. I find this is a time consuming niche no matter how I go about it. With practice, I can probably begin cutting time here but I think where smart scopes find their home is among people who love to shoot the night sky but don't have the spare time to go deep with the "navigator level" attunement to the night sky itself in addition to everything else. Having said this, _if_ you have even more time to spend on this hobby, it will probably be even more rewarding to do it more by hand and learn the skies and the details of how it all works.
    • I misread the title and thought Teams itself would be redesigned. Imagine having this one as a native WinUI app.
    • Dell, HP PCs ran into endless reboot, BitLocker recovery loops but Windows 11 isn't to blame by Sayan Sen Last month Neowin reported on a major issue on Dell systems wherein a bug in its official support tool was leading to endless blue screen of death (BSOD) and restarts. Following our report, Dell officially acknowledged its SupportAssist-related crash issue, confirming that the culprit is not Microsoft's operating system but rather a faulty version of its own remediation software. In a newly published support advisory, Dell stated that version 5.5.16.0 of Dell SupportAssist Remediation and Alienware SupportAssist Remediation can trigger blue screen errors and unexpected system restarts. The company notes that the problematic component operates independently of the main SupportAssist application, meaning users should not remove the primary SupportAssist software when troubleshooting the issue. According to Dell, the crashes are linked specifically to the SupportAssist Remediation service, which is bundled with SupportAssist OS Recovery Tools, and as such it has since released an updated version, 5.5.16.1, which is said to resolve the problem. Affected users are advised to first verify whether version 5.5.16.0 is installed by checking the Installed Apps section in Windows Settings. If so, Dell recommends updating SupportAssist OS Recovery Tools through either SupportAssist's "Update Software" feature or Dell Command Update. Dell also advises users to back up important data before performing the update and to ensure systems remain connected to power throughout the installation process. If you are still having issues though make sure to report to the Dell support forum. As it turns out though Dell is not the only PC maker currently dealing with update-related headaches as HP is also facing a separate but probably equally frustrating issue involving recent Windows Secure Boot updates that were released with recent Windows 11 Patch Tuesdays. Similar to Dell, HP also put up its own support article where it explains the issue. The company says that affected devices could hit a brick wall when booting as they run into a BitLocker recovery loop after the April 2026 updates. The problem appears to affect systems wherein the new UEFI Secure Boot CA 2023 certificates fail to apply properly. As such affected users will find themselves entering their recovery key over and over again despite the system otherwise functioning normally. HP says such PCs should be updated to the latest available BIOS version and configured with the necessary Secure Boot certificates before installing Microsoft's Windows 11 Patch Tuesday updates. Systems that are already experiencing the problem may require BIOS configuration changes to restore normal boot behavior. Admins can find information regarding that in the support article here on HP's official website.
    • Getting further away from the artistic study of mental disease that was the first game... (which never needed any sequels to begin with) But I get it, a company has to make money. And the second was at least visually impressive, if not in any other way.
    • If its the devs fault you would think Unreal would help M$ take full advantage of Unreal and work with them to fix the performance issues. Otherwise they are catching unwarranted bad press.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dedicated
      Conjor earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      493
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      246
    3. 3
      Steven P.
      72
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      69
    5. 5
      neufuse
      68
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!