Recommended Posts

On a side note:

Has anyone else had issues with bookmarks using b8? For ex:

#1. losing any / all existing bookmarks in your profile after your update to b8. :cry:

and

#2. bookmarks imported from backed-up json or html file(s) show up when you click on bookmark navigation button in browser window, but don't appear when using Bookmark Manager / "Show All Bookmark" menu. :crazy:

<Now you see them...>

5291405414_c96866a4db.jpg

<Now you don't...>

5290802327_2cebd10f47.jpg

and

#3. any new bookmarked pages using b8 disappear when closing ff & starting new session (with saved tabs or otherwise). :angry:

I was close to that a few days ago. There were about 20-30 tabs, about 8 of them were YouTube pages, and I had them all sorted in Panorama in 3-5 different groups.

EDIT:

No bookmark issues here.

Just curious, why did you have 8 YouTube pages open?

Again, memory issues will be fixed before Final which should lower memory usage by about 40%. Currently it is about the same as Chrome and Slightly more then Opera 11.

P.S - No issues here upgrading from Beta 7 to Beta 8 on five computers. Which version are you upgrading from?

Just curious, why did you have 8 YouTube pages open?

I was watching a multi-part documentary. The uploader only had links to all the other parts in the first video, and Youtube's automatic related video thing doesn't always work right, so before I started watching, I found the rest of the videos and grouped them together. The only thing I didn't do was preload them.

most people have firefox 3.6 installed, why arent any instructions/recomendations on installing FF4?

i mean can they be installed side by side?, should i remove 3.6 first? if installed side by side and i dont like v4, can i uninstall it without mesing 3.6? (found the hard way, NO.)

if installed side by side, when ff4 reaches final, what to uninstall, or there's no need to...

most people have firefox 3.6 installed, why arent any instructions/recomendations on installing FF4?

i mean can they be installed side by side?, should i remove 3.6 first? if installed side by side and i dont like v4, can i uninstall it without mesing 3.6? (found the hard way, NO.)

if installed side by side, when ff4 reaches final, what to uninstall, or there's no need to...

If you're interested enough to try FF4 beta, then you're asking the wrong question. What you should do is read a little bit more. I know it's kinda hard, but me give you a head start. >>> http://www.mozilla.com/en-US/firefox/4.0b8/releasenotes/

Strange , open new window , close it , u get save tabs dialog (twice sometimes) , even for new window dialogs like when sharing something on fb , twitter etc

a bug is filled?

I was going to say that I saw it mentioned on Mozillazine forums, but I see that it was you that mentioned it, lol. Anyway, it works for me and I haven't come across a bug for that yet.

I was going to say that I saw it mentioned on Mozillazine forums, but I see that it was you that mentioned it, lol. Anyway, it works for me and I haven't come across a bug for that yet.

haha! :p i faced it with new profile too

Steps :

Open new window

Close it

You see "save tabs , close tabs , cancel"

OR

Click Fb Share on a youtube video (after clicking share)

close the window that opens up (dialog window)

You see same thing

Hi guys. I decided to try this out due to some issues I've been having with Firefox 3. This browser is so much faster but the UI is different so I'm not sure how to handle some addins. For example...

Download status bar - there is no bottom bar now so don't know where to check for my downloads?

Scrapbook - I see no menu entry for this so not sure how to access it.

For some reason this beta freezes for me a few seconds after opening and stays that way for about 5 sec or less. Each and everytime.

I thought it could be xmarks, and disabled it, but firefox still freezes. anyone else have this problem? or knwo how to fix it?

thanks

Same, althought im using Speed Dial, i thought it may have been that..

For some reason this beta freezes for me a few seconds after opening and stays that way for about 5 sec or less. Each and everytime.

I thought it could be xmarks, and disabled it, but firefox still freezes. anyone else have this problem? or knwo how to fix it?

thanks

You can try disabling Hardware Acceleration in the Options and restart Firefox. Not sure if it will fix your problem since it only froze on a cold start for me but maybe it's worth a try.

There already is a bug that talks about Firefox freezing on cold start with Direct2D enabled so i hope it will be fixed soon.

I believe it's you. :whistle:

i don't think it's just him.

certain sites, namely 'www.themortalkombat.com' (the forums there etc) , seem to eat more and more ram the more you refresh the pages and it just keeps going higher and never seems to free any ram back up. that's one site i noticed there definitely seems to be a ram issue with.

other than that site... i seem to be fine for the most part although ram does seem to climb up if you got your browser open for a while as i am around 323MB as i type this with 10 tabs open. (i am sure my browser been running for roughly a 24hours off the top of my head with quite a few random site loads)

p.s.it even does it (i.e. the ram issues) with the stable Firefox v3.6.

Beta 8 so far seems stable enough to use on a daily basis. Really can't wait for the final... I think once that comes out Firefox will become my favorite browser once again.

Yeah i just used Firefox 4 BETA 8 (first time using Firefox 4 as i always used Firefox 3.6) and it's good enough to use as primary browser.

i just think in overall browser smoothness that Firefox beats the competition.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • One reason it might be running hotter is dust build up within the cooling or perhaps the paste has dried out. You could always try repasting your old GPU and cleaning the cooler. Your experience in Linux will be much better with an AMD GPU; the performance in gaming is much closer to Windows than nVidia would be. I personally think on Windows, AMD drivers are junk.
    • I reviewed it back in March, but I didn't have a 5070 at the time https://www.neowin.net/reviews/amd-rx-9070-review-vs-rtx-5070-4070-and-rx-9070-xt-7800-xt--just-good-enough/ When I reviewed the 9070 I did have a 5070 to compare it against, so the scores are there for the 9070 XT. it outperforms the 5070 in raster, and is barely neck and neck in Ray Tracing. So it's better than a 5070 in everything but Ray Tracing where it is neck and neck, or just under. To be honest, the uplift from 3080 when it was new to the 9070 XT is not as great a step up. If you can find a used 4080 Super for around the same money, you would probably be better off, but if you only want to buy new then the 16GB 9070 XT is the best value for money in its category.
    • I really hope the author's health is ok. Squirreling away a official backup of this software. Looks like the internet archive already cached a copy as well - https://web.archive.org/web/20...ldbit-soft.fi/software.html
    • AMD is supported out of the box in linux because of their open source driver. Nvidia does not. All my systems are amd and all of them work nicely on linux arch without doing anything.
    • Never had a problem with TPM and started using that many years ago in Win10. Through several motherboards and OS versions, it just does what it does without complaint. My games library doesn't even know it's there. Secure boot does a lot more than support anti-cheat, as it came along long before anti-cheat software. I've used it religiously since before I started using TPM, and I always liked it for being able to nullify virus contagions that try their best to come in underneath the firmware during boot, so that the OS doesn't see them, etc. That is its purpose, imo. I'll never understand why people who elect to use another OS feel compelled to run down Windows... I guess they need to do that to feel secure about their choices? I run Windows because it supports all the software (including games) natively that I want to buy, and I've never had to run down another OS to make me feel better about it. (Although it's certainly possible to do that, of course...) Win10 is on a ventilator atm, and Win11 is very close to being free, and I finally got to stop running StartAllBack as I moved to the Experimental/Dev channel and my 26300.8553 build supports the moveable taskbar and it's running fine at the top of the screen! Finally, my last major dislike of Win11 is being rectified! So, I'm not at all surprised to see Win11's share of the Steam survey hitting 70%.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dedicated
      Conjor earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Dedicated
      Mark Spruce earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Collaborator
      conkir earned a badge
      Collaborator
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      479
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      252
    3. 3
      Steven P.
      71
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      69
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      68
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!