Recommended Posts

I keep hearing people gloat about has fast it is, but how is the text rendering? Has it improved? I've tried beta 6 and 7 but couldn't stick with it because pages look like crap.

Beta 8 font rendering looks like crap agreed, if Mozilla don't change it then 3.6 will stay on as my browser. Then again is there any performance gain to be won/lost with turning the feature off?

Turning off DirectWrite reduces the text quality, and also disables Direct2D (You don't want to mix the old API with the new API)

Edit: Oh yeah, and it also disables a bunch of other stuff like support for some international scripts and changes the way Firefox sees fonts, but that just brings it into par with previous versions. And any bugs in DirectWrite will need to be fixed by Microsoft, and it's very likely that will happen (IE9 also uses DirectWrite, and is running into the same bugs)

Beta 8 font rendering looks like crap agreed, if Mozilla don't change it then 3.6 will stay on as my browser. Then again is there any performance gain to be won/lost with turning the feature off?

Turn off hardware acceleration = less memory usage + better fonts + snappy browser UI + slow hardware accelerated sites(ie9 experiments and stuff) = better than staying @ 3.6

Beta 8 font rendering looks like crap agreed, if Mozilla don't change it then 3.6 will stay on as my browser. Then again is there any performance gain to be won/lost with turning the feature off?

I think it's better if you turn off hardware acceleration. I prefer the default font rendering:

meetfirefox40beta8neowi.png

The font rendering with Hardware Acceleration is the best reason to use FF. I have a 720p monitor that looks great with FF compared to other browsers. After finding a bug in Beta 8 & switching to Opera 11, I have returned to the gecko fold with Minefield & the freakin awesome "Stratiform" extension! I really wonder what monitor you font disturbed members are using. Maybe it's your graphics? Glaucoma? This is the best, sharpest, crisp looking fonts that are only rivaled by IE9. I found it hard to use Opera 11 after Ff. Though with Opera 11, Ff could take a look at how they get that speed, smoothest scrolling, & fast launch. Maybe Ff needs to cache itself in memory like IE9.

I turned off the hardware acceleration in beta 8 and it's now very nice and readable.

I have also noticed on sites such as PC mag, Lifehacker or Gizmodo, where in Firefox 3.6, Chrome 9 or IE9 the fonts were blurry and unreadable forcing me to "Ctrl+" a couple of times to make them readable - which buggers the images somewhat - Beta 8 with hardware acceleration off displays them beautifully thus allowing me to "Ctrl0" back to the site intended size. Nice.

I haven't noticed any increase in speed over 3.6 though. I don't care about the startup times, or memory usage, I'm more interested in the page rendering and tab opening. They all seem the same to me

@dotnetnightmare I fail to see what the monitor has to do with this problem when other browsers render the fonts nice and sharp.

I've been using beta 8 for awhile now and its awesome. :)

I took everyone's advice and turned off hardware acceleration and now everything is way more readable.

Stupid question... how are people using Greasemonkey and Stylish on b8? "This add-on has not been updated to work with your version of Firefox."... :/

Does this happen to anyone else?

I pinned Gmail as an app tab and every time I restart Firefox it always "takes to long to load."

Its fine once I refresh the page, but its really annoying...

I hardly have any add-ons, and I disabled the ones I was using and it still happens.

gmailproblem.jpg

A slight change to how text is rendered has landed in the latest nightly, at the moment it's just for Direct3D 9 users (i.e. Windows XP or people with D2D disabled), but the change now means that text should retain sub-pixel anti-aliasing everywhere (Currently it depends on the opacity of the page layer it was drawn into). The change should also be making it's way to OS X soon enough, with Direct3D 10/DirectWrite taking a bit longer.

I turned off the hardware acceleration in beta 8 and it's now very nice and readable.

...

A nicer solution is actually just to disable Direct2D (about:config > direct2d.disabled > true), you'll fall back to software rendering for the majority of content, but page display will still be hardware accelerated.

Edit: Generally you'll want to keep Direct2D/DirectWrite enabled though, speed increases are a plus and DirectWrite is just a better text rendering API than GDI is, see this example.

A nicer solution is actually just to disable Direct2D (about:config > direct2d.disabled > true), you'll fall back to software rendering for the majority of content, but page display will still be hardware accelerated.

Trying that now, fonts look ok

Well at least they're giving people the option to turn off hardware acceleration. I have a feeling I'll need to flip that switch to avoid unnecessary battery drain if FF decides to require my dedicated GPU as opposed to the integrated.

I'm still holding off on trying the betas though because I don't want to deal with messing up my 3.6 profile or managing separate profiles just to try a browser...

Well at least they're giving people the option to turn off hardware acceleration. I have a feeling I'll need to flip that switch to avoid unnecessary battery drain if FF decides to require my dedicated GPU as opposed to the integrated.

I'm still holding off on trying the betas though because I don't want to deal with messing up my 3.6 profile or managing separate profiles just to try a browser...

Why not use the portable version of Firefox 4 Beta then so you don't have to! http://portableapps.com/apps/internet/firefox_portable/test

That or a second pc but I highly doubt everyone here has that. You can even try the latest nightly minefield build as well if you really want.

Got a error messagebox on it earlier telling me the tab animation had timed out with an actual listed bug number for it.

Except for the odd copy & paste issue i get when using 4, its a brilliant browser.

Though i can't see the point in the mini menu on Windows - might as well just press 'Alt' ;)

If you find the font rendering not to your liking, open up the Start menu (Vista/7 only, XP has a Powertoy i think they're called) and type 'ClearType,' it should find the setting tweaker and you can adjust the appearance accordingly.

That bottom screenshot looks really cool. Is it a skin? and what are those 3 buttons neat the minimize button on top right of your screen?

Its a Stylish code i took form various places :p thanks to SoapHamHock and Heart-ripper majorly

Created userstyle out of it : http://userstyles.org/styles/42286

Wow, they're really pushing Beta 9 out the door. There are only 7 blockers left.

https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/buglist.cgi?quicksearch=blocking2.0%3Abeta9%2B

Yes, it's going to be a scheduled release unlike beta 8. So they're pushing out the bugs if they don't have time to fix them. It's not an indication of them fixing bugs like mad. ;) They're just postponing those to the next beta and moving them out of the beta 9 timeframe. Beta 9 will be out by mid-january unless something unexpected happens.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Windows 95 offered the ability to add and edit the right click menus, on a per file type basis. This feature seems to be missing in the new file explorer. Are they bringing it back as a "new" feature?
    • It's nearly time to replace my aging Founders Edition 3080, it doesn't OC as nicely as it used to and it's running around 10c warmer than it did when I first bought it.  I don't have budget for much more than what I spent on the 3080 and locally, that means the best GPU I can manage is a 9070XT. On this basis I have a few questions: 1. At present I don't use ray tracing, if this was to change, would this GPU be an issue? 2. How does it compare on a performance basis? 3. Are the drivers worse or better than those for nVidia? 4. Linux support, is it there? 5. Anything else I should be aware of if I were to make this change? 6. Is it a good idea or shall I try and keep the 3080 a little longer.
    • What OS is that? It looks a bit like Mac OS but the command line suggests it isn't, either way I like it!
    • Outlook classic is inherently better than new outlook, for a number of reasons. That said, if the only reason people need office is to read email, they should just use thunderbird.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Dedicated
      Mark Spruce earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Collaborator
      conkir earned a badge
      Collaborator
    • Rising Star
      olavinto went up a rank
      Rising Star
    • One Month Later
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      479
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      250
    3. 3
      Steven P.
      74
    4. 4
      FloatingFatMan
      69
    5. 5
      +Edouard
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!