Recommended Posts

Hmmm pinch.gif

By the way are you planning a Firefox theme to go with your Windows theme?

My Windows theme :blink: Maybe you mean Dom's theme? I think his theme has a lot of potential to work as a Firefox theme. Knowing us we will probably end up doing it after Minimal, TwentyTen, Metro, and all those others we have had on the back burner for a while.

There was something planned with the "Home Tab" but I think that's been scrapped.

Yeah, the Home Tab got scaled back a whole lot, currently it's just a google search box and news items from Mozilla.

Lots of stuff got scaled back/cut though, like browsing bookmark folders in content. But it can always come back in the future, since the foundation is there at least.

My Windows theme :blink: Maybe you mean Dom's theme? I think his theme has a lot of potential to work as a Firefox theme. Knowing us we will probably end up doing it after Minimal, TwentyTen, Metro, and all those others we have had on the back burner for a while.

lol yes, sorry I get you two confused some times! blush.gif

With a bunch of [softblocker] bugs which make FF4 slower than FF3.6

EDIT: What I am trying to say it that [hardblocker] bugs are not the only things you want them to fix.

Yeah, that first line made no sense. Blockers are blockers based on their specific issue ... they generally have little relevance to performance compared to 3.6 - they could be issues within new functionality, or new functionality itself.

The continued existence of a blocker doesn't mean the product is broken - just something wanted isn't there yet, which could be many things.

So what is the difference between this list of bugs:

https://bugzilla.moz...cking2.0:betan+

and this one:

https://bugzilla.moz...final%20sw:hard

first one is the list of bugs which were SUPPOSED to be fixed for the betas (soft + hard + others blockers)

while the second list has bugs which are MUST to be fixed for the betas (hard blockers)

Fonts look bad due to a Microsoft bug that is only evident when hardware acceleration is used. The best fix ATM, rather than turning hardware acceleration completely off in Options, is to just turn the text stuff off using about:config, adding an entry...... gfx.direct2d.disabled and set it to boolean TRUE and restart Firefox 4.

And now they're hiding one of the major new features of Firefox 4.0 from the user in the default config:

Actually, after talking with Limi, we've decided that the safest way forward will be to remove the Panorama button from the toolbar by default. Users can customize their toolbar to re-add it, or use the menu options to get in/out.

I'll file a bug to track that work, but for now let's take this off the list. I suspect Ian will agree, as he'd mentioned that this was one of the riskier changes left.

Source: Bugzilla@Mozilla

Read the discussion following the comment quoted above. Joe User sticks to the default settings most of the time - removing the toolbar icon makes it undiscoverable to most of the Firefox userbase. IMHO Mozilla might as well remove Panorama entirely from 4.0 and re-add it in 4.next.

Then again I consider Panorama an idea which looked good on paper, yet feels over-engineered and buggy when you actually use it.

Good grief... beta 9 is utter crap...

My window flickers like hell, it eats even more memory, it slows down fast... What the heck?

Glassed Silver:mac

Anyone know if they've fixed isolated cases of the browser freezing or stuttering on a cold start of the browser? I can easily see this happen by starting the browser, navigating to Neowin, and then scrolling up and down.

This is on beta 9 with a system that usually runs off a Intel HD Graphics chip.

I've had all these problems with beta 9, beta 8 was much better in those regards :(

Same here... beta 8 was rock solid compared to this POS...

To go even further, I much prefered any beta I tried before: 4, 6 and 8 have been awesome...

Glassed Silver:mac

Joe User sticks to the default settings most of the time - removing the toolbar icon makes it undiscoverable to most of the Firefox userbase. IMHO Mozilla might as well remove Panorama entirely from 4.0 and re-add it in 4.next.

Then again I consider Panorama an idea which looked good on paper, yet feels over-engineered and buggy when you actually use it.

Leaving it in allows them to get more feedback on it than leaving it out. Removing it is also likely a much bigger challenge.

Good grief... beta 9 is utter crap...

My window flickers like hell, it eats even more memory, it slows down fast... What the heck?

Glassed Silver:mac

Apparently *some* of beta 9's issues are fixed in a later trunk build (as problems I had with b9 I don't have with the current Minefield, which is b10pre) - some fixes failed to beat the clock?

Apparently *some* of beta 9's issues are fixed in a later trunk build (as problems I had with b9 I don't have with the current Minefield, which is b10pre) - some fixes failed to beat the clock?

I dislike Minefield's name and icon, hence I don't install it, but most likely yes I suppose...

Oh well... At this rate I will have b10 by next week or so :p

Glassed Silver:mac

Leaving it in allows them to get more feedback on it than leaving it out. Removing it is also likely a much bigger challenge.

I like TabCandy Panorama, but I think it was added a bit too late into the process, since it's been nothing but bug fixes and regressions.

I'll keep using it though, since I often have 30+ tabs open for distinct reasons.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • WhatsApp slams Isreali firm, NSO Group, for trying to spy on its users by David Uzondu WhatsApp has come out accusing Israeli cyber-intelligence firm, NSO Group, of deploying a fresh wave of highly targeted "spear phishing" attacks against users, which its security teams successfully thwarted. The Israeli firm, according to WhatsApp, ran this operation like its usual one-click phishing campaigns, trying to get people to click malicious links that lead them to external sites. To coordinate the campaign, the spyware vendor created fake test accounts and groups on the messaging app. WhatsApp said it is sharing the specific malicious domains, ikhwancast[.]com, ghazacast[.]com, and fr24cast[.]com, because potential victims need this data to check if they were targeted across other messaging systems or email platforms. The NSO Group is infamous for creating and selling Pegasus, a military-grade commercial spyware capable of silently compromising smartphones simply by sending a message or placing a missed call via apps like WhatsApp or iMessage. Users do not even have to interact with the incoming notification before the infection takes hold. Once Pegasus manages to break in, the spyware harvests private data, letting operators read private messages, emails, photos, and documents. It also tracks precise GPS locations, records keystrokes, activates the device's camera, and monitors live microphone audio. Independent investigations by cybersecurity watchdogs like The Citizen Lab and human rights organizations like Amnesty International have proven that governments use this software to track humanitarian workers, journalists, diplomats, and political dissidents. These findings directly contradict NSO Group claims that clients use the technology to spy on criminals and terrorists only. In late 2021, the U.S. Department of Commerce added the firm to its Entity List, effectively banning the vendor from buying hardware and software from American tech companies. WhatsApp said in its blog post that the spyware vendor violated a permanent court injunction with this new spear-phishing campaign. This injunction, which took effect in 2025, strictly prohibited NSO Group from targeting WhatsApp and its users. The platform is now asking a federal court to hold the firm in contempt.
    • It would be surprising if even 3 year old Apple Watches (and not SE models at that) cannot run watchOS 27. Granted, it doesn't mean it would work as well. We'll see.
    • Apple launches new website for parents and a revamped Screen Time experience by Aditya Tiwari At WWDC 2026, Apple announced new parental control features for iOS 27, iPadOS 27, and macOS 27 to keep kids' device usage in check and keep them safe online. As a parent, you'll get access to a simpler setup experience, Ask to Browse, Time Allowances, and a redesigned Screen Time. You'll be able to pick exactly which apps your child can access on their device, choosing from just a few essential apps, a curated set, or the apps you feel are appropriate. There will be an option to gradually add more apps. Ask to Browse is a new feature that requires kids to request permission before visiting a new website in Safari on iPhone, iPad, or Mac. You can also turn on a setting that requires your kid to ask for approval before connecting with an unknown contact via Messages, FaceTime, or the Phone app. You can manage your child's screen time more effectively with Time Allowances that work across categories, including Games, Entertainment, and Social Media. You can set time limits based on your kid's age and get suggestions informed by expert research. Speaking of expert guidance, Apple added that it's working with the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) to adapt its Family Media Plan to create a guide parents can refer to when using Apple products. Moreover, the company has also set up a new dedicated website, where you can find tools, resources, and answers to common questions around parental controls and child safety. Apple also allows parents to set daily schedules to manage screen time, configuring access to different apps at different times of the day and across the week. Overall, the Screen Time section has been revamped and provides a bird's-eye view of your kid's average device usage and most-used apps. "For example, to help protect important family moments, parents can quickly limit access during meals, outdoor play, and other times that deserve full attention. If kids need a little extra time to finish something in an app, parents can also easily extend access," Apple said. Apart from these, Communication Safety has been updated to block gore or violent content when detected in shared images or videos. The feature already blurs nudity in Messages and FaceTime calls, and is enabled by default for users under 18.
    • They already threw the Ultra 1st gen under the bus? It really feels like someone screwed up, and that advanced AI features will only be available on the list above but someone screwed up and said that Watch OS 27 in general will only be available for those models. I think they will pull it back. I did see someone also put a snap shot of their series 9 watch being offered the watch os 27 beta. As the backlash online is already in full swing.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Very Popular
      Captain_Eric earned a badge
      Very Popular
    • One Month Later
      amusc earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      513
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      231
    3. 3
      ATLien_0
      87
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      84
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      80
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!