Recommended Posts

I just gave up on FireFox and switched to Chrome. The beta uses WAY too much RAM.

I've had Chrome installed and used it from time to time, but it is now my default.

Sorry Mozilla, it was a good run. Hopefully they improve so I can switch back.

are you sure ?

in here the ram usage gets lower from beta to beta

beta 10 is now eats only 150 instead of 200+ in beta 9

anyone see this high ram usage

are you sure ?

in here the ram usage gets lower from beta to beta

beta 10 is now eats only 150 instead of 200+ in beta 9

anyone see this high ram usage

I have also noticed that firefox is using less ram in latest builds.

BTW, I have a question. I remember in beta 1 (not so sure) that tabs had progress bars in pie-like form. It was dropped in later betas. Are no progress bars of any kind planned for release? We have the loading indicators, but it's not the same.

Beta10 build 1 on my Mac with Snow Leopard installed does not have push-states on its buttons. I was greeted with the initial window with options to import from Safari and upon clicking Cancel I noticed that no there was no push-state. It's the same throughout the application. Wait, wasn't there some debate a loooong time ago that Firefox wasn't a good OS X citizen? Oh yeah. This just adds to that debate which is ongoing to this day.

I'm still going to try out Firefox 4 when it comes out as final.

just tried again with a fresh Firefox installation of the first build of beta 10. There's simply no response to the Cancel pillbutton in the Import window on first launch. The only time I got it to respond and give me feedback is on the "Set Firefox as the default browser" It responded to No and gave me visual feedback. Once in Preferences no pillbutton gave me any feedback as to whether they are pressed or not(I know they are but Firefox wont give me the visual feedback)

Mysterious.

I switched mice too. From my usual Marathon Mouse m705 to an old Mighty Mouse. No luck with either.

Edit.. okay, so after browsing through the different prefpanes inside Firefox preferences I got them to respond. Except for the initial launch of the Preferences window. No buttons there respond, that is until I activate the other prefpanes, then suddenly they come to life. But after a new launch of Firefox the issue is back.

Chromium Vs Firefox Nightly Ram usage on my machine.

Chromium has 13 extensions, and Firefox 10.First screenshot is with all addons/extensions disabled.The second one is with all extensions/addons enabled.In both cases Firefox uses less ram than Chromium with 4 same tabs.

post-351666-0-56372100-1295874418.png

post-351666-0-52097600-1295874441.png

Oh, they have f***ed up the UI in Beta 9. Just like Google Chrome, there is no longer any white space above the tabs when the window is maximized. After opening 4/5 tabs there is no space left to DRAG A MAXIMIZED WINDOW. And IF I CAN'T DRAG A MAXIMIZED WINDOW on Windows 7 how will I take advantage of the incredibly useful Aero Snap and Aero Shake. IE9 does it perfectly with beautiful white space above the tab bar. Until Beta 9 Firefox 4 used to have white space too. Apparently some Luddites who are used to XP and don't know how useful it is to DRAG A MAXIMIZED WINDOW on Windows 7, thought the space was wasted. This is quite pathetic.

Mt right-click menu has become a scrollable list :angry:

Any fix for this?

@ WindowsFanatic, I use the tab counter addon, that gives me a spot to use for dragging.

Is it permanent? I've had this problem before, but it usually goes away on its own. It's been a bug for me since 3.0. Tried restarting the browser?

Oh, they have f***ed up the UI in Beta 9. Just like Google Chrome, there is no longer any white space above the tabs when the window is maximized. After opening 4/5 tabs there is no space left to DRAG A MAXIMIZED WINDOW. And IF I CAN'T DRAG A MAXIMIZED WINDOW on Windows 7 how will I take advantage of the incredibly useful Aero Snap and Aero Shake. IE9 does it perfectly with beautiful white space above the tab bar. Until Beta 9 Firefox 4 used to have white space too. Apparently some Luddites who are used to XP and don't know how useful it is to DRAG A MAXIMIZED WINDOW on Windows 7, thought the space was wasted. This is quite pathetic.

Alternatively, some "Luddites" thought it would be better if tabs were easier to select. It's not like they moved the window controls to the bottom left or something, nothing has been "F'ed up". Anyway, even though there's a comparatively messier way to add an aerosnap margin through a little css edit, I think there should be an option for it.

Alternatively, some "Luddites" thought it would be better if tabs were easier to select. It's not like they moved the window controls to the bottom left or something, nothing has been "F'ed up". Anyway, even though there's a comparatively messier way to add an aerosnap margin through a little css edit, I think there should be an option for it.

I see they have discussed this issue for months here: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=572160

It's unfortunate that they have arrived at the wrong decision. But one suggestion I liked from the discussion is to replace "tab-tearing" feature from maximized windows with Aero Snap. Or of course, at least a hidden option to allow space above the tab bar. But this is a make or break feature for Aero Snap lovers like me. This reminds me of Chrome's pathetic decision to remove the option to include the bookmarks button.

P.S: Oh stupid me. Forget everything I just said because there IS a solution:

Setting browser.tabs.drawInTitlebar to false does the trick.

LOL

By the time Firefox reaches version 5.0, Chrome will be in v27.0. Not that it means anything, though. :rolleyes:

Replying to a post to how Firefox plan to speed up their release times, directly talking about Chrome's faster release cycle, you're saying it's hilarious how slow they will be? Are you from the future?

After opening 4/5 tabs there is no space left to DRAG A MAXIMIZED WINDOW.

Don't exaggerate, there is still space to do that - it's just small.

Don't exaggerate, there is still space to do that - it's just small.

He does have a point. I can find places to drag the window, but I do agree that we need a spot of free space on the title bar to drag the window. Even a 2px gap at the top of the window would suffice.

He does have a point. I can find places to drag the window, but I do agree that we need a spot of free space on the title bar to drag the window. Even a 2px gap at the top of the window would suffice.

They can't please everyone. If they add the space some people will want it removed.

If you really want that extra px or two to grab it use this:

#main-window[sizemode="maximized"] #TabsToolbar {
  padding-top: 1px !important;
}

Is it permanent? I've had this problem before, but it usually goes away on its own. It's been a bug for me since 3.0. Tried restarting the browser?

Seems to be permanent :(

Maybe I have too many items in my right click menu? Is there a threshold I can set, before it turns itself scrollable?

Oh, they have f***ed up the UI in Beta 9. Just like Google Chrome, there is no longer any white space above the tabs when the window is maximized. After opening 4/5 tabs there is no space left to DRAG A MAXIMIZED WINDOW. And IF I CAN'T DRAG A MAXIMIZED WINDOW on Windows 7 how will I take advantage of the incredibly useful Aero Snap and Aero Shake. IE9 does it perfectly with beautiful white space above the tab bar. Until Beta 9 Firefox 4 used to have white space too. Apparently some Luddites who are used to XP and don't know how useful it is to DRAG A MAXIMIZED WINDOW on Windows 7, thought the space was wasted. This is quite pathetic.

I assume the majority of people (myself included) don't drag windows all that much. Besides, to use aero snap just use the keyboard shortcuts (much easier):

Windows key (held down) + up arrow = maximise

Windows key (held down) + down arrow = minimise

Windows key (held down) + left arrow = snap to left side of screen

Windows key (held down) + right arrow = snap to right side of screen

I assume the majority of people (myself included) don't drag windows all that much. Besides, to use aero snap just use the keyboard shortcuts (much easier):

Windows key (held down) + up arrow = maximise

Windows key (held down) + down arrow = minimise

Windows key (held down) + left arrow = snap to left side of screen

Windows key (held down) + right arrow = snap to right side of screen

That, or about:config and flip browser.tabs.drawInTitlebar to false.

Edit: unrelated.. but sort of funny, since the preloading patch hit tech sites couple spammers have tried to attach fake executable patches to the bug, they have been hidden pretty quickly but pay attention if you follow the bug (there are no executable patches that you use, unless you compile the browser yourself you have to wait for a build that has the patch in it).

Thanks for the heads up, macel. I was looking for something to "install" :blush:

Right click menu seems to have fixed it self. Not sure if it's because I installed another add-on, which added yet another item to the menu, two items actually :rolleyes:

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I think it depends on what you're looking for to do, and the time you have to spare. With my Dwarf 3, I easily spend 3-4 hour sessions; half an hour driving to an un-light polluted place, another half hour unpacking and setting up the smart scope + tripod for equatorial tracking, then 15 more minutes mucking around with settings and shooting calibration frames, spending a few hours shooting, merging with past photo sessions, etc. It's crazy how time flies and I often get home later than I expected. It's something I still need to set aside a good part of an evening to do, all in all. For one session, where you often need like four for best results when it comes to deep space objects. Even with a smart scope like Dwarf 3, regular non-astro photography is still way more approachable to people getting into photography. I find this is a time consuming niche no matter how I go about it. With practice, I can probably begin cutting time here but I think where smart scopes find their home is among people who love to shoot the night sky but don't have the spare time to go deep with the "navigator level" attunement to the night sky itself in addition to everything else. Having said this, _if_ you have even more time to spend on this hobby, it will probably be even more rewarding to do it more by hand and learn the skies and the details of how it all works.
    • I misread the title and thought Teams itself would be redesigned. Imagine having this one as a native WinUI app.
    • Dell, HP PCs ran into endless reboot, BitLocker recovery loops but Windows 11 isn't to blame by Sayan Sen Last month Neowin reported on a major issue on Dell systems wherein a bug in its official support tool was leading to endless blue screen of death (BSOD) and restarts. Following our report, Dell officially acknowledged its SupportAssist-related crash issue, confirming that the culprit is not Microsoft's operating system but rather a faulty version of its own remediation software. In a newly published support advisory, Dell stated that version 5.5.16.0 of Dell SupportAssist Remediation and Alienware SupportAssist Remediation can trigger blue screen errors and unexpected system restarts. The company notes that the problematic component operates independently of the main SupportAssist application, meaning users should not remove the primary SupportAssist software when troubleshooting the issue. According to Dell, the crashes are linked specifically to the SupportAssist Remediation service, which is bundled with SupportAssist OS Recovery Tools, and as such it has since released an updated version, 5.5.16.1, which is said to resolve the problem. Affected users are advised to first verify whether version 5.5.16.0 is installed by checking the Installed Apps section in Windows Settings. If so, Dell recommends updating SupportAssist OS Recovery Tools through either SupportAssist's "Update Software" feature or Dell Command Update. Dell also advises users to back up important data before performing the update and to ensure systems remain connected to power throughout the installation process. If you are still having issues though make sure to report to the Dell support forum. As it turns out though Dell is not the only PC maker currently dealing with update-related headaches as HP is also facing a separate but probably equally frustrating issue involving recent Windows Secure Boot updates that were released with recent Windows 11 Patch Tuesdays. Similar to Dell, HP also put up its own support article where it explains the issue. The company says that affected devices could hit a brick wall when booting as they run into a BitLocker recovery loop after the April 2026 updates. The problem appears to affect systems wherein the new UEFI Secure Boot CA 2023 certificates fail to apply properly. As such affected users will find themselves entering their recovery key over and over again despite the system otherwise functioning normally. HP says such PCs should be updated to the latest available BIOS version and configured with the necessary Secure Boot certificates before installing Microsoft's Windows 11 Patch Tuesday updates. Systems that are already experiencing the problem may require BIOS configuration changes to restore normal boot behavior. Admins can find information regarding that in the support article here on HP's official website.
    • Getting further away from the artistic study of mental disease that was the first game... (which never needed any sequels to begin with) But I get it, a company has to make money. And the second was at least visually impressive, if not in any other way.
    • If its the devs fault you would think Unreal would help M$ take full advantage of Unreal and work with them to fix the performance issues. Otherwise they are catching unwarranted bad press.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dedicated
      Conjor earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      493
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      246
    3. 3
      Steven P.
      72
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      69
    5. 5
      neufuse
      68
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!