Recommended Posts

There will not be a Beta 13. I expect one or two RC's.

actually they have not ruled out the possibility of a beta 13 :\

"B12 has a small enough list of bugs that it's plausible it will be the last beta, though we're not locking that up, since some of the plugin work needs to crystallize before we can assess timing risk."

https://wiki.mozilla.org/Firefox/Planning/2011-02-02

i personally am getting fed up with using firefox 3.6 :wacko: its so slow but i refuse to use beta software either.

I thought something had changed as stratiform is kinda broken with today's nightly.

I disliked the bubble in the bottom left corner as I found it distracting so disabled it using stylish. now they have gotten rid of the hovered urls appearing in the url bar I have no way of telling if need be. I see no reason why they should have removed it from the url bar. I kinda feel this release is going backwards now in terms of the UI. :/

I hope somebody can make an add-on that brings back some of the scrapped features or it can be bought back as part of stratiform.

Well it was kinda strange to see loading messages in the lower left bar and look for hovered url in the adressbar.These both should be in the same place.The bottom left bar was the better choice and i like it.I have been using chrome for a while and got used to it showing those down there and i am happy now FF is showing them down there too.

I thought something had changed as stratiform is kinda broken with today's nightly.

I disliked the bubble in the bottom left corner as I found it distracting so disabled it using stylish. now they have gotten rid of the hovered urls appearing in the url bar I have no way of telling if need be. I see no reason why they should have removed it from the url bar. I kinda feel this release is going backwards now in terms of the UI. :/

I hope somebody can make an add-on that brings back some of the scrapped features or it can be bought back as part of stratiform.

Everyone hates that but Mozilla seems to now be a follower and stopped leading. There is an extension called Status4Evar that will fix part of this as well as an ext called URL Tooltip that will ease the distraction. I filed a Bug on this but Mozilla will not fix it.

actually they have not ruled out the possibility of a beta 13 :\

"B12 has a small enough list of bugs that it's plausible it will be the last beta, though we're not locking that up, since some of the plugin work needs to crystallize before we can assess timing risk."

https://wiki.mozilla.org/Firefox/Planning/2011-02-02

i personally am getting fed up with using firefox 3.6 :wacko: its so slow but i refuse to use beta software either.

I use the Nightly builds and they are very stable and have been for quite some time. The Final release of Firefox 4 is scheduled by the end of February. I think that they will skip Beta 13 and go directly to an RC. Beta 12 should be out tomorrow or Tuesday.

Everyone hates that but Mozilla seems to now be a follower and stopped leading. There is an extension called Status4Evar that will fix part of this as well as an ext called URL Tooltip that will ease the distraction. I filed a Bug on this but Mozilla will not fix it.

There were lots of complaints about the URL bar overlay. I haven't agreed with much of what the design team has done lately, but they seemed to really want to keep the links and status in the URL bar.

I liked it, personally. I use a 1080p monitor with Firefox maximized and the Omnibar extension installed, so it didn't affect me, but it wasn't very practical for netbook users and the like.

Also, Status4Evar seems to be broken now. I'm not getting anything in the bottom corner or the URL bar.

actually they have not ruled out the possibility of a beta 13 :\

"B12 has a small enough list of bugs that it's plausible it will be the last beta, though we're not locking that up, since some of the plugin work needs to crystallize before we can assess timing risk."

https://wiki.mozilla.org/Firefox/Planning/2011-02-02

i personally am getting fed up with using firefox 3.6 :wacko: its so slow but i refuse to use beta software either.

i know what you mean, ff 3.6 was pssing me off with how slow it was + crashing, also checking out this thread for new firefox awesomness didn't help.

i've been using beta10 for the last 4 days (as my main browser), it actually seems more stable than 3.6 (but that's probably bcos of all extensions i had installed)

There were lots of complaints about the URL bar overlay. I haven't agreed with much of what the design team has done lately, but they seemed to really want to keep the links and status in the URL bar.

I liked it, personally. I use a 1080p monitor with Firefox maximized and the Omnibar extension installed, so it didn't affect me, but it wasn't very practical for netbook users and the like.

Also, Status4Evar seems to be broken now. I'm not getting anything in the bottom corner or the URL bar.

S4E is not broken if you are using the latest release Status-4-Evar 2011.01.17.02.3 . There also is an extension called Status Address Bar 1.7 that places the status back into the URL Bar. S4E has an option to hide the other Status text. It seems that Mozilla does not know when they have a good thing.

i know what you mean, ff 3.6 was pssing me off with how slow it was + crashing, also checking out this thread for new firefox awesomness didn't help.

i've been using beta10 for the last 4 days (as my main browser), it actually seems more stable than 3.6 (but that's probably bcos of all extensions i had installed)

im just afraid to use beta software incase it brakes something or is really buggy.. i might upgrade once release candidate is out tho because there wont be much of a change between RC and Final.. wasnt 3.6 RC2 the same as 3.6 final just took off the RC name with no additional bug fixes, etc.?

oh yeah they did say they wont build beta 12 till the beta N blockers are all fixed and than the rest of the blockers are on the release candidate build.

They already have 3 Beta 12 candidates. I was using one this morning. It is fast and stable. As previously stated B12 will be out either tomorrow or Tuesday.

They already have 3 Beta 12 candidates. I was using one this morning. It is fast and stable. As previously stated B12 will be out either tomorrow or Tuesday.

there is no beta 12 yet.. you must be refearing to beta 11 and no it wont be out tomorrow is sunday.. it will be out monday afternoon sometime.. beta 12 is most likely to be out the week of feb 14 at the earliest.

there is no beta 12 yet.. you must be refearing to beta 11 and no it wont be out tomorrow is sunday.. it will be out monday afternoon sometime.. beta 12 is most likely to be out the week of feb 14 at the earliest.

Yes you are right, Beta 11. Beta 11 will be out on Monday or Tuesday. Sorry for the confusion. There was talk about Beta 12 being out very soon/days after 11. We will see.

I don't get why people are getting so mad about it coming out later then expected. I'd rather have a product that is finished and less bugs, then a product that rushes out their product and has so many annoying bugs (like Google did with Chrome).

The nightly builds of Firefox are almost completely stable for me atm and have no problem waiting for the final to come out, to work out the remaining major bugs.

I don't get why people are getting so mad about it coming out later then expected. I'd rather have a product that is finished and less bugs, then a product that rushes out their product and has so many annoying bugs (like Google did with Chrome).

The nightly builds of Firefox are almost completely stable for me atm and have no problem waiting for the final to come out, to work out the remaining major bugs.

Because any version other than 4.0 is slow and outdated and many people don't use beta software and want the final stable version already.

Because any version other than 4.0 is slow and outdated and many people don't use beta software and want the final stable version already.

Well, I'd rather wait for Mozilla to take their time fixing bugs, rather then releasing it already with bugs still not worked out. Either use another browser for the time being or simply wait.

I'm just waiting because I don't like the other browsers really

Then you don't need to wait. If your not going to use it why wait. It is stable in it's present form and today's nightly is far superior than any other released browser on the market.

Then you don't need to wait. If your not going to use it why wait. It is stable in it's present form and today's nightly is far superior than any other released browser on the market.

That's right! Rock solid for me.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I think it depends on what you're looking for to do, and the time you have to spare. With my Dwarf 3, I easily spend 3-4 hour sessions; half an hour driving to an un-light polluted place, another half hour unpacking and setting up the smart scope + tripod for equatorial tracking, then 15 more minutes mucking around with settings and shooting calibration frames, spending a few hours shooting, merging with past photo sessions, etc. It's crazy how time flies and I often get home later than I expected. It's something I still need to set aside a good part of an evening to do, all in all. For one session, where you often need like four for best results when it comes to deep space objects. Even with a smart scope like Dwarf 3, regular non-astro photography is still way more approachable to people getting into photography. I find this is a time consuming niche no matter how I go about it. With practice, I can probably begin cutting time here but I think where smart scopes find their home is among people who love to shoot the night sky but don't have the spare time to go deep with the "navigator level" attunement to the night sky itself in addition to everything else. Having said this, _if_ you have even more time to spend on this hobby, it will probably be even more rewarding to do it more by hand and learn the skies and the details of how it all works.
    • I misread the title and thought Teams itself would be redesigned. Imagine having this one as a native WinUI app.
    • Dell, HP PCs ran into endless reboot, BitLocker recovery loops but Windows 11 isn't to blame by Sayan Sen Last month Neowin reported on a major issue on Dell systems wherein a bug in its official support tool was leading to endless blue screen of death (BSOD) and restarts. Following our report, Dell officially acknowledged its SupportAssist-related crash issue, confirming that the culprit is not Microsoft's operating system but rather a faulty version of its own remediation software. In a newly published support advisory, Dell stated that version 5.5.16.0 of Dell SupportAssist Remediation and Alienware SupportAssist Remediation can trigger blue screen errors and unexpected system restarts. The company notes that the problematic component operates independently of the main SupportAssist application, meaning users should not remove the primary SupportAssist software when troubleshooting the issue. According to Dell, the crashes are linked specifically to the SupportAssist Remediation service, which is bundled with SupportAssist OS Recovery Tools, and as such it has since released an updated version, 5.5.16.1, which is said to resolve the problem. Affected users are advised to first verify whether version 5.5.16.0 is installed by checking the Installed Apps section in Windows Settings. If so, Dell recommends updating SupportAssist OS Recovery Tools through either SupportAssist's "Update Software" feature or Dell Command Update. Dell also advises users to back up important data before performing the update and to ensure systems remain connected to power throughout the installation process. If you are still having issues though make sure to report to the Dell support forum. As it turns out though Dell is not the only PC maker currently dealing with update-related headaches as HP is also facing a separate but probably equally frustrating issue involving recent Windows Secure Boot updates that were released with recent Windows 11 Patch Tuesdays. Similar to Dell, HP also put up its own support article where it explains the issue. The company says that affected devices could hit a brick wall when booting as they run into a BitLocker recovery loop after the April 2026 updates. The problem appears to affect systems wherein the new UEFI Secure Boot CA 2023 certificates fail to apply properly. As such affected users will find themselves entering their recovery key over and over again despite the system otherwise functioning normally. HP says such PCs should be updated to the latest available BIOS version and configured with the necessary Secure Boot certificates before installing Microsoft's Windows 11 Patch Tuesday updates. Systems that are already experiencing the problem may require BIOS configuration changes to restore normal boot behavior. Admins can find information regarding that in the support article here on HP's official website.
    • Getting further away from the artistic study of mental disease that was the first game... (which never needed any sequels to begin with) But I get it, a company has to make money. And the second was at least visually impressive, if not in any other way.
    • If its the devs fault you would think Unreal would help M$ take full advantage of Unreal and work with them to fix the performance issues. Otherwise they are catching unwarranted bad press.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dedicated
      Conjor earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      493
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      246
    3. 3
      Steven P.
      72
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      69
    5. 5
      neufuse
      68
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!