Recommended Posts

There will not be a Beta 13. I expect one or two RC's.

actually they have not ruled out the possibility of a beta 13 :\

"B12 has a small enough list of bugs that it's plausible it will be the last beta, though we're not locking that up, since some of the plugin work needs to crystallize before we can assess timing risk."

https://wiki.mozilla.org/Firefox/Planning/2011-02-02

i personally am getting fed up with using firefox 3.6 :wacko: its so slow but i refuse to use beta software either.

I thought something had changed as stratiform is kinda broken with today's nightly.

I disliked the bubble in the bottom left corner as I found it distracting so disabled it using stylish. now they have gotten rid of the hovered urls appearing in the url bar I have no way of telling if need be. I see no reason why they should have removed it from the url bar. I kinda feel this release is going backwards now in terms of the UI. :/

I hope somebody can make an add-on that brings back some of the scrapped features or it can be bought back as part of stratiform.

Well it was kinda strange to see loading messages in the lower left bar and look for hovered url in the adressbar.These both should be in the same place.The bottom left bar was the better choice and i like it.I have been using chrome for a while and got used to it showing those down there and i am happy now FF is showing them down there too.

I thought something had changed as stratiform is kinda broken with today's nightly.

I disliked the bubble in the bottom left corner as I found it distracting so disabled it using stylish. now they have gotten rid of the hovered urls appearing in the url bar I have no way of telling if need be. I see no reason why they should have removed it from the url bar. I kinda feel this release is going backwards now in terms of the UI. :/

I hope somebody can make an add-on that brings back some of the scrapped features or it can be bought back as part of stratiform.

Everyone hates that but Mozilla seems to now be a follower and stopped leading. There is an extension called Status4Evar that will fix part of this as well as an ext called URL Tooltip that will ease the distraction. I filed a Bug on this but Mozilla will not fix it.

actually they have not ruled out the possibility of a beta 13 :\

"B12 has a small enough list of bugs that it's plausible it will be the last beta, though we're not locking that up, since some of the plugin work needs to crystallize before we can assess timing risk."

https://wiki.mozilla.org/Firefox/Planning/2011-02-02

i personally am getting fed up with using firefox 3.6 :wacko: its so slow but i refuse to use beta software either.

I use the Nightly builds and they are very stable and have been for quite some time. The Final release of Firefox 4 is scheduled by the end of February. I think that they will skip Beta 13 and go directly to an RC. Beta 12 should be out tomorrow or Tuesday.

Everyone hates that but Mozilla seems to now be a follower and stopped leading. There is an extension called Status4Evar that will fix part of this as well as an ext called URL Tooltip that will ease the distraction. I filed a Bug on this but Mozilla will not fix it.

There were lots of complaints about the URL bar overlay. I haven't agreed with much of what the design team has done lately, but they seemed to really want to keep the links and status in the URL bar.

I liked it, personally. I use a 1080p monitor with Firefox maximized and the Omnibar extension installed, so it didn't affect me, but it wasn't very practical for netbook users and the like.

Also, Status4Evar seems to be broken now. I'm not getting anything in the bottom corner or the URL bar.

actually they have not ruled out the possibility of a beta 13 :\

"B12 has a small enough list of bugs that it's plausible it will be the last beta, though we're not locking that up, since some of the plugin work needs to crystallize before we can assess timing risk."

https://wiki.mozilla.org/Firefox/Planning/2011-02-02

i personally am getting fed up with using firefox 3.6 :wacko: its so slow but i refuse to use beta software either.

i know what you mean, ff 3.6 was pssing me off with how slow it was + crashing, also checking out this thread for new firefox awesomness didn't help.

i've been using beta10 for the last 4 days (as my main browser), it actually seems more stable than 3.6 (but that's probably bcos of all extensions i had installed)

There were lots of complaints about the URL bar overlay. I haven't agreed with much of what the design team has done lately, but they seemed to really want to keep the links and status in the URL bar.

I liked it, personally. I use a 1080p monitor with Firefox maximized and the Omnibar extension installed, so it didn't affect me, but it wasn't very practical for netbook users and the like.

Also, Status4Evar seems to be broken now. I'm not getting anything in the bottom corner or the URL bar.

S4E is not broken if you are using the latest release Status-4-Evar 2011.01.17.02.3 . There also is an extension called Status Address Bar 1.7 that places the status back into the URL Bar. S4E has an option to hide the other Status text. It seems that Mozilla does not know when they have a good thing.

i know what you mean, ff 3.6 was pssing me off with how slow it was + crashing, also checking out this thread for new firefox awesomness didn't help.

i've been using beta10 for the last 4 days (as my main browser), it actually seems more stable than 3.6 (but that's probably bcos of all extensions i had installed)

im just afraid to use beta software incase it brakes something or is really buggy.. i might upgrade once release candidate is out tho because there wont be much of a change between RC and Final.. wasnt 3.6 RC2 the same as 3.6 final just took off the RC name with no additional bug fixes, etc.?

oh yeah they did say they wont build beta 12 till the beta N blockers are all fixed and than the rest of the blockers are on the release candidate build.

They already have 3 Beta 12 candidates. I was using one this morning. It is fast and stable. As previously stated B12 will be out either tomorrow or Tuesday.

They already have 3 Beta 12 candidates. I was using one this morning. It is fast and stable. As previously stated B12 will be out either tomorrow or Tuesday.

there is no beta 12 yet.. you must be refearing to beta 11 and no it wont be out tomorrow is sunday.. it will be out monday afternoon sometime.. beta 12 is most likely to be out the week of feb 14 at the earliest.

there is no beta 12 yet.. you must be refearing to beta 11 and no it wont be out tomorrow is sunday.. it will be out monday afternoon sometime.. beta 12 is most likely to be out the week of feb 14 at the earliest.

Yes you are right, Beta 11. Beta 11 will be out on Monday or Tuesday. Sorry for the confusion. There was talk about Beta 12 being out very soon/days after 11. We will see.

I don't get why people are getting so mad about it coming out later then expected. I'd rather have a product that is finished and less bugs, then a product that rushes out their product and has so many annoying bugs (like Google did with Chrome).

The nightly builds of Firefox are almost completely stable for me atm and have no problem waiting for the final to come out, to work out the remaining major bugs.

I don't get why people are getting so mad about it coming out later then expected. I'd rather have a product that is finished and less bugs, then a product that rushes out their product and has so many annoying bugs (like Google did with Chrome).

The nightly builds of Firefox are almost completely stable for me atm and have no problem waiting for the final to come out, to work out the remaining major bugs.

Because any version other than 4.0 is slow and outdated and many people don't use beta software and want the final stable version already.

Because any version other than 4.0 is slow and outdated and many people don't use beta software and want the final stable version already.

Well, I'd rather wait for Mozilla to take their time fixing bugs, rather then releasing it already with bugs still not worked out. Either use another browser for the time being or simply wait.

I'm just waiting because I don't like the other browsers really

Then you don't need to wait. If your not going to use it why wait. It is stable in it's present form and today's nightly is far superior than any other released browser on the market.

Then you don't need to wait. If your not going to use it why wait. It is stable in it's present form and today's nightly is far superior than any other released browser on the market.

That's right! Rock solid for me.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • add $200 and get DWARF 3 model add $2000 and visit scientists center in your town add $20000 and visit the biggest telescope in Chile
    • Guess it's one of those things best used by devs to thoroughly test stuff.
    • is it all upside down there? traffic lights reverted too?
    • Bluesky COO warns social media regulations could destroy competition from small startups by Paul Hill Fears that increasing government control of social media risks regulatory capture by the biggest social media firms were raised again recently. Bluesky’s chief operating officer said in an interview that social media bans for children and tighter regulations for social media firms risk creating a world where there are only a few social media platforms run by companies with the deepest pockets. Regulations on social media firms have been very lax since they appeared for mainstream users in the 2000’s. This gave Meta, Snapchat, and Google time to build up their user bases and get entrenched, with Meta being the most successful. Now that Meta has succeeded, it has been attempting regulatory capture. By pushing for more regulations of social media, Meta hopes to make it more difficult for rivals to challenge it. For its part, it doesn’t need to worry about the cost of regulation because it has a lot of money to spend, whereas startups do not. Speaking to CNBC, Rose Wang, Bluesky’s chief operating officer, said: “I support the protection and the safety of youth, the question that we have then is at what cost, because essentially what I’m scared of is in the long term, we’re headed to a world where there’s about three to five platforms, and extreme heavy regulation of those platforms, and basically the whole compliance teams of these platforms are 10 times the size of our entire team. So, basically, we’re living in a world where it’s almost impossible for smaller entrants to come in and build healthier spaces. These platforms have led to a place where the bottom line is the thing that drives what they do... so I understand why governments have to step in and regulate, because the platforms have done nothing right.” She said that while she is not against regulation, there needs to be more channels between the small to mid-sized players and regulators to help protect them. She says that big tech players, on the other hand, “who we know are circumventing regulation,” need to be regulated. Essentially, the Bluesky position is one of nuance, rather than absolutes. While Bluesky’s proposal may preserve competition in the social media space, it still doesn’t address the massive privacy implications these age verification measures introduce, such as handing over sensitive identity documents to access age-gated content. Source: CNBC
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dedicated
      Conjor earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      493
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      249
    3. 3
      Steven P.
      71
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      70
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!