Recommended Posts

http://canweshipyet.com/

only 16 hard blockers left :whistle:

I wish they'd add a couple more to that. The bouncing on the sides for aero is incredibly annoying when window is not maximized and the text rendering with Hardware acceleration off is pretty bad as well.

I wish they'd add a couple more to that. The bouncing on the sides for aero is incredibly annoying when window is not maximized and the text rendering with Hardware acceleration off is pretty bad as well.

It must be your computer I have not had either problems on mine.

It must be your computer I have not had either problems on mine.

It's not my computer, it's known bugs already.

https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=632423

For instance go here and look on the left black menu: http://www.disney.co.uk/disney-parks/

Can't find the aero bouncing one atm. I'm talking about nightlies though not sure if your using beta or the nightlies. On nightly for instance if you hover over "Edit" button on here the aero part on left and right move or "bounce".

Another annoying one is the entire Aero border is too thick:

https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=618353

All problems though sound like they will not be fixed until Firefox 5.0 though :(

Just tried watching a Flash video in the Beta 12 nightly and for some reason flash "flashes" in it. Using the same plugin on the stable version (3.6.13) it doesn't flicker. This is using Beta 12 64 bit on Ubuntu Linux.

Because they are not important.

1.I almost never use the browser not maximized so i don't see the "bouncing aero"

2.i don't care about border thickness because of 1. (is 1 pixel that big a difference?)

3.I use HA so i don't get this bug either

Well a lot of people do use their browser not maximized... and HA is terrible until they fix the bug where you can read text on white backgrounds without it being blurry. "About:home" looks awful on the address bar.

And the border bugs are negligible (really 1 pix and the "bouncing" aero).

It's an issue of consistency. That's one thing I liked about OSX (though recently they've been diverging away from it), is that the UI is consistent (not trying to start a flame war, I'm a Windows 7 user through and through). In Windows, everything is all over the place. Yes it's only 1 pixel but it's NOT consistent with the rest of the windows and it needs to be addressed, same with the "bouncing" aero.

Some people may not care about the visuals as long as the program works but the UI is what the user sees, it is critical and it kills me to see how inconsistent the UI is in Windows (going off topic beyond Firefox). Microsoft should implement some restrictions which wouldn't allow Mozilla programmers to have a thicker or thinner border and going beyond that such as custom themes (i.e. iTunes, Nokia Ovi Suite, Yahoo Messenger, Quicktime to name a few)

  • Like 2

It's an issue of consistency. That's one thing I liked about OSX (though recently they've been diverging away from it), is that the UI is consistent (not trying to start a flame war, I'm a Windows 7 user through and through). In Windows, everything is all over the place. Yes it's only 1 pixel but it's NOT consistent with the rest of the windows and it needs to be addressed, same with the "bouncing" aero.

Some people may not care about the visuals as long as the program works but the UI is what the user sees, it is critical and it kills me to see how inconsistent the UI is in Windows (going off topic beyond Firefox). Microsoft should implement some restrictions which wouldn't allow Mozilla programmers to have a thicker or thinner border and going beyond that such as custom themes (i.e. iTunes, Nokia Ovi Suite, Yahoo Messenger, Quicktime to name a few)

I completely agree about the inconsistent UI on Windows. It's a shame that most developers do not make a greater effort to make their software look like it belongs in Windows; such as those developers that insist on not having Aero borders.

Currently I have disabled Hardware Acceleration. The reason is while browsing random websites the screen goes black for 2-3 seconds and resumes normal activity.

I know many of you would point to faulty drivers, bad GPU etc.

Below is the spec

Windows 7 (64-bit)

Lenovo T410

Nvidia NVS 3100M

Driver running latest 8.15.10.2253

Currently I have disabled Hardware Acceleration. The reason is while browsing random websites the screen goes black for 2-3 seconds and resumes normal activity.

I know many of you would point to faulty drivers, bad GPU etc.

Make sure you report it to Mozilla.

How can there be two parts to one bug? Right now there are two blockers. There's a part 1 and a part 2.

bug https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=634590 failed automated tests after it landed. Bugs that fail tests generally spawn another bug to 'fix the tests' - thus part 2

part 2 bug: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=635582 to fix the tests.

There is some discussion they might just drop this for 4.0 - but that's not been made for sure yet. Seems to be folks still pro & con on the issue.

yeah i noticed the font is a little bit blurry on beta 11 and the nightlies too but i have no idea why it is like that.

After looking into it more, apparently IE9 uses GDI type font on a ton of websites. Fx4 is not. I guess that explains it mostly for me at least, as I prefer how Firefox 3.6.x handles fonts, but cannot stand it's handling of fonts on menu's.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • add $200 and get DWARF 3 model add $2000 and visit scientists center in your town add $20000 and visit the biggest telescope in Chile
    • Guess it's one of those things best used by devs to thoroughly test stuff.
    • is it all upside down there? traffic lights reverted too?
    • Bluesky COO warns social media regulations could destroy competition from small startups by Paul Hill Fears that increasing government control of social media risks regulatory capture by the biggest social media firms were raised again recently. Bluesky’s chief operating officer said in an interview that social media bans for children and tighter regulations for social media firms risk creating a world where there are only a few social media platforms run by companies with the deepest pockets. Regulations on social media firms have been very lax since they appeared for mainstream users in the 2000’s. This gave Meta, Snapchat, and Google time to build up their user bases and get entrenched, with Meta being the most successful. Now that Meta has succeeded, it has been attempting regulatory capture. By pushing for more regulations of social media, Meta hopes to make it more difficult for rivals to challenge it. For its part, it doesn’t need to worry about the cost of regulation because it has a lot of money to spend, whereas startups do not. Speaking to CNBC, Rose Wang, Bluesky’s chief operating officer, said: “I support the protection and the safety of youth, the question that we have then is at what cost, because essentially what I’m scared of is in the long term, we’re headed to a world where there’s about three to five platforms, and extreme heavy regulation of those platforms, and basically the whole compliance teams of these platforms are 10 times the size of our entire team. So, basically, we’re living in a world where it’s almost impossible for smaller entrants to come in and build healthier spaces. These platforms have led to a place where the bottom line is the thing that drives what they do... so I understand why governments have to step in and regulate, because the platforms have done nothing right.” She said that while she is not against regulation, there needs to be more channels between the small to mid-sized players and regulators to help protect them. She says that big tech players, on the other hand, “who we know are circumventing regulation,” need to be regulated. Essentially, the Bluesky position is one of nuance, rather than absolutes. While Bluesky’s proposal may preserve competition in the social media space, it still doesn’t address the massive privacy implications these age verification measures introduce, such as handing over sensitive identity documents to access age-gated content. Source: CNBC
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dedicated
      Conjor earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      493
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      249
    3. 3
      Steven P.
      71
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      70
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!