Recommended Posts

Firefox isn't going anywhere, market share might go up and down but we're not at the point where we need just 1 or 2 browsers.

Edit: And having just IE and Chrome would slow down progress again since it'd stall specs.

For the foreseeable future, there will be five browser: IE, Chrome, FF, Opera, and Safari. Should keep the competition and innovation healthy, and really can't think of any other major players that would want to invest in building a new browser. Only Facebook has a potential reason and the money to do so, but would be a waste of resources for them.

IE (excluding IE9) and Chrome are basically swapping marketshare, while the other three are have been pretty stead over the past year. Should get interesting from this month forward after IE9 and FF4 releases to see how users decide which browser is best for them.

Awesome find , also one must consider that Firefox 4 compared to Firefox 3.6 is AGGEESSS AHEEADD and the time taken seems less to me sometimes , its just that they failed to deliver products at the time they promised (or rather targeted in wiki notes and we took it as promise) , that's what made us feel they are slow , if they had said Firefox 4 would come next year Q1 , no one would have said development is slow

I feel Mozilla development process is slow because when they release new features in FF, they are usually old, and other browsers already had them for a while (like decent UI on Windows, addon manager as a tab, bookmarks sync, etc.). The only thing Mozilla can do quickly? Mockups. Unfortunately, making those pictures real takes them forever ...

Install latest beta from here: https://adblockplus.org/devbuilds/adblockplus/

I managed to get the 1.3.3 installed without any issue yesterday, but I didn't realize that there are newer builds released over the past few weeks.

Did Mozilla change the font or font effects with FF4? I've installed a few previous betas, now I'm using FF4b12. There is something different about the font style or effect. It either reminds me of looking at text in Safari or looking at text on an old flat screen crt trinitron monitor. Its hard for me to explain but, something is different about it. Any input?

Can't bring myself to use Firefox 4 simply because of the enormous start-up time. I sometimes wonder if it'll load at all and then pop it appears. Using beta 12.

In comparison, Chrome 10 is up in under a second from cold boot.

I have a 3GHz Core2Duo laptop with 4GB of RAM and Firefox 4 is taking 7 seconds to be usable from a warm (but not recent) boot and much longer for a cold boot. A warm and recent boot is pretty much instant, like all apps in Windows 7 though.

Firefox 4 uses DirectWrite instead of GDI, so text looks different (but the same as other DirectWrite apps like the XPS viewer or IE9)

Edit: If you don't like it, you can disable DirectWrite and Direct2D in about:config (search for "direct2d")

I did that and two listings came up the first one was "gfx.direct2d.disabled". I "toggled" or double clicked it and it bolded that line. I re-started FF and now its not nearly as bad on my eyes. The second listing was this "gfx.direct2d.force-enabled" I didn't touch that one. What is it though?

like the ability to manually add search engines, which is something I find essential for fast/convenient browsing.

http://kb.mozillazine.org/Search_Bar

http://support.mozilla.com/en-US/kb/search%20bar

http://lifehacker.com/#!196779/hack-attack-firefox-and-the-art-of-keyword-bookmarking

http://www.mozilla.org/docs/end-user/keywords.html

What more adding of search engines do you need?

Please consider what you say just a little bit more... Check your facts before you become an internet liar.

How funny does that last part sound hehe

Can't bring myself to use Firefox 4 simply because of the enormous start-up time. I sometimes wonder if it'll load at all and then pop it appears. Using beta 12.

In comparison, Chrome 10 is up in under a second from cold boot.

I have a 3GHz Core2Duo laptop with 4GB of RAM and Firefox 4 is taking 7 seconds to be usable from a warm (but not recent) boot and much longer for a cold boot. A warm and recent boot is pretty much instant, like all apps in Windows 7 though.

It takes me around that much time on warm boot as well but I don't find it annoying. Chrome (in my case) takes as much time as well when filled with webapps though. But I agree, they need to find a way to trim down the warm boot time but I don't think it should be a priority.

I did that and two listings came up the first one was "gfx.direct2d.disabled". I "toggled" or double clicked it and it bolded that line. I re-started FF and now its not nearly as bad on my eyes. The second listing was this "gfx.direct2d.force-enabled" I didn't touch that one. What is it though?

DirectWrite, or the options?

DirectWrite is a new hardware accelerated text rendering API designed to replace GDI. GDI at it's core is designed for CRT screens, and is incapable of taking advantage of LCD screens (And can't be made to do so without breaking programs). One side effect is that since the glyphs are no longer forced to take up a whole pixel, some people say it's "blurry" (Which is one of the complaints thrown at Quartz on OS X, which doesn't have the GDI limitations)

DirectWrite is linked to Direct2D, you can mix them but it's so buggy and slow that you don't want to do that (DirectWrite and no Direct2D results in black pixels everywhere, Direct2D with no DirectWrite slows down the browser terribly)

As for the options, "gfx.direct2d.disabled" is self explanatory, and "gfx.direct2d.force-enabled" is there for forcing Direct2D to be enabled when it would otherwise be disabled (due to old drivers, blocked hardware, etc.)

DirectWrite, or the options?

DirectWrite is a new hardware accelerated text rendering API designed to replace GDI. GDI at it's core is designed for CRT screens, and is incapable of taking advantage of LCD screens (And can't be made to do so without breaking programs). One side effect is that since the glyphs are no longer forced to take up a whole pixel, some people say it's "blurry" (Which is one of the complaints thrown at Quartz on OS X, which doesn't have the GDI limitations)

DirectWrite is linked to Direct2D, you can mix them but it's so buggy and slow that you don't want to do that (DirectWrite and no Direct2D results in black pixels everywhere, Direct2D with no DirectWrite slows down the browser terribly)

As for the options, "gfx.direct2d.disabled" is self explanatory, and "gfx.direct2d.force-enabled" is there for forcing Direct2D to be enabled when it would otherwise be disabled (due to old drivers, blocked hardware, etc.)

Thanks for your help. I have a LCD and with that change in FF4. It was hard to read. I could read it but, it strained my eyes and was uncomfortable to look at. Toggling the first option changed it back. Thank you. Its a lot easier on my eyes now. Its funny because, I have IE9 installed as well and I didn't notice they were using it too until you said so. I notice it now but, it wasn't nearly as bad as it was on FF4.

Does anyone know how to keep Firefox 4 bookmark button keeps open-window or drop list after middle-clicking to open a bookmark site in the background? It's so annoyance to reclick the bookmark button if you want to open may background tab in your bookmark.

I use Stay open menu:

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-us/firefox/addon/stay-open-menu/

Firefox 4 uses DirectWrite instead of GDI, so text looks different (but the same as other DirectWrite apps like the XPS viewer or IE9)

Edit: If you don't like it, you can disable DirectWrite and Direct2D in about:config (search for "direct2d")

I wonder if turning of 'Use Hardware Acceleration When Available' in the Options > Advanced tab does the same thing .. or not?

I'm sure I read something about this a couple of weeks ago .. can't remember where now ..

Anybody know for sure?

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Spyro: A Realm Beyond revealed by Toys for Bob, the first new entry after almost 20 years by Pulasthi Ariyasinghe The Xbox Games Showcase had a surprise reveal from Activision that wasn't related to Call of Duty. The Microsoft-owned publisher revealed a brand-new Spyro game, confirming the return of the series that last had a brand-new entry appear nearly 20 years ago. Watch the new Spyro: A Realm Beyond trailer above, which shows off a new look for the iconic dragon. While most of the trailer is a rendered cinematic, the very end does feature a snippet of gameplay captured on PC. The development team working on this project is Toys for Bob. This is the same studio that delivered the Spyro Reignited Trilogy remasters that brought back the original games for fans. "We are huge Spyro fans ourselves and we are so excited that 'the adventure continues'," says Toys For Bob Studio Head, Paul Yan. "I know the wait has been excruciating but we’re so thrilled to finally come out of stealth and confirm that a new Spyro game is indeed what we’ve been up to these past few years." As is evident from the trailer, Spyro has grown since his previous adventures, and that means he is better at flying too. Players will be able to fly around with freedom for the first time in the series this time, and not just inside mini-levels. "In Spyro: A Realm Beyond, Spyro will experience the freedom of true dragon flight," adds Yan. "He’s small, but mighty, so we had to do a lot of different experiments to explore how he could be both nimble and still be very physical when actively pushing his way through the air." The studio promises the return of whimsical worlds to explore, with plenty of treasure and activities to find. There is a new antagonist coming in to threaten this peaceful world too. Moreover, Tom Kenny is returning to voice Spyro. Spyro: A Realm Beyond is releasing sometime in Spring 2027 across PC, Xbox Series X|S, PlayStation 5, and Nintendo Switch 2.
    • They couldn't have done a better job, this is beautiful!
    • Oh, of course not. The real "victims" are the people who snipe kids in the head, have killed more journalist than all the worlds wars combined, do double tap strikes on medical personnel, claim history started on October 7th, have a $700 million dollar annual Hasbara budget and pay influencers $7k a post to spout exactly this kind of propaganda. How dare you question the most moral army in the world. Victimhood belongs to these genocidal freaks alone. Anyone who denies that is literally Hitler. If you're going to support a terrorist state, the least you could do is come up with better talking points.
    • Gears of War: E-Day brings 12-player co-op, smoother traversal mechanics, and more by Pulasthi Ariyasinghe Right as the Xbox Games Showcase came to an end today, The Gears of War developer The Coalition took over to show off its next project: E-Day. This prequel project was announced back in 2024, but now we have a lot more details about its campaign, new gameplay mechanics, and even a release date. The studio says this is the first time it has managed to get the time to build the entire game in a new engine, as it had worked non-stop on new titles for years while porting classic code and assets. With Unreal Engine 5 now powering Gears of War: E-Day, The Coalition says it started completely anew, with all assets, animations, environments, and others being built from scratch. The campaign will take place across three days in the city of Kalona. The story will follow the events through the eyes of Bravo Squad. This is made up of the returning classic duo Marcus and Dom, as well as the new characters Mags Carter and Lucas Reyes. Watch the trailer below to see Marcus in action without his iconic armor and gear, just as the Locust invasion kicks off. The story will draw on classic Gears novels like Aspho Fields as well, with the studio even collaborating with author Karen Traviss. "That continuity is what makes the destruction land," says the studio. "In E-Day, you watch a living city torn apart—homes still lit, meals half-finished—while people abandon their cars and run for cover. Small details—a child’s toy, an uneaten dinner—make the loss real as everyday places collapse under the Locust assault." The movement system is getting a big overhaul here. Players will be able to slide while running, jump across gaps, climb head-height covers, and even crawl on the ground to avoid fire from enemies. As for the returning horde mode, The Coalition teased a new 12-player PvE mode. This will involve three squads of Gears going up against the incoming Locusts in larger city maps than usual. The studio says that it is going to reimagine the classic formula just as co-op games are going through a resurgence. Multiplayer was touched on today too, where Versus is coming back touting four versus four Gears PVP action set across Kalona maps. More details about multiplayer will be revealed later. Open beta weekends are kicking off this August for fans wanting to jump in early too. Gears of War: E-Day is releasing on Xbox Series X|S and PC on October 6 with pre-orders available now. It will also be a part of Xbox Game Pass on day one. Microsoft has confirmed this as an Xbox platform exclusive, as there are no plans to bring it to PlayStation or Switch.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dedicated
      Conjor earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Dedicated
      Mark Spruce earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Collaborator
      conkir earned a badge
      Collaborator
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      479
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      243
    3. 3
      Steven P.
      72
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      66
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      65
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!