Recommended Posts

Firefox isn't going anywhere, market share might go up and down but we're not at the point where we need just 1 or 2 browsers.

Edit: And having just IE and Chrome would slow down progress again since it'd stall specs.

For the foreseeable future, there will be five browser: IE, Chrome, FF, Opera, and Safari. Should keep the competition and innovation healthy, and really can't think of any other major players that would want to invest in building a new browser. Only Facebook has a potential reason and the money to do so, but would be a waste of resources for them.

IE (excluding IE9) and Chrome are basically swapping marketshare, while the other three are have been pretty stead over the past year. Should get interesting from this month forward after IE9 and FF4 releases to see how users decide which browser is best for them.

Awesome find , also one must consider that Firefox 4 compared to Firefox 3.6 is AGGEESSS AHEEADD and the time taken seems less to me sometimes , its just that they failed to deliver products at the time they promised (or rather targeted in wiki notes and we took it as promise) , that's what made us feel they are slow , if they had said Firefox 4 would come next year Q1 , no one would have said development is slow

I feel Mozilla development process is slow because when they release new features in FF, they are usually old, and other browsers already had them for a while (like decent UI on Windows, addon manager as a tab, bookmarks sync, etc.). The only thing Mozilla can do quickly? Mockups. Unfortunately, making those pictures real takes them forever ...

Install latest beta from here: https://adblockplus.org/devbuilds/adblockplus/

I managed to get the 1.3.3 installed without any issue yesterday, but I didn't realize that there are newer builds released over the past few weeks.

Did Mozilla change the font or font effects with FF4? I've installed a few previous betas, now I'm using FF4b12. There is something different about the font style or effect. It either reminds me of looking at text in Safari or looking at text on an old flat screen crt trinitron monitor. Its hard for me to explain but, something is different about it. Any input?

Can't bring myself to use Firefox 4 simply because of the enormous start-up time. I sometimes wonder if it'll load at all and then pop it appears. Using beta 12.

In comparison, Chrome 10 is up in under a second from cold boot.

I have a 3GHz Core2Duo laptop with 4GB of RAM and Firefox 4 is taking 7 seconds to be usable from a warm (but not recent) boot and much longer for a cold boot. A warm and recent boot is pretty much instant, like all apps in Windows 7 though.

Firefox 4 uses DirectWrite instead of GDI, so text looks different (but the same as other DirectWrite apps like the XPS viewer or IE9)

Edit: If you don't like it, you can disable DirectWrite and Direct2D in about:config (search for "direct2d")

I did that and two listings came up the first one was "gfx.direct2d.disabled". I "toggled" or double clicked it and it bolded that line. I re-started FF and now its not nearly as bad on my eyes. The second listing was this "gfx.direct2d.force-enabled" I didn't touch that one. What is it though?

like the ability to manually add search engines, which is something I find essential for fast/convenient browsing.

http://kb.mozillazine.org/Search_Bar

http://support.mozilla.com/en-US/kb/search%20bar

http://lifehacker.com/#!196779/hack-attack-firefox-and-the-art-of-keyword-bookmarking

http://www.mozilla.org/docs/end-user/keywords.html

What more adding of search engines do you need?

Please consider what you say just a little bit more... Check your facts before you become an internet liar.

How funny does that last part sound hehe

Can't bring myself to use Firefox 4 simply because of the enormous start-up time. I sometimes wonder if it'll load at all and then pop it appears. Using beta 12.

In comparison, Chrome 10 is up in under a second from cold boot.

I have a 3GHz Core2Duo laptop with 4GB of RAM and Firefox 4 is taking 7 seconds to be usable from a warm (but not recent) boot and much longer for a cold boot. A warm and recent boot is pretty much instant, like all apps in Windows 7 though.

It takes me around that much time on warm boot as well but I don't find it annoying. Chrome (in my case) takes as much time as well when filled with webapps though. But I agree, they need to find a way to trim down the warm boot time but I don't think it should be a priority.

I did that and two listings came up the first one was "gfx.direct2d.disabled". I "toggled" or double clicked it and it bolded that line. I re-started FF and now its not nearly as bad on my eyes. The second listing was this "gfx.direct2d.force-enabled" I didn't touch that one. What is it though?

DirectWrite, or the options?

DirectWrite is a new hardware accelerated text rendering API designed to replace GDI. GDI at it's core is designed for CRT screens, and is incapable of taking advantage of LCD screens (And can't be made to do so without breaking programs). One side effect is that since the glyphs are no longer forced to take up a whole pixel, some people say it's "blurry" (Which is one of the complaints thrown at Quartz on OS X, which doesn't have the GDI limitations)

DirectWrite is linked to Direct2D, you can mix them but it's so buggy and slow that you don't want to do that (DirectWrite and no Direct2D results in black pixels everywhere, Direct2D with no DirectWrite slows down the browser terribly)

As for the options, "gfx.direct2d.disabled" is self explanatory, and "gfx.direct2d.force-enabled" is there for forcing Direct2D to be enabled when it would otherwise be disabled (due to old drivers, blocked hardware, etc.)

DirectWrite, or the options?

DirectWrite is a new hardware accelerated text rendering API designed to replace GDI. GDI at it's core is designed for CRT screens, and is incapable of taking advantage of LCD screens (And can't be made to do so without breaking programs). One side effect is that since the glyphs are no longer forced to take up a whole pixel, some people say it's "blurry" (Which is one of the complaints thrown at Quartz on OS X, which doesn't have the GDI limitations)

DirectWrite is linked to Direct2D, you can mix them but it's so buggy and slow that you don't want to do that (DirectWrite and no Direct2D results in black pixels everywhere, Direct2D with no DirectWrite slows down the browser terribly)

As for the options, "gfx.direct2d.disabled" is self explanatory, and "gfx.direct2d.force-enabled" is there for forcing Direct2D to be enabled when it would otherwise be disabled (due to old drivers, blocked hardware, etc.)

Thanks for your help. I have a LCD and with that change in FF4. It was hard to read. I could read it but, it strained my eyes and was uncomfortable to look at. Toggling the first option changed it back. Thank you. Its a lot easier on my eyes now. Its funny because, I have IE9 installed as well and I didn't notice they were using it too until you said so. I notice it now but, it wasn't nearly as bad as it was on FF4.

Does anyone know how to keep Firefox 4 bookmark button keeps open-window or drop list after middle-clicking to open a bookmark site in the background? It's so annoyance to reclick the bookmark button if you want to open may background tab in your bookmark.

I use Stay open menu:

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-us/firefox/addon/stay-open-menu/

Firefox 4 uses DirectWrite instead of GDI, so text looks different (but the same as other DirectWrite apps like the XPS viewer or IE9)

Edit: If you don't like it, you can disable DirectWrite and Direct2D in about:config (search for "direct2d")

I wonder if turning of 'Use Hardware Acceleration When Available' in the Options > Advanced tab does the same thing .. or not?

I'm sure I read something about this a couple of weeks ago .. can't remember where now ..

Anybody know for sure?

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Does anyone here know if these updates are integrated into the UUP dump isos?
    • Motrix Next 3.9.4 by Razvan Serea Motrix Next is a modern, open-source cross-platform download manager built as the official next-generation successor to the original Motrix project. It has been completely rewritten using Tauri 2, Vue 3, TypeScript, and Rust, while still relying on the powerful Aria2 download engine for high-speed multi-protocol transfers. The app supports HTTP, HTTPS, FTP, BitTorrent, ED2K and magnet links, offering advanced features like multi-connection acceleration, task scheduling, bandwidth control, and batch download management. With a significantly reduced install size (around 20MB), it focuses on being lightweight, fast, and resource-efficient compared to traditional Electron-based download tools. Designed for Windows, macOS, and Linux, Motrix Next delivers a clean, modern UI inspired by Material Design 3 principles, with smooth animations and a minimal workflow. It improves usability through better download organization, system tray integration, and enhanced torrent handling including selective file downloads and tracker management. Motrix Next features: Multi-protocol downloads — HTTP, FTP, BitTorrent, Magnet, .torrent, ED2K, and Metalink tasks BitTorrent — Selective file download, DHT, peer exchange, encryption controls, metadata caching, GeoIP peer flags, and tracker probing Browser extension integration — Embedded Extension API with independent authentication, download confirmation, smart auto-submit, filename hints, referer/cookie forwarding, and real-time controls (Chrome Web Store · Edge Add-ons) Safe filename handling — Content-Disposition, RFC 2047, non-UTF-8, percent-encoded, and extensionless URL resolution with path traversal sanitization Download organization — Favorite and recent folders, optional file-type categorization, stale-record cleanup, and completed history backed by SQLite Concurrent downloads — Independent controls for active tasks, HTTP connections per server, segments per file, and BT peer limits Speed control — Global and per-task upload/download limits with day-of-week and time-of-day scheduling System integration — Tray operation, optional tray speed display, macOS Dock badge/progress, protocol handlers for magnet://, thunder://, and motrixnext:// Lightweight mode — Destroys the WebView on minimize-to-tray while Rust keeps the engine, task monitor, notifications, history, and extension routing alive Notifications and power options — Native task start/complete/failure notifications, keep-awake during downloads, and optional shutdown after completion Network controls — Scoped proxy support for downloads, app updates, and tracker updates, plus system proxy detection Auto-update channels — Stable, Beta, and Latest Across Channels policies with separate download and install phases Diagnostics — Structured logs, exportable diagnostic ZIPs, database integrity checks, automatic DB rebuild, and Linux GPU rendering fallback Personalization — Light/dark/system theme, 10 color schemes, 26 languages, and first-launch system language detection Motrix Next 3.9.4 changelog: Motrix Next 3.9.4 promotes the 3.9.4 beta cycle to stable. This release refreshes bundled engine binaries, improves task detail readability and copy actions, expands link handling for magnet and ED2K workflows, polishes responsive navigation and text wrapping, updates browser extension documentation, and refines network preference controls. New Features Task Detail copy actions — Added copyable values for task metadata and reusable render functions for long text fields. Magnet and ED2K lifecycle support — Added task lifecycle handling for magnet and ED2K links. History cleanup for deleted tasks — Deleted tasks can now remove matching history records. User-Agent management — Added user-agent management and improved related network preference controls. Browser extension documentation — Added the Firefox Add-ons link for the Motrix Next extension. Improvements Engine binaries — Updated bundled binaries for supported architectures. Task Detail readability — Long task names, URLs, tracker values, and copyable metadata now render more clearly. Deletion messaging — Refined localized task deletion text for clarity and consistency. Text wrapping — Improved URI input wrapping and task name multiline display. Navigation layout — Improved sub-navigation responsiveness. Disk allocation default — Changed the default file allocation method to trunc. Proxy controls — Improved proxy button styling in network preferences. Download: Motrix Next 64-bit | ARM64 | macOS ~20.0 MB (Open Source) Links: Website | macOS / Linux | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • NVIDIA officially supports Ubuntu, as linked above with the GeForce NOW Hands on I did in collaboration with Paul Hill.
    • TO be clear I am not running linux today, however I keep thinking about it. And I want to make sure there are minimal obstacles if I decide to make that switch in the coming months.
    • Yes, I actually glossed over the Linux part from the OP. You could always go for a 9070 XT and if you really want to play Ray Traced games in the future, GeForce Now is pretty damn good on Linux https://www.neowin.net/news/nvidias-native-geforce-now-app-for-linux-bridges-the-gaming-gap-hands-on/
  • Recent Achievements

    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dedicated
      Conjor earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Dedicated
      Mark Spruce earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Collaborator
      conkir earned a badge
      Collaborator
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      479
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      252
    3. 3
      Steven P.
      72
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      69
    5. 5
      Skyfrog
      67
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!