Recommended Posts

*sigh* Starting to look like no RC tomorrow. Monday still looks promising.

Just wondering, does Minefield finally have autoupdate like chrome or do you still have to manually download the latest build from the trunk each time?

just like chrome, go to help > about

*sigh* Starting to look like no RC tomorrow. Monday still looks promising.

Just wondering, does Minefield finally have autoupdate like chrome or do you still have to manually download the latest build from the trunk each time?

I don't know about autoupdate since I've turned that off, but Help > About > Check for Updates does a differential update < 3MB at least for the last few Minefields.

I don't know about autoupdate since I've turned that off, but Help > About > Check for Updates does a differential update < 3MB at least for the last few Minefields.

that's only if you get the update each day, if you miss an update or two it will download the entire update, around 26mb or so

that's only if you get the update each day, if you miss an update or two it will download the entire update, around 26mb or so

Does it only autoupdate once per day or just whenever you manually go to help>about>update? Obviously it wouldn't make sense for it to update hourly for stability and bandwidth concerns.

They look sharper and crisp compared with the current rounded tabs they have now.

Rocking the new square tabs. Definitely easier on the eye now and gives a few pixels of clicking space on the tabs.

Does it only autoupdate once per day or just whenever you manually go to help>about>update? Obviously it wouldn't make sense for it to update hourly for stability and bandwidth concerns.

the auto update doesn't work for the hourlies, only the nightly builds, so it will update once a day

and i usually just go to help>about>update because i don't use the browser enough to know if it will just update automatically

the auto update doesn't work for the hourlies, only the nightly builds, so it will update once a day

and i usually just go to help>about>update because i don't use the browser enough to know if it will just update automatically

Makes sense.

Okay, I'll make it a point to check daily till the stable is shipped.

Will do the same. Curious to see how it works.

It's not really clear to me from the bug page. Are they eventually reducing the tab height in a later Firefox, (5?) or something?

i have no idea, I just added that stylish code someone posted on the last page and I'm happy :)

I think this is more of an issue with Windows, but it really annoys me:

(The little white squares around the edge of the loading bar)

Yeah, you've discovered one of the 1,339,042 quirks of the Windows API. Developers can paint Windows controls without the opaque background, but then they have to re-implement the entire functionality of each control, which kinda defeats the purpose of using the API in the first place. That's what Chrome does; everything from the window border to the Min/Max/Close buttons are individually drawn using the same images that Windows uses internally.

I'm fine with how they look, and I can sort of get used to the new tab height if I think about how it's still thinner than a maximized Explorer window (Windows explorer, not IE.) if I use small icons and disable the bookmarks bar. But that's really not what we should be measuring against.

For all the talk about every little pixel saved with the new inteface, it's a little ironic to see it some of it blown away at the last second thanks to bigger tabs, lol.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • add $200 and get DWARF 3 model add $2000 and visit scientists center in your town add $20000 and visit the biggest telescope in Chile
    • Guess it's one of those things best used by devs to thoroughly test stuff.
    • is it all upside down there? traffic lights reverted too?
    • Bluesky COO warns social media regulations could destroy competition from small startups by Paul Hill Fears that increasing government control of social media risks regulatory capture by the biggest social media firms were raised again recently. Bluesky’s chief operating officer said in an interview that social media bans for children and tighter regulations for social media firms risk creating a world where there are only a few social media platforms run by companies with the deepest pockets. Regulations on social media firms have been very lax since they appeared for mainstream users in the 2000’s. This gave Meta, Snapchat, and Google time to build up their user bases and get entrenched, with Meta being the most successful. Now that Meta has succeeded, it has been attempting regulatory capture. By pushing for more regulations of social media, Meta hopes to make it more difficult for rivals to challenge it. For its part, it doesn’t need to worry about the cost of regulation because it has a lot of money to spend, whereas startups do not. Speaking to CNBC, Rose Wang, Bluesky’s chief operating officer, said: “I support the protection and the safety of youth, the question that we have then is at what cost, because essentially what I’m scared of is in the long term, we’re headed to a world where there’s about three to five platforms, and extreme heavy regulation of those platforms, and basically the whole compliance teams of these platforms are 10 times the size of our entire team. So, basically, we’re living in a world where it’s almost impossible for smaller entrants to come in and build healthier spaces. These platforms have led to a place where the bottom line is the thing that drives what they do... so I understand why governments have to step in and regulate, because the platforms have done nothing right.” She said that while she is not against regulation, there needs to be more channels between the small to mid-sized players and regulators to help protect them. She says that big tech players, on the other hand, “who we know are circumventing regulation,” need to be regulated. Essentially, the Bluesky position is one of nuance, rather than absolutes. While Bluesky’s proposal may preserve competition in the social media space, it still doesn’t address the massive privacy implications these age verification measures introduce, such as handing over sensitive identity documents to access age-gated content. Source: CNBC
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dedicated
      Conjor earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      493
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      249
    3. 3
      Steven P.
      71
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      70
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!