496 members have voted

  1. 1. Which browser engine do you like the best?

    • Trident (Internet Explorer)
    • Gecko (Mozilla)
    • Presto (Opera)
    • KHTML (Konqueror)
    • Webkit (Safari, Chrome)


Recommended Posts

Hm. What people don't know is that the browser -engine- isn't the most important thing for speed, but rather the Javascript thing. For Chrome for example, this is V8. The one Mozilla is working on for Firefox is TraceMonkey.

No, the browseres rendering engine is more important - parsing and accurately rendering HTML as fast as possible is more important, simply because its the basis of the web. The javascript area does give big speed discrepancies, but then again only a minority of sites are heavily javascript based to a point where those javascript speed differences would make a discernible difference.

Definitely Webkit for me as well. I use quite a few Webkit based browsers (like QTWeb and Arora along with Lunascape which uses like all 4 major rendering engines heh) and find them all super fast. Opera is also very fast, especially the new 10.60 alpha release. We'll have to see where Webkit and Presto go from here I suppose...

All engines have their pros and cons. I'm worried about webkit getting too much use, though. We don't need another browser monopoly.

I thought that the Opera 10.60 alpha got its speed from a new or upgraded JS renderer rather than actual Presto improvements. Heh.

The JS engine is part of the browser's engine...

I really like Presto and Webkit, however when it comes down to overall compatability I find Webkit usually does a bit better of a job. The other engines are fine too, just I feel have less speed. As for Trident though, lets wait for IE 9 beta or so to see the improvements. shifty.gif

  • 2 weeks later...

I like Webkit a lot, But i voted for Presto.

Gecko is slow - No matter what Firefox Users in their forum tries to tell you about low memory usage etc. It is slow and this is a fact.

Startup , Rendering, JS Performance are all slower then WebKit and Presto. While it is improving, i dont see Webkit and Presto be leapfrogged in a short term. ( However that doesn't mean Firefox is no good, in fact version 4 will properly be better then others on the market )

I am a bit skeptical of calling what Chrome is using Webkit as well, Since it definitely differs in terms of its Multi Process nature. WebKit will have its own version of Multi Process in Webkit 2.?

Webkit's Nightly Build download size for installation is 22MB. Google Chrome is 18MB, and Saferi is around 30MB. This compare to Presto based Opera less then 11MB, not to mention Opera includes a BitTorrent and Mail / Chat Client inside. While Download sizes differ by installation system, Presto definitely looks like leaner and more compact then Webkit based competitor.?

In terms of Mobile Usage, Opera works on Mobile and many other devices ( Including even Wii ) so it is definitely very portable, on par with WebKit.

Speed is about the same. Memory usage is on par as well, Opera uses slightly less memory then Saferi, ( Because of Sandboxing Chrome is a memory monster, so not much point in comparison. ) But Difference are quite small overall.

Webkit scores much higher in compatibility due to Chrome ( Who mess with Google on the internet? ) and Saferi.

My only problem with Presto is Opera as a browser.?

  • 2 months later...
  • 4 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...

Gecko is slow - No matter what Firefox Users in their forum tries to tell you about low memory usage etc. It is slow and this is a fact.?

Firefox is on par with Chrome on my machine, IE and Opera are incredibly slow.

I voted for Gecko, because it has animated png support, but once webkit gets animated png, it truly will be a god.

Firefox is on par with Chrome on my machine, IE and Opera are incredibly slow.

I voted for Gecko, because it has animated png support, but once webkit gets animated png, it truly will be a god.

Firefox fast and Opera slow? I think there's either something wrong with you or your computer, because those should definitely be reversed. Firefox's slowness is why I quit using it.

Firefox fast and Opera slow? I think there's either something wrong with you or your computer, because those should definitely be reversed. Firefox's slowness is why I quit using it.

I'm not sure what to tell you :/ FF only takes like 2 seconds to load a forum I frequent, while it takes 5 to 10 seconds on Opera.

  • 2 months later...

WebKit. Still too many bugs in Presto that result in incompatibilities. Perhaps because of the, relatively speaking, small user base which leads to low usage "in the field" so to speak. In defense of Presto, it can be said that it's not an engine many webmasters regularly test their sites against, but I frequently saw bug fixes for incorrectly rendered websites that were fixed in the Presto core even now leading up to Opera 11.

WebKit on the other hand feels more mature to me. It has seen a long time of usage with a slightly greater market share than Opera thanks to Safari, which is extremely valuable for a rendering engine.

  • 2 months later...
  • 3 weeks later...
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • These features described above are good, but far from what developers like me was eager to get. And that main feature that developers will love it`s the ability to connect to LOCAL AI models running on Ollama. So if you have a beefy spec machine you can now use your own model 100% local inside Visual Studio 2026 18.7.0
    • Microsoft Teams is getting a controversial location tracking feature that users may hate by Usama Jawad Image generated with Microsoft Copilot Earlier this year, Microsoft planned to roll out a controversial location tracking feature in Teams, but following customer feedback, it decided to delay its release. The bad news is that the company has decided to launch it later this year, but it's based on roughly the same design that was shared earlier, which means that many users still have good reason to worry. Basically, Microsoft Places and Teams have received workplace check-ins via Wi-Fi. The idea is that if an employee arrives at the office and connects to their enterprise network, their profile status indicator will show them as being present in the office. For example, if you arrive at work, open Teams on your PC, and connect to the "Studio B" company Wi-Fi network, your Teams profile will indicate that you are present in "Studio B", as shown below: Microsoft says that this feature is basically a replacement for physical workplace check-in peripherals, it reduces the need to manually update your status, and it also enables co-workers to know that you're at work so that they can coordinate in-person meetings with you. IT admins can enable this workplace check-in capability at a tenant level, and users have the ability to control whether they want to enable it or not. Of course, all of that sounds great on paper, but naturally, many Teams customers may still have concerns, as they did before. This is because it enables your reporting manager and other members of the organization to track if you are at the office, when you arrive at the office, and where you are right now. This could be problematic for people who work in what they consider to be flexible work environments or hybrid setups, and this kind of location tracking could be considered an invasion of privacy. Microsoft has tried to alleviate some of these concerns by letting users know that they can manually set their location easily, which essentially overrides workplace check-in if they feel uncomfortable with it. However, that doesn't really solve the problem because your organization could enforce a workplace policy that mandates that this feature remains enabled. The Redmond tech giant has also assured users that this capability does not store historical data and is only a real-time indicator of location. Finally, it only generates a signal when you connect to a corporate network, which means that if you are working from home and connect your PC to your personal Wi-Fi, it won't broadcast your location to your employer; you will simply be shown as "Remote". Microsoft has encouraged IT admins to prepare for this change and begin informing users so they know what to expect once it begins rolling out later this year.
    • Wow, Microsoft IS cooking lately... This only shows that they COULD improve, they just chose not to for whatever reasons. That obsession with AI was destroying them from the inside out.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Very Popular
      AndrewSteel earned a badge
      Very Popular
    • Veteran
      Taliseian went up a rank
      Veteran
    • One Month Later
      Clizby earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      Timaximus earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Timaximus earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      512
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      162
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      157
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      82
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      80
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!