Don't Disable Aero For Increased Performance


Recommended Posts

But what about games? Is the UI still drawn (but not visible), does it load it to the memory, in any case isn't it better to turn off aero if you are gaming?

I've learned having DWM enabled or disabled has little to no effect with gaming. That said, I believe it gets disabled when in full screen on some games, but the transition is so quick you don't notice it was disabled. There is an option to have it disabled when launching certain programs through the Compatibility options in the Properties dialog.

by disabling aero do you mean turning off the theme's service that runs and sucks up a ton of memory? i think with lowend builds that have loweish memory turning it off does actually help them. yeah they are putting more pressure on the processor as you said but at least they have some ram free to run more tabs in a browser.

by disabling aero do you mean turning off the theme's service that runs and sucks up a ton of memory? i think with lowend builds that have loweish memory turning it off does actually help them. yeah they are putting more pressure on the processor as you said but at least they have some ram free to run more tabs in a browser.

DWM taking up 8MB of RAM is not a "ton of memory". Your argument fails especially if the systems are using WDDM 1.1 drivers.

Luna (XP Themes Service) still put very minimal strain on the system.

Especially with a driver that supports hardware acceleration.?

But what about games? Is the UI still drawn (but not visible), does it load it to the memory, in any case isn't it better to turn off aero if you are gaming?

Aero is disabled when running fullscreen applications.

Especially with a driver that supports hardware acceleration.?

Aero is disabled when running fullscreen applications.

and aero stays disabled till the full screen app is closed so there is no overhead if any, it's just making use of a resource that we should have been able to use before but couldn't.

Doesn't Microsoft recommending turning it off on low-end PCs?

Low-end PCs would likely have a low-end graphics card that would not be able to run Aero effectively. This is mostly the situation to which this would apply. If you got a compatible graphics card, you should take advantage of Aero.

Doesn't Microsoft recommending turning it off on low-end PCs?

they probably do, if the pc can't handle Aero then it gets turned off but if you got a gpu that can handle it then why not take advantage of it,it's like extra free offloading at no extra expense

My Mothers PC is a dated 2200+ 1.6ghz athlon XP system and i just put a PCI based 8400 in the system for her and windows 7 runs flawlessly with Aero enabled on it.

now when ya turn off aero no matter how good your system is you get UI Lag and tearing effect or if you all remember the multi-copy window effect when somthing stops responding or the driver has a small glitch or something and ya get a white space in places where an application may have been but is not now or when ya drag another window around ya get duplicat version of part of that window erasing the blank white space area . all these issue are common with Microsofts old Windows GDI API or Win32 API and all of these issue are still presented in todays system when running Non Full Aero Ui

  • 2 weeks later...

Performance should be a bit better (probably not noticeable on a recent CPU) but if you're using a portable you'll lose a bit of battery life (not a lot though)

The performance issue is *highly* GPU-dependent. Older *portable* GPUs (especially those based on Intel Bear Lake or the nV/AMD equivalents) were not really designed to take advantage of Aero; fortunately, the onboard GPU of the past year (from all the players) has vastly improved in this area. nVidia's ION (common in netbooks), Intel's own X/G4x series, and AMD's HD4200 Mobility take few steps back compared to desktop equivalents.

Generally, if a GPU is designed around DX10 or better, leave Aero settings alone.

Especially with a driver that supports hardware acceleration.?

Aero is disabled when running fullscreen applications.

Depends on the application.

Some applications (mostly older applications) are not designed to support Aero when run full-screen. (While Office 2003 falls into this category, Office 2007 and later do not.) The few *games* the issue affects are, like the offending applications, largely designed around older performance metrics.

  • 8 months later...

I believe if you have a WDDM 1.0 Graphics card (IE not DX 10.1 capable) surface textures for DWM are stored in system memory, rather than graphics memory which means you may see a possible performance benefit from disabling the service, especially if you have 1GB of memory or less.

Also, with a WDDM 1.1 card, surface textures are stored almost entirely in graphics memory, so if you have a large amount of windows open, you may see a performance boost from stopping the service if you want to play a game, however under normal usage circumstances I would advocate leaving it on.

However, on a modern system you're not really likely to notice a great deal of performance difference between off and on.

Yeah I knew this, I mean come on, im running at 1080i with Aero, and DWM is only using 11MB out of my 3GB :)

I feel its actually slower when its off because I hate the way that GDI+ calls are not hardware accelerated like they were in XP under Vista and 7 IIRC. Which to me, sucks :p

Wow. Seen this thread on the main page and decided to check it out.

Glad i did, had no idea this was the case.

Had it disabled on my HTPC for general speediness ect. It's mainly running XBMC 24/7 and downloads.

But it looks really ugly if i use it for web browsing or something.

Although I didn't notice a difference in speed when i disabled it, it's nice to know i can have it looking pretty and speedy (Having my cake and eating it, so to speak)

I would point out that if your system responds slowly then Windows 7 will prompt you to disable Aero.

This has only ever happened to me once and that was when resuming from sleep with a heck of a lot things in memory.

Aero is disabled when running fullscreen applications.

This is not true, it all depends on the calls being made through WDDM by the application which is running full screen whether windows decides to turn of transparency or not.

I don't have any proof, but run two monitors side-by-side, launch a full screen app and see what happens to an open window on the other screen. :shiftyninja:

Also in terms of performance, I recently had to build an image for a poor model of netbook, I left Aero enabled but turned off transparency, and removed all of the nifty little features like window animations (minimise/maximise etc). This helped immensely (also displaying windows search and other heavy services helped a lot)

  • 1 month later...

left 4 dead 2 crashes after a while if i don't disable aero.But this is probably because of the unsigned themes patch i did.I always switch to classic before gaming

Right-click the app > Properties > Compatibility > Disable Desktop Composition. That will automatically turn off aero whenever you launch it (and turn it back on when you quit it).

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I have never been a huge fan of libre, it feels really good but exactly when you need an advance feature for data wrangling it falls short every time or has bugs. I am all for euro office if they can deliver a good and usable alternative to MS office with backing of govt function.
    • Go on, I'll bite. How does windows (nice comment on an 'article' which doesn't actually involve it ) lock users out of their data then? Been using it since 3.1 back in 92 and not once have I been locked out of my data? Perhaps you mean Bitlocker? In which case the average user (who doesn't mess about) will have been forced to use a MSA, and in which case the recovery key would have been saved to said account..... If the user did happen to bodge around and not use an MSA then Bitlocker wouldn't have become live (as it cannot without a safe place to store the key) I want to point out Bitlocker and MSA are not connected and you can of course force it on without a safe place to store the key, but you do that with your eyes open. So your standard consumer who knows no better sets up an MSA, gets bitlocker and a recovery key stored off box, with a route to reset their password. All of this notwithstanding the fact, if your data is important, you back it up, no ifs, no buts, no-ones responsibility other than your own. Important data lives in at least two locations, one of which is offline and recovery is tested, otherwise that data wasn't really that important. Disks, fail, laptops get lost, phones end up down the toilet, tablets get stolen, if your only copy of data is on a single device you're doing it wrong.
    • Clearly that feature isn't for us. It's for the ad spam marketers so they can more directly target us about going to places we might want to go again...but without understanding context clues. Like for the flight someone took for a friend's funeral. We want to be reminded of that every time we open an app, a browser, or email, right? Right, Siri?
    • Is your Apple Watch supported? Check the watchOS 27 compatibility list by Aditya Tiwari Apple kicked off WWDC 2026 with a ton of announcements, mostly centered around Apple Intelligence improvements, the Siri AI, and Liquid Glass updates. However, there is a lot of other stuff that couldn't catch the limelight. Let's talk about watchOS 27 and which models are supported by the newest operating system. According to the Cupertino giant, watchOS 27 will be supported on the following Apple Watch models when it arrives later this year: Apple Watch Ultra 3 Apple Watch Series 11 Apple Watch SE 3 Apple Watch Series 10 Apple Watch Ultra 2 It's a stark contrast with last year's watchOS 26 update, which had almost a dozen Apple Watch models in its list of supported devices. Apple supported models all the way back to Apple Watch Series 6. That said, if you own one of the five models, you'll need an iPhone 11 (or later) with iOS 27 to install the latest update. Yes, Apple has shown some extra love to the iPhone 11, and it old horse supports the iOS 27 update. watchOS 27 beta 1 is now available for developers and interested power users through the Apple Developer Program. So, if you're among those who like to play with fire, you can download it to your supported Apple Watch. Otherwise, the public beta for watchOS 27 will be available next month. The freshly baked Apple Watch update comes with Siri AI - an advanced, fully conversational version of Siri powered by Apple Intelligence due for later this year. A new dynamic app grid features icons for five Siri-suggested apps. You can use a new tap gesture to open a widget in the Smart Stack, and a new Find My app finally clears the mess of Find Devices, Find Items, and Find People on Apple Watch. Workout Buddy can run without an iPhone nearby and offers new insights based on data, including your progress for pace, distance, and workout duration. Apple improved its motion tracking algorithms to measure the distance of indoor treadmill runs and walks more precisely. Speaking of other changes, the music playback on watchOS 27 starts faster and you can create custom passes for any membership or card that uses a QR code or barcode, then easily access them in the Wallet app or pin in the Smart Stack.
    • "and pull old flight details from your email during back-and-forth conversations" The Siri I've become to know and trust. I've always wanted to pull info on old flights. /s
  • Recent Achievements

    • Very Popular
      Captain_Eric earned a badge
      Very Popular
    • One Month Later
      amusc earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      501
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      232
    3. 3
      ATLien_0
      85
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      76
    5. 5
      +Edouard
      75
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!