Don't Disable Aero For Increased Performance


Recommended Posts

But what about games? Is the UI still drawn (but not visible), does it load it to the memory, in any case isn't it better to turn off aero if you are gaming?

I've learned having DWM enabled or disabled has little to no effect with gaming. That said, I believe it gets disabled when in full screen on some games, but the transition is so quick you don't notice it was disabled. There is an option to have it disabled when launching certain programs through the Compatibility options in the Properties dialog.

by disabling aero do you mean turning off the theme's service that runs and sucks up a ton of memory? i think with lowend builds that have loweish memory turning it off does actually help them. yeah they are putting more pressure on the processor as you said but at least they have some ram free to run more tabs in a browser.

by disabling aero do you mean turning off the theme's service that runs and sucks up a ton of memory? i think with lowend builds that have loweish memory turning it off does actually help them. yeah they are putting more pressure on the processor as you said but at least they have some ram free to run more tabs in a browser.

DWM taking up 8MB of RAM is not a "ton of memory". Your argument fails especially if the systems are using WDDM 1.1 drivers.

Luna (XP Themes Service) still put very minimal strain on the system.

Especially with a driver that supports hardware acceleration.?

But what about games? Is the UI still drawn (but not visible), does it load it to the memory, in any case isn't it better to turn off aero if you are gaming?

Aero is disabled when running fullscreen applications.

Especially with a driver that supports hardware acceleration.?

Aero is disabled when running fullscreen applications.

and aero stays disabled till the full screen app is closed so there is no overhead if any, it's just making use of a resource that we should have been able to use before but couldn't.

Doesn't Microsoft recommending turning it off on low-end PCs?

Low-end PCs would likely have a low-end graphics card that would not be able to run Aero effectively. This is mostly the situation to which this would apply. If you got a compatible graphics card, you should take advantage of Aero.

Doesn't Microsoft recommending turning it off on low-end PCs?

they probably do, if the pc can't handle Aero then it gets turned off but if you got a gpu that can handle it then why not take advantage of it,it's like extra free offloading at no extra expense

My Mothers PC is a dated 2200+ 1.6ghz athlon XP system and i just put a PCI based 8400 in the system for her and windows 7 runs flawlessly with Aero enabled on it.

now when ya turn off aero no matter how good your system is you get UI Lag and tearing effect or if you all remember the multi-copy window effect when somthing stops responding or the driver has a small glitch or something and ya get a white space in places where an application may have been but is not now or when ya drag another window around ya get duplicat version of part of that window erasing the blank white space area . all these issue are common with Microsofts old Windows GDI API or Win32 API and all of these issue are still presented in todays system when running Non Full Aero Ui

  • 2 weeks later...

Performance should be a bit better (probably not noticeable on a recent CPU) but if you're using a portable you'll lose a bit of battery life (not a lot though)

The performance issue is *highly* GPU-dependent. Older *portable* GPUs (especially those based on Intel Bear Lake or the nV/AMD equivalents) were not really designed to take advantage of Aero; fortunately, the onboard GPU of the past year (from all the players) has vastly improved in this area. nVidia's ION (common in netbooks), Intel's own X/G4x series, and AMD's HD4200 Mobility take few steps back compared to desktop equivalents.

Generally, if a GPU is designed around DX10 or better, leave Aero settings alone.

Especially with a driver that supports hardware acceleration.?

Aero is disabled when running fullscreen applications.

Depends on the application.

Some applications (mostly older applications) are not designed to support Aero when run full-screen. (While Office 2003 falls into this category, Office 2007 and later do not.) The few *games* the issue affects are, like the offending applications, largely designed around older performance metrics.

  • 8 months later...

I believe if you have a WDDM 1.0 Graphics card (IE not DX 10.1 capable) surface textures for DWM are stored in system memory, rather than graphics memory which means you may see a possible performance benefit from disabling the service, especially if you have 1GB of memory or less.

Also, with a WDDM 1.1 card, surface textures are stored almost entirely in graphics memory, so if you have a large amount of windows open, you may see a performance boost from stopping the service if you want to play a game, however under normal usage circumstances I would advocate leaving it on.

However, on a modern system you're not really likely to notice a great deal of performance difference between off and on.

Yeah I knew this, I mean come on, im running at 1080i with Aero, and DWM is only using 11MB out of my 3GB :)

I feel its actually slower when its off because I hate the way that GDI+ calls are not hardware accelerated like they were in XP under Vista and 7 IIRC. Which to me, sucks :p

Wow. Seen this thread on the main page and decided to check it out.

Glad i did, had no idea this was the case.

Had it disabled on my HTPC for general speediness ect. It's mainly running XBMC 24/7 and downloads.

But it looks really ugly if i use it for web browsing or something.

Although I didn't notice a difference in speed when i disabled it, it's nice to know i can have it looking pretty and speedy (Having my cake and eating it, so to speak)

I would point out that if your system responds slowly then Windows 7 will prompt you to disable Aero.

This has only ever happened to me once and that was when resuming from sleep with a heck of a lot things in memory.

Aero is disabled when running fullscreen applications.

This is not true, it all depends on the calls being made through WDDM by the application which is running full screen whether windows decides to turn of transparency or not.

I don't have any proof, but run two monitors side-by-side, launch a full screen app and see what happens to an open window on the other screen. :shiftyninja:

Also in terms of performance, I recently had to build an image for a poor model of netbook, I left Aero enabled but turned off transparency, and removed all of the nifty little features like window animations (minimise/maximise etc). This helped immensely (also displaying windows search and other heavy services helped a lot)

  • 1 month later...

left 4 dead 2 crashes after a while if i don't disable aero.But this is probably because of the unsigned themes patch i did.I always switch to classic before gaming

Right-click the app > Properties > Compatibility > Disable Desktop Composition. That will automatically turn off aero whenever you launch it (and turn it back on when you quit it).

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Those persons has complete control over the internet right now. They do see everything what we do regardless.
    • Everyone and every country who doesn't support Israel's aggression, terrorism and hypocrisy is their immediate enemy. You can definitely see how many innocent people they are killing almost everyday. In fact they're the actual Neo-Nazi who holds Hitler's ideology.
    • Just pull a 4Chan and ignore the UK gov, or better troll them. It's not like they can enforce the fine across border.
    • It has NEVER been shown that all these overreaching creepy methods of surveillance have ever saved a child or prevented a terrorist attack. Not a single one. It's the kind of people like you who just wave it away as "paranoid conspiracy" that makes big tech and governments this creepy mass data hoarding entities. Not only that, 3/4 of these surveillance ideas undermine the very foundations of safe online communication because they always want to have a backdoor in everything "just in case" they might need it to... checks the notes "save the children". If you put a backdoor into encryption chain there is no encryption chain anymore. You know what encryption keeps safe? Your medical records, your online shopping and credit card during payment, your photos in the cloud, your emails, your passwords, everything. There is ZERO guarantee only the good guys will use it. And if you think police suddenly can't apprehend child abusers because of encryption, Epstein was running his entire sex trafficking ring using GMail which is not even encrypted end to end. Or to make matters even worse, USA has a **** and a good buddy of Epstein as a president. Absolutely NOTHING has been done to address it. Maxwell just got a better "hotel" room as a reward. This clearly shows how they absolutely don't really care about the children but they care about the absolute control over all of us. And you're defending them here. Good grief. On top of constant attempts to insert backdoors into encryption chain, the entire age verification nonsense is again entirely over reaching, creepy, invades everyone's privacy with premise of yet again "protecting the children" instead of demanding device makers to provide simple and powerful tools for PARENTS to control how their children use devices and what they do on them. THIS would be the way, not the stupid age verification for everyone. Imagine if government would be dictating companies how their phones work and not the company's IT department. The parents should be the IT department to their children. And for everyone excusing "they are not knowledgeable enough" buuuuuulsheat. We live in a digital age, if you have children now, you absolutely are well versed in digital everything at least to basic extent. If you're not, how do you even function in these times then? Reality is that parents are just lazy and don't want to deal with this. They want government to raise their kids because they are too busy scrolling stupid Instagram and Tiktok or some bs.
    • You could make the argument that K should not be included, but FC, the fried chicken, is not the framework, it's the product. It's the Paint in Paint.NET. A closer analogy is if KFC included the name of the deep fryer they used. HennyPennyFC.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Very Popular
      Captain_Eric earned a badge
      Very Popular
    • One Month Later
      amusc earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      507
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      221
    3. 3
      ATLien_0
      92
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      88
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      83
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!