Don't Disable Aero For Increased Performance


Recommended Posts

But what about games? Is the UI still drawn (but not visible), does it load it to the memory, in any case isn't it better to turn off aero if you are gaming?

I've learned having DWM enabled or disabled has little to no effect with gaming. That said, I believe it gets disabled when in full screen on some games, but the transition is so quick you don't notice it was disabled. There is an option to have it disabled when launching certain programs through the Compatibility options in the Properties dialog.

by disabling aero do you mean turning off the theme's service that runs and sucks up a ton of memory? i think with lowend builds that have loweish memory turning it off does actually help them. yeah they are putting more pressure on the processor as you said but at least they have some ram free to run more tabs in a browser.

by disabling aero do you mean turning off the theme's service that runs and sucks up a ton of memory? i think with lowend builds that have loweish memory turning it off does actually help them. yeah they are putting more pressure on the processor as you said but at least they have some ram free to run more tabs in a browser.

DWM taking up 8MB of RAM is not a "ton of memory". Your argument fails especially if the systems are using WDDM 1.1 drivers.

Luna (XP Themes Service) still put very minimal strain on the system.

Especially with a driver that supports hardware acceleration.?

But what about games? Is the UI still drawn (but not visible), does it load it to the memory, in any case isn't it better to turn off aero if you are gaming?

Aero is disabled when running fullscreen applications.

Especially with a driver that supports hardware acceleration.?

Aero is disabled when running fullscreen applications.

and aero stays disabled till the full screen app is closed so there is no overhead if any, it's just making use of a resource that we should have been able to use before but couldn't.

Doesn't Microsoft recommending turning it off on low-end PCs?

Low-end PCs would likely have a low-end graphics card that would not be able to run Aero effectively. This is mostly the situation to which this would apply. If you got a compatible graphics card, you should take advantage of Aero.

Doesn't Microsoft recommending turning it off on low-end PCs?

they probably do, if the pc can't handle Aero then it gets turned off but if you got a gpu that can handle it then why not take advantage of it,it's like extra free offloading at no extra expense

My Mothers PC is a dated 2200+ 1.6ghz athlon XP system and i just put a PCI based 8400 in the system for her and windows 7 runs flawlessly with Aero enabled on it.

now when ya turn off aero no matter how good your system is you get UI Lag and tearing effect or if you all remember the multi-copy window effect when somthing stops responding or the driver has a small glitch or something and ya get a white space in places where an application may have been but is not now or when ya drag another window around ya get duplicat version of part of that window erasing the blank white space area . all these issue are common with Microsofts old Windows GDI API or Win32 API and all of these issue are still presented in todays system when running Non Full Aero Ui

  • 2 weeks later...

Performance should be a bit better (probably not noticeable on a recent CPU) but if you're using a portable you'll lose a bit of battery life (not a lot though)

The performance issue is *highly* GPU-dependent. Older *portable* GPUs (especially those based on Intel Bear Lake or the nV/AMD equivalents) were not really designed to take advantage of Aero; fortunately, the onboard GPU of the past year (from all the players) has vastly improved in this area. nVidia's ION (common in netbooks), Intel's own X/G4x series, and AMD's HD4200 Mobility take few steps back compared to desktop equivalents.

Generally, if a GPU is designed around DX10 or better, leave Aero settings alone.

Especially with a driver that supports hardware acceleration.?

Aero is disabled when running fullscreen applications.

Depends on the application.

Some applications (mostly older applications) are not designed to support Aero when run full-screen. (While Office 2003 falls into this category, Office 2007 and later do not.) The few *games* the issue affects are, like the offending applications, largely designed around older performance metrics.

  • 8 months later...

I believe if you have a WDDM 1.0 Graphics card (IE not DX 10.1 capable) surface textures for DWM are stored in system memory, rather than graphics memory which means you may see a possible performance benefit from disabling the service, especially if you have 1GB of memory or less.

Also, with a WDDM 1.1 card, surface textures are stored almost entirely in graphics memory, so if you have a large amount of windows open, you may see a performance boost from stopping the service if you want to play a game, however under normal usage circumstances I would advocate leaving it on.

However, on a modern system you're not really likely to notice a great deal of performance difference between off and on.

Yeah I knew this, I mean come on, im running at 1080i with Aero, and DWM is only using 11MB out of my 3GB :)

I feel its actually slower when its off because I hate the way that GDI+ calls are not hardware accelerated like they were in XP under Vista and 7 IIRC. Which to me, sucks :p

Wow. Seen this thread on the main page and decided to check it out.

Glad i did, had no idea this was the case.

Had it disabled on my HTPC for general speediness ect. It's mainly running XBMC 24/7 and downloads.

But it looks really ugly if i use it for web browsing or something.

Although I didn't notice a difference in speed when i disabled it, it's nice to know i can have it looking pretty and speedy (Having my cake and eating it, so to speak)

I would point out that if your system responds slowly then Windows 7 will prompt you to disable Aero.

This has only ever happened to me once and that was when resuming from sleep with a heck of a lot things in memory.

Aero is disabled when running fullscreen applications.

This is not true, it all depends on the calls being made through WDDM by the application which is running full screen whether windows decides to turn of transparency or not.

I don't have any proof, but run two monitors side-by-side, launch a full screen app and see what happens to an open window on the other screen. :shiftyninja:

Also in terms of performance, I recently had to build an image for a poor model of netbook, I left Aero enabled but turned off transparency, and removed all of the nifty little features like window animations (minimise/maximise etc). This helped immensely (also displaying windows search and other heavy services helped a lot)

  • 1 month later...

left 4 dead 2 crashes after a while if i don't disable aero.But this is probably because of the unsigned themes patch i did.I always switch to classic before gaming

Right-click the app > Properties > Compatibility > Disable Desktop Composition. That will automatically turn off aero whenever you launch it (and turn it back on when you quit it).

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Dell, HP PCs ran into endless reboot, BitLocker recovery loops but Windows 11 isn't to blame by Sayan Sen Last month Neowin reported on a major issue on Dell systems wherein a bug in its official support tool was leading to endless blue screen of death (BSOD) and restarts. Following our report, Dell officially acknowledged its SupportAssist-related crash issue, confirming that the culprit is not Microsoft's operating system but rather a faulty version of its own remediation software. In a newly published support advisory, Dell stated that version 5.5.16.0 of Dell SupportAssist Remediation and Alienware SupportAssist Remediation can trigger blue screen errors and unexpected system restarts. The company notes that the problematic component operates independently of the main SupportAssist application, meaning users should not remove the primary SupportAssist software when troubleshooting the issue. According to Dell, the crashes are linked specifically to the SupportAssist Remediation service, which is bundled with SupportAssist OS Recovery Tools, and as such it has since released an updated version, 5.5.16.1, which is said to resolve the problem. Affected users are advised to first verify whether version 5.5.16.0 is installed by checking the Installed Apps section in Windows Settings. If so, Dell recommends updating SupportAssist OS Recovery Tools through either SupportAssist's "Update Software" feature or Dell Command Update. Dell also advises users to back up important data before performing the update and to ensure systems remain connected to power throughout the installation process. If you are still having issues though make sure to report to the Dell support forum. As it turns out though Dell is not the only PC maker currently dealing with update-related headaches as HP is also facing a separate but probably equally frustrating issue involving recent Windows Secure Boot updates that were released with recent Windows 11 Patch Tuesdays. Similar to Dell, HP also put up its own support article where it explains the issue. The company says that affected devices could hit a brick wall when booting as they run into a BitLocker recovery loop after the April 2026 updates. The problem appears to affect systems wherein the new UEFI Secure Boot CA 2023 certificates fail to apply properly. As such affected users will find themselves entering their recovery key over and over again despite the system otherwise functioning normally. HP says such PCs should be updated to the latest available BIOS version and configured with the necessary Secure Boot certificates before installing Microsoft's Windows 11 Patch Tuesday updates. Systems that are already experiencing the problem may require BIOS configuration changes to restore normal boot behavior. Admins can find information regarding that in the support article here on HP's official website.
    • Getting further away from the artistic study of mental disease that was the first game... (which never needed any sequels to begin with) But I get it, a company has to make money. And the second was at least visually impressive, if not in any other way.
    • If its the devs fault you would think Unreal would help M$ take full advantage of Unreal and work with them to fix the performance issues. Otherwise they are catching unwarranted bad press.
    • Thanks for the advice guys, I'll give my current GPU a clean and then run the benchmarks to see how similar it is. Hopefully a bit of a clean-out will help it last a bit longer.
    • Pretty sure those will still be in this game. The series' well-explored psychosis themes will return as well.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dedicated
      Conjor earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      493
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      246
    3. 3
      Steven P.
      72
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      69
    5. 5
      neufuse
      68
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!