• 0

C# adding a console window in a windows app


Question

17 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0
  On 26/05/2010 at 18:37, NotSoSmartGuy said:

Basically I have a windows app and would like to add a console window where I can output Console.WriteLine("SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS");

embedding a console in windows app or opening a new console windows from windows app?

  • 0

I don't think there is any .NET call for that, but the native function is AllocConsole and you could call that with interop:

[DllImport("kernel32")]
static extern int AllocConsole();

static void Main()
{
        AllocConsole();
}

If you call AllocConsole before calling any console functions, that should be all you need. Otherwise you need to also manually set up stdout and friends. FreeConsole is the opposite of AllocConsole, and is used to get rid of the console.

  • 0

using System.Runtime.InteropServices;

[DllImport("kernel32.dll", EntryPoint = "AllocConsole", SetLastError = true, CharSet = CharSet.Auto, CallingConvention = CallingConvention.StdCall)]

private static extern int AllocConsole();

AllocConsole();

Console.WriteLine("Hello World!"); // outputs to console window

  • 0

Wouldn't it make more sense for a GUI app to have a dialog/form/whatever with a textbox that you write to instead? Is there something about the console that you specifically need? If you're just trying to "check what you're doing," I think allocating a console is inappropriate. Especially since the Windows console hasn't changed since Windows 98

It's usually better to tell us what goal you're trying to achieve. Lots of people use the wrong tool for the job.

  • 0
  On 26/05/2010 at 22:23, hdood said:

The console is a quick and useful way of outputting debug messages.

Check out the Debug.Writeline method if you are using Visual Studio, this is an easy way of outputting debug messages http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/system.diagnostics.debug.writeline.aspx

  • 0
  On 26/05/2010 at 23:07, luke_smily_face said:

Check out the Debug.Writeline method if you are using Visual Studio, this is an easy way of outputting debug messages http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/system.diagnostics.debug.writeline.aspx

I do not write managed code, but presumably it is equivalent to the native debugging functions, which means you actually have to have a debugger attached in order to see the output. Sometimes you just want to display debug messages without the need for that.

  • 0
  On 27/05/2010 at 09:21, ReDwAvE said:

Easy, Just go to the property of the project and make the Application Type : Console Application

and Writes Console.WriteLine() :)

That's not what he wants. His application is NOT a console application but he still wants to send text to a console. A solution has already been posting anyway

  • 0
  On 27/05/2010 at 17:54, Rudy said:

That's not what he wants. His application is NOT a console application but he still wants to send text to a console. A solution has already been posting anyway

From the smiley face above you should have realized he was joking.

  • 0
  On 26/05/2010 at 23:07, luke_smily_face said:

Check out the Debug.Writeline method if you are using Visual Studio, this is an easy way of outputting debug messages http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/system.diagnostics.debug.writeline.aspx

Use this instead of console, visual studio will then output this for you internally instead of having one extra window spawning for your console, that also goes away if your program crashes.

If you need to read debug-output from deployed applications or similar have a look on Log4Net(http://logging.apache.org/log4net/index.html) that allows you to configure exactly how you want your debug lines to be output (console/debug, file, to server etc)

  • 0
  On 30/05/2010 at 10:16, FusionOpz said:

Your not writing managed code but you are using C# :/

Are you talking to me? I do not write managed code in C# or any other language, but I can still guess the answer to simpler questions. I said this to make it clear that I had no expertise and was guessing that it was equivalent to certain native APIs. I was saying that a console can be useful because you sometimes want to output certain information to something other than a debugger. The two complement each other, it's not one or the other.

  • 0
  On 31/05/2010 at 05:46, hdood said:

Are you talking to me? I do not write managed code in C# or any other language, but I can still guess the answer to simpler questions. I said this to make it clear that I had no expertise and was guessing that it was equivalent to certain native APIs. I was saying that a console can be useful because you sometimes want to output certain information to something other than a debugger. The two complement each other, it's not one or the other.

Ah was somehow confusing you with the OP :p :whistle: *sneaks out the back door*

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Nvidia and Foxconn planning to deploy humanoid robots within months by Paul Hill Never mind intellectual work, Foxconn and Nvidia are now in talks to deploy humanoid robots at Foxconn’s new Houston factory to carry out physical work, Reuters has reported. The two companies want to have the robots operational by the first quarter of 2026. This is a big development for both companies; it marks the first time Nvidia products will be made with robot assistance, and the first time Foxconn has used robots in an AI server factory on a production line. While the development is certainly interesting, and potentially bad for factory workers, we do not know many of the details such as which robots are being planned for use at the factory, what they’ll look like, or how many will be deployed. While Foxconn has trialed robots made by Chinese firm UBTech, the report states that Foxconn is developing its own robots with Nvidia. The news was told to Reuters via unnamed sources who are not allowed to discuss the matter, so they did so under anonymity. They said that the robots will start work early next year and will contribute to the production of Nvidia’s GB300 AI servers. Foxconn has been training the robots to pick and place objects, insert cables, and do assembly work, but it’s not clear exactly what their role will be on the factory floor and whether jobs will be impacted. One of the sources that spoke to Reuters said that the Houston factory was the best place to trial the robots because it is more spacious, giving robots more room to move about. Last month, a Foxconn subsidiary, which is in charge of the group’s AI server business, said there were two robots being developed which are expected to be showcased in November. One of the robots will have legs, while the other will use a wheeled autonomous mobile robot base. Predictably, the latter version will cost less money than the one with legs, but pricing is unknown at this point. Reuters noted that these two businesses are not the only ones working on robots. It also said that Mercedes-Benz and BMW have been testing robots on production lines and that Tesla is developing its own robots too. China is also getting heavily invested in the sector. Jensen Huang, head of Nvidia, believes that they will be in wide use in manufacturing facilities within five years.
    • That's great and all, but humans have a finite range of vision and a rather slow reaction time. I live in a rural area too and the roads are painted with dear carcasses most of the year. It's not because people choose to hit them. A human simply can't react quick enough when they come firing out of the woods perpendicular to your vision. Those issues can and are being solved with machine vision. The industrial world has been doing this for many years already and cars are finally jumping on the bandwagon using the same technology. It's a known fact that driving is the most dangerous thing (most) people do every day, and that's solely because humans are driving. It's one thing to use technology to be lazy, but it's another to use it to be safe and save lives.
    • Microsoft doesn't make AMD drivers. The "AMD" driver on Windows update comes from AMD, its AMD decision to put it there.
    • While the Windows key shortcut is fine, I would argue that it's not as efficient as just using your mouse. It's a one-handed task vs two-handed. And with the keyboard, you trust that you don't hit a wrong key or that Windows can actually find what you're looking for. For me, Win 10 search struggled to find some things I had in the start menu, but Win 11 has seemingly fixed that. The main issue is that Microsoft did such a crappy job on the start menu since Win 8. The use of space is horrible and needs much more functionality. Most of all, it needs to be customizable. Having to rely on third-party apps to make it useful is really embarrassing.
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      675
    2. 2
      ATLien_0
      275
    3. 3
      Michael Scrip
      218
    4. 4
      +FloatingFatMan
      165
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      162
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!