• 0

What is (are) the best programming language(s) for beginners?


  

465 members have voted

  1. 1. What is (are) the best programming language(s) for beginners?

    • Pascal
      13
    • Java
      68
    • Python
      36
    • Vb.net
      50
    • Basic
      23
    • Delphi
      6
    • C
      37
    • C++
      37
    • C#
      100
    • Smalltalk
      0
    • Lisp
      1
    • A++
      0
    • Curry
      1
    • Haskell
      2
    • Ruby
      12
    • Perl
      8
    • Other (refer)
      9
    • PHP
      62


Question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

Let's say someone's starting off with a background (from 10+ years ago) in Visual Basic. Going back into programming without all that much knowledge. Would eventually like to make little 2D games and helpful little apps, maybe contribute to open source projects. C#, C++? I'm leaning C++ right now with a later transition into C# and maybe some Objective C for ipod app development in the future.

I'm starting off quaint, but would like to turn it into a profession.

  • Like 1
  • 0

Depends what kind of open-source projects. I'd say open-source projects use C++ more than any other language, although often they have no reason for using C++ other than making their lives more miserable than need be (and ensuring the project fails). Still, a lot of them use C#, Python and others.

C++ is great for learning how computers and operating systems work, while getting acquainted with principles of OOP. It's not so great for making desktop applications, in general. What bugs me is how C++ is selected sort of "by default" for many projects when there are a lot of better choices out there, choices that would lead to a faster and less frustrating development experience, and probably to a better product in the end. C++ is held in way too high esteem. Sure, you need it to develop for PS3. But for Windows? Maybe, but probably not.

  • 0

I learned C++ first, then Java, C#, Perl, then C for system programing, and sone other stuff that I forgot like smalltalk, scheme, and prolog for my Programing languages course. Oh also FuzzyCLIPS for my Intelligent Systems course.

  • 0

I learned Visual Basic (back when it was VB6) and then learned Java. I'd say Java is the more powerful of the two, but VB may help you get your head around programming concepts a tad easier (this IMO is the absolute greatest barrier to learning programming in any language - it's a total paradigm shift in thinking patterns). After learning Java and VB I eventually moved onto C++, which is also a great programming language (but definitely not for beginners IMO). You can learn C#, it's okay, but once you've learned VB, Java and C++ learning C# is well, up to you. At the moment I'm re-learning Java (it's easy enough to forget after 3 years of constant C++) but definitely going to be moving onto PHP and Objective-C because I'm one of those weird people that just love to learn it for fun - PHP more specifically will become useful for me as it'll help me make improvements to the forum I'm an admin on, but that's another story altogether.

So, tl;dr, just go for Java. It's easy enough to begin with and it'll help you pick up common programming concepts fairly easy too.

EDIT: Also, what revvo said.

  • 0

Suggesting to start on a harder, heavier language? Really?

I am keen to understand your thoughts further?

Once you learn C and C++ going to higher level languages like Java, C# and Objective-C is a piece of cake. I also believe some of the concepts you learn with a lower language like C are very valuable in understanding how programming work...something that will be harder to learn in a higher level language

If he just wants to code for fun and he doesn't really care about programming, going straight to C# or Java is a pretty good idea

Rudy doesn't believe a person should enjoy learning to program. Don't mind him.

No, I just believe there are valuable lessons to be learned from C and C++

If he just wants to program as a hobby and isn't very serious about it then by all mean go straight to a higher level language like C#

  • 0

I learned C++ first, then Java, C#, Perl, then C for system programing, and sone other stuff that I forgot like smalltalk, scheme, and prolog for my Programing languages course. Oh also FuzzyCLIPS for my Intelligent Systems course.

Forgot Assembly (hate it, hate it, HATE IT), Verilog, VHDL. I think out of all the languages I learned I really like Verilog. I had to simulate a CPU with it and I felt it was my only class where I was doing real work. Java and Assembly were just create games classes and I learned a lot about Object-oriented programming with Java so I agree with people who are saying to take that first. Java almost does everything plus the kitchen sink and the Java API Docs are some of the best (along with .NET's) documentation I have seen.

  • 0

There is no reason why C or C++ can't be enjoyable to learn. It all comes down to whether you have a real interest in learning how things work, or if you just want to push a few buttons in a wizard and be instantly rewarded on a massive scale. Pick whatever suits your style.

  • 0
No, I just believe there are valuable lessons to be learned from C and C++

If he just wants to program as a hobby and isn't very serious about it then by all mean go straight to a higher level language like C#

While I agree that learning C++ should be part of the curriculum of any serious programmer, it's questionable whether it should be chosen as a first programming language. One can very well learn memory management and the low-level APIs like Win32 after having learned variables, loops, classes, encapsulation, etc., in a higher-level language. As a path it presents less resistance and more gratification. I was exposed to a variety of programming languages before C++, some old and cruddy, some very good, as a result I already had a critical look at it when I started. I remember asking my teacher why were header files needed (unlike in any other language, save for C, but I didn't know C)... he said it was because it was cleaner to have the declaration separate. :laugh:
  • 0

There is no reason why C or C++ can't be enjoyable to learn. It all comes down to whether you have a real interest in learning how things work, or if you just want to push a few buttons in a wizard and be instantly rewarded on a massive scale. Pick whatever suits your style.

Name one programming language where you can "push a few buttons in a wizard" and magically have a program that can do everything.

Go ahead. I'm waiting. :rolleyes:

  • 0
One can very well learn memory management and the low-level APIs like Win32 after having learned variables, loops, classes, encapsulation, etc., in a higher-level language.

You can learn all about variables, loops, classes, encapsulation, etc in C++ without having to worry about advanced memory management and low-level APIs. All that complicated stuff can be done whenever the person feels ready. It's very easy to make a simple app in C++.

  • 0

I've found Java and C# are good because they take something from a bunch of languages, which makes learning other things easier. PHP is a good in-between for scripting and programming, but I've found that my PHP habits create some re-familiarization time when switching to Java. Python and VB, don't like the syntax, and it's very different from other languages so transitioning would be a bit more difficult.

  • 0
As a technical lead I am begging you to stop suggesting C# as a beginners language. I ve seen it all.

Start with VB and when you realise whats going on in the .NET Framework start looking into C#. VB gives you lots of bad habbits though...

Care to explain why C# wouldn't be a good choice? And why do you recommend VB instead if it teaches bad habits?
You can learn all about variables, loops, classes, encapsulation, etc in C++ without having to worry about advanced memory management and low-level APIs. All that complicated stuff can be done whenever the person feels ready. It's very easy to make a simple app in C++.
It's not so much the memory management that's the problem, it's the confusing syntax, the complicated compilation model (you can't get away without understanding the concept of translation unit and the real purpose of header files for long), the poor libraries, the duplicated features (is a string const char* or std::string? C or C++ libraries? etc.), and the relatively unhelpful IDE support, that all combine to produce a remarquably painful experience before you learn your way around all that stuff. Which gets in the way of learning basic concepts such as variables, loops etc.

Example: in C#, to be able to use a class, I just have to write that code somewhere in the project. In C++, I have to ensure the declaration will be accessible in any translation unit in which I want to use the class, that the declaration is guarded from multiple inclusion using include guards, and that the code corresponding to the declaration is available at link time otherwise I will get an error with mangled names that doesn't reference any particular line of code. Oh, and what was that thing about forward declarations?

It gets messy real quick.

  • 0

As pointed out before in this thread, C/C++ forces you to learn lots of things that you probably won't see again in languages like C#, Visual Basic and Java. So for a nice start and learning the basics, I'd recomend anyone to use a high level programming language.

My personal journey started in C/C++, then moved on to VB where I really learned the programmers way of thinking. Then I moved back to C++ again quickly followed by Java. All of those where in a professional environment except for the very first C/C++ teachings. Looking back at those experiences I dont think it makes much difference if I had learned Visual Basic or Java before C++, but I know that first strugle with C/C++ was often about problems not related to any simple programming in itself.

In terms of C#, it was a walkover to learn after Java, and I feel that you can master that basics of any of those and easily enough go into the other.

Because I have something of a softspot for C# with WPF/XAML and LINQ I voted for this.

  • 0

There is no reason why C or C++ can't be enjoyable to learn. It all comes down to whether you have a real interest in learning how things work, or if you just want to push a few buttons in a wizard and be instantly rewarded on a massive scale. Pick whatever suits your style.

Since this is your claim, why don't you answer?

You said it, not me. Therefore, YOU should be the one answering. And if you're complaining about how I didn't quote the phrase verbatim, well get a grip and don't be such a hardass.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Microsoft will soon allow some users to block Copilot from analyzing their Office files by Usama Jawad Microsoft Purview is a pretty useful data governance, security, and management service that allows customers to gain enhanced visibility and control over their content. It's meant for commercial customers, such as organizations that are storing data at scale. As AI continues to expand and infiltrate every corner of a firm, many are a bit conscious about the technology gaining access to their confidential data. Microsoft is now making a configuration change that will allow such customers to rest easy. Right now, users within an organization have the option to apply Purview sensitivity labels (when available) to secure certain files and label them as such. For example, if you apply the "Confidential" label on an Excel file, the file will be encrypted, and a "confidential" watermark will be applied to it. So, if this file is shared with anyone, they are aware that its access is supposed to be restricted. Up until now, Microsoft was allowing some connected experiences, like its AI services, to analyze files, regardless of their sensitivity label. This is of major concern to most organizations, as a recent example highlighted how confidential emails with data loss prevention (DLP) policies like privacy labels were being uploaded to Copilot for analysis. As such, Microsoft is updating an existing Purview data label sensitivity setting that prevents "some connected experiences that analyze content", from being blocked completely from doing this. The label isn't changing, but the blocking is now being enforced across all connected services (including Copilot and other AI tools), and now extends to Microsoft Word, Excel, and PowerPoint. Files with the label applied already will get this enhancement automatically too once it becomes available. Microsoft has urged IT admins to inform their respective helpdesk and compliance teams, update internal documentation, and review sensitivity labels to ensure that they meet their respective compliance needs. This change is tagged as MC1297982 in the Message Center. General availability is scheduled to begin in a phased manner soon and will complete by the end of next month. That said, it is important to note that this only applies to commercial customers who have a license that allows them to use Purview.
    • llamas are unruly going haywire in New Guinea.
    • The Persuasion Engine: How Any Business Can Use AI-Powered Neuromarketing —was $28 now free by Steven Parker Claim your complimentary copy (worth $35) of "The Persuasion Engine: How Any Business Can Use AI-Powered Neuromarketing to Understand and Win Customers" for free, before the offer ends on June 24. Description The Persuasion Engine, by neuromarketing and behavioral science expert Roger Dooley, solves the most pressing challenge faced by every marketer: how to figure out why customers make the decisions they do when 95% of their thought processes occur at an unconscious level. Dooley explains how artificial intelligence democratizes sophisticated neuromarketing tools that were once available only to Fortune 500 companies, making powerful customer insight and persuasion techniques accessible to businesses of any size. The book walks you through the evolution of traditional neuromarketing into ”Neuromarketing 2.0,” where AI-powered tools eliminate the need for expensive lab studies and human behavioral science experts. It offers a comprehensive roadmap for implementing eye tracking, facial coding, biometrics, implicit testing, and advanced AI behavioral techniques that dramatically improve marketing effectiveness while reducing costs and time investment. Inside the book, you’ll find: Revolutionary AI prompting strategies that bring world-class behavioral science expertise to your desktop Practical frameworks for leveraging attention, emotion, credibility, and decision architecture to boost conversions Step-by-step guidance for implementing biometric tools and implicit testing without laboratory resources Advanced techniques for creating scarcity, urgency, and FOMO that drive immediate customer action Comprehensive methods for auditing and enhancing empathy in customer communications Perfect for marketing professionals, business owners, entrepreneurs, and anyone with a stake in customer acquisition and retention, The Persuasion Engine provides actionable strategies that will transform your approach to marketing. Whether you're working on a shoestring or managing enterprise campaigns, you'll discover how to use your customers' non-conscious motivations and create compelling marketing that work on real people in the real world. How to download for free Please ensure you read the terms and conditions to claim this offer. Complete and verifiable information is required in order to receive this free offer. If you have previously made use of these offers, you will not need to re-register. Was $28, but is now FREE | Below free offer link expires on June 24. The Persuasion Engine: How Any Business Can Use AI-Powered Neuromarketing to Understand and Win Customers The below offers are also available for free in exchange for your (work) email: The Vibe Coding Playbook: Building Your Tech Business with AI ($35 Value) FREE - Expires 6/23 The Persuasion Engine: How Any Business Can Use AI-Powered Neuromarketing to Understand and Win Customers ($28 Value) FREE - Expires 6/24 How to Do More with Less: Future-Proofing Yourself in an AI-driven Economy ($28 Value) FREE - Expires 6/30 Cloud Security Fundamentals: Building the Foundations for Secure Cloud Platforms ($131.95 Value) FREE - Expires 7/1 The Complete Free AI Learning: Master ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini & More ($21 Value) FREE How to Build an AI Design Workflow with Gamma ($21 Value) FREE The Ultimate Linux Newbie Guide – Featured Free content Python Notes for Professionals – Featured Free content Learn Linux in 5 Days – Featured Free content Quick Reference Guide for Cybersecurity – Featured Free content We post these because we earn commission on each lead so as not to rely solely on advertising, which many of our readers block. It all helps toward paying staff reporters, servers and hosting costs. Other ways to support Neowin The above deal not doing it for you, but still want to help? Check out the links below. Check out our partner software in the Neowin Store Buy a T-shirt at Neowin's Threadsquad Subscribe to Neowin - for $14 a year, or $28 a year for an ad-free experience Disclosure: An account at Neowin Deals is required to participate in any deals powered by our affiliate, StackCommerce. For a full description of StackCommerce's privacy guidelines, go here. Neowin benefits from shared revenue of each sale made through the branded deals site.
    • All versions is correct. The bug appears on any version of Windows with KB5094126 installed. It's a little insane to expect the author to explain that systems that can't possibly have that patch installed, will not experience the bug. If you have any gripe about the title, it would be that it doesn't mention the update at all, but I wouldn't agree with that either. A title is not expected to be a full summery of the article.
    • (Can't see if he's still wearing the clompy clown shoes though)
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      Skeet Campbell earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      Sharbel earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • First Post
      BizSAR earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      589
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      190
    3. 3
      Michael Scrip
      76
    4. 4
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      75
    5. 5
      neufuse
      73
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!