• 0

Microsoft MSDN Expression 4


Question

Somehow, I was included in a special program verified by Microsoft to obtain at no cost*, the following products:

* Visual Studio 2010 at no cost

* Three Visual Studio? 2008 licenses.

* Two Expression? Web 3 licenses plus an Expression Studio 3 license. - They gave me one for Expression 4 Studio Premium DVD

* One Windows Web Server? 2008 R2 license. - Might do this later

* One SQL Server? 2008 Web Edition license. - Downloading now

With a special footnote:

This offer is only valid for two weeks and will expire on 6/29/10.

*At the end of the three year program there is a one-time $100 program fee.

---Not forwarding the email per the instructions ---

I found this a bit curious as it almost seems to be too good to be true, but I did verify everything and it appears to be legit. I do have the right to cancel within 60 days with no cause and not have to pay per the contract that I signed. Anyone else get set up with something like this?

I am a Mac user, and developer of web sites, but do have a couple of PC's laying around and will surely be checking this out very soon. I do want to grow my business and these might be some good tools to do so. If this doesn't work out for me, I will do the cancellation and provide total proof as they request of destruction of documents/downloads/materials.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/913774-microsoft-msdn-expression-4/
Share on other sites

6 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

That's from the Website Spark program.

And yes, it's legit - Microsoft are helping out small business ventures (known as "startups").

Edit : It's not Dreamspark, that program doesn't charge you at the end of the subscription (12 months).

Edited by Raa
  • 0

Looking closely at their program requirements, I am seeing something a bit concerning as I have my own host which I am very pleased with:

  Quote
In accordance with Program requirements, please use the field(s) below to list the URL for each new Website you?ve created and deployed using the Program development software and servers during your participation in the Program. Please do not list any duplicate URLs. We will use these URLs to verify your compliance with the Program requirements by: a) visiting the URL, and b) connecting to the server hosting each URL to collect information about the server OS, web server, and scripting technologies.

I presently have 4 sites of my own online and 2 client web sites that I cannot move and won't, but any new ones I will develop and host on the server 2008, or move to a hosting partner that they have listed. I am a bit concerned with this though as my ISP Charter frowns upon web sites being hosted on their system w/o a special agreement. I do host one dev server on a dedicated box right now just for that purpose and point my clients to that server while the site is being developed to keep control of it until it is signed off on.

Their download servers are a bit slow though, I should be getting about 1.6mb/s for downloads but getting around 126kb/s with NO multipart downloading. :( Good thing I am setting up the downloads to run tonight while I am sleeping. :)

  • 0

Right but if I go and give them the URLS of my sites, they will verify if I am with a hosting partner which none are (I just checked), those then would disqualify my entries I would presume. I understand the whole leveraging and advertising power behind their program with it all being "Look at the power behind our servers, look at what our business partners have built and are doing with them." So I do see that part being a vital ingredient in it.

I must say though that this did come in good timing though as I am about to deploy 2 other sites which are in the works and can list those once those are completed. One at least can go on my own server, the other is already hosted by a different company which also is not part of the partner program.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • A summary of the article shouldn't be an issue in theory, as the information is all based within the document itself. The problem with a lot of AI models is that they are trained off both Wikipedia as a primary source and other secondary websites which have less reliable information. As an encyclopaedia it is no doubt going to have bias in one way or another, all encyclopaedias do. The difference is that there is a process for a lot of this information to be figured out whether or not it is an opinion, or the source of that information, and to be aware of the possible bias in the first place, even your own bias as a reader. The way many people understand languages these days is quite limited, particularly in certain areas of the world. This is obvious in many types of "journalism" where some articles are thinly disguised opinion pieces, Where language is carefully curated to push a point of view despite it looking like fact. This is partly why a lot of the Western world is now so divided.
    • I paid for a year subscription, starting in December, I think. I like the user-friendliness and assets like royalty-free music and sounds. But they need to fix some of the horrific bugs before they start adding more features. For starters, you should be able to drag stuff around the timeline without it completely obliterating transitions, synchronization timing, and clip lengths. If you already set up footage and audio how you want, and try to insert more by sliding content to the right, you'll have to clean it all up again. The scroll wheel constantly stops working, and you have to minimize the window and restore it to get it back. When selecting text at the top right in special text tools, it glitches and goes to "copy" mode with a weird pop-up on top of your cursor and you can't type. These are more important than AI tools and new features. Microsoft, start by making your product less painful to use.
    • 🙄 Whats the need to launder? Do you have any reputable sources?
    • Thanks, I'll download it and see how it goes. Gonna be tough. I've used Nova Launcher for around 10+ years I think.
    • Wikipedia has become hot molasses with mostly filth masquerading as truth. Most of it is the imagination of few writers who think of themselves as above god. The narrative setup is mind boggling.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Apprentice
      Adrian Williams went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • Reacting Well
      BashOrgRu earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Collaborator
      CHUNWEI earned a badge
      Collaborator
    • Apprentice
      Cole Multipass went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • Posting Machine
      David Uzondu earned a badge
      Posting Machine
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      515
    2. 2
      ATLien_0
      258
    3. 3
      +Edouard
      191
    4. 4
      +FloatingFatMan
      174
    5. 5
      snowy owl
      133
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!