Retail calls for sub-


Recommended Posts

June 24th, 2010 @ 13:44

By Joe Anderson

Retailers are calling on Microsoft to release its new Kinect motion camera for under ?100, despite reports that the device costs $150 to manufacture.

HMV?s games chief Tim Ellis, told MCV that without the right price the device will never go mass market.

?Kinect is likely to find a significant audience with a market-responsive price,? he said.

Morrison?s games buyer Nick Sultanti said that any price under three figures will get the consumer very interested.

?Sub-?100 and Kinect will benefit immensely. People are going to compare price points between Move and Kinect, and it would be fairly detrimental if there is a major price discrepancy in favour of Move.?

ShopTo boss Igor Cipolletta added that the lower the price, the better for Microsoft?s install base.

?Predictions of Kinect price being over ?79.99 will do little to engender early adopters and thus affect unit sales in the short to medium term,? he said.

Kinect was announced at E3 last week. It?s due to release in November.

http://www.vg247.com/2010/06/24/retail-calls-for-sub-100-kinect/

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/913968-retail-calls-for-sub/
Share on other sites

Move can cost more than £100

£30 for Navi

£40 for Move (x2 for games that require it)

£25 for PS Eye

You can buy the bundle but like I said, if you need another Move controller that's another £40.

Kinect is really going to appeal more to the gamers that want to play party games. It's a one off cost & supports more than one person.

Whereas Move is damn pricey for each gamer. Imagine £80 just for 2 Move controllers to play that boxing game alone :no:

I really think a $99 US price would work MUCH better, especially since the 360 hardware is falling behind the PS3 hardware at this point and with the Move coming out, it needs to be competitive or A LOT more people are going to go to the PS3

I think with the target market of Kinect it makes sense about the sub ?100 price because it makes it more attractive as a bit of an impulse buy.

And all these people complaining about the Move cost when you factor everything together, i thought you guys liked this kind of modularity? At least that's the impression i got when people were complaining about the lack of Wi-Fi included in the old 360? ;)

I think with the target market of Kinect it makes sense about the sub ?100 price because it makes it more attractive as a bit of an impulse buy.

And all these people complaining about the Move cost when you factor everything together, i thought you guys liked this kind of modularity? At least that's the impression i got when people were complaining about the lack of Wi-Fi included in the old 360? ;)

It's perfectly fine (just look at the Wii, you need to buy nun-chuck and wiimote separate), but Sony takes the cake when you need 2 Moves, a camera and a navi controller. This is why the old Sega add-ons failed as well. Poorly priced and barely any games made use of them.

Move can cost more than ?100

?30 for Navi

?40 for Move (x2 for games that require it)

?25 for PS Eye

You can buy the bundle but like I said, if you need another Move controller that's another ?40.

Kinect is really going to appeal more to the gamers that want to play party games. It's a one off cost & supports more than one person.

Whereas Move is damn pricey for each gamer. Imagine ?80 just for 2 Move controllers to play that boxing game alone :no:

Even if you buy the bundle, you still have to add ?30 for Navigation.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • add $200 and get DWARF 3 model add $2000 and visit scientists center in your town add $20000 and visit the biggest telescope in Chile
    • Guess it's one of those things best used by devs to thoroughly test stuff.
    • is it all upside down there? traffic lights reverted too?
    • Bluesky COO warns social media regulations could destroy competition from small startups by Paul Hill Fears that increasing government control of social media risks regulatory capture by the biggest social media firms were raised again recently. Bluesky’s chief operating officer said in an interview that social media bans for children and tighter regulations for social media firms risk creating a world where there are only a few social media platforms run by companies with the deepest pockets. Regulations on social media firms have been very lax since they appeared for mainstream users in the 2000’s. This gave Meta, Snapchat, and Google time to build up their user bases and get entrenched, with Meta being the most successful. Now that Meta has succeeded, it has been attempting regulatory capture. By pushing for more regulations of social media, Meta hopes to make it more difficult for rivals to challenge it. For its part, it doesn’t need to worry about the cost of regulation because it has a lot of money to spend, whereas startups do not. Speaking to CNBC, Rose Wang, Bluesky’s chief operating officer, said: “I support the protection and the safety of youth, the question that we have then is at what cost, because essentially what I’m scared of is in the long term, we’re headed to a world where there’s about three to five platforms, and extreme heavy regulation of those platforms, and basically the whole compliance teams of these platforms are 10 times the size of our entire team. So, basically, we’re living in a world where it’s almost impossible for smaller entrants to come in and build healthier spaces. These platforms have led to a place where the bottom line is the thing that drives what they do... so I understand why governments have to step in and regulate, because the platforms have done nothing right.” She said that while she is not against regulation, there needs to be more channels between the small to mid-sized players and regulators to help protect them. She says that big tech players, on the other hand, “who we know are circumventing regulation,” need to be regulated. Essentially, the Bluesky position is one of nuance, rather than absolutes. While Bluesky’s proposal may preserve competition in the social media space, it still doesn’t address the massive privacy implications these age verification measures introduce, such as handing over sensitive identity documents to access age-gated content. Source: CNBC
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dedicated
      Conjor earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      493
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      249
    3. 3
      Steven P.
      71
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      70
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!