Recommended Posts

How's the responsiveness of the GUI as compared to iPod Touch (since you've used it)?

Great really. If the HTC Legend turned out to provide a lesser experience I would have returned it in a heartbeat, like I did with my HTC Touch Diamond back in 2008.

How's the speed of the web browser?

Here in Amsterdam and surrounding areas I almost always have full 3G coverage, so I can't really complain about the web browser speeds. So far it's responsive and fast as far as mobile browsers go. Just like Safari on the iPhone it's based on WebKit.

How are the built-in calendar and media player apps?

The Calendar works just fine really. The media player is something that, GUI wise, feels a bit dated compared to my iPod touch. That doesn't mean it plays music any worse than my iPod, it just isn't as nice too look at. ;)

Friend of mine at work just got a HTC Legend (I lead her towards HTC & Android). And I plan on having a play with it throughout the week (in fact I have it now) and first impressions is actually it isn't that much smaller from a Desire. It certainly looks it, but side-by-side, and ontop. There is hardly any difference (ok, maybe a slight difference in height).

It is just as fast as my Desire. Well, on "normal" operations like email, text, music etc. Haven't tried any gaming. The screen size is an issue that is beginning to annoy me. The on screen keyboard now takes up 80%+ of the screen when in use. Which is very impractical. By the way SwiftKey is kinda rocking it.

I gotta be honest, I prefer the look and the solidness of the Legend over the Desire. If they bought out a Desire in a unibody (DesireHD?), I'd snap it up in an instance.

You can't go wrong with either phones in my opinion. If you can afford it, I would go with the Desire for future Android 3.0 goodness. But if not, the Legend is certainly not to be considered a loser or second place. It certainly holds its own again the Desire (and in some cases - design, look and feel - wins outright).

Lesson learnt? Sometimes bigger, better and faster doesn’t matter, it is the overall package.

  • 4 months later...
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I like the show more options. The only problem with it is that it's not always in a consistent spot in the menu. If the copy/paste/cut, happens to show on top, then more option is the last in the menu. But if copy/paste/cut happens to show on the bottom, then more options is before the copy/paste/cut. But I do like the more options because it hides the stuff that I rarely use. But I would like to choose what it is or isn't hiding. That would make it better.
    • I wonder if "put it back the way it was for decades" ever crossed their minds? 🤣
    • Rescind the stupid "Show more options" in context menus and just give us the full menu instead of adding more steps to get to what we want. The "simpler by default" makes me think they'll go in the opposite direction. Every context menu should have a configure button so you can pick and choose what options should be shown, I know you can do that with some registry fu but that shouldn't be required.
    • This is why competition must exist. Finally, pressure is mounting on Microsoft to move in the right direction.
    • Microsoft is making Windows 11's context menus faster, simpler, and configurable by Taras Buria Five years ago, Windows 11 introduced redesigned context menus, offering users a simpler, more modern design. However, customers quickly discovered that the new menus leave a lot to be desired. Many are unhappy with performance (they are really slow), while others dislike the double-layed design, where many options are hidden behind the "Show more options" button. In addition, over the years, menus became cluttered and overloaded. While Microsoft has already fixed plenty of pain points across Windows 11, context menus remain mostly unchanged. Fortunately, Microsoft is finally listening. Marcus Ash, Design and Research Lead for Windows at Microsoft, responded to a tweet on X, confirming that the company is working on fixing Windows 11's context menus. Reworked context menus are supposed to be faster, simpler by default, and "configurable to what you use most." What the latter means is unknown, just like whether Microsoft plans to keep the classic menu alongside the modern one, but according to Marcus, the wait should finally be over soon, as he promised to "share our approach soon." Improved context menus will most likely appear first in Windows 11 preview builds in the Experimental Channel. While we wait for Microsoft to release them, you can try fixing context menus on your PC with a simple tool called Windows 11 Context Menu Manager. It lets you disable entries you do not need, not only cleaning up context menus, but also making them significantly faster. Microsoft has already improved Windows 11's Start menu and taskbar, so hopefully it will address user criticism of the context menu as well. Stay tuned for new Windows 11 preview builds, which usually arrive every Friday.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      I2D earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Dr Jared Dental Studio earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      RG INVESTMENT GROUP earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Very Popular
      The Norwegian Drone Pilot earned a badge
      Very Popular
    • Very Popular
      s0nic69 earned a badge
      Very Popular
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      468
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      249
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      79
    4. 4
      FloatingFatMan
      64
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      61
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!