Recommended Posts

LAS VEGAS ? In case you were wondering if Fedor Emelianenko's recent loss to Fabricio Werdum might open up the possibility of the Russian making his way to the octagon, UFC president Dana White has a simple message for you: It's not happening.

Following Thursday's UFC 116 pre-event press conference, White said he has absolutely no interest in continuing his years-long pursuit of the former PRIDE champ.

"Now that he loses, now they want to say, 'OK, now we'll come over,' because he lost?" White asked. "I'm done playing the games."

Werdum shocked Emelianenko and the MMA world with a 69-second submission win over the Russian that snapped his incredible 27-fight winning streak. Other than a smiley face posted on his Twitter account, White has remained relatively quiet since the June 26 result.

While one might have expected White to gloat in the agony of the "crazy Russians," the UFC exec said he viewed the loss as inevitable and was simply glad to see a hole poked in the mystique of Emelianenko that he believes has been largely built by the media.

"Honestly, when he lost, you guys know there's been times when I have animosity with guys and you lose, and I'm like, 'Ha. Alright, there you go,'" White said. "But to be honest with you, I didn't have any of that for Fedor.

"In my opinion, the media pumped him up more than anything. When he did the fight, they were far from selling out. They did under a million-dollar gate. They had 400,000 people watch it on Showtime. It's not like anybody is really clamoring for [him to come to the UFC]."

The UFC exec said he has not any discussion with Emelianenko's reps following the loss. But White contends now, as he long has, that Emelianenko is not even a top heavyweight, much less a pound-for-pound great, and with the Russian's incredible run over, there's simply no reason to bring him to the UFC.

"To be honest with you, without joking around and no [expletive], I honestly and truly have not believed that Fedor is this great heavyweight that everybody thinks he is," White said. "Yes, back in the day in 2005 and before that, he was beating some great guys who were in their prime, and he was nasty. But to prove that you're the best in the world, you have to fight the best consistently. You have to consistently fight the best.

"It would be like calling the Lakers the world champions and they're playing some college team. It's not the same. I know that everybody can see the sense in that, but people just love to because he's not here they want to say, 'Oh, he could do this and that.' It's all mythology and [expletive]."

White said there was a time when Emelianenko coming to the UFC would have been profitable for everyone involved, but that's simply no longer the case.

"If we were to have come to a deal with Fedor, yeah, we could have put on a big promotion, and we could have found out (how goood he is)," White said. "People are going to say, 'Oh, he got caught in a triangle. Anybody can.' Yeah, anybody can, but it would have been a lot better if he came over here and lost to Shane Carwin, Brock Lesnar, Cain Velasquez, than losing to Werdum."

Of course, now that Emelianenko is tumbling down most MMA pundits' rankings list, Saturday's UFC 116 heavyweight title unification bout between UFC champ Brock Lesnar and interim title-holder Shane Carwin will likely produce the sport's undisputed heavyweight king.

White said that's just what should happen.

"Shane Carwin and Brock Lesnar, we know all their attributes," White said. "We know how good they both are. I have no idea what's going to happen on Saturday night. I have no clue. So to say that one guy could beat this guy, there's only one way to find out who can beat who, and that's fight, and [Emelianenko and his camp] aren't willing to do it.

"You don't get the honor of being called the best fighter in the world when you won't fight the best guys in the world. Now doesn't that make sense?"

So with Emelianenko's run over and the majority of the world's best fighters competing within the UFC's octagon, it's unlikely that any fighter in any weight class will be considered a world No. 1 any time in the near future. It would seem to be the end of controversy for the UFC, but White said he's not expecting a moment of peace.

"I know it's fun because I don't have [Emelianenko] and he's not in the UFC, so it's fun to say, 'Oh, what we he do?'" White said. "And I guarantee you, get ready: (Strikeforce heavyweight champion Alistair) Overeem will be the next guy now. 'Oh, Overeem would beat them all.'

"Overeem got knocked out by Chuck Liddell at light heavyweight."

Source

No, he could not.

Fedor blew his chance with the UFC. Now that he doesn't have the hype behind him, he is still a good fighter but isn't that much of a draw. Overeem would fare better in the UFC than Fedor.

Fedor hasn't fought anyone (since pride) but ex UFC champions who are ex champions for a reason, Overeem would have been his biggest challenge yet which won't happen now that he lost to Werdum who is a decent fighter but not a champion, still not sure why the UFC got rid of him he beat Gonzaga and Vera before losing to Dos Santos whose beat everyone the UFC has gave him. :blink:

Still if M1 weren't the greediest bunch of **** we would already know the answer to how well Fedor would have done in the UFC.

ZAnwar you coulnd't be any more in denial...lol

Fedor was overhyped and undertested, he wouldn't stand a chance against Cain, Lesnar or Carwin. I hate lesnar as much as the next guy but if you really think Fedor could beat lesnar you're insane..lol

I'm not saying he's not talented, but he was only unbeaten because he hadn't faced anyone even worth mentioning in the last 10 years. I'm not saying that Fedor isn't capable of being in the same league as Lesnar and Carwin either.. Fedor has much more experience than either of them, however Fedor has been exposed by Werdum. He hasn't just lost a fight, he was exposed for exactly what people have been saying about him for ages now, in that he hasn't fought anyone worth fighting and when he does, he breaks. In all honesty, aside from Fedor's KO power, I would go as far as saying that Arlovski and Rogers were both winning the fight up until the KO. Lesnar doesn't have near the experience that Fedor has, but his freak athleticism and strength make me believe it would be a pretty easy win for him over Fedor.

But by all means continue with your Fedor is the greatest thing since sliced bread train.. soon enough it will come to and end and you'll be seeing him for what he is. A talented guy that likes to hide behind his record and not challenge himself.

Actually you DID say that he wasn't in their league by saying that he wouldn't stand a chance.

Fedor has been exposed? By doing what? Giving up position to a two time world jiu-jitsu champion who took advantage of it? If anyone had to take advantage, it would be him. Fedor would kill Lesnar if the fight stayed standing. Lesnar doesn't have one punch knockout power (we haven't seen it yet), but Fedor does AND his striking accuracy is light years superior. It is due to this reason that Lesnar would take it to the ground, but Fedor is no Frank Mir either.

Even I say that Fedor doesn't challenge himself, but to discredit him like that is insulting.

Actually you DID say that he wasn't in their league by saying that he wouldn't stand a chance.

Fedor has been exposed? By doing what? Giving up position to a two time world jiu-jitsu champion who took advantage of it? If anyone had to take advantage, it would be him. Fedor would kill Lesnar if the fight stayed standing. Lesnar doesn't have one punch knockout power (we haven't seen it yet), but Fedor does AND his striking accuracy is light years superior. It is due to this reason that Lesnar would take it to the ground, but Fedor is no Frank Mir either.

Even I say that Fedor doesn't challenge himself, but to discredit him like that is insulting.

What I meant by the league comment is simple, it's almost the same for Couture imo, couture and Fedor are in the same league (technically speaking) because of their talent, record, experience etc... however neither of them are a match for someone of Lesnar's size and strength, they just can't cut it.

Yes, Fedor has been exposed, he gave up a position, which many think he could have gotten out of in the first 20 seconds or so but he failed to do so. He lost to a 2 time world jiujitsu guy, who you failed to mention couldn't cut it in the ufc and got cut for losing. Yes he's great at juijitsu, but if he's as talented as you make him out to be, why coulndn't he beat Dos Santos, a relatively new guy to the sport?

Lesnar does lack stand up skills, so by you saying that fedor would beat him standing up is a no brainer, of course he would. But lesnar would never allow it, he would charge fedor and get him down and beat him senseless and there is nothing fedor could do to stop it. We all understand that Fedor is superior at striking, it's no shock dude but he can't MAKE lesnar stand, the way that lesnar can MAKE him go to the ground.

I'm not sure what you meant by saying Fedor is no Mir... Mir is a much more talented jiujitsu guy than Fedor is.

Comparing Couture's record to Fedor's? Come on. Randy has lost half the amount of fights he has won.

Werdum lost two of the four fights he's had in the UFC and he got cut. Pretty stupid if I may say so on Dana White's part. He beat the likes of Gonzaga and Vera and only lost to Arlovski (via decision) before that. Santos has got a record which not many people have in the UFC. As I said before, Werdum is a force to be reckoned with in the UFC also. He would kill the likes of Randy Couture. Carwin or Valesquez? No.

Fedor is a MUCH stronger guy than Mir, that's what I was talking about. He's not going to get manhandled like Mir did.

Comparing Couture's record to Fedor's? Come on. Randy has lost half the amount of fights he has won.

Werdum lost two of the four fights he's had in the UFC and he got cut. Pretty stupid if I may say so on Dana White's part. He beat the likes of Gonzaga and Vera and only lost to Arlovski (via decision) before that. Santos has got a record which not many people have in the UFC. As I said before, Werdum is a force to be reckoned with in the UFC also. He would kill the likes of Randy Couture. Carwin or Valesquez? No.

Fedor is a MUCH stronger guy than Mir, that's what I was talking about. He's not going to get manhandled like Mir did.

Since when did i say we were comparing fight stats.. fedor is like 31-2 or something, of course nobody can compare to that, then again nobody has gone as long as him fighting nobodies. Aside from there actual wins/losses, they are very comparable. This is why so many people wanted to see that matchup. But if you wanna go by fight stats go for it.. i could just as easily say that Couture has held a HW belt and a LHW belt, something fedor could never do, so that must make couture better, right?

If you watched his fights you'd understand why he got cut, the Vera fight was a horrible fight and he only won due to a horrible ref stoppage, watch it for yourself. He was in the same boat as thallas Leites was.. great BJJ guys, but they didn't want to fight, just wanted to lay on their back and hope for the best. Leites got cut right after a title fight, so it has nothing to do with fight stats, it has to do with horrible fighters. Werdum couldn't do **** in the UFC, he couldn't before, what makes you think he can now? I honestly think Couture would beat Werdum.

Since when did i say we were comparing fight stats.. fedor is like 31-2 or something, of course nobody can compare to that, then again nobody has gone as long as him fighting nobodies. Aside from there actual wins/losses, they are very comparable. This is why so many people wanted to see that matchup. But if you wanna go by fight stats go for it.. i could just as easily say that Couture has held a HW belt and a LHW belt, something fedor could never do, so that must make couture better, right?

If you watched his fights you'd understand why he got cut, the Vera fight was a horrible fight and he only won due to a horrible ref stoppage, watch it for yourself. He was in the same boat as thallas Leites was.. great BJJ guys, but they didn't want to fight, just wanted to lay on their back and hope for the best. Leites got cut right after a title fight, so it has nothing to do with fight stats, it has to do with horrible fighters. Werdum couldn't do **** in the UFC, he couldn't before, what makes you think he can now? I honestly think Couture would beat Werdum.

You talked about 'record'? What other meaning does that have?

Let's just hope that the Fedor v Overeem fight happens now. That'll put to rest much of the criticism surrounding Fedor.

We all know that the beast that was unleashed on Rogers this past month would wreak havoc in UFC. I could see Overeem beating Lesnar. Whether it'd be easy or not, that's another story. For some reason you people overrate fighters in the UFC so much. Just because they're in the UFC doesn't mean that other fighters from other organisations can't beat them.

Let's wait for Carwin and Lesnar's fight tonight. We'll see how Brock likes fighting a person who may have the same raw power as him.

Yes, like Fedor would get a title shot after losing. Oh wait, this is Bizarro Land MMA aka Strikeforce where a loss is the only way to secure your spot as a n? 1 contender. :rolleyes:

Fedor will probably rematch Werdum for the last fight of his contract and then try and jump ship to the UFC, costing Dana White a fraction of what he would have had to pay for him had he jumped ship while technically undefeated.

Valesquez would be a bigger challenge than Lesnar as well. The former's boxing is far superior to Lesnar's.

Velasquez's has pillow punches, you lost your mind. A lucky punch on Nog won't make him good, remember Ben Rothwell and Kongo. He could punch forever, noone cares.

Fedor is a MUCH stronger guy than Mir, that's what I was talking about. He's not going to get manhandled like Mir did.

Mir weighed in at 265 and couldn't stop Carwin, Fedor is small, this time size really matters. The way he presented himself against Rogers and Werdum, Mir could beat him with a hand tied behind his back.

Fedor will probably rematch Werdum for the last fight of his contract and then try and jump ship to the UFC, costing Dana White a fraction of what he would have had to pay for him had he jumped ship while technically undefeated.

Fedor's not going to UFC.

Velasquez's has pillow punches, you lost your mind. A lucky punch on Nog won't make him good, remember Ben Rothwell and Kongo. He could punch forever, noone cares.

You on crack? Pillow punches? :rofl:

Mir weighed in at 265 and couldn't stop Carwin, Fedor is small, this time size really matters. The way he presented himself against Rogers and Werdum, Mir could beat him with a hand tied behind his back.

Size isn't everything. Technique plays a big part, and Fedor has bucket loads of it.

No, he could not.

Fedor blew his chance with the UFC. Now that he doesn't have the hype behind him, he is still a good fighter but isn't that much of a draw. Overeem would fare better in the UFC than Fedor.

Yeah he could. Fedor made a simple mistake of just rushing in against Werdum, possibly the best Heavyweight BJJ fighter out there. He had Werdum down, but he should have seen it, but he didn't. With other fighters in the past, he was very careful in his strikes when the fighter was on the ground waiting to trap Fedor.

After seeing that performance by Lesnar yesterday, I'm convinced that he's one of the best HW fighters out there, but his stand-up was weak. Fedor could easily knock Lesnar out standing up. On the ground, I'm not too sure how his Sambo would fare with Lesnar's wrestling..

Dana White is stupid though, because anyone can tell you that Fedor vs any other heavyweight in the UFC will still sell PPVs like crazy. Big deal, he has 1 loss. Any great fighter out there has had losses. Does Carwin suck after that 1 loss? Hell no. Nogueira has a few losses, and what about GSP? The loss isn't the issue, it's how they rebound from the loss, if you come back stronger.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • DVD only? What kind of self-respecting optical disk backup/ripping tool doesn't support Blu-ray these days? I burned all my DVDs like 15+ years ago...
    • ...but you're Johnny, from Australia?    
    • Glow 26.9 by Razvan Serea Glow provides detailed reporting on every hardware component in your computer, saving you valuable time typically spent searching for CPU, motherboard, RAM, graphics card, and other stats. With Glow, all the information is conveniently presented in one clean interface, allowing you to easily access and review the comprehensive hardware details of your system. Glow provides detailed information on various system aspects, including OS, motherboard, processor, memory, graphics card, storage, network, battery, drivers, and services. The well-organized format ensures easy access to the required information. You can export all the gathered data to a plain text file, facilitating sharing with others for troubleshooting purposes. No installation needed. Just decompress the archive, launch the executable, and access computer-related information. Glow runs on Windows 11 and Windows 10 64-bit versions. Glow 26.9 changelog: New Features The processor hardware detection engine has been significantly enhanced beyond traditional Intel and AMD architectures. Native support is now available for modern platforms such as Apple Silicon (M-Series) and the newly introduced NVIDIA Spark. In addition, all ARM-based processors can now be accurately distinguished between ARM32 and ARM64 architectures, providing precise hardware reporting. This marks a major milestone for Glow's hardware detection capabilities. The RAM manufacturer identification algorithm has been expanded. JEDEC vendor codes for popular brands such as Patriot, PNY, Team Group, GeIL, Lexar (Longsys), and Asgard/Gloway have been integrated into the database. This significantly reduces the likelihood of incorrect or "Unknown Manufacturer" results and improves overall hardware detection accuracy. New Public IP Address and Internet Service Provider (ISP) features have been added to the Network section. To ensure reliability, this information is retrieved from the trusted service ipwho.is. When Hiding Mode is enabled, no requests are sent and these features remain hidden, as they may expose sensitive information. The search engine used in the Installed Drivers, Installed Services, and Installed Applications sections has been enhanced. You can now perform more flexible and accurate searches using initials, partial matches, and loosely arranged character sequences. The TS Preloader loading bar has been rebuilt using our modern TS Custom Controls graphics library, developed entirely in-house. As a result of this infrastructure upgrade, the loading bar now features smooth rendering and rounded corners that align with the visual style of Windows 11. [TS Updater] A new validation algorithm has been added to check whether the target application is currently running before the update process begins. Bug Fixes Resolved a condition that could prevent TS Preloader from shutting down safely during rare application crash scenarios. Fixed a text alignment issue in the Network section affecting the display of DNS addresses. Alignment is now rendered correctly. [TS Updater] Fixed an issue that could prevent the updated application's executable "*.exe" file from being located after the update process. [TS Updater] Fixed a bug that could leave outdated "*.sha256" files in the application directory after an update. [TS Updater] Fixed a rare issue that could cause subfolders to be moved into the root directory after an update. [TS Updater] Fixed an issue during the first launch that could cause flickering and a temporary white window appearance due to Windows Defender interactions. Changes A small improvement has been made to the internet connectivity detection algorithm. Connectivity checks are now performed in the background with minimal impact on the user interface thread. The keyboard shortcuts in the top menu have been reorganized and simplified to provide a consistent experience across all Türkaysoft applications and to avoid potential conflicts with standard Windows shortcuts. The TS Preloader splash image has been updated with a Türkiye-themed stadium design to celebrate Türkiye's qualification for the 2026 FIFA World Cup—its first appearance in 24 years. Congratulations, Türkiye! The TS Custom Controls module has been updated to version 26.6, delivering improved stability and a more polished visual appearance. [TS Updater] The application icon has been redesigned to provide a more modern and refined look. Note: Always unzip the program before using it. Otherwise you may get an error. Download: Glow 26.9 | 1.8 MB (Open Source) Links: Glow Homepage | Screenshot | Github Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • DWARF mini review: the world's smallest smart telescope for night and day sky captures by Steven Parker DWARFLAB reached out to me asking if I was interested in checking out the DWARF mini, which is a portable astronomy telescope designed for amateur astronomers. Why do I say it's for amateurs? Well, for starters, it's not what you'd call "high end"; it's more of a professional-grade starting point for amateurs serious about capturing what's up there in our night and day skies. A typical amateur astronomer is most likely thousands of dollars deep into the hobby, and I will make no claims that this DWARF mini (at a fraction of the cost) could replace it all, okay? Well, if you read on, it will be clearer what I am trying to convey. Disclosure: DWARFLAB provided a free sample without any editorial input or review pre-approval. I have always been interested in looking up and observing the night sky. I see satellites crossing the sky above my garden most nights, and I am always looking at the moon. Yeah, I have a 200MP camera on my phone, but at 200X zoom, AI takes over and makes the pretty moon pictures that I snap, the DWARF mini does not, you get an actual true picture of what you can barely see with the naked eye. Before we start, let's share the highlights of the DWARF mini in bite-sized format: Pocket-Sized & Ultra-Lightweight Weighing just 1.85 lbs (840g), the DWARF mini easily fits into a backpack or large pocket. Its all-in-one, compact design makes it the ultimate grab-and-go digital telescope for hiking, camping, or traveling to dark-sky locations. Intuitive App Control & Built-in Sky Atlas Go from unboxing to your first shot in just 3 minutes! The DWARFLAB App provides a seamless experience with an interactive star map. Simply select your target and start exploring without the steep learning curve of traditional setups. Auto GOTO & 360° Pivot Freedom Enjoy pinpoint automated tracking with full 360° rotation. Powered by a high-sensitivity Sony IMX662 sensor (1/2.8-inch, 2.9μm pixels), it captures amazing, low-noise astro details, bringing faint nebulas and star clusters to life with stunning clarity. Pro-Level EQ Mode & Long Exposure Unlock advanced deep-space imaging with Equatorial (EQ) Mode. Supporting impressive single-frame exposures up to 90 seconds and featuring built-in light pollution filters, it easily cuts through city glow to reveal intricate celestial structures. Smart Cloud Processing & All-Ages Fun Effortlessly enhance your raw data with integrated cloud processing for professional-grade results. Perfect for beginners, kids, and adults, this telescope makes exploring and sharing the wonders of the universe an exciting, family-friendly adventure. The packaging is a pretty minimal affair with the outer box opening like a flap to reveal the plastic mould of the DWARF mini sitting in it. Below, the Sun filter, charging cable, cleaning cloth, and documentation can be found. DWARFLAB also provided a Mini Hydraulic Tripod ($89.99), and I highly recommend getting it if you plan on purchasing the DWARF mini, as it fully supports the motorized tracking feature of the telescope; plus, at 840g, the weight of the telescope, you will need a tripod that supports more than the weight of a smartphone anyway. What's in the box DWARF Mini Smart Telescope × 1 Sun Filter x 1 Type-C to Type-C Cord x 1 Cleaning Cloth x 1 User Guide With that out of the way, here are the full specs: DWARF mini Dimensions (DWH): 60.70 mm x 100.38 × 183.61 (2.39" x 3.95" x 7.23") Weight: 840g (1.85lbs) Aperture diameter: 30 mm (telephoto), 3.4 mm (wide angle) Image Sensor: SONY IMX662 1/2.8" (Telephoto) OmniVision OS02K10 1/2.8" (Wide-angle) Focal length: 150 mm (telephoto), 6.7 mm (wide-angle) Equivalent focal length: 1016 mm (telephoto), 45 mm (wide-angle) Shutter Speed: Tele - 1/10000-90s, Wide - 1/10000-30s Maximum exposure time: 90s (telephoto & wide-angle), Both in EQ mode Rotation range: Lens: 225°, Base: 360° Effective Pixels: 2.07M Maximum Resolution: 1920 × 1080 (Telephoto & Wide-angle) Built-in filters: Astro, Dark, Duo-Band (Telephoto), Astro (Wide-angle) Output: JPG, FITS, TIFF, MP4 Shooting Mode: Photos, Videos, Astronomy, Burst Shooting, Time-lapse Photography Storage: 64 GB Battery: Built-in 7000 mAh, supports external USB charging Charging Port: Type-C NPU: 1 TOPS Features: WiFi, NFC NFC One-Touch Connection Astronomy Post-Processing/Appointment Shooting/Astronomy Mosaic Wi-Fi Transmission Range: 15m (open environment) Color: Black Compatibility: iOS & Android smartphones/tablets Warranty: 2-years (24-months) MSRP: $399 Design Charge port On/off button Lens On the DWARF mini itself, it is a pretty minimal affair. On one side, there is a Type-C USB port to charge the non-removable 7000 mAh battery, and on the other side, a large button to power on or off the telescope. The button is flanked by an LED that is green when connected via the DWARFLAB app, or lights up red when being powered off. Below the button, there are four LEDs that indicate battery power. The DWARF mini does not have any sharp edges as all sides are rounded off; it has a good heft to it, but the weight of it feels quite balanced in the hand, so it isn't top or bottom-heavy. On the front there is the DWARFLAB logo which is quite small and there are no other markings on it. The tripod offers full 360° rotation of the motorized base, which allows for tracking for the time-lapse mode, but also for the 90-second captures of nearer objects in the sky, such as the Sun or the moon. Usage To get started, simply power on the DWARF mini and open the DWARFLAB app, tap on Connect, and it will scan for the DWARF mini over the Wi-Fi network. The device supports both 2.4 GHz and 5 GHz Wi-Fi, as well as Bluetooth for discovery, so connection issues were minimal in my experience with it. As previously noted in the specs, the DWARF mini will stay connected with a phone or tablet up to 15 meters in an open environment, such as a backyard. Lighting status Powering on: The green circular light will rotate and breathe in turn Powering off: The red circular light is gradually extinguished Connecting: Green light strip rotating Connected: Green light strip solid/always on 4 lights 1= 0-25%, 2= 25-50%, 3= 50-75%, 4= 75-100% battery power To view the full lighting status, such as tracking mode and connection failure, you can check the user guide on the official DWARFLAB page. DWARFLAB app Above, you can see the steps undertaken to connect the DWARFLAB app to my Galaxy S26 Ultra. Weirdly, I got an alert that a firmware update failed to get uploaded to the DWARF mini the first time, but upon retrying, it worked. Then place the DWARF mini outside, make sure your smartphone or tablet is connected to it, and then head back inside, because you can manage it from the comfort of your home. Simply enter the Atlas tab in the app and search for what you want to capture, and then tap on the camera icon; the DWARF mini will then attempt to track the object and give you a live view right on your connected device. Results I've had the DWARF mini since April, but even though my garden is south-facing, I had a lot of trouble trying to capture a good image of the moon. In the end, it was possible after I took it with me on a trip to my parents in Southend, UK, at the end of May. Here is a capture of the moon, resulting from 20 stacked images over a 90-second exposure. What you are seeing here is not AI-assisted. A good example of what I mean is the latest flagships with their 200MP cameras claiming to capture things like closeups of the moon, and while they are not as good as the above example on the DWARF mini, the resulting image on smartphones is actually AI-assisted above 30X zoom. Here is an example of a similar shot at the moon at 200X zoom using an HONOR Magic8 Pro. The difference is clear. Next, here we have a shot of the daytime moon. Here is a shot of Arcturus, the red giant star, which is the fourth brightest in the night sky. As previously mentioned, it could be a bit clearer, but clouds passing in front of it muddied the shot a bit. The Sun The DWARF mini also ships with a sun filter, meaning you can take great shots of the sun as well. Tracking Sun Resulting (stacked) shot Live zoom The pictures themselves are limited to Full HD, and some of the examples actually came out in HD (1280x720), but this is because the standard telescopic result is in 720p while "Wide" is in 1080p. Above you can see how in the app the Sun is tracked, the resulting capture, and Live zoom. I have only scratched the surface of what is possible with this telescope; I found several examples online of shots of the Milky Way, among others, such as nebulae and galaxies. All of this requires patience and knowledge, although if you know what you are looking for, simply enter it in the Atlas tab in the DWARFLAB app, tap the camera icon, and the telescope will attempt to track it. Conclusion The good The DWARF mini definitely places itself in a price point that makes astrology accessible to anyone looking to get started in the hobby. Say you want to have a closer look at the moon, simply enter it in the Atlas, and the Live view also lets you zoom in and snap pictures. The bad Some issues I came across while operating the DWARF mini were that it sometimes failed to connect unless I held my smartphone right next to it, and finding and tracking sometimes took several attempts to get it calibrated. I discovered that it helped if I sort of positioned and pointed the telescope in the general area it was supposed to detect, but this obviously wouldn't work with objects you can't see with the naked eye; more testing is required for that. Another bit of advice is to ensure that the lens is clean. While making the examples of live zooming on the sun, I discovered that the telescope lens and sun filter were not completely clean, and only after cleaning with a microfiber cloth was I able to get a decent shot of the sun. Where to buy and a coupon Okay, $399 is not cheap for a side hobby, but nor is a $1,500 smartphone flagship that you'll most likely have for a couple of years. This is a one-time entrance into astrology, and it won't become obsolete in one year like a smartphone. It's a thumbs up from me. The DWARF mini is available to buy right now in the U.S. and U.K. at the links below. DWARF mini for $399 on the official site DWARF mini for $399 on Amazon U.S. Use the NEOWIN5OFF coupon code for an additional 5% off at checkout (expires June 21) As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Reacting Well
      X-No-file earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      pestcontrol46 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      pestcontrol46 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      504
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      270
    3. 3
      +Edouard
      75
    4. 4
      Skyfrog
      74
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!