Recommended Posts

Hey all,

Got an odd problem with my computer and it's LAN connection to my Netgear DG834G router (to my motherboard's built-in LAN port), which has been going on for a while but is just getting annoying now. I think it might be Windows 7 related, but I can't be sure.

Basically whenever I turn my computer on or wake it up from sleep mode the router shows my computer's connection with an orange light instead of the usual green, which means the connection is at only 10Mbps instead of 100Mbps (confirmed via Windows network connection information). If I physically plug and unplug the cable in the back of the router it will usually then reconnect at 100Mbps (sometimes takes a few goes). Once it is connected at 100Mbps it stays connected at that speed, until it is next restarted or awoken from sleep mode.

I have already had to disable the "turn off this device to save power" feature under Windows 7 as it struggled to reconnect when coming out of sleep mode, which has made me suspect Windows 7 as it was not an issue on Vista. Although I have had Windows 7 a while, I have had this problem just as long. I definitely had no issues with the network on Vista.

I have tried a new LAN cable to no avail, and a second computer with a much older network card connects to the router with no issues. I even tried one of the other router ports. Have done a lot of searching for answers with few results to show for it... :(

Any advice on settings to try, ways to diagnose the problem?

Thanks :)

Problem seems a little similar to this although that seems to say that its merely a display issue, whereas you're seeing that the port is actually connected to the router at 10 Mbps.

It does seem like it is actually connecting at 10Mbps - if I look at the device properties it says so and the router's orange light apparently means the same. :/

Look in the nic properties, advanced tab, in the device manager.

<snip>

Tried both full and half duplex 100Mbps and rebooted to be sure - in both cases it would just flick from "enabled" to "connecting" to "connected" to "disabled" repeatedly in the network connections center (it was actually working in-between too as I managed to half-load Wikipedia before it got forceably cut-off). I then changed it to "auto" and it instantly picked it up... at 100Mbps. :s I guess that means that enabling/disabling the device via the control panel would have the same effect as unplugging/plugging the actual cable.

If it helps the onboard ethernet controller is an "Atheros AR8121/AR8113/AR8114".

Turn off BIOS level PCI-E and LAN power saving settings.

Turn off Windows 7 power saving for PCI-E link level state.

Install latest lan driver, turn off power saving settings (Keep an eye out for 'Green Ethernet' or 'Energy Star Compliance'). Turn off Priority & VLAN support as well for network compatability (DG's do not support Priority packets unless you own a DGN2000 with DG-Team's latest fw).

DG834G* don't permit forcing duplex modes, stick with Auto.

Issue is driver or bios related with Windows Vista or Windows 7, not really an MS issue though.

Turn off BIOS level PCI-E and LAN power saving settings.

Turn off Windows 7 power saving for PCI-E link level state.

Install latest lan driver, turn off power saving settings (Keep an eye out for 'Green Ethernet' or 'Energy Star Compliance'). Turn off Priority & VLAN support as well for network compatability (DG's do not support Priority packets unless you own a DGN2000 with DG-Team's latest fw).

DG834G* don't permit forcing duplex modes, stick with Auto.

Issue is driver or bios related with Windows Vista or Windows 7, not really an MS issue though.

Turned off the PCI-E link level state power saving and am about to try some newer drivers. Will see how we go...

Well the newest driver and PCI-E link level state changes haven't worked. :( I think I've got the power saving on LAN already turned off - I disabled the "turn it off to save power" option a while back as it frequently failed to turn it on again, and I haven't noticed other power saving options for LAN that are on.

Do you know where I can change the priority and VLAN support options? Anything else I can try?

Changed network cable?

I was going to say drivers - noticed it didn't help you.

Can you try another switch (just to test!)

Yes, I tried a different cable. Was the one used by the second computer on the network that has no problems at all. Made no difference to this computer though. :(

By switch do you mean the router or the network "card"?

Will give the drivers from Atheros' site a go. Tried the latest one from ASUS (motherboard).

Tried the Atheros drivers, but discovered they are actually older than the ones from ASUS and will seemingly only connect at 10mbps. I was uninstalling those to give the beta driver from ASUS a go and noticed Windows install its own driver which so far hasn't dropped to 10mbps despite me restarting and sleeping the computer several times. So I think I'll stick with it for a while and see what it does before trying the beta.

Also, is the LAN supposed to "turn off" when going into sleep mode? I ask as I've noticed that the LAN light for my computer goes off whenever I put it to sleep or shut it down. However, the light for an old machine that is on the same network is always on, even when the computer is shut down or put in stand-by.

I think this is fixed now. Not had it at all since I let Windows install its own drivers... would seem that the drivers being distributed on the disc with the motherboard, and on ASUS' and Atheros' sites, were causing the problems. Furthermore these drivers seem to get the connection to wake-up a lot quicker. Previously I'd have to wait 30-40 seconds after coming out of sleep mode before the Internet would work (despite the LAN apparently being already connected), but now it is almost instantaneous. :)

Thanks for all the help guys.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I don't find them "bitchy" or "whiny". I think the term you should use it, uhm, "passionate."
    • Ahh, I didn't know that. It makes sense. I was thinking I would be fine with 50 hours, but 100 is close enough that I wouldn't feel like I am paying for more than I am using. I might check it out sometime.
    • Google's next-gen Tensor AI chips might be produced by Samsung, report says by Hamid Ganji Image via Google Google’s Tensor Processing Unit (TPU) is produced in collaboration with companies such as Broadcom and TSMC, but a recent report suggests that the search giant is in talks with Samsung to hand over part of the production to the Korean tech company. According to a report by The Information, citing people familiar with the matter, Google has begun talks with Samsung about using its chip manufacturing capacity for the next generation of Tensor AI chips. Google’s upcoming TPUs are reportedly codenamed “Icefish” and will be produced using Samsung's 2-nanometer process technology. Meanwhile, Samsung is expected to produce only a portion of the next-generation Tensor chips, with most of the production remaining at TSMC. The Information says the new Tensor chips are currently in the design stage and are scheduled to enter mass production in 2028. TSMC is generally considered one of the most reliable chip manufacturing partners and is trusted by tech giants such as Apple and Google. However, the growing demand for TSMC’s AI chips, combined with the company’s focus on meeting demand from AI data centers, has reportedly prompted Google to seek additional manufacturing partners for its next-generation TPUs. Besides Samsung and TSMC, Intel could also be assigned part of the production. The Information reported this week is that Google has begun talks with Intel to produce up to three million TPUs in 2028. However, this is not the first time Google has partnered with Samsung on chip production, as Samsung has previously manufactured Tensor chips for Pixel smartphones. Google’s Tensor Processing Unit is used in cloud data centers and competes with NVIDIA’s chips, which currently dominate the market. By relying on in-house chips, Google can not only reduce its dependence on third-party providers but also create new revenue opportunities. The company has already supplied its TPUs to the AI firm Anthropic.
    • Reminder that the Premium and Ultimate plans already come with a 100 hour per month limit, which you then have to pay more to increase in 15 hour blocks.
    • It does invite Linux because MS should have been improving their products all along these years instead chose to ignore the users now this year they’re making all of these improvements to their products where as Linux doesn’t have this kind of problems in fact it has gotten so good I can even play Windows games in Steam that I no longer ever needed Windows to carry on with my life, unlike you still use Windows and chose to try beat down down those who don't use Windows because they love their LG TV. (Surprisingly I actually own a 55” LED LG TV and it has been going strong for almost 14 years, longer than any Sony TV”)
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      FBSPL earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      Jim Dugan earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      Tommi118 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      sjbousquet earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      sjbousquet earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      488
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      196
    3. 3
      +Edouard
      155
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      84
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!