Recommended Posts

Hi,

We just received our Cisco 1141N AP. I plugged it in for the first time and couldn't connect to the web interface (The IP address is correct). So I decided to connect via console to double check the IP's and to enable the HTTP server. IP was correct, tried to enter the Configuration Terminal to enable the HTTP server and for some reason, the configure terminal command doesn't exist:

AP5475.d0f5.1d8d con0 is now available

Press RETURN to get started.


AP5475.d0f5.1d8d>en
Password:
AP5475.d0f5.1d8d#conf t
                  ^
% Invalid input detected at '^' marker.

AP5475.d0f5.1d8d#
AP5475.d0f5.1d8d#?
Exec commands:
  cd               Change current directory
  clear            Reset functions
  clock            Manage the system clock
  crypto           Encryption related commands.
  debug            Debugging functions (see also 'undebug')
  delete           Delete a file
  dir              List files on a filesystem
  disable          Turn off privileged commands
  enable           Turn on privileged commands
  exit             Exit from the EXEC
  fsck             Fsck a filesystem
  help             Description of the interactive help system
  led              LED functions
  lock             Lock the terminal
  login            Log in as a particular user
  logout           Exit from the EXEC
  lwapp            lwapp exec commands
  mkdir            Create new directory
  monitor          Monitoring different system events
  more             Display the contents of a file
  name-connection  Name an existing network connection
 --More--

Am I doing something wrong? Or is there an issue with my AP?

Thanks,

H

  On 07/07/2010 at 07:33, bitbucket said:

can we see the output of a show run

also which version of the 1141N is it? the standalone ap or the lightweight version that needs a controller?

this thread might be of some assistance https://learningnetwork.cisco.com/thread/9562

The model of the device is: AIR-LAP1141N-A-K9

Here is the Show Run:

sh run
Building configuration...

Current configuration : 16735 bytes
!
version 12.4
no service pad
service timestamps debug datetime msec
service timestamps log datetime msec
no service password-encryption
!
hostname AP5475.d0f5.1d8d
!
enable secret <Removed>
!
!
crypto pki trustpoint Cisco_IOS_MIC_cert
 revocation-check none
 rsakeypair Cisco_IOS_MIC_Keys
!
crypto pki trustpoint cisco-root-cert
 revocation-check none
 rsakeypair Cisco_IOS_MIC_Keys
!
crypto pki trustpoint airespace-device-root-cert
 revocation-check none
 rsakeypair Cisco_IOS_MIC_Keys
!
crypto pki trustpoint airespace-new-root-cert
 revocation-check none
 rsakeypair Cisco_IOS_MIC_Keys
!
crypto pki trustpoint airespace-old-root-cert
 revocation-check none
 rsakeypair Cisco_IOS_MIC_Keys
!
!
username Cisco secret 5 <Removed>
!
!
!
interface GigabitEthernet0
 ip address dhcp client-id GigabitEthernet0
 no ip route-cache
 duplex auto
 speed auto
 no keepalive
!
!
line con 0
line vty 0 4
 login
!
end

I have never configured an AP before, I have only worked with Cisco Switches and Routers. Could you please explain the differences between a standalone and controller based AP?

Thanks,

H

The unified, aka lightweight (controller based) access points use a controller for configuration etc while the standalone is by definition, standalone.

What you have there is the lightweight ap denoted by the L in the model name AIR-LAP1141N-A-K9

If this is a new access point, then you may wish to send it back and request a standalone model otherwise you will need a controller

take a look at tables 3 and 4 http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/wireless/ps5678/ps10092/datasheet_c78-502797.html

also here is a cisco link that will help clarify what a wireless lan controller does.

http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/ps6302/Products_Sub_Category_Home.html

Hope that helps

  On 07/07/2010 at 08:53, bitbucket said:

The unified, aka lightweight (controller based) access points use a controller for configuration etc while the standalone is by definition, standalone.

What you have there is the lightweight ap denoted by the L in the model name AIR-LAP1141N-A-K9

If this is a new access point, then you may wish to send it back and request a standalone model otherwise you will need a controller

take a look at tables 3 and 4 http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/wireless/ps5678/ps10092/datasheet_c78-502797.html

also here is a cisco link that will help clarify what a wireless lan controller does.

http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/ps6302/Products_Sub_Category_Home.html

Hope that helps

Ok, makes sense now. I will try and get it swapped out for a standalone model... If not, I guess I can follow the thread you posted (https://learningnetwork.cisco.com/thread/9562) and convert the IOS to standalone.

Thank you so much for your help! Much appreciated!

H

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • It seems like I'm just renting games now. I can't resell them and they can be removed from the steam or Epic store or the servers shut down at any time.
    • Sure - let's expand on that a bit then to try and be of more help. It's not a one-time use code that can be gamed - each time the proof is required a new transaction takes place to go through the "proof" process. It's a unique step each time. Not a...reusable QR code or pass so to speak. Each time proof is required, a new cryptographic transaction is required. The tricky part here, is trusted issuers. That is still needed. Since this is open source - it doe snot mean that Google has to be the issuer. Google has just provided the tooling to do this, but they don't store the data - to be clear. Presumably, again - you would have some type of government or state issued digital ID that supports the zero-knowledge functions. Effectively, the same entities today that have your information and you (assumingly trust) would continue to have it, it would just be able to be leveraged in a more private manner when you go somewhere or interact with anything requireing age verification. To fake this, someone would need to have a legitimate private key tied to an actual real identity. Cryptographic checks using zero-knowledge would fail otherwise - and again - it can't be used over and over again. Can someone screw up and somehow leak that private key? Sure. No different than leaking your password to your private accounts - a password change would be necessary and let's hope that future implementation of ZKP-based identities bake in some kind of 2FA/MFA for better security. There's not much to hack here, as I said - really comes down to the issuer. If you receive this from the government, none of your real data gets sent to say "MyHubOfChoice.com" when doing age verification - the protocol is only designed to say "Yes - I meet the requirement." Reality is, this keeps you more anonymous than you could ever be today with age verification without having to share anything else about you. However, it's worth stating that anonymity isn't the goal with ZKP - it's removing disclosure. True anonymity is more difficult, as how everything works today to an extent you need to prove who you are with a "trusted" source (ie government/state issued ID). And that data, at the end of the day, does sit in a centralized db as designed. Could that change in the future, perhaps. But the goal of this is just to not have to hand over anymore information than you need to.
    • Oh yeah because its SO hard to duplicate some of the server's logic on the client
    • Software versions increase while older ones are deprecated. This is nothing new, except now it's not included with Windows. Do you not upgrade your software? The biggest issue for me living with 2.0 was that the new versions never upgraded it, it installed side-by-side. I accidentally launched the shite version more than once on accident.
    • They would have to include .NET (not be to be confused with legacy .NET Framework), and they don't. That might be why...dunno. Or maybe because it's open source (guessing)? It's kind of nice to have it separated from the OS.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      K.I.S.S. earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      solidox earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Dedicated
      solidox earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      Devesh Beri earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      956400 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      444
    2. 2
      ATLien_0
      162
    3. 3
      +FloatingFatMan
      147
    4. 4
      Nick H.
      66
    5. 5
      +thexfile
      61
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!