Recommended Posts

Hi,

We just received our Cisco 1141N AP. I plugged it in for the first time and couldn't connect to the web interface (The IP address is correct). So I decided to connect via console to double check the IP's and to enable the HTTP server. IP was correct, tried to enter the Configuration Terminal to enable the HTTP server and for some reason, the configure terminal command doesn't exist:

AP5475.d0f5.1d8d con0 is now available

Press RETURN to get started.


AP5475.d0f5.1d8d>en
Password:
AP5475.d0f5.1d8d#conf t
                  ^
% Invalid input detected at '^' marker.

AP5475.d0f5.1d8d#
AP5475.d0f5.1d8d#?
Exec commands:
  cd               Change current directory
  clear            Reset functions
  clock            Manage the system clock
  crypto           Encryption related commands.
  debug            Debugging functions (see also 'undebug')
  delete           Delete a file
  dir              List files on a filesystem
  disable          Turn off privileged commands
  enable           Turn on privileged commands
  exit             Exit from the EXEC
  fsck             Fsck a filesystem
  help             Description of the interactive help system
  led              LED functions
  lock             Lock the terminal
  login            Log in as a particular user
  logout           Exit from the EXEC
  lwapp            lwapp exec commands
  mkdir            Create new directory
  monitor          Monitoring different system events
  more             Display the contents of a file
  name-connection  Name an existing network connection
 --More--

Am I doing something wrong? Or is there an issue with my AP?

Thanks,

H

  On 07/07/2010 at 07:33, bitbucket said:

can we see the output of a show run

also which version of the 1141N is it? the standalone ap or the lightweight version that needs a controller?

this thread might be of some assistance https://learningnetwork.cisco.com/thread/9562

The model of the device is: AIR-LAP1141N-A-K9

Here is the Show Run:

sh run
Building configuration...

Current configuration : 16735 bytes
!
version 12.4
no service pad
service timestamps debug datetime msec
service timestamps log datetime msec
no service password-encryption
!
hostname AP5475.d0f5.1d8d
!
enable secret <Removed>
!
!
crypto pki trustpoint Cisco_IOS_MIC_cert
 revocation-check none
 rsakeypair Cisco_IOS_MIC_Keys
!
crypto pki trustpoint cisco-root-cert
 revocation-check none
 rsakeypair Cisco_IOS_MIC_Keys
!
crypto pki trustpoint airespace-device-root-cert
 revocation-check none
 rsakeypair Cisco_IOS_MIC_Keys
!
crypto pki trustpoint airespace-new-root-cert
 revocation-check none
 rsakeypair Cisco_IOS_MIC_Keys
!
crypto pki trustpoint airespace-old-root-cert
 revocation-check none
 rsakeypair Cisco_IOS_MIC_Keys
!
!
username Cisco secret 5 <Removed>
!
!
!
interface GigabitEthernet0
 ip address dhcp client-id GigabitEthernet0
 no ip route-cache
 duplex auto
 speed auto
 no keepalive
!
!
line con 0
line vty 0 4
 login
!
end

I have never configured an AP before, I have only worked with Cisco Switches and Routers. Could you please explain the differences between a standalone and controller based AP?

Thanks,

H

The unified, aka lightweight (controller based) access points use a controller for configuration etc while the standalone is by definition, standalone.

What you have there is the lightweight ap denoted by the L in the model name AIR-LAP1141N-A-K9

If this is a new access point, then you may wish to send it back and request a standalone model otherwise you will need a controller

take a look at tables 3 and 4 http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/wireless/ps5678/ps10092/datasheet_c78-502797.html

also here is a cisco link that will help clarify what a wireless lan controller does.

http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/ps6302/Products_Sub_Category_Home.html

Hope that helps

  On 07/07/2010 at 08:53, bitbucket said:

The unified, aka lightweight (controller based) access points use a controller for configuration etc while the standalone is by definition, standalone.

What you have there is the lightweight ap denoted by the L in the model name AIR-LAP1141N-A-K9

If this is a new access point, then you may wish to send it back and request a standalone model otherwise you will need a controller

take a look at tables 3 and 4 http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/wireless/ps5678/ps10092/datasheet_c78-502797.html

also here is a cisco link that will help clarify what a wireless lan controller does.

http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/ps6302/Products_Sub_Category_Home.html

Hope that helps

Ok, makes sense now. I will try and get it swapped out for a standalone model... If not, I guess I can follow the thread you posted (https://learningnetwork.cisco.com/thread/9562) and convert the IOS to standalone.

Thank you so much for your help! Much appreciated!

H

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Comments like these are genuinely fascinating to me because they're so far from anything I experience as a daily user of Win 11 since the first public beta. AI stuff? Have it turned off completely, never pops up anywhere. Forced MS account? Yes, they strongly recommend it and kinda push it lately during big updates and such, but it's still not forced. Pop up dialogs when you're not using Edge? Yeah, I vaguely remember seeing some reminders about using Edge a long time ago. I just clicked them away and kept using Vivaldi as usual (but frankly, I'd still much rather use Edge than Chrome - which I'm forced to use at work - I've grown to dislike Google a lot more than Microsoft lately, even if I am still deeply rooted in their ecosystem unfortunately). Awful context menus? A single simple tweak will get you the old context menus. Search in Windows using Bing? People use search in Windows for anything else than to search for local files or apps? Why? I just don't get a lot of the complains people have about Win 11.
    • Nice, but if you change the colour, the folder no longer shows image preview on the actual folder icon.
    • Taiwan hits Huawei and SMIC with new export restrictions by David Uzondu Taiwan has added Huawei and Semiconductor Manufacturing International Corporation, or SMIC, to its export control entity list. According to CNBC, this means companies in Taiwan now need a special license to ship certain high-tech goods to these two mainland Chinese firms. The conflict has been escalating for a while. The United States government, for instance, has been going after Huawei since at least 2019, putting the telecom equipment maker on its own Entity List over national security fears. The worry has always been about Huawei's connections to the Chinese government and the potential for its network gear to be used for spying. The United Kingdom eventually followed suit, ordering all Huawei 5G equipment to be ripped out of its networks by 2027. Remember, in December 2020, the US added SMIC to its Entity List over its alleged ties to the Chinese military. The goal was to choke off the chipmaker's access to the tools it needs to produce the most advanced semiconductors. Despite all the pressure, the two firms managed to collaborate and produce a 7nm chip for Huawei's Mate 60 phone, which annoyed some people in Washington who thought the sanctions had completely crippled China's chipmaking ambitions. This new blacklisting from Taiwan just tightens the screws even more. Last year, research firm TechInsights found a TSMC-made chip inside a Huawei AI training card. That was a huge "oh no" moment because it showed that, despite all the American restrictions, Huawei was still getting its hands on advanced Taiwanese silicon. That discovery led directly to the U.S. Commerce Department leaning on TSMC to shut down access for Chinese clients to specific AI chips. Huawei had cleverly exploited loopholes to hoard millions of GPU dies for its Ascend AI chip program, a direct attempt to build a homegrown alternative to Nvidia's dominant hardware. For Taiwan, this feels less like a trade issue and more like a matter of survival. The island's lead in chipmaking, largely thanks to TSMC, is often seen as its "silicon shield." The idea is that global reliance on Taiwanese chips makes any military action by China a huge risk for the world. Letting its most advanced tech reach the country that threatens its very existence could seriously weaken that shield. Source: CNBC
    • Anything is "news worthy" if it's new and someone writes about it. Something like an inconsequential note about "correcting a typo in the readme file" buried deep in the changelog could become "news worthy". And, on related note, anything can be used as a justification to complain about something one is clearly already biased against. Say, if someone's biased against Windows 11, they could see even an inconsequential change like an added time display as a reason to rant about "Microsoft these days"... ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
    • I expect i will always have the choice, I doubt I will be around to see self drive cars on the roads in any great amounts. I can understand where your wife is coming from, but then being in a car alone can have other problems.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Explorer
      Legend20 went up a rank
      Explorer
    • One Month Later
      jezzzy earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • First Post
      CSpera earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      MIR JOHNNY BLAZE earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Apprentice
      Wireless wookie went up a rank
      Apprentice
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      615
    2. 2
      ATLien_0
      277
    3. 3
      +FloatingFatMan
      180
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      150
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      115
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!