Choosing A Laptop: Most Bang For My Buck?


Recommended Posts

Hey Peeps,

I'm searching for a laptop for legal work this fall. I'd primarily use it for document work but also for simple programming and design, basic XHTML and CSS work. I'd like it to handle movies, streaming, and skype well too. I like big screens (15.6'' and over) but also want something with at least 2.5 hours of battery life.

I have a sponsored budget of up to $1400 and want to get the most bang for my buck. No real preference on the brand. Something in the $1000 - 1400 price range would be great.

My Questions:

1) For my needs, which criteria should I weigh more heavily? That is, should I value the Processor Speed over whether it's a dual or quad core and should I care about the graphics card?

2) Do you know of any laptops in my price range which really stand out, really fit my needs?

I scoped it out and found these options among others:

1) Sony ? VAIO VPCF126FM/B Laptop $1350

Intel? Core? i7 Processor 1.73 up to 2.93 GHz

16.4" Display

6GB Memory, 640GB Hard Drive

NVIDIA GeForce GT 330M 1GB Card

2) HP ProBook 4720s - Core i5 430M 2.26 (? 2.53) GHz - 17.3" $1100

4 GB DDR3 SDRAM - 1333 MHz

500 GB - Serial ATA-300 - 7200 rpm

ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4350 512 MB

3) HP EliteBook 8540p - Core i5 520M 2.4 GHz - 15.6" $1250

2 GB DDR3 SDRAM - 1333 MHz

320 GB - Serial ATA-300 - 7200 rpm

NVIDIA NVS 5100M 1GB Card

Feel free to fill me in on your thoughts. Thank you for your time.

I would certainly discourage you to buy a laptop from HP ProBook series. These laptops have some overheating problems, and I also wasn't happy with the quality of the LCD display.

Most of currently available laptops will be able to handle your work. If you need it mostly for document work, I would recommend bigger screen.

I would certainly discourage you to buy a laptop from HP ProBook series. These laptops have some overheating problems, and I also wasn't happy with the quality of the LCD display.

Most of currently available laptops will be able to handle your work. If you need it mostly for document work, I would recommend bigger screen.

Avoid Dell while you're at it, they have bad heat problems, and a lot of the tracker-pads these days are really bad quality (using the same single piece of plastic where you rest your wrists, but sunken on to the tracker-pad, the insperon range is really really poor response, and horrible to the touch).

We got a 17" quad core dell laptop in work, and have to keep a small usb fan running at all times pointing at the air intake to stop it from overheating :/

Look up reviews, search forums (neowin being an awesome place to start)

I personally like Acer's latest stuff, it seems to be decent enough build quality for the price.

Let us know what you decide!

Thank you all for the replies.

I'll dig more into HP Probooks and Elitebooks in regards to overheating. Worth looking in to.

I'm leaning away from Macs for several reasons. Of the people I work with and those in the legal industry, most seem to use PCs. For my price range of 1000-1400, I've seen a lot of Macs with smaller hard drives compared to PCs, 5400 rpm drives as opposed to 7200 too.

My now ancient but trusty Dell Inspiron 6000 is about to hit the 5 year mark. 1 Hard drive replacement, but otherwise lasted me very well. I agree that it does overheat though and I could see the plastic wearing easily on a new one. I have used a fan which has presumably helped extend its life. I need to and will check out Acer tonight, thank you!

If you can think of any other laptops which would fit my needs, let me know!

There is a product recall on the Vaio F series.

They say a firmware update will fix it (how very apple), but i'd wait till the community finds out whats wrong......

last thing you want is to buy a dud, like i did with my Vaio FZ series, they will give you a 100 of whatever currency voucher for your troubles :blink:

if you want quality, get a ThinkPad. you can also look into Asus' offerings, they tend to have some top-notch laptops for a reasonable price. the trickiest thing would be the big screen + battery life combination, if you're going with a juice-sucking machine then you'll probably want to get the 9 or 12 cell battery upgrade (depending on what's offered), or even go with something that can take modular bay batteries.

You likely won't have to spend half of your budget. Pretty much any computer these days can do the stuff you want it to do, unless you want to consider a MacBook Pro? Seriously it's a great machine if you have the money, which you seem to.

he said most bang for the buck.

Best bang for the buck is the Gateway FX laptop and the Asus gaming laptops found in Best Buy. Nothing can beat it. All of them can play games and handle processor upgrades if you care to future proof it. You can even mod the laptops to add a 1920x1200 LCD. Check out my specs in my signature for more information on my Gateway laptop.

Do not buy an HP, Dell or Sony. Go for a Gateway, Asus or Lenovo. They all are offered for great prices in Best Buy, Tiger Direct and Newegg.

Edit: Just now found out that the Gateway P-7815u sells for around $800. 4GB DDR3 Ram, 2.5+Ghz Core 2 Duo, Nvidia 9800m GTS 1 GB Ram. The newer edition (7908u) has a GTX 260m, which is slightly more powerful and sports new decals. I believe Gateway will be putting out a new refresh with a quad core processor in the coming months that will sell for less than $1300.

You should get around 2.5-3 hours of battery life with the FX. If you mod your processor (by upgrading to a Core 2 Extreme processor), it will halve. You can also undervolt the CPU and increase the GPU clock settings for even more performance. It also has a dedicated member forum with information about mods, troubleshooting issues and others.

Thank you for the replies, I appreciate it. I am now leaning towards an HP, Asus, or $1300 Gateway if I can find one.

My 3 questions:

-Does Gateway sell only directly through retailers?

-Why not an HP Elitebook: Why do some people see a Lenovo Thinkpad T510 as better than an HP?

- Any suggestions on good HPs or good Asus laptops?

My Responses

peacemf:

Heard about the Vaio recall this past Monday. I?m in the same boat: a bit too risky to get a new one now, despite the great specs.

Argote

1: Dell The Dell Studio XPS16 seems solid for $700 but I want a better one. The Dell M4500 at $1240 seems like a gas guzzler: I can get more for the same money.

Kralik:

2: Toshiba

If I can find one in my range with a significant amount of positive reviews, I will consider it. Ideas are welcome.

3: Alienware is more of a gaming computer for me, solid, impressive, but perhaps out of my league? The Mx15 is real nice: smooth, professional. With an i5 processor, 320GB drive, 1GB card, and 4GB memory upgrade I clocked it at $1630.. a bit overbudget.

I?ll consider Alienware more strongly in 3 years.

Masked Forever

4: Gateway I like Gateways, the NV7901 looks great. In February I was set to buy one, the NV7915u, until my budget doubled to $1400. The highest priced gateway I saw was $1100 ? I can squeeze out more features.

Does Gateway sell only directly through retailers? I didn?t see a ?build your own computer? page, maybe I missed it. I don?t want to scavange 5 websites to find a match for my needs, whether it?s a Gateway, Acer, or Asus.

primexx, farmeunit:

5: Lenovo The Lenovo Thinkpad T510 series is a strong option. Not really a brand I was considering, but they have a lot of good options.

ThinkPad T510 4314 ? $1380

Core i5 540M 2.53 GHz up to 3.03 ?

15.6" screen

4GB DDR3 Ram 1066MHz

500GB Serial 500 GB - Serial ATA-300 - 7200 rpm

NVIDIA NVS 3100M 512 MB

Why not an HP Elitebook: Why do some people see a Lenovo Thinkpad T510 as better than an HP?

6: Asus An Asus G73JH-RBBX05 and Asus G51 JX-X1 at $1200 have better specs than the above Lenovo, albeit with i7 1.6Ghz drives. Asus has a lot of great options too ? but I wish I could directly build my computer on their corporate site. Buying through outside distributers is painful to research.

Any suggestions on good HPs or good Asus laptops?

Thank you all for your input!

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Again, this is an irrelevant attempt to attack the messenger. The truth does not require any justification.
    • Removed the blue and underline as you did not post a link. This would also  be considered spamming.
    • Why it's almost impossible to produce a smartphone in the United States by Hamid Ganji If you look at the back of some Apple products, you can see the famous phrase “Designed by Apple in California, Assembled in China.” This phrase appears on products from one of the largest smartphone brands in the United States. These products are designed in the U.S., but their manufacturing takes place in China, India, Vietnam, or even Brazil. But why can’t Apple, as one of the largest American tech companies, produce its iPhones on U.S. soil? The idea for this topic came to me after the Trump Foundation launched a smartphone called the T1 and claimed that it was designed and built with American values in mind. However, this claim did not last long, as it was revealed that Trump’s phone was actually a rebranded HTC U24 Pro, with only a gold case and minor internal component changes. You see? Even a phone that is supposed to represent American values is manufactured in China. With a gross domestic product (GDP) exceeding $32 trillion, the United States is currently the world’s largest economy, while China ranks second with around $20 trillion. On the other hand, the United States is by a wide margin the global leader in various technological fields, and American companies spend hundreds of billions of dollars annually on research and development. From Apple and Google to Microsoft, Lockheed Martin, Boeing, and others, American tech and industrial giants lead their foreign competitors in many sectors. The United States also has no shortage of smartphone brands. Apple, Google, and Motorola are among the major brands in the smartphone market, collectively holding a significant share. However, the vast majority of their products are manufactured outside the United States. So why is it that the world’s largest economy, home to the most advanced technology companies and industrial powers, cannot produce a smartphone on its own soil? Let’s explore this question together. Even threats to impose tariffs won’t work After Trump entered the White House as the 47th President of the United States, his administration adopted strict tariff policies. One of these policies was the imposition of a 25% tariff on smartphones manufactured outside the United States. Trump said he “had a little problem” with Apple CEO Tim Cook over producing smartphones outside the U.S. So he thought that threatening a 25% tax on imported phones might force Apple to bring manufacturing back to the United States. “I have long ago informed Tim Cook of Apple that I expect their iPhones that will be sold in the United States of America will be manufactured and built in the United States, not India, or anyplace else,” Trump wrote on Truth Social. Image via The White House Although Apple currently manufactures some of the iPhone’s chips in the United States with TSMC's help, it still shows no willingness to shift full iPhone production to the country. At the time, renowned Apple supply chain analyst Ming-Chi Kuo wrote on X, “In terms of profitability, it’s way better for Apple to take the hit of a 25% tariff on iPhones sold in the US market than to move iPhone assembly lines back to the US.” However, manufacturing a smartphone in the United States is not as easy as it might seem, and many technical and economic barriers are involved. The lack of necessary manufacturing hubs There is a clear reason why many companies prefer to manufacture their products in China. China has established itself as the main global manufacturing hub for international companies, and over the past few decades, large contract manufacturers have emerged there, allowing companies like Apple to outsource production. One such example is Foxconn, which also manufactures some Apple products in India. Building the infrastructure required to produce smartphones in the United States would require tens of billions of dollars in new investment. Factories would need to be built, essential manufacturing equipment would have to be installed, and, most importantly, a skilled workforce capable of operating these systems would need to be recruited and trained. The United States currently lacks the core infrastructure needed to manufacture smartphones, and for this reason, many companies prefer to outsource production to Chinese contractors rather than spend tens of billions of dollars to build that infrastructure, which is significantly more economically efficient. Additionally, building such infrastructure in the United States could take up to a decade, ultimately leading to a significant increase in the product's final price for consumers. Shortage of trained labor in the U.S. compared to China Decades of serving as a global manufacturing hub have allowed China to build a massive talent pool in the production sector that is almost unmatched worldwide. Today, if a company chooses to manufacture its products in China, it can be confident that the workers involved in production have years of experience in their respective roles and are capable of producing high-quality goods with minimal errors. Even if we assume that tens of billions of dollars were invested in building smartphone manufacturing infrastructure in the United States, finding skilled workers would remain highly challenging. Apple CEO Tim Cook visiting the iPhone 6 assembly line in China in 2014. Image: Tim Cook on X In a 2015 interview on CBS’s 60 Minutes, Tim Cook said the main reason Apple isn’t producing in the US is a lack of skills. "China put an enormous focus on manufacturing, in what you and I would call vocational kind of skills. The US over time began to stop having as many vocational kinds of skills. I mean you could take every tool and die maker in the United States and probably put them in the room that we're currently sitting in. In China you would have to have multiple football fields,” Cook said. Also, in 2017, at the Fortune Global Forum in Guangzhou, Cook once again emphasized the importance of highly skilled Chinese workers. “China has moved into very advanced manufacturing, so you find in China the intersection of craftsman kind of skill, and sophisticated robotics and the computer science world. That intersection, which is very rare to find anywhere, that kind of skill, is very important to our business because of the precision and quality level that we like. The thing that most people focus on if they’re a foreigner coming to China is the size of the market, and obviously, it’s the biggest market in the world in so many areas. But for us, the number one attraction is the quality of the people,” Apple CEO said. Higher labor costs in the United States Producing almost any product in the United States is more expensive than in many other countries, and one of the main reasons is the higher cost of labor in the U.S. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, median weekly earnings of full-time workers in the United States were $1,235 in the first quarter of 2026. Meanwhile, the average annual salary in China's private sector in 2025 was RMB 71,590 (US$9,961). In many parts of the world, the weekly wage of an American worker is equivalent to several months of income. Another important factor to consider is that in the United States, the workforce capable of working on a smartphone assembly line is highly specialized and therefore commands higher-than-average wages. According to an estimate by Bank of America, producing an iPhone in the U.S. is technically possible, but “iPhone cost can increase 25% purely on higher labor cost in the U.S.” However, this 25% increase applies only if final assembly is performed in the United States while components are still sourced from China or elsewhere. In this case, the price of a base iPhone would rise from $799 to around $1,000. But in another scenario, if Apple were to produce the required components for the iPhone within the United States, production costs could increase by more than 90%. Trump’s dream for a “Made in the USA” iPhone might never come true In a free-market capitalist economy, one of the primary responsibilities of any CEO is to maximize profit. Using Apple as an example, Tim Cook’s role is to maximize the company’s profits so that it can fund research and development for new products and invest in areas such as artificial intelligence, while also keeping shareholders satisfied. Therefore, it is entirely understandable that Apple would choose not to bring its manufacturing back to the United States and instead keep production in countries where labor is cheaper, and products can be manufactured at a lower cost, thereby maximizing its profit margins. What is your opinion about manufacturing smartphones in the United States? If you are an American citizen, would you be willing to pay hundreds of dollars more for a smartphone made domestically in the USA? Let us know in the comments.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      jessse3334 earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Reacting Well
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      506
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      196
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      153
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      72
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      65
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!