Choosing A Laptop: Build Quality


Recommended Posts

Hey Peeps,

I scoped it out and made a tidy list of laptops I'm interested in. However, I'm getting conflicting advice across multiple forums.

Category A: Clarification

Do you see certain computers as "consumer laptops" and "business laptops"?

If so, what are examples of computers you would consider "consumer laptops,"? Are these laptops with good specs but poor quality or a poor build which doesn't last up to 3 years?

Category B: Assessment

Out of these choices, would you consider any to be of poor quality? (with battery life issues, overheating concerns, and/or almost guaranteed parts replacement 2 years after you purchase it.)

In what ways?:

Dell Latitude E6150

HP EliteBook 8540p

HP Pavilion - dv7-4080us

Lenovo ThinkPad T510

Asus G73JH-RBBX05

HP Envy 15

Dell Studio 17

Please help. Thank you.

An offshoot of the original post found at: https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/918188-choosing-a-laptop-most-bang-for-my-buck/

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/919190-choosing-a-laptop-build-quality/
Share on other sites

I've found dell laptops the most flimsy/breakable. Thinkpad is probably the best choice out of those for durability. Never had an acer but don't hear the best things about them. HP and asus are alright.

My cheap gateway laptop is surprisingly tough, I have dropped it many times while it was on and its fine, did manage to break the Ethernet port though, by knocking it off a chair when a cable was plugged in (I am a real clumsy ****) :pinch:

I am not sure if you are an anti-Apple user but, MacBook's are A LOT better in terms of quality and longevity compared to other laptops I've used. You pay a premium but the hardware is not cheap and the batteries are made from the latest battery technology that maintain charge over a longer period of time.

I am not sure if you are an anti-Apple user but, MacBook's are A LOT better in terms of quality and longevity compared to other laptops I've used. You pay a premium but the hardware is not cheap and the batteries are made from the latest battery technology that maintain charge over a longer period of time.

Completely agree. If your goal is build quality then pay the premium and get a MacBook Pro. Its unibody construction beats anything out there right now in my opinion.

From my experience with past Dells and my current Dell XPS 16 which is kind of a similiar form factor

It does overheat and it is not the firmest machine ever, If it dropped from a metre I would be scared it would explode into 1000 pieces

However they are super machines though and the internal parts haven't failed me one bit!

I had an Acer for about 2 years and the only problem I had was the battery, but that's because I didn't take care of it properly. I dropped it and the only thing that got damaged were the clips that hold down the screen when i would go to close it. It did overheat, but only because the fan was clogged with cat and dog hair. Once that was cleaned out, it worked perfectly.

My sister had a Dell, and the hinges broke on it within a year and a half. It would also overheat after about 10 minutes for no apparent reason.

My gateway is also working perfectly, dropped a couple times and it's still working beautifully.

I am not sure if you are an anti-Apple user but, MacBook's are A LOT better in terms of quality and longevity compared to other laptops I've used. You pay a premium but the hardware is not cheap and the batteries are made from the latest battery technology that maintain charge over a longer period of time.

MacBooks retain a lot more value than other laptops and I love Mac OS to death, but they are not built better than ThinkPads. Not even close. Their aluminum is mallable, their hinges are wobbly, some older models were prone to discoloration and in short, I would not dream of handling my 17" unibody MacBook Pro (which is no doubt Apple's best notebook effort) as fearlessly I did all my ThinkPads before it. Try this with a MacBook.

My vote goes to the Dell Latitude E6510, the E6510 is the slightly updated version of the E6500 and it is the very best laptop I have ever owned...

* Not too large, and not a wuss laptop either

* Great battery life

* Support for a 9 cell battery (although it sticks out a bit)

* Very high screen resolution with LED backlight

* Modular Bay, you can take out the DVD or BD writer and place in a second hard drive. The laptop even has RAID support!

* Full size backlit keyboard

* Very easy to upgrade, the back comes off with just 1 screw.

* Support for 3G modems, GPS, Wireless N

* Integrated smartcard reader, as well as RFID support

* 2 PCMCIA slots

* USB powershare, you can charge stuff though USB without the laptop being even on.

* Nipple mouse as well as a touchpad

* Displayport

* Overall superb build quality, although it's not a Lenovo

Really, I wouldn't even pick a lenovo X301 over this great piece of engineering!

Thanks for the replies. I put my assessments below. I'm going to check out the Lenovo and Hp-Pavilion in a store tomorrow to better assess their build.

Quality[gathered across multiple forums]:

Lenovo ThinkPad T510 i7620M

Dell Latitude E6150 i7620M

Dell XPS 16 i7720QM

Asus G73JH-RBBX05

Dell Studio 17 i7720QM

HP EliteBook 8540p

HP Pavilion - dv7-4080us

HP Envy 15

Personal, Layman Assesment of Quality

Lenovo ThinkPad T510 i7620M

Dell XPS 16 i7720QM

HP Pavilion - dv7-4080us

Dell Latitude E6150 i7620M

Dell Studio 17 i7720QM

Asus G73JH-RBBX05

HP EliteBook 8540p

HP Envy 15

Price (note: i put in the specs I would want)

Dell Studio 17 $1200

Asus G73JH-RBBX05 $1250

HP EliteBook 8540p $1250

HP Pavilion - dv7-4080us $1300

HP Envy 15 $1350

Dell XPS 16 $1370

Lenovo ThinkPad T510 4313 $1420

Dell Latitude E6150 $1440

Cheers,

Acer's have been known to have a bad build quality overall. I would avoid them.

Only thing worse than Acer's build quality, is their support.

Had to send in a laptop three times, for them to finally replace a faulty motherboard......however they botched the installation, which would cause it to ground/short if moved.

So I just gave up :laugh:

The fact Dell provide a 'in-home' repair plan, is now a big plus for me.

  • 3 weeks later...

I promised I would let you know which one I got, here it is:

Dell Studio 17

Intel i7 740 QM (1.73 GHz) processor

6 GB DDR3 SDRam

500GB SATA 7200rpm drive

1GB ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4650

17.3'' 9-cell lithium battery

Webcam, Bluetooth, Bloatware

Price: $1200, 1300 with tax

I haven't had heat issues but haven't done something like heavy video editing yet.

2 Cons which I anticipated before buying: Case build and battery. Case build (regular black) is sturdy enough but almost seems soft: it smudges easily and will get scratched with time. Battery is good for 300 uses (charge and discharge) but I anticipate that it will be out with less use in a year or so.

Please feel free to shoot me any suggestions as to what I should do to prep my laptop. I created backup disks, updated drivers & virus protection, got rid of some unneeded programs, and downloaded an alternate browser.

Dell uses cheap junk parts, so you'll be dealing with that in near future. And yeah, you're absolutely right that the battery will be dead in a year (if not less).

Nice specs, but you should have went with a better rep'ed company (IBM, HP).

  • 4 months later...

My Dell Vostro was fine for abt 6 months before it got dead pixels.. got the screen replaced in warranty.. then the hinges broke 1 month after that.. again replaced in warranty.. then the new hinges were so jerky that they broke the palm rest and base plastics realmad.gif got the base and palm rest replaced.. in warranty.. then got clouding in the new LCD after 1 year use and that was just 15 days before my 2 years warranty was running out.. so I hurried and got the new LCD.. now the new one has a dead pixel and the screw holes where the right hinge is fixed has become stripped.. im out of warranty now so thinking what to do with this? pinch.gifrealmad.gif

Ive owned Dell.. always.. and never had such horrible build quality as their Vostros have.. plus all my older Dells had built-in microphones and the new ones don't? WTF?!! I'm planning on getting this one fixed and putting it on my lil sis's desktop and sell very 10 years old P4.. and I'll buy a new one.. after watching the Lenovo crash videos I'm ready for a Lenovo :p or should I give Dell another another? They reason I wanna stick with them is it never takes them more than 3-5 days to get anything broken under warranty fixed..

ThinkPad. If you dropped it, it would probably dent whatever surface it lands on and not the machine.

Funny that's actually true... I accidentally dropped my T400 from over a meter while it was turned on (Lid closed though) on cold hard concrete. Some very minor scruff marks -- honestly it's so minor it looks like normal wear and tear -- and it scared the crap out of this guy standing next to me. I opened the laptop, and it was still running... Windows didn't even freeze :laugh:

Never dropped my Thinkpad but my gf pushed my T61 off the bed (granted the bed is probably what, 3ft off the ground?) cuz she was mad. It didn't just go plop on the hardwood floor, she pushed it so it flew into the wall first then plopped on the ground. It was running with lid open. She pushed it and the back right corner hit the wall and closed the lcd and then it hit the floor front left corner then tipped over and landed upside (LCD side first!) Picked it up, left the room and prayed. LOL It was just fine. She came to me trying to give me puppy eyes later but then she was so excited it was fine and all that. Needless to say, she bought her parents a Thinkpad now and they love it. LOL

Got to say my wife had a T61 and our son was always knocking it off her desk or jumping on it if she left it on the couch and up to the point she got her new sl410 it never needed anything more then a new hdd.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Dude, im talking about simply disable it from settings app. Because of the eu regulation, you could disable it here for years.
    • One big question about Mars was answered thanks to Einstein's 100 year old theory by Sayan Sen Image via DepositPhotos Scientists at the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) have calculated how time passes on Mars compared with Earth, adding detail to how timekeeping would need to work beyond Earth’s orbit. The study, published in The Astronomical Journal, found that clocks on Mars run an average of 477 microseconds, or millionths of a second, faster per day than clocks on Earth. A microsecond is one millionth of a second, a very small unit used in precise scientific timing systems such as atomic clocks, which measure time using consistent atomic behavior. This difference is not constant. Because Mars moves around the Sun in a non-circular path (an eccentric orbit, meaning its distance from the Sun changes over time instead of staying fixed) and is affected by gravity from other bodies, the daily difference can vary by as much as 226 microseconds over a Martian year. The study also identifies smaller repeating changes of about 40 microseconds per day linked to synodic cycles (repeating periods that describe how planets line up with each other as they orbit the Sun from different positions). These longer patterns affect how time differences slowly rise and fall. To make these estimates, researchers compared Mars with Earth and the Moon. The work looks at relativistic proper time (the time actually measured by a clock depending on its speed and the strength of gravity where it is located, as described in Einstein’s relativity). This shows that each world has its own slightly different “rate” of time. This becomes more important as space missions expand into cislunar space (the region between Earth and the Moon) and toward Mars. On Earth, time systems rely on atomic clocks and satellites, which stay closely synchronized for navigation and communication. The study is based on Albert Einstein’s theory of relativity, which shows that time is affected by gravity and motion. Stronger gravity makes clocks run slower, while weaker gravity makes them run faster. “The time is just right for the Moon and Mars,” said NIST physicist Bijunath Patla. “This is the closest we have been to realizing the science fiction vision of expanding across the solar system.” A day on Mars is about 40 minutes longer than on Earth, and a Martian year lasts 687 Earth days. But the main question is not just about days and years, but how fast time itself passes. An atomic clock placed on Mars would function normally, but compared with one on Earth, the two would slowly drift apart due to differences in gravity and motion. This requires careful calculation of what is similar to a time-zone difference across planets. Researchers modeled Mars using a reference surface and included gravitational effects from the Sun, Earth, the Moon, and other planets. This includes a multi-body gravitational system (often described as a three-body or four-body problem, where predicting motion becomes difficult because multiple large objects all pull on each other at the same time through gravity). Mars also follows a Keplerian orbit (an idealized elliptical orbit based on simple gravitational laws that assume smooth motion, before adding real-world disturbances from other bodies). In addition, the researchers accounted for solar tides (small changes in gravitational force caused by the Sun that slightly distort planetary motion and timing, especially in systems involving Earth and the Moon). These combined effects are described as relativistic proper-time offsets (small but measurable differences in elapsed time between locations caused by gravity and motion), which must be included when comparing clocks across planets. “But for Mars, that’s not the case. Its distance from the Sun and its eccentric orbit make the variations in time larger. A three-body problem is extremely complicated. Now we’re dealing with four: the Sun, Earth, the Moon and Mars,” Patla explained. “The heavy lifting was more challenging than I initially thought.” Although the differences are extremely small, they matter for navigation and communication systems that depend on precise timing. Even modern networks on Earth, such as mobile systems, rely on timing accuracy at very small fractions of a second. Communication between Earth and Mars currently takes about four to 24 minutes or more depending on planetary positions, meaning signals are not real-time. A shared and accurate time system could help future missions reduce confusion in navigation and data exchange. “If you get synchronization, it will be almost like real-time communication without any loss of information. You don’t have to wait to see what happens,” Patla said. Researchers note that fully developed interplanetary communication networks are still far in the future. However, understanding how time behaves across planets helps prepare for those systems. “It may be decades before the surface of Mars is covered by the tracks of wandering rovers, but it is useful now to study the issues involved in establishing navigation systems on other planets and moons,” said Neil Ashby. “Like current global navigation systems like GPS, these systems will depend on accurate clocks, and the effects on clock rates can be analyzed with the help of Einstein’s general theory of relativity.” Patla added that the results also help improve understanding of time itself under relativity. “It's good to know for the first time what is happening on Mars timewise. Nobody knew that before. It improves our knowledge of the theory itself, the theory of how clocks tick and relativity,” he said. Source: NIST, IOPscience This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • TeraCopy 4.0 Build 26 by Razvan Serea TeraCopy is a compact program designed to copy and move files at the maximum possible speed, also providing you with a lot of features. Copy files faster. TeraCopy uses dynamically adjusted buffers to reduce seek times. Asynchronous copy speeds up file transfer between two physical hard drives. Pause and resume transfers. Pause copy process at any time to free up system resources and continue with a single click. Error recovery. In case of copy error, TeraCopy will try several times and in the worse case just skips the file, not terminating the entire transfer. Interactive file list. TeraCopy shows failed file transfers and lets you fix the problem and recopy only problem files. Shell integration. TeraCopy can completely replace Explorer copy and move functions, allowing you work with files as usual. TeraCopy is free for non-commercial use only. For commercial use you need to buy a license. The paid version of the program includes the following features: Copy/move to your favorite folders. Save reports as HTML and CSV files. Select files with the same extension/folder. Remove the selected files from the copy queue. TeraCopy 4.0 Build 26 changelog: Added support for receiving files via the LocalSend protocol. Improved exception handling and automated bug report upload. Fixed several minor bugs and small memory leaks. Build 26 (June 24) Fixed a rare exception when a transfer completed. Features added since version 3.17: Enhanced speed graph. New multi-threaded copy engine. Support for copying to multiple targets. Queue system for managing multiple copy operations. Support for receiving files via the LocalSend protocol. TeraCopy entry in the modern Windows Explorer context menu. Integrated toolbar in the title bar. Why receive LocalSend transfers with TeraCopy? Handle file conflicts: Skip, overwrite, or rename files when a file with the same name already exists. LocalSend always creates another copy, which can waste time and disk space, especially when resuming an interrupted transfer. Filter unwanted files: Apply ignore lists or remove files manually before accepting a transfer, so unnecessary files are not downloaded. Better performance on fast networks: In tests over a 10 Gbps connection, TeraCopy received files several times faster than the standard LocalSend app on Windows. Download: TeraCopy 4.0 Build 26 | 14.5 MB (Freeware, paid upgrade available) View: TeraCopy Website | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Briefly used Turbo Pascal (and Turbo C++) in 97 and soon after that I bought PC magazine that included a full version of Delphi 2. I still use Delphi today, some 29 years later.
    • Age of Empires Mobile comes to PC, here's how to carry over progress from your phone by Ivan Jenic Image: YouTube/Microsoft Microsoft just released Age of Empires Mobile for PC. The game, officially called Age of Empires Mobile: PC Edition, is available for free on Steam and Microsoft Store, almost two years after its initial release for handheld devices. Age of Empires is one of those franchises that entire generations grew up with. The original came out in 1997, and immediately got people hooked to building civilizations and crushing their enemies on the battlefield. However, the franchise today is a far cry from its roots, as Age of Empires Mobile is, well, a game optimized for handheld devices, and not a classic RTS title we’ve all loved for years. And, of course, it includes in-game purchases. The PC version is still a mobile game at its core, but it’s been optimized for desktop play. There’s mouse control, full keyboard compatibility, and a refined UI. Microsoft also refreshed the visuals with some 4k textures, so the game should look better on larger screens. The game supports Crossplay, so you can switch between your phone, tablet, and PC without losing anything. But linked progress doesn’t come out of the box, as you have to enable it first. Here’s how to link your progress: On your mobile device, open Age of Empires Mobile. Go to Settings (Gear icon) > Account. Select Bind Account and choose a sign-in option. Once you enable account binding, sign in on PC using the same method, and your progress will be accessible across all your devices. Xbox Game Pass subscribers also get a bonus reward pack on PC, which includes: 1 Monthly Pass Token 1 Custom Resource Chest 10 Universal 60-Minute Speed-Ups 1,000 Empire Coins Exclusive Player Portrait Frame You can find more info about Age of Empires Mobile: PC Edition, as well as download links, on the Age of Empires official website.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      Philsl earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      D0nn13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Rookie
      +ChiefOfNeo went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      458
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      177
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      124
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      79
    5. 5
      Xenon
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!