Recommended Posts

#browser-bottombox,
#status-bar,
#status-bar *,
#FindToolbar {
  -moz-appearance: -moz-win-glass !important;
  background: transparent !important;
  border: 0 !important;
  text-shadow: 0 0 3px white !important;
}

Is there any way of having the glass status bar, with the green progress bar showing too, when sites are loading? In your stylish code, the progress bar disappeared.

I released a new version of my LeftSideStar addon which should fix the issue. http://soapyhamhocks.deviantart.com/art/LeftSideStar-for-Firefox-4-173619789

That did the trick. Thanks! :D

Was there anything to remove the dropdown arrow next to the "back" button?

Soapy, a bit of a different question for ya:

I currently use this script http://userstyles.org/styles/132 to remove icons from menus (because I find them cluttersome) but it still has an empty bar on the left side (where the icons would be).

Is there a way to remove that bar?

#browser-bottombox,
#status-bar,
#status-bar *,
#FindToolbar {
  -moz-appearance: -moz-win-glass !important;
  background: transparent !important;
  border: 0 !important;
  text-shadow: 0 0 3px white !important;
}

Thanks!^^

Could you share please?^^

#status-bar *{
opacity: 0.99 !important;
color: white !important;
text-shadow: 0px 0px 0px white, 0px 0px 0px white, 0px 0px 0px white !important;
}

Sorry, I had some problems. This one works great.

#status-bar *{
opacity: 0.99 !important;
color: white !important;
text-shadow: 0px 0px 0px white, 0px 0px 0px white, 0px 0px 0px white !important;
}

Sorry, I had some problems. This one works great.

Thanks also^^

Hello,

this is what I'm currently working on:

after.png

Link is here: http://userstyles.org/styles/35240

I'd appreciate your opinions guys. :)

I have some issues in my style, as written in userstyle details, and I hope you have better ideas to fix it than me. ;)

What I didn't write in description, but I want to fix, is to move nav-bar and menu button 1 px left to keep it in one line with whole window. I found it impossible, however (Mozilla Team neither, they are not able to do what they did in their own mockup). :(

Edit: Ah, one more thing. When there are more cards, and they do not fit in screen space and <- -> are shown, and then I close tabs and there are a few of them so they fit in screen space, tab bar moves 3 px left. Why?

Hello,

this is what I'm currently working on:

after.png

Link is here: http://userstyles.org/styles/35240

I'd appreciate your opinions guys. :)

I have some issues in my style, as written in userstyle details, and I hope you have better ideas to fix it than me. ;)

What I didn't write in description, but I want to fix, is to move nav-bar and menu button 1 px left to keep it in one line with whole window. I found it impossible, however (Mozilla Team neither, they are not able to do what they did in their own mockup). :(

Edit: Ah, one more thing. When there are more cards, and they do not fit in screen space and <- -> are shown, and then I close tabs and there are a few of them so they fit in screen space, tab bar moves 3 px left. Why?

The button looks great. One thing I'm trying to figure out is how to move the entire button a little to the right? I've tried messing around with the code, but it just moves the text around. Other than that, I think its really nice.

The button looks great. One thing I'm trying to figure out is how to move the entire button a little to the right? I've tried messing around with the code, but it just moves the text around. Other than that, I think its really nice.

Okay. Sooo.

#appmenu-button-container {
    padding: 0px 0px 6px 6px !important;
    width: 84px !important;
    border-bottom: 1px solid #a0a0a0 !important; /* comment this line if you want to use tabs on top version */
}

#appmenu-button-container is on the top of the window. And guess what, it contains button! :D It has no margins, but bottom and left paddings are both 6px to keep button in it i good position. So, to move it for example by 10 pixels right, you need to change numbers to: 0px 0px 6px 16px.

#main-window[sizemode="normal"] #appmenu-button-container {
    padding-left: 0px !important;
}

Thanks to that code, when window is not maximized, it moves button to the left edge since not maximized window has it own margin. So, you need to add 10 pixels to there too.

However, since tab bar is in one line with this button, you need to make two more changes. Both are in the following block:

/* REPOSITION TAB BAR */

#navigator-toolbox[tabsontop="true"] #TabsToolbar {
    margin-top: -26px !important;
    margin-left: 84px !important;
    margin-right: 116px !important;
}

#main-window[sizemode="normal"] #navigator-toolbox[tabsontop="true"] #TabsToolbar {
    margin-left: 79px !important;
}

...and I believe you already know where to add 10 pixels here ;)

Yup, it's margin-left.

I'm glad it worked.

I added animation to Menu Button so everyone who downloaded my style might want to update it ;) Much more sexy now.

When I used your updated code, Stylish gave me an error. This is the error I got:

"84:32 Expected end of value but found 'inset'. Error in parsing value for 'border'. Declaration dropped."

Not sure what it means.

When I used your updated code, Stylish gave me an error. This is the error I got:

"84:32 Expected end of value but found 'inset'. Error in parsing value for 'border'. Declaration dropped."

Not sure what it means.

It makes no difference, it works just fine. And this error had to be earlier too, cause I didn't add anything about inset in last update. However, I updated it just for Youuuu! And error no longer exists ;)

It makes no difference, it works just fine. And this error had to be earlier too, cause I didn't add anything about inset in last update. However, I updated it just for Youuuu! And error no longer exists ;)

This is what it looks like:

AquaFFButton.jpg

The screenshot also includes other stylish scripts I have installed.

This is what it looks like:

(...)

The screenshot also includes other stylish scripts I have installed.

I guess Tabs in Titlebar or Tab Overlap is in conflict. But check yourself, disable them all except mine one and then enable one by one, you'll find what caused it.

I guess Tabs in Titlebar or Tab Overlap is in conflict. But check yourself, disable them all except mine one and then enable one by one, you'll find what caused it.

You were right, it was the "Tabs in Titlebar" stylish code, that was causing the conflict. But personally, I think I like the way you originally had the button. But, thats just my opinion.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I think it depends on what you're looking for to do, and the time you have to spare. With my Dwarf 3, I easily spend 3-4 hour sessions; half an hour driving to an un-light polluted place, another half hour unpacking and setting up the smart scope + tripod for equatorial tracking, then 15 more minutes mucking around with settings and shooting calibration frames, spending a few hours shooting, merging with past photo sessions, etc. It's crazy how time flies and I often get home later than I expected. It's something I still need to set aside a good part of an evening to do, all in all. For one session, where you often need like four for best results when it comes to deep space objects. Even with a smart scope like Dwarf 3, regular non-astro photography is still way more approachable to people getting into photography. I find this is a time consuming niche no matter how I go about it. With practice, I can probably begin cutting time here but I think where smart scopes find their home is among people who love to shoot the night sky but don't have the spare time to go deep with the "navigator level" attunement to the night sky itself in addition to everything else. Having said this, _if_ you have even more time to spend on this hobby, it will probably be even more rewarding to do it more by hand and learn the skies and the details of how it all works.
    • I misread the title and thought Teams itself would be redesigned. Imagine having this one as a native WinUI app.
    • Dell, HP PCs ran into endless reboot, BitLocker recovery loops but Windows 11 isn't to blame by Sayan Sen Last month Neowin reported on a major issue on Dell systems wherein a bug in its official support tool was leading to endless blue screen of death (BSOD) and restarts. Following our report, Dell officially acknowledged its SupportAssist-related crash issue, confirming that the culprit is not Microsoft's operating system but rather a faulty version of its own remediation software. In a newly published support advisory, Dell stated that version 5.5.16.0 of Dell SupportAssist Remediation and Alienware SupportAssist Remediation can trigger blue screen errors and unexpected system restarts. The company notes that the problematic component operates independently of the main SupportAssist application, meaning users should not remove the primary SupportAssist software when troubleshooting the issue. According to Dell, the crashes are linked specifically to the SupportAssist Remediation service, which is bundled with SupportAssist OS Recovery Tools, and as such it has since released an updated version, 5.5.16.1, which is said to resolve the problem. Affected users are advised to first verify whether version 5.5.16.0 is installed by checking the Installed Apps section in Windows Settings. If so, Dell recommends updating SupportAssist OS Recovery Tools through either SupportAssist's "Update Software" feature or Dell Command Update. Dell also advises users to back up important data before performing the update and to ensure systems remain connected to power throughout the installation process. If you are still having issues though make sure to report to the Dell support forum. As it turns out though Dell is not the only PC maker currently dealing with update-related headaches as HP is also facing a separate but probably equally frustrating issue involving recent Windows Secure Boot updates that were released with recent Windows 11 Patch Tuesdays. Similar to Dell, HP also put up its own support article where it explains the issue. The company says that affected devices could hit a brick wall when booting as they run into a BitLocker recovery loop after the April 2026 updates. The problem appears to affect systems wherein the new UEFI Secure Boot CA 2023 certificates fail to apply properly. As such affected users will find themselves entering their recovery key over and over again despite the system otherwise functioning normally. HP says such PCs should be updated to the latest available BIOS version and configured with the necessary Secure Boot certificates before installing Microsoft's Windows 11 Patch Tuesday updates. Systems that are already experiencing the problem may require BIOS configuration changes to restore normal boot behavior. Admins can find information regarding that in the support article here on HP's official website.
    • Getting further away from the artistic study of mental disease that was the first game... (which never needed any sequels to begin with) But I get it, a company has to make money. And the second was at least visually impressive, if not in any other way.
    • If its the devs fault you would think Unreal would help M$ take full advantage of Unreal and work with them to fix the performance issues. Otherwise they are catching unwarranted bad press.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dedicated
      Conjor earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      493
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      246
    3. 3
      Steven P.
      72
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      69
    5. 5
      neufuse
      68
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!