Recommended Posts

Sorry for double post!

@panoc

Using your idea I modified the code and styled it a bit. Also modified it's margin not the padding so now when you hover the area where the down button of the scroll bar is the add-on bar doesn't pop-up ! I still don't know how to add delay to it popping up and staying up thought ...

#addon-bar {
  position: fixed;
  bottom: -21px;
  right: 1px;
  border: 0 !important;
  -moz-appearance: none !important;
  -moz-transition: bottom .7s;
  padding-top: 12px !important;
  margin-right: 20px !important;
}

#addon-bar:hover {
 bottom: 1px;
}

#main-window[sizemode="maximized"] #addon-bar {
  bottom: -22px;
  right: 0;
  -moz-transition: bottom .7s;
}

#main-window[sizemode="maximized"] #addon-bar:hover {
  bottom: 0;
}

#addon-bar > #status-bar {
  margin: 0 !important;
  padding: 0 2px 0 2px;
  border-radius: 4px 4px 0 0;
  border: 0 !important;
  border-left: 1px solid rgba(0,0,0,.25) !important;
  border-right: 1px solid rgba(0,0,0,.25) !important;
  border-top: 1px solid rgba(0,0,0,.25) !important;
  box-shadow: 0 0 0 1px rgba(255,255,255,.5) inset;
}

BTW deleted the blue style lines of the background, add it back if you want that. I like it better gray, fits my other styles ...

@mNiosu

Hey, I edited my style so that it doesn't obscure the vertical scrollbar anymore. I just edited the "right" properties to move it more to the left so you don't have to use margins. But there still is the problem with what to do if there is a horizontal scrollbar. It should be possible to adjust the addon-bar's position to the visibility of the different scrollbars but I don't know which selectors to use.

#addon-bar {
  position: fixed;
  bottom: -21px;
  right: 19px;
  border: 0 !important;
  -moz-appearance: none !important;
  -moz-transition: bottom .5s;
  padding-top: 22px !important;
}

#addon-bar:hover {
 bottom: 1px;
}

#main-window[sizemode="maximized"] #addon-bar {
  bottom: -22px;
  right: 18px;
  -moz-transition: bottom .5s;
}

#main-window[sizemode="maximized"] #addon-bar:hover {
  bottom: 0;
}

#addon-bar > #status-bar {
  margin: 0 !important;
  padding: 0 2px 0 2px;
  border-radius: 4px 4px 0 0;
  border: 0 !important;
  border-left: 1px solid rgba(0,0,0,.25) !important;
  border-top: 1px solid rgba(0,0,0,.25) !important;
  border-right: 1px solid rgba(0,0,0,.25) !important;
  background-color: rgb(207, 219, 236) !important;
  background-image: -moz-linear-gradient(rgba(255,255,255,.5), rgb(207,220,236)) !important;
  box-shadow: 0 0 0 1px rgba(255,255,255,.5) inset;
}

I found code for a loading bar similar to IE8/9 one, I think it looks a lot better than the small line you normally see, but not too keen on the color, can anyone improve it and make it look more like a glass loader, like in Windows?

post-2-12856802648889.png

PRETTY PLEASE WITH SUGAR ON TOP!

My Code:

@namespace url(http://www.mozilla.org/keymaster/gatekeeper/there.is.only.xul);
@-moz-document url(chrome://browser/content/browser.xul) {

#urlbar {
position: relative!important;
z-index: 2 !important;
}

#urlbar-progress {
position: relative !important;
z-index: -1 !important;
height: 20px !important;
margin: -21px 0 1px 1px !important;
}

#urlbar-progress .progress-bar, 
#tabbrowser-tabs .progress-bar {
background: rgba(0,61,245,0.5) -moz-linear-gradient(0% 50%, rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.1) 50%, rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.4) 90%, rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.8)) repeat scroll 0% 0% !important;
}

#urlbar-progress .progress-bar {
-moz-border-radius: 3px 0 0 3px !important;
}

.progress-remainder {
background-image: none !important;
}

}

try these, they don't interfere with both horizontal and vertical scroll bars

but i can't get it work with animation

transparent background

#addon-bar:hover {
margin-top:-21px;
bottom: 0px;
margin-right: 20px;
border: 0 !important;
-moz-appearance: none !important;}

#addon-bar:not(:hover) {
posititon: fixed;
margin-bottom: -21px;

border: 0 !important;
-moz-appearance: none !important;}

#addon-bar > #status-bar {
-moz-appearance: -moz-win-glass !important;
background: none !important;
margin: 0 !important;
padding: 0 2px 0 2px;
border-radius: 4px 0 0 0;
border: 0 !important;
border-left: 1px solid rgba(0,0,0,.25) !important;
border-right: 1px solid rgba(0,0,0,.25) !important;
border-top: 1px solid rgba(0,0,0,.25) !important;
}

colored background

#addon-bar:hover {
margin-top:-21px;
bottom: 0px;
margin-right: 20px;
border: 0 !important;
-moz-appearance: none !important;}

#addon-bar:not(:hover) {
posititon: fixed;
margin-bottom: -21px;

border: 0 !important;
-moz-appearance: none !important;}

#addon-bar > #status-bar {
  margin: 0 !important;
  padding: 0 2px 0 2px;
  border-radius: 4px 4px 0 0;
  border: 0 !important;
  border-left: 1px solid rgba(0,0,0,.25) !important;
  border-top: 1px solid rgba(0,0,0,.25) !important;
  border-right: 1px solid rgba(0,0,0,.25) !important;
  background-color: rgb(207, 219, 236) !important;
  background-image: -moz-linear-gradient(rgba(255,255,255,.5), rgb(207,220,236)) !important;
  box-shadow: 0 0 0 1px rgba(255,255,255,.5) inset;
}

I found code for a loading bar similar to IE8/9 one, I think it looks a lot better than the small line you normally see, but not too keen on the color, can anyone improve it and make it look more like a glass loader, like in Windows?

i prefer the opposite one (light in the beginning becoming darker at the end)

@namespace url(http://www.mozilla.org/keymaster/gatekeeper/there.is.only.xul);
@-moz-document url(chrome://browser/content/browser.xul) {

.progress-remainder {
background-image: none !important;
}

#urlbar-progress .progress-bar {
background-image: -moz-linear-gradient(left, transparent 10%, rgba(65, 105, 255, 0.4) 90%, rgba(65, 105, 255,0.8)) !important;
background-color: transparent !important; 
; 
}

#urlbar-progress{
height: 22px !important;
margin-top: -22px !important;
margin-bottom: 0px !important;
margin-left: 28px !important;
}
}

i also use different color for the url preview

.urlbar-over-link-host-label, 
.urlbar-over-link-path-label {
   color: royalblue !important;
}

I found code for a loading bar similar to IE8/9 one, I think it looks a lot better than the small line you normally see, but not too keen on the color, can anyone improve it and make it look more like a glass loader, like in Windows?

post-2-12856802648889.png

PRETTY PLEASE WITH SUGAR ON TOP!

My Code:

@namespace url(http://www.mozilla.org/keymaster/gatekeeper/there.is.only.xul);
@-moz-document url(chrome://browser/content/browser.xul) {

#urlbar {
position: relative!important;
z-index: 2 !important;
}

#urlbar-progress {
position: relative !important;
z-index: -1 !important;
height: 20px !important;
margin: -21px 0 1px 1px !important;
}

#urlbar-progress .progress-bar, 
#tabbrowser-tabs .progress-bar {
background: rgba(0,61,245,0.5) -moz-linear-gradient(0% 50%, rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.1) 50%, rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.4) 90%, rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.8)) repeat scroll 0% 0% !important;
}

#urlbar-progress .progress-bar {
-moz-border-radius: 3px 0 0 3px !important;
}

.progress-remainder {
background-image: none !important;
}

}

You may prefer mNiosu's version over mine:

Fission-like, windows-style progress bar

@Neobond

Another fan ... :laugh: :cool:

@dert07

Yes, it's kind of the same thing. Anyway I'm happy with it the way it is, don't like panoc's version. I don't know about the horizontal scroll bar thought, I have encountered any such page since using your style and is not such a big problem for me. What I'm looking for now is to style something like Win7's Aero Slate (graphite) color theme (glass and dark grey). Any help?

@panoc

Hi,

I tried your style but it didn't really work. It still overlaps the horizontal scrollbar. You also got a typo in the "position" property, when I fix it it doesn't work anymore.

- - -

@all

I switched back to my first style for now. I don't really care if it obscures either of the scrollbars since I can't click the arrows anyway when the bar is shown and I don't like the look of the addonbar with the blank space at the right when no scrollbar is there. It is more of a problem when you don't autohide but I'm good for now.

If you don't want the autohide use SoapyHamHock's code and maybe move it a bit to the left so it at least doesn't overlap the vertical scrollbar although icons don't seem to change instantly.

Mozilla will come up with their own style soon, I hope. I don't know when the theme is supposed to be finished, i guess in the first RC.

- - -

@mNiosu

Yeah that's what I thought, too. Horizontal scrollbars hardly ever occur and if they do you could always just take the big slider to scroll.

I'm not exactly sure what you mean by the Aero Slate style. If you want the addonbar to be glassed it isn't that easy. You can apply the -moz-win-glass stuff only to #browser-bottombox which contains both the addon-bar and statusbar. But if you apply Glass to it the webpage doesn't shine through.

@panoc

Hi,

I tried your style but it didn't really work. It still overlaps the horizontal scrollbar. You also got a typo in the "position" property, when I fix it it doesn't work anymore.

- - -

hm i just noticed the typo, so that means that ti doesn't need the position property.

strangely the style works fine for me.

it autohides addon bar and does not interfere with the scroll bars, but i will check it in new profile and see if it works

@mNiosu

Yeah that's what I thought, too. Horizontal scrollbars hardly ever occur and if they do you could always just take the big slider to scroll.

I'm not exactly sure what you mean by the Aero Slate style. If you want the addonbar to be glassed it isn't that easy. You can apply the -moz-win-glass stuff only to #browser-bottombox which contains both the addon-bar and statusbar. But if you apply Glass to it the webpage doesn't shine through.

I know how to make it transparent but I want to copy the win7 grey color theme style, not just plain transparency but I'm not very good with color mixing...

Anyway the best solution to scroll-bar overlap would be my idea few posts back, to force the add-on bar under the scroll bar but I don't know if it is possible...

@panoc

Didn't have much time to study the style code but you use a different method for styling the add-on bar witch is not a bad thing but it kind of forces you to use another autohide code that I don't like at all. Also your style has some unnecessary lines. I'll give it a look when I'll have some time ...

well programming is not my forte :p

most of the css styles i write are made by trial and error.

i would be glad if you can shrink my styles and correct them !

I'm not good at programming either. I really don't see the advantages of your style over dert07's except the icons react in real time but that isn't a problem for me as they do change as the bar hides on dert07's style. The problem is that I don't think his idea of autohide works with streetwolf's fix for the icons so I really can't do much to edit your style so I'll stick with the one I modified after dert07's idea because I like it better ...

BTW doesn't anyone have a solution for me to add something like 500ms delay to the add-on bar popping up and also something like 500ms to keep it showing after I stopped hovering it ? That would be really great! :D

Anyway the best solution to scroll-bar overlap would be my idea few posts back, to force the add-on bar under the scroll bar but I don't know if it is possible...

I don't think that's possible. Personally, I just hide those scrollbars. :)

BTW doesn't anyone have a solution for me to add something like 500ms delay to the add-on bar popping up and also something like 500ms to keep it showing after I stopped hovering it ? That would be really great! :D

Oh sorry, I forgot about your delay question. You could either use:

-moz-transition-property: bottom;
-moz-transition-duration: .5s;
-moz-transition-delay: .5s;

or easier, just put everything into the -moz-transition property:

-moz-transition: bottom .5s .5s;

If you want to edit the timings the values are -moz-transition: [property] [duration] [delay];

SoapyHamHocks and I tweaked the style a bit more and now the icons also change instantly!

The style can be found here: http://boneyardbrew.posterous.com/

I have two problems:

1 - flexible spacers don't work

2 - findbar won't display

Is it just me?

@foxxyn8

You're right, the findbar doesn't show up anymore, we didn't try that. We'll see if we can fix this. I can't add flexible spacers in between icons even without the style. And to the left or right to all icons it doesn't really make sense since the bar adjusts its width automatically.

You're right, the findbar doesn't show up anymore, we didn't try that. We'll see if we can fix this. I can't add flexible spacers in between icons even without the style. And to the left or right to all icons it doesn't really make sense since the bar adjusts its width automatically.

You can't add flexible spacers to the statusbar icons, but if you customize and add buttons to the add-on bar you can. The problem is that with this style enabled they don't work.

In the following images there is one expandable spacer used to push the button to the far left:

Without style:

screenhunter30sep282253.jpg

With Style:

screenhunter31sep282255.jpg

As you can see, with your style applied the expandable spacer isn't working. However this seems to be a common problem with any of the styles which are using a position:fixed for the add-on bar.

Concerning the findbar - if you add bottom: 0 to #browser-bottombox the contents of the findbar will display, but without a background.

@ dert07 i made some modification to your style according to foxxyn8's suggestion

#addon-bar {
  position: fixed;
  bottom: -21px;
  right: 20px;
  border: 0 !important;
  -moz-appearance: none !important;
  -moz-transition: bottom .5s 1s ease-in;
  /*padding-top: 22px !important;*/
}

#browser-bottombox {
position: fixed;
}

#addon-bar:hover {
 bottom: 0;
 -moz-transition: bottom .5s .4s ease-out;
}

#main-window[sizemode="maximized"] #addon-bar {
  right: 20;
}

#addon-bar > #status-bar {
  margin: 0 !important;
  padding: 0 2px 0 2px;
  border-radius: 4px 4px 0 0;
  border: 0 !important;
  border-left: 1px solid rgba(0,0,0,.25) !important;
  border-top: 1px solid rgba(0,0,0,.25) !important;
  border-right: 1px solid rgba(0,0,0,.25) !important;
  background-color: rgb(207, 219, 236) !important;
  background-image: -moz-linear-gradient(rgba(255,255,255,.5), rgb(207,220,236)) !important;
  box-shadow: 0 0 0 1px rgba(255,255,255,.5) inset;
}

with the above code addon bar does not hover when you scroll horizontal.

can you try this and tell if it works ?

What is the identifier for the search box. I want to style it a bit ... :D

@foxxyn8

I have a background but it displays only half the search box. That's not such a big problem but a little styling would be better that's why I want the identifier.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • AMD RX 9070 GRE AI, Blender benchmarks vs 9070 XT, 7800XT, Nvidia RTX 5070, 4070 by Sayan Sen Earlier this week, we shared the first part of our review of AMD's new RX 9070 GRE. It was about the gaming performance of the GPU, and we gave it an 8 out of 10. As a follow-up, similar to how we did with the 9070 XT and non-XT, we are doing a dedicated productivity review for the RX 9070 GRE as well, where we compare it against the 9070 XT, 9070, 7800 XT, as well as Nvidia's 5070 and 4070. This will include AI, rendering, compute, and more benchmarks. AI performance, especially, is a very important metric in today's world, and AMD also promised big improvements thanks to its underlying architectural improvements. We will be pitching it against the data we already have for the RX 9070, and RX 9070 XT, but also the Nvidia 5070 FE, MSI GeForce RTX 4070 VENTUS 2X 12G, and Gigabyte Radeon RX 7800 XT GAMING OC 16G as they are in a similar price class, but also because we do not have a comparable 5060 Ti card lying around here that we can compare it against. Before we get underway, this is a collaboration between Sayan Sen and Steven Parker, who lent me his test bed. Also, there was no editorial input from AMD. First up, the specs of the RX 9070, 9070 XT, and 9070 GRE, which were given to us by AMD: Radeon RX 9070 GRE Radeon RX 9070 Radeon RX 9070 XT Boost Clock: Game Clock: up to 2.79GHz up to 2.20GHz up to 2.52GHz up to 2.07GHz up to 2.97GHz up to 2.40GHz Stream Processors 3,072 (48 CU) 3,584 (56 CU) 4,096 (64 CU) Ray Accelerator 48 56 64 AI Accelerator 96 112 128 ROPs 96 128 Texture Mapping Units 192 224 256 Memory 12 GB GDDR6, 18Gbps Clock, 192-bit Bus 432 GB/s 16 GB GDDR6, 20Gbps Clock, 256-bit Bus Effective Memory Bandwidth: 640 GB/s Infinity Cache 48 MB (3rd Gen) 64 MB (3rd Gen) Card Bus PCI-E 5.0 X16 Output 2x HDMI 2.1b 2x DisplayPort 2.1a Power consumption 220W 304W Recommended PSU 650W 750W Slot width 2x 3x Price (SEP) $549 $599 As you can see from the specs above, it is less than the standard RX 9070 in every way that counts, except for slightly higher Boost and Game clock speed. Design Moving on, the RX 9070 GRE we were given is an XFX Swift triple-fan, dual-slot design with two 8-pin connectors. At 30cm (self-measured), it will fit in most systems easily. There is no RGB either. The AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE by XFX from all angles. Test system Our test system consists of the following: Lian Li O11 Dynamic Mini V2 Flow (Amazon|Newegg) ASUS Z890 ProArt Creator WiFi (Amazon|Newegg) Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus (Amazon|Newegg) Thermal Grizzly KryoSheet - 44x37 (Amazon|Newegg) 2x 16GB G.Skill Trident Z5 RGB (7200 MT/s in XMP) (Amazon|Newegg) Sabrent Rocket4 Plus 2TB SSD (Amazon) Windows 11 25H2 (Build 26200.8246) AMD shared a press driver based on the recently released Adrenaline 26.5.2 that we were required to use. We now move on to our benchmarks. First up, we have Geekbench AI running on ONNX. For some reason, the 9070 GRE does exceptionally well here in both half-precision (FP16) and single-precision (FP32). It manages to beat the RTX 5070 and RX 9070 non-XT, and is only behind the 9070 XT. Since Geekbench runs in short bursts instead of continuously hammering the graphics card, it seems the GRE's faster boost clocks are helping here. Next up, we move to the UL Procyon AI test suite, starting with the image generation benchmark. We chose the Stable Diffusion XL FP16 test since it is the most intense workload available on Procyon. The Nvidia cards do very well here, as even the 4070 out-muscles AMD's best fairy easily. The positive thing about the GRE is that it gets quite close to the 9070 non-XT in this test; this indicates that the VRAM does not play a very big role here, as SD XL relies on float16 (FP16). So this is something to keep in mind again. If you wish to work with float32 AI workloads, graphics cards with larger than 12 GB buffers would likely emerge as victors. Regardless, the gains are still massive on AMD's 9000 series compared to the 7000 series. Following image generation, we move to the text generation benchmark. This is one test where the 9070 GRE struggled, quite a lot. It seems that the 12 GB VRAM and lower memory bandwidth of the new Radeon 9070 GRE are hurting it quite a bit; the split is massive, especially in a test like Llama2, which packs 13 billion parameters. As such, in all the tests, the 9070 GRE is the slowest of the lot. Next, we tried Blender, and here the AMD GPUs were beaten by Nvidia. Rendering is something the Green team has always had a lead over the Red side, and it has not changed so far. On the positive side, though, the 9070 GRE shows significantly better results than the 7800 XT, which means AMD is on the right path. Catching up to Nvidia, though, will require a lot more effort. And we hope HIP and ROCm can keep improving. Wrapping up AI testing, we measured OpenCL throughput in the Geekbench compute benchmark. The RX 9070 GRE alongside the 9070 did not fare well here at all, even falling behind the 7800 XT. Interestingly, even the RTX 5070 could not beat the 4070 on OpenCL, so perhaps this suggests that OpenCL optimization may not have been a priority for either AMD or Nvidia in the modern era. Conclusion We reached the end of our productivity performance review of the 9070 GRE, and we have to say it's a mixed bag. Unlike the 9070 and 9070 XT, the GRE excels in some areas while losing ground fairly easily in others. Similar to how it happened in gaming, any time the card's memory subsystem gets hammered, it tends to fall behind the others. This was the case with text generation, wherein we saw the VRAM sometimes hit its maximum available 12 GB of usage with larger model sizes. So what do we make of the RX 9070 as a productivity hardware? It can certainly be used, but you have to know it has its limitations. For those looking for a GPU that can deal with more, AMD recently unveiled the Radeon AI PRO R9700, which is essentially a 32 GB refresh of the 9070 XT with some additional workstation-based optimizations. On a similar note, the new Ryzen AI Halo platform is something you can consider if you want to set up a local AI processing station. Considering everything, we rate AMD's Radeon RX 9070 GRE a 7.5 out of 10 for its productivity performance. Price is less of a factor for those looking at productivity cases compared to those considering the GPU for gaming, and as such, we felt it did quite decently on many occasions and can be handy if you need a 12 GB GPU and, for some reason, don't want to get Nvidia. Purchase links: RX 9070 / XT / GRE (Amazon US) As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • Does anyone here know if these updates are integrated into the UUP dump isos?
    • Motrix Next 3.9.4 by Razvan Serea Motrix Next is a modern, open-source cross-platform download manager built as the official next-generation successor to the original Motrix project. It has been completely rewritten using Tauri 2, Vue 3, TypeScript, and Rust, while still relying on the powerful Aria2 download engine for high-speed multi-protocol transfers. The app supports HTTP, HTTPS, FTP, BitTorrent, ED2K and magnet links, offering advanced features like multi-connection acceleration, task scheduling, bandwidth control, and batch download management. With a significantly reduced install size (around 20MB), it focuses on being lightweight, fast, and resource-efficient compared to traditional Electron-based download tools. Designed for Windows, macOS, and Linux, Motrix Next delivers a clean, modern UI inspired by Material Design 3 principles, with smooth animations and a minimal workflow. It improves usability through better download organization, system tray integration, and enhanced torrent handling including selective file downloads and tracker management. Motrix Next features: Multi-protocol downloads — HTTP, FTP, BitTorrent, Magnet, .torrent, ED2K, and Metalink tasks BitTorrent — Selective file download, DHT, peer exchange, encryption controls, metadata caching, GeoIP peer flags, and tracker probing Browser extension integration — Embedded Extension API with independent authentication, download confirmation, smart auto-submit, filename hints, referer/cookie forwarding, and real-time controls (Chrome Web Store · Edge Add-ons) Safe filename handling — Content-Disposition, RFC 2047, non-UTF-8, percent-encoded, and extensionless URL resolution with path traversal sanitization Download organization — Favorite and recent folders, optional file-type categorization, stale-record cleanup, and completed history backed by SQLite Concurrent downloads — Independent controls for active tasks, HTTP connections per server, segments per file, and BT peer limits Speed control — Global and per-task upload/download limits with day-of-week and time-of-day scheduling System integration — Tray operation, optional tray speed display, macOS Dock badge/progress, protocol handlers for magnet://, thunder://, and motrixnext:// Lightweight mode — Destroys the WebView on minimize-to-tray while Rust keeps the engine, task monitor, notifications, history, and extension routing alive Notifications and power options — Native task start/complete/failure notifications, keep-awake during downloads, and optional shutdown after completion Network controls — Scoped proxy support for downloads, app updates, and tracker updates, plus system proxy detection Auto-update channels — Stable, Beta, and Latest Across Channels policies with separate download and install phases Diagnostics — Structured logs, exportable diagnostic ZIPs, database integrity checks, automatic DB rebuild, and Linux GPU rendering fallback Personalization — Light/dark/system theme, 10 color schemes, 26 languages, and first-launch system language detection Motrix Next 3.9.4 changelog: Motrix Next 3.9.4 promotes the 3.9.4 beta cycle to stable. This release refreshes bundled engine binaries, improves task detail readability and copy actions, expands link handling for magnet and ED2K workflows, polishes responsive navigation and text wrapping, updates browser extension documentation, and refines network preference controls. New Features Task Detail copy actions — Added copyable values for task metadata and reusable render functions for long text fields. Magnet and ED2K lifecycle support — Added task lifecycle handling for magnet and ED2K links. History cleanup for deleted tasks — Deleted tasks can now remove matching history records. User-Agent management — Added user-agent management and improved related network preference controls. Browser extension documentation — Added the Firefox Add-ons link for the Motrix Next extension. Improvements Engine binaries — Updated bundled binaries for supported architectures. Task Detail readability — Long task names, URLs, tracker values, and copyable metadata now render more clearly. Deletion messaging — Refined localized task deletion text for clarity and consistency. Text wrapping — Improved URI input wrapping and task name multiline display. Navigation layout — Improved sub-navigation responsiveness. Disk allocation default — Changed the default file allocation method to trunc. Proxy controls — Improved proxy button styling in network preferences. Download: Motrix Next 64-bit | ARM64 | macOS ~20.0 MB (Open Source) Links: Website | macOS / Linux | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • NVIDIA officially supports Ubuntu, as linked above with the GeForce NOW Hands on I did in collaboration with Paul Hill.
    • TO be clear I am not running linux today, however I keep thinking about it. And I want to make sure there are minimal obstacles if I decide to make that switch in the coming months.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dedicated
      Conjor earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Dedicated
      Mark Spruce earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Collaborator
      conkir earned a badge
      Collaborator
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      479
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      244
    3. 3
      Steven P.
      72
    4. 4
      FloatingFatMan
      66
    5. 5
      +Edouard
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!