Recommended Posts

Hi,

i the new nightly my userstyle for yellow urlbar background not longer work with https:// Connections?

#urlbar[level] .urlbar-contents{
  background-color: rgba(255,255,185,.8) !important;
  margin-right: 0px !important;
  border-radius: 4px !important;
  box-shadow: 0 1px 0 rgba(0,0,0,.1) inset !important;
}

What must i change?

Hi,

i the new nightly my userstyle for yellow urlbar background not longer work with https:// Connections?

#urlbar[level] .urlbar-contents{
  background-color: rgba(255,255,185,.8) !important;
  margin-right: 0px !important;
  border-radius: 4px !important;
  box-shadow: 0 1px 0 rgba(0,0,0,.1) inset !important;
}

What must i change?

Fixed:

#urlbar[level] .urlbar-frontcap-and-textbox{
  background-color: rgba(255,255,185,.8) !important;
  margin-right: 0px !important;
  border-radius: 4px !important;
  box-shadow: 0 1px 0 rgba(0,0,0,.1) inset !important;
}

or if you want it to extend under the stop/go/refresh :

#urlbar[level] {
  background-color: rgba(255,255,185,.8) !important;
  margin-right: 0px !important;
  border-radius: 4px !important;
  box-shadow: 0 1px 0 rgba(0,0,0,.1) inset !important;
}

NVM foxxyn... Now I see only the cross... Also when I hover on the cross nothing happens even with your script. Anyway it's not a problem.

Ok, but I think maybe I misunderstood what you were asking for. If I'm understanding you correctly now, you want to maintain the hover affect for the new tab button. Is that correct?

If so, try this:

.tabs-newtab-button:hover { 
  -moz-appearance: none !important;
  background: -moz-linear-gradient(hsla(0,0%,50%,.4), hsla(0,0%,37%,.4) 50%) !important;
  background-position: -5px -2px !important;
  background-repeat: no-repeat !important;
  background-size: 200% !important;
  margin: 0 !important;
  padding: 0 !important;
  -moz-border-image: url("chrome://browser/skin/tabbrowser/tab.png") 4 5 3 6 / 4px 5px 3px 6px repeat stretch !important;
  border-radius: 10px 8px 0 0 !important;
}

Fixed:

#urlbar[level] .urlbar-frontcap-and-textbox{
  background-color: rgba(255,255,185,.8) !important;
  margin-right: 0px !important;
  border-radius: 4px !important;
  box-shadow: 0 1px 0 rgba(0,0,0,.1) inset !important;
}

Thank you very much :cool:

O.K.! Working!

You did something for Identity Box while using S4E? Looking a bit out of the box... Site & Fav icons always disabled.

I use the latest MineField version. It isn't FireFox beta 6 btw. Just made it look like.

post-350150-12875827081949.png

O.K.! Working!

You did something for Identity Box while using S4E? Looking a bit out of the box... Site & Fav icons always disabled.

I use the latest MineField version. It isn't FireFox beta 6 btw. Just made it look like.

The newest version of S4E reverts that identity box styling it had previously introduced.

S4E 2010.10.20.02

Nice thank you!

Bro... I just installed Win-Pro7 theme from devian art. I don't know if you know it... But it's black...

Is there a script to change all fonts from black to white ( menus )? Except bars of course... The inactive grey color doesn't bother me...

16i643.png

2nc2ptk.png

check the difference

Nice thank you!

Bro... I just installed Win-Pro7 theme from devian art. I don't know if you know it... But it's black...

Is there a script to change all fonts from black to white ( menus )? Except bars of course... The inactive grey color doesn't bother me...

16i643.png

2nc2ptk.png

check the difference

menupopup menu,
menupopup menuitem {
color: #fff !important; 
}

!!!

I'm glad that it was easy and you didn't spend time.

The grey made white too ( the inactive/dead links )... Is it easy to solve it?

Can I add the tooltips too? Forgot it, sorry!

tooltip,
menupopup menu:not([disabled="true"]),
menupopup menuitem:not([disabled="true"]) {
color: #fff !important; 
}

Styles updated.

Changelog:

- oct.21.2010

* polished some codes

* removed hide dropmarker from back/forward button (b8pre already removed)

* remove some margins and padding

* added padding-left navbar

* added mouse hover on tabbar not selected

* added mouse hover left gradient on urlbar and search bar

* changed tabbar select and non select transparency, better integration

* changed firefox appmenu button - Now the button is invisible, but still there. Visible on mouse hover only

* improved some cosmetics

* throbber style - using places/searching_16.png from default theme

2vud509.jpg

Changelog:

- oct.21.2010

* polished some codes

* removed hide dropmarker from back/forward button (b8pre already removed)

* remove some margins and padding

* added padding-left navbar

* added mouse hover on tabbar not selected

* added mouse hover left gradient on urlbar and search bar

* changed tabbar select and non select transparency, better integration

* changed firefox appmenu button - Now the button is invisible, but still there. Visible on mouse hover only

* changed detached back/forward buttons to square layout

* improved some cosmetics

* throbber style - using places/searching_16.png from default theme

14ditdz.jpg

what's wrong with this code?????

#main-window[sizemode="normal"][tabsontop="false"] #PersonalToolbar:not[disabled="true"]) #TabsToolbar {
	border-left: ThreeDShadow 1px solid !important;
	border-right: ThreeDShadow 1px solid !important;
}

anyone can help me?

thanks!

what's wrong with this code?????

#main-window[sizemode="normal"][tabsontop="false"] #PersonalToolbar:not[disabled="true"]) #TabsToolbar {
	border-left: ThreeDShadow 1px solid !important;
	border-right: ThreeDShadow 1px solid !important;
}

anyone can help me?

thanks!

  #main-window[sizemode="normal"][tabsontop="false"] #PersonalToolbar:not([collapsed="true"]) + #TabsToolbar {
        border-left: 1px solid ThreeDShadow  !important;
        border-right: 1px solid ThreeDShadow !important;
}

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • add $200 and get DWARF 3 model add $2000 and visit scientists center in your town add $20000 and visit the biggest telescope in Chile
    • Guess it's one of those things best used by devs to thoroughly test stuff.
    • is it all upside down there? traffic lights reverted too?
    • Bluesky COO warns social media regulations could destroy competition from small startups by Paul Hill Fears that increasing government control of social media risks regulatory capture by the biggest social media firms were raised again recently. Bluesky’s chief operating officer said in an interview that social media bans for children and tighter regulations for social media firms risk creating a world where there are only a few social media platforms run by companies with the deepest pockets. Regulations on social media firms have been very lax since they appeared for mainstream users in the 2000’s. This gave Meta, Snapchat, and Google time to build up their user bases and get entrenched, with Meta being the most successful. Now that Meta has succeeded, it has been attempting regulatory capture. By pushing for more regulations of social media, Meta hopes to make it more difficult for rivals to challenge it. For its part, it doesn’t need to worry about the cost of regulation because it has a lot of money to spend, whereas startups do not. Speaking to CNBC, Rose Wang, Bluesky’s chief operating officer, said: “I support the protection and the safety of youth, the question that we have then is at what cost, because essentially what I’m scared of is in the long term, we’re headed to a world where there’s about three to five platforms, and extreme heavy regulation of those platforms, and basically the whole compliance teams of these platforms are 10 times the size of our entire team. So, basically, we’re living in a world where it’s almost impossible for smaller entrants to come in and build healthier spaces. These platforms have led to a place where the bottom line is the thing that drives what they do... so I understand why governments have to step in and regulate, because the platforms have done nothing right.” She said that while she is not against regulation, there needs to be more channels between the small to mid-sized players and regulators to help protect them. She says that big tech players, on the other hand, “who we know are circumventing regulation,” need to be regulated. Essentially, the Bluesky position is one of nuance, rather than absolutes. While Bluesky’s proposal may preserve competition in the social media space, it still doesn’t address the massive privacy implications these age verification measures introduce, such as handing over sensitive identity documents to access age-gated content. Source: CNBC
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dedicated
      Conjor earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      493
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      249
    3. 3
      Steven P.
      71
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      70
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!