Recommended Posts

Hi all! I'm back! :D :laugh: Been busy last several weeks, didn't have the time to visit this forum.

I have a very simple question for now: How can I change the default text color in the search-box (see print screen) ? Thanks!

post-344974-12898531133155.jpg

Hi all! I'm back! :D :laugh: Been busy last several weeks, didn't have the time to visit this forum.

I have a very simple question for now: How can I change the default text color in the search-box (see print screen) ? Thanks!

Just throw this code into Stylish and modify it to your likings. :)

.searchbar-textbox {
    color: rgba(0,0,0,.8) !important;
}

Just throw this code into Stylish and modify it to your likings. :)

.searchbar-textbox {
    color: rgba(0,0,0,.8) !important;
}

Thanks mate, but I meant also (or only) the default text (the one that says "wikipedia" or "google" when you are not typing anything)...

So how may I change that also?

Thanks mate, but I meant also (or only) the default text (the one that says "wikipedia" or "google" when you are not typing anything)...

So how may I change that also?

#searchbar .textbox-input:-moz-placeholder {
color: red !important;
}

Foxxyn "save" me please! Found a "bug"...

On my Nav-Bar if I place a normal button, it's getting my style... But If I place a button with 2 functions, not getting my style

2v9f2ue.jpg

And this is my style:

#nav-bar .toolbarbutton-1:not(#back-button) {
 padding: 1px 5px !important;
 margin: 1px 3px !important;
 border-radius: 1px !important;
 height: 25px !important;
}

Foxxyn "save" me please! Found a "bug"...

On my Nav-Bar if I place a normal button, it's getting my style... But If I place a button with 2 functions, not getting my style

2v9f2ue.jpg

try this:

#nav-bar .toolbarbutton-1:not(#back-button) {
  padding: 1px 5px !important;
  margin: 1px 3px !important;
  border: 1px solid rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.19) !important;
  border-radius: 1px !important;
  height: 25px !important;
  box-shadow: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.3) 0px 0px 0px 1px inset, rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.1) 0px 0px 0px 2px inset, rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.15) 0px 1px 0px 0px !important;
  background-image: -moz-linear-gradient(rgba(251, 252, 253, 0.95), rgba(246, 247, 248, 0.47) 49%, rgba(231, 232, 233, 0.45) 51%, rgba(225, 226, 229, 0.3)) !important;
}

#nav-bar .toolbarbutton-1 > .toolbarbutton-menubutton-button,
#nav-bar .toolbarbutton-1 > .toolbarbutton-menubutton-dropmarker {
  border: 0 !important;
  box-shadow: none !important;
  background: none !important;
}

:(

Now it's unified and a bit bigger... Can we make it exactly like when it's on my add-on bar?

nwil1g.jpg

#nav-bar .toolbarbutton-1:not(#back-button) {
 margin: 1px 3px !important;
 border-radius: 1px !important;
 height: 25px !important;
}

#nav-bar .toolbarbutton-1 > .toolbarbutton-menubutton-button,
#nav-bar .toolbarbutton-1 > .toolbarbutton-menubutton-dropmarker {
 border: 1px solid rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.19) !important;
 border-radius: 1px !important;
}

#nav-bar .toolbarbutton-1 > .toolbarbutton-menubutton-button {
border-right: 0 !important;
}

post-350326-12899288295678.jpg

  • 2 weeks later...

Foxxyn... I've custom Windows Theme and you know, there is a problem with FF and its colors.

Can you give me the code for normal Menu Colors? Half-White and Half-Light Blue!

I searched the entire topic but didn't find it. I was pretty sure, somewhere here, someone posted it...

EDIT: NVM! Found it by extreme luck...

Well... Please someone can help me?

The Menu got its final style... The Sub-Menus of Blue Pane made blue too... The Sub-Menus of White Pane made white too...

So, can someone give me the entire final code?

Not sure what you're asking for Deo. I know you're using a custom Windows theme. Are your submenus not using the default colors? did you do this already:

Foxxyn I saw all those but I didn't manage to fix it.

Can you please give me the final code of Menu? If it's impossible...

Also I saw the code in Bugzilla but that has many things and I can't even copy-paste correctly...

Αdditionally, many custom themes have their specific colors so it's normal to become white for example... Isn't it?

Here is the code, I think...

https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=589435

And here what I have now but it isn't the final which I ask for:

#appmenuPrimaryPane {
  -moz-border-end: 1px solid ThreeDShadow;
}
#appmenu-popup {
  -moz-appearance: none;
  background: white;
  border: 1px solid rgba(0,0,0,.5);
}
#appmenuPrimaryPane {
  background-color: rgba(255,255,255,0.5);
  padding: 2px;
}
#appmenuSecondaryPane {
  background-color: #f1f5fb;
  box-shadow: 1px 0 2px rgb(204,214,234) inset;
  padding-top: 2px;
  padding-bottom: 2px;
}
#appmenuSecondaryPane:-moz-locale-dir(rtl) {
  box-shadow: -1px 0 2px rgb(204,214,234) inset;
}

#appmenuPrimaryPane menupopup would be the submenus of the left pane

#appmenuSecondaryPane menupopup would be the submenus of the right pane

this is from the patch:

#appmenuPrimaryPane menupopup {
	-moz-appearance: none!important;
	background-image: -moz-linear-gradient(left, white 26px, ThreeDLightShadow 26px, ThreeDLightShadow 27px, ThreeDHighlight 27px, ThreeDHighlight 28px, white 28px)!important;
	border: 3px solid!important;
	-moz-border-top-colors: ThreeDShadow white!important;
	-moz-border-bottom-colors: ThreeDShadow white!important;
	-moz-border-left-colors: ThreeDShadow white!important;
	-moz-border-right-colors: ThreeDShadow white!important;
}

#appmenuSecondaryPane menupopup {
	-moz-appearance: none!important;
	background-image: -moz-linear-gradient(left, #f1f5fb 26px, ThreeDLightShadow 26px, ThreeDLightShadow 27px, ThreeDHighlight 27px, ThreeDHighlight 28px, #f1f5fb 28px)!important;
	border: 3px solid!important;
	-moz-border-top-colors: ThreeDShadow #f1f5fb!important;
	-moz-border-bottom-colors: ThreeDShadow #f1f5fb!important;
	-moz-border-left-colors: ThreeDShadow #f1f5fb!important;
	-moz-border-right-colors: ThreeDShadow #f1f5fb!important;
	background-color: #f1f5fb!important;
	border: 1px solid ThreeDShadow!important;
	padding: 2px!important;
	}

Well-Well... That's it!

The code that I posted above, is the final? Is the latest correct one?

according to the patch this is:

 #appmenuPrimaryPane {
   -moz-border-end: 1px solid ThreeDShadow;
 }

   #appmenu-popup {
     -moz-appearance: none;
     background: white;
     border: 1px solid ThreeDShadow;
   }

   #appmenuPrimaryPane {
     background-color: rgba(255,255,255,0.5);
     padding: 2px;
   }

   #appmenuSecondaryPane {
     background-color: #f1f5fb;
     box-shadow: 1px 0 2px rgb(204,214,234) inset;
     padding-top: 2px;
     padding-bottom: 2px;
     font-family: "Segoe UI Semibold", "Segoe UI", sans-serif;
   }

according to the patch this is:

 #appmenuPrimaryPane {
   -moz-border-end: 1px solid ThreeDShadow;
 }

   #appmenu-popup {
     -moz-appearance: none;
     background: white;
     border: 1px solid ThreeDShadow;
   }

   #appmenuPrimaryPane {
     background-color: rgba(255,255,255,0.5);
     padding: 2px;
   }

   #appmenuSecondaryPane {
     background-color: #f1f5fb;
     box-shadow: 1px 0 2px rgb(204,214,234) inset;
     padding-top: 2px;
     padding-bottom: 2px;
     font-family: "Segoe UI Semibold", "Segoe UI", sans-serif;
   }

what is this stylish code for?

Foxxyn!

I found this style: http://userstyles.org/styles/40101

And saw your comment! Tried to apply your suggestions... And look what I've got:

#urlbar {
    position: relative !important;
}

.urlbar-over-link-box[overlinkstate="fade-out"] { visibility: collapse !important; 
}

.urlbar-over-link-box {
    position: fixed !important;
    bottom: 28px !important;
    left: 5px !important;
    opacity: 0.9 !important;
    width: -moz-max-content !important;
    max-width: none !important;
    height: 22px !important;  
    padding: 2px 5px 2px 5px !important;
    border-radius:  1px !important;
    border: 1px solid #767676 !important;
    background: -moz-linear-gradient(top, #F8F8F8 , #E8E8F0) padding-box !important;
    font-family: Verdana !important;

}

.urlbar-textbox-container-children[overlinkstate]{ opacity: 1 !important; 
}

.urlbar-over-link-path-label {
    max-width: 500px !important; 
    width: -moz-max-content !important;
    white-space: nowrap !important;
    overflow: hidden !important;
}

.urlbar-over-link-host-label,
.urlbar-over-link-path-label {
    color: #594E52 !important;
    font-size: 12px !important;
}

I just applied your suggestion and customized few things like "bottom: 28px !important;" and border-radius to 1, to fit well in my script.... Nothing important...

But, sometimes it doesn't work correctly... Some times not dissapearing... And if I go to Add-ons Manager a link awlays appears...

Did you refine it? Did you make it perfect? It's exactly like IE 9's and loved it!

Foxxyn!

I found this style: http://userstyles.org/styles/40101

And saw your comment! Tried to apply your suggestions... And look what I've got:

I just applied your suggestion and customized few things like "bottom: 28px !important;" and border-radius to 1, to fit well in my script.... Nothing important...

But, sometimes it doesn't work correctly... Some times not dissapearing... And if I go to Add-ons Manager a link awlays appears...

Did you refine it? Did you make it perfect? It's exactly like IE 9's and loved it!

Actually, I don't use it because it refuses to obey my transition delay settings. As far as the link which always shows on about:addons, this problem doesn't occur in the latest hourlies in which in-content-ui has landed (you'll see it in the nightly update tomorrow). In the beta you can work around it by replacing .urlbar-over-link-box with #main-window:not([stylish-url=about:addons]) .urlbar-over-link-box {.

Of course that will only work if you're using stylish.

Well, True... Now with Content UI not appearing anymore. I've latest hourly.

Few problems left... Seems appears an address randomly ( when I'm in Add-ons Manager and Trying to go to the creator's address for example )? Dunno, anyway. Since you don't use it, crap for me!

Replace what with what? That was kinda confusing...

Do you know if the final patch for UI Content will be exactly like mock-up design?

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I think it depends on what you're looking for to do, and the time you have to spare. With my Dwarf 3, I easily spend 3-4 hour sessions; half an hour driving to an un-light polluted place, another half hour unpacking and setting up the smart scope + tripod for equatorial tracking, then 15 more minutes mucking around with settings and shooting calibration frames, spending a few hours shooting, merging with past photo sessions, etc. It's crazy how time flies and I often get home later than I expected. It's something I still need to set aside a good part of an evening to do, all in all. For one session, where you often need like four for best results when it comes to deep space objects. Even with a smart scope like Dwarf 3, regular non-astro photography is still way more approachable to people getting into photography. I find this is a time consuming niche no matter how I go about it. With practice, I can probably begin cutting time here but I think where smart scopes find their home is among people who love to shoot the night sky but don't have the spare time to go deep with the "navigator level" attunement to the night sky itself in addition to everything else. Having said this, _if_ you have even more time to spend on this hobby, it will probably be even more rewarding to do it more by hand and learn the skies and the details of how it all works.
    • I misread the title and thought Teams itself would be redesigned. Imagine having this one as a native WinUI app.
    • Dell, HP PCs ran into endless reboot, BitLocker recovery loops but Windows 11 isn't to blame by Sayan Sen Last month Neowin reported on a major issue on Dell systems wherein a bug in its official support tool was leading to endless blue screen of death (BSOD) and restarts. Following our report, Dell officially acknowledged its SupportAssist-related crash issue, confirming that the culprit is not Microsoft's operating system but rather a faulty version of its own remediation software. In a newly published support advisory, Dell stated that version 5.5.16.0 of Dell SupportAssist Remediation and Alienware SupportAssist Remediation can trigger blue screen errors and unexpected system restarts. The company notes that the problematic component operates independently of the main SupportAssist application, meaning users should not remove the primary SupportAssist software when troubleshooting the issue. According to Dell, the crashes are linked specifically to the SupportAssist Remediation service, which is bundled with SupportAssist OS Recovery Tools, and as such it has since released an updated version, 5.5.16.1, which is said to resolve the problem. Affected users are advised to first verify whether version 5.5.16.0 is installed by checking the Installed Apps section in Windows Settings. If so, Dell recommends updating SupportAssist OS Recovery Tools through either SupportAssist's "Update Software" feature or Dell Command Update. Dell also advises users to back up important data before performing the update and to ensure systems remain connected to power throughout the installation process. If you are still having issues though make sure to report to the Dell support forum. As it turns out though Dell is not the only PC maker currently dealing with update-related headaches as HP is also facing a separate but probably equally frustrating issue involving recent Windows Secure Boot updates that were released with recent Windows 11 Patch Tuesdays. Similar to Dell, HP also put up its own support article where it explains the issue. The company says that affected devices could hit a brick wall when booting as they run into a BitLocker recovery loop after the April 2026 updates. The problem appears to affect systems wherein the new UEFI Secure Boot CA 2023 certificates fail to apply properly. As such affected users will find themselves entering their recovery key over and over again despite the system otherwise functioning normally. HP says such PCs should be updated to the latest available BIOS version and configured with the necessary Secure Boot certificates before installing Microsoft's Windows 11 Patch Tuesday updates. Systems that are already experiencing the problem may require BIOS configuration changes to restore normal boot behavior. Admins can find information regarding that in the support article here on HP's official website.
    • Getting further away from the artistic study of mental disease that was the first game... (which never needed any sequels to begin with) But I get it, a company has to make money. And the second was at least visually impressive, if not in any other way.
    • If its the devs fault you would think Unreal would help M$ take full advantage of Unreal and work with them to fix the performance issues. Otherwise they are catching unwarranted bad press.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dedicated
      Conjor earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      493
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      246
    3. 3
      Steven P.
      72
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      69
    5. 5
      neufuse
      68
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!