Recommended Posts

Hi all! I'm back! :D :laugh: Been busy last several weeks, didn't have the time to visit this forum.

I have a very simple question for now: How can I change the default text color in the search-box (see print screen) ? Thanks!

post-344974-12898531133155.jpg

Hi all! I'm back! :D :laugh: Been busy last several weeks, didn't have the time to visit this forum.

I have a very simple question for now: How can I change the default text color in the search-box (see print screen) ? Thanks!

Just throw this code into Stylish and modify it to your likings. :)

.searchbar-textbox {
    color: rgba(0,0,0,.8) !important;
}

Just throw this code into Stylish and modify it to your likings. :)

.searchbar-textbox {
    color: rgba(0,0,0,.8) !important;
}

Thanks mate, but I meant also (or only) the default text (the one that says "wikipedia" or "google" when you are not typing anything)...

So how may I change that also?

Thanks mate, but I meant also (or only) the default text (the one that says "wikipedia" or "google" when you are not typing anything)...

So how may I change that also?

#searchbar .textbox-input:-moz-placeholder {
color: red !important;
}

Foxxyn "save" me please! Found a "bug"...

On my Nav-Bar if I place a normal button, it's getting my style... But If I place a button with 2 functions, not getting my style

2v9f2ue.jpg

And this is my style:

#nav-bar .toolbarbutton-1:not(#back-button) {
 padding: 1px 5px !important;
 margin: 1px 3px !important;
 border-radius: 1px !important;
 height: 25px !important;
}

Foxxyn "save" me please! Found a "bug"...

On my Nav-Bar if I place a normal button, it's getting my style... But If I place a button with 2 functions, not getting my style

2v9f2ue.jpg

try this:

#nav-bar .toolbarbutton-1:not(#back-button) {
  padding: 1px 5px !important;
  margin: 1px 3px !important;
  border: 1px solid rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.19) !important;
  border-radius: 1px !important;
  height: 25px !important;
  box-shadow: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.3) 0px 0px 0px 1px inset, rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.1) 0px 0px 0px 2px inset, rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.15) 0px 1px 0px 0px !important;
  background-image: -moz-linear-gradient(rgba(251, 252, 253, 0.95), rgba(246, 247, 248, 0.47) 49%, rgba(231, 232, 233, 0.45) 51%, rgba(225, 226, 229, 0.3)) !important;
}

#nav-bar .toolbarbutton-1 > .toolbarbutton-menubutton-button,
#nav-bar .toolbarbutton-1 > .toolbarbutton-menubutton-dropmarker {
  border: 0 !important;
  box-shadow: none !important;
  background: none !important;
}

:(

Now it's unified and a bit bigger... Can we make it exactly like when it's on my add-on bar?

nwil1g.jpg

#nav-bar .toolbarbutton-1:not(#back-button) {
 margin: 1px 3px !important;
 border-radius: 1px !important;
 height: 25px !important;
}

#nav-bar .toolbarbutton-1 > .toolbarbutton-menubutton-button,
#nav-bar .toolbarbutton-1 > .toolbarbutton-menubutton-dropmarker {
 border: 1px solid rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.19) !important;
 border-radius: 1px !important;
}

#nav-bar .toolbarbutton-1 > .toolbarbutton-menubutton-button {
border-right: 0 !important;
}

post-350326-12899288295678.jpg

  • 2 weeks later...

Foxxyn... I've custom Windows Theme and you know, there is a problem with FF and its colors.

Can you give me the code for normal Menu Colors? Half-White and Half-Light Blue!

I searched the entire topic but didn't find it. I was pretty sure, somewhere here, someone posted it...

EDIT: NVM! Found it by extreme luck...

Well... Please someone can help me?

The Menu got its final style... The Sub-Menus of Blue Pane made blue too... The Sub-Menus of White Pane made white too...

So, can someone give me the entire final code?

Not sure what you're asking for Deo. I know you're using a custom Windows theme. Are your submenus not using the default colors? did you do this already:

Foxxyn I saw all those but I didn't manage to fix it.

Can you please give me the final code of Menu? If it's impossible...

Also I saw the code in Bugzilla but that has many things and I can't even copy-paste correctly...

Αdditionally, many custom themes have their specific colors so it's normal to become white for example... Isn't it?

Here is the code, I think...

https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=589435

And here what I have now but it isn't the final which I ask for:

#appmenuPrimaryPane {
  -moz-border-end: 1px solid ThreeDShadow;
}
#appmenu-popup {
  -moz-appearance: none;
  background: white;
  border: 1px solid rgba(0,0,0,.5);
}
#appmenuPrimaryPane {
  background-color: rgba(255,255,255,0.5);
  padding: 2px;
}
#appmenuSecondaryPane {
  background-color: #f1f5fb;
  box-shadow: 1px 0 2px rgb(204,214,234) inset;
  padding-top: 2px;
  padding-bottom: 2px;
}
#appmenuSecondaryPane:-moz-locale-dir(rtl) {
  box-shadow: -1px 0 2px rgb(204,214,234) inset;
}

#appmenuPrimaryPane menupopup would be the submenus of the left pane

#appmenuSecondaryPane menupopup would be the submenus of the right pane

this is from the patch:

#appmenuPrimaryPane menupopup {
	-moz-appearance: none!important;
	background-image: -moz-linear-gradient(left, white 26px, ThreeDLightShadow 26px, ThreeDLightShadow 27px, ThreeDHighlight 27px, ThreeDHighlight 28px, white 28px)!important;
	border: 3px solid!important;
	-moz-border-top-colors: ThreeDShadow white!important;
	-moz-border-bottom-colors: ThreeDShadow white!important;
	-moz-border-left-colors: ThreeDShadow white!important;
	-moz-border-right-colors: ThreeDShadow white!important;
}

#appmenuSecondaryPane menupopup {
	-moz-appearance: none!important;
	background-image: -moz-linear-gradient(left, #f1f5fb 26px, ThreeDLightShadow 26px, ThreeDLightShadow 27px, ThreeDHighlight 27px, ThreeDHighlight 28px, #f1f5fb 28px)!important;
	border: 3px solid!important;
	-moz-border-top-colors: ThreeDShadow #f1f5fb!important;
	-moz-border-bottom-colors: ThreeDShadow #f1f5fb!important;
	-moz-border-left-colors: ThreeDShadow #f1f5fb!important;
	-moz-border-right-colors: ThreeDShadow #f1f5fb!important;
	background-color: #f1f5fb!important;
	border: 1px solid ThreeDShadow!important;
	padding: 2px!important;
	}

Well-Well... That's it!

The code that I posted above, is the final? Is the latest correct one?

according to the patch this is:

 #appmenuPrimaryPane {
   -moz-border-end: 1px solid ThreeDShadow;
 }

   #appmenu-popup {
     -moz-appearance: none;
     background: white;
     border: 1px solid ThreeDShadow;
   }

   #appmenuPrimaryPane {
     background-color: rgba(255,255,255,0.5);
     padding: 2px;
   }

   #appmenuSecondaryPane {
     background-color: #f1f5fb;
     box-shadow: 1px 0 2px rgb(204,214,234) inset;
     padding-top: 2px;
     padding-bottom: 2px;
     font-family: "Segoe UI Semibold", "Segoe UI", sans-serif;
   }

according to the patch this is:

 #appmenuPrimaryPane {
   -moz-border-end: 1px solid ThreeDShadow;
 }

   #appmenu-popup {
     -moz-appearance: none;
     background: white;
     border: 1px solid ThreeDShadow;
   }

   #appmenuPrimaryPane {
     background-color: rgba(255,255,255,0.5);
     padding: 2px;
   }

   #appmenuSecondaryPane {
     background-color: #f1f5fb;
     box-shadow: 1px 0 2px rgb(204,214,234) inset;
     padding-top: 2px;
     padding-bottom: 2px;
     font-family: "Segoe UI Semibold", "Segoe UI", sans-serif;
   }

what is this stylish code for?

Foxxyn!

I found this style: http://userstyles.org/styles/40101

And saw your comment! Tried to apply your suggestions... And look what I've got:

#urlbar {
    position: relative !important;
}

.urlbar-over-link-box[overlinkstate="fade-out"] { visibility: collapse !important; 
}

.urlbar-over-link-box {
    position: fixed !important;
    bottom: 28px !important;
    left: 5px !important;
    opacity: 0.9 !important;
    width: -moz-max-content !important;
    max-width: none !important;
    height: 22px !important;  
    padding: 2px 5px 2px 5px !important;
    border-radius:  1px !important;
    border: 1px solid #767676 !important;
    background: -moz-linear-gradient(top, #F8F8F8 , #E8E8F0) padding-box !important;
    font-family: Verdana !important;

}

.urlbar-textbox-container-children[overlinkstate]{ opacity: 1 !important; 
}

.urlbar-over-link-path-label {
    max-width: 500px !important; 
    width: -moz-max-content !important;
    white-space: nowrap !important;
    overflow: hidden !important;
}

.urlbar-over-link-host-label,
.urlbar-over-link-path-label {
    color: #594E52 !important;
    font-size: 12px !important;
}

I just applied your suggestion and customized few things like "bottom: 28px !important;" and border-radius to 1, to fit well in my script.... Nothing important...

But, sometimes it doesn't work correctly... Some times not dissapearing... And if I go to Add-ons Manager a link awlays appears...

Did you refine it? Did you make it perfect? It's exactly like IE 9's and loved it!

Foxxyn!

I found this style: http://userstyles.org/styles/40101

And saw your comment! Tried to apply your suggestions... And look what I've got:

I just applied your suggestion and customized few things like "bottom: 28px !important;" and border-radius to 1, to fit well in my script.... Nothing important...

But, sometimes it doesn't work correctly... Some times not dissapearing... And if I go to Add-ons Manager a link awlays appears...

Did you refine it? Did you make it perfect? It's exactly like IE 9's and loved it!

Actually, I don't use it because it refuses to obey my transition delay settings. As far as the link which always shows on about:addons, this problem doesn't occur in the latest hourlies in which in-content-ui has landed (you'll see it in the nightly update tomorrow). In the beta you can work around it by replacing .urlbar-over-link-box with #main-window:not([stylish-url=about:addons]) .urlbar-over-link-box {.

Of course that will only work if you're using stylish.

Well, True... Now with Content UI not appearing anymore. I've latest hourly.

Few problems left... Seems appears an address randomly ( when I'm in Add-ons Manager and Trying to go to the creator's address for example )? Dunno, anyway. Since you don't use it, crap for me!

Replace what with what? That was kinda confusing...

Do you know if the final patch for UI Content will be exactly like mock-up design?

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • "...a low price of just $340..." I don't think it means what you think it means.
    • This Corsair Vengeance DDR5-6000 32GB RAM with RGB is a great deal for limited time by Sayan Sen Memory prices have been through the roof for a while, though it seems like things might finally be getting better. If you are in the market for one, then grab this Corsair Vengeance DDR5 32GB (2x16GB) DDR5 6000 CL36 kit with RGB for a low price of just $340 (purchase link under the specs table down below). The kit is compatible with both AMD and Intel systems as it supports both EXPO and XMP overclocking profiles, respectively. 6000 MT/s is often the sweet spot for many systems as it provides ample data transfer speed while still being on Gear 1 mode. This Vengeance variant has RGB so if you love bright setups with such lighting, this is a win-win for you. The technical specifications of the Corsair Vengeance memory kit are given in the table below: Specification Value Memory Type DDR5 Memory Size (Total) 32GB Kit Configuration 2 × 16GB Form Factor UDIMM (Desktop) Pin Count 288-pin Speed (Data Rate) 6000 MT/s Speed Rating PC5-48000 Tested CAS Latency 38-44-44-96 Voltage (Tested) 1.35V Performance Profile AMD EXPO & Intel XMP Heat Spreader Aluminum heatspreader Cooling Type Passive (Heatsink) Lighting Ten Zone RGB Software Support Corsair iCUE Get it at the link below: CORSAIR Vengeance RGB DDR5 32GB (2 x 16GB) 6000 CL38 – Gray (CMH32GX5M1E6000Z38): $339.99 (Sold and Shipped by Woot US, Fulfilled by Amazon US) This Woot deal is US-specific and not available in other regions unless specified. This is a first-party seller link (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you also purchase from a first-party seller link only. If you don't like it or want to look at more options, check out the previous deals that we have covered, OR you can also visit Amazon US deals page. Get Prime (SNAP), Prime Video, Audible Plus or Kindle / Music Unlimited. Free for 30 days. As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • The very fact that a TPM (v2.0 specifically which is part of the issue I suspect) is now a baseline for any supported Windows installation will naturally mean other vendors will start to leverage it as they know it'll be there. It's called progress, and it's always been the way. A TPM isn't a windows thing, it's just a module designed to securely store keys. Secure boot isn't a Windows thing (although MS are the TCA as I recall hence the upheaval this year as the 2011 certs expire), it's just a way to verify a bootloader is signed. Windows simply leverages them.
    • It's a local account with the ability to reset a password at a very base level. I really don't get the issue that gets whipped up around it But you do you
  • Recent Achievements

    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dedicated
      Conjor earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Dedicated
      Mark Spruce earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Collaborator
      conkir earned a badge
      Collaborator
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      479
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      244
    3. 3
      Steven P.
      72
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      66
    5. 5
      Skyfrog
      65
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!