Recommended Posts

Anyone know how to change this arrow next to Google logo? Trying to get it so it's the bigger arrow like in mockups:

me8qg.png

something like this:

 #searchbar .searchbar-dropmarker-image{
   list-style-image: url("url-of-the-image") !important;
 }

@CromoPT: thank you too for appreciating my style :)

something like this:

 #searchbar .searchbar-dropmarker-image{
   list-style-image: url("url-of-the-image") !important;
 }

@CromoPT: thank you too for appreciating my style :)

How would I go about lowering it a bit? It's a bit too high.

Anyone know how to change this arrow next to Google logo? Trying to get it so it's the bigger arrow like in mockups:

me8qg.png

 #searchbar .searchbar-dropmarker-image{
	list-style-image: url("chrome://global/skin/arrow/arrow-dn-sharp.gif") !important; }

Oh I made this a few weeks ago here its the style in userstyles, well change all the dropmarkers

http://userstyles.org/styles/44128/

 #searchbar .searchbar-dropmarker-image{
	list-style-image: url("chrome://global/skin/arrow/arrow-dn-sharp.gif") !important; }

Oh I made this a few weeks ago here its the style in userstyles, well change all the dropmarkers

http://userstyles.org/styles/44128/

That's not working for me. Arrow is way too high up.

please post me your code so i'll what can be done!

Here you go:

 #searchbar .searchbar-dropmarker-image{
   list-style-image: url("") !important;
 }

Don't know if anyone wants it, but here's the identity panel style I use:

995797065.png

It's based off the mockups in this bug.

You can grab it here: http://userstyles.org/styles/44985/identity-panel-larry-2-0-based?r=1299633674

And since I'm here I might as well ask if there's a way to do the gray block or the domain highlighting like in the mockups with only CSS? It doesn't seem like it, but some of you guys know a lot more about this than I do.

Can someone help me make my url look like this:

745220490.jpg

With the forward/back and home buttons touching the url bar like in the image? Using Photoshop to make it look like that is as close as I can get to actually making it work. :laugh:

Thanks in advance.

Here you go:

try this

 #searchbar .searchbar-dropmarker-image{
   list-style-image: url("") !important;
   margin-top: 2px !important;
 }

adjust the 2px.

Can someone help me make my url look like this:

745220490.jpg

With the forward/back and home buttons touching the url bar like in the image? Using Photoshop to make it look like that is as close as I can get to actually making it work. :laugh:

Thanks in advance.

try this:

 #nav-bar[currentset*="unified-back-forward-button,urlbar-container"] #forward-button{
  border-radius: 0 !important;
  margin-right: 0 !important;
 }

 #nav-bar[currentset*="unified-back-forward-button,urlbar-container"] #urlbar{
  border-top-left-radius: 0 !important;
  border-bottom-left-radius: 0 !important;
  margin-left: 0 !important;
  border-left: 0 !important;
 }

 #nav-bar[currentset*="urlbar-container,reload-button,stop-button,home-button"] #urlbar{
  border-top-right-radius: 0 !important;
  border-bottom-right-radius: 0 !important;
  margin-right: 0 !important;
 }

 #nav-bar[currentset*="urlbar-container,reload-button,stop-button,home-button"] #home-button{
  border-top-left-radius: 0 !important;
  border-bottom-left-radius: 0 !important;
  margin-left: 0 !important;
  border-left: 0 !important;
 }

try this

 #searchbar .searchbar-dropmarker-image{
   list-style-image: url("") !important;
   margin-top: 2px !important;
 }

adjust the 2px.

Thank you so much!

My userchrome is currently

menu[label=Bookmarks Toolbar] {display: none !important;}

menuitem[label=Unsorted Bookmarks] {display: none !important;}

menuitem[label=View Bookmarks Toolbar] {display: none !important;}

I've been trying to find out how to remove the separator that is tied to each of those and have yet to find anything that works.

Someone suggested adding +menuseparator but that makes the menu and menuitem that I'm hiding show back up.

Could someone help me please.

My userchrome is currently

menu[label=Bookmarks Toolbar] {display: none !important;}

menuitem[label=Unsorted Bookmarks] {display: none !important;}

menuitem[label=View Bookmarks Toolbar] {display: none !important;}

I've been trying to find out how to remove the separator that is tied to each of those and have yet to find anything that works.

Someone suggested adding +menuseparator but that makes the menu and menuitem that I'm hiding show back up.

Could someone help me please.

You've gotta do it like this:

menu[label="Bookmarks Toolbar"],
menu[label="Bookmarks Toolbar"] + menuseparator {
  display: none !important;
}

Thank you so much, that's been bugging me all day.

It worked for all of them except the one above Unsorted Bookmarks.

For that one try this:

#BMB_bookmarksPopup > .hide-if-empty-places-result {
  display: none !important;
}

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I really hope the author's health is ok. Squirreling away a official backup of this software. Looks like the internet archive already cached a copy as well - https://web.archive.org/web/20...ldbit-soft.fi/software.html
    • AMD is supported out of the box in linux because of their open source driver. Nvidia does not. All my systems are amd and all of them work nicely on linux arch without doing anything.
    • Never had a problem with TPM and started using that many years ago in Win10. Through several motherboards and OS versions, it just does what it does without complaint. My games library doesn't even know it's there. Secure boot does a lot more than support anti-cheat, as it came along long before anti-cheat software. I've used it religiously since before I started using TPM, and I always liked it for being able to nullify virus contagions that try their best to come in underneath the firmware during boot, so that the OS doesn't see them, etc. That is its purpose, imo. I'll never understand why people who elect to use another OS feel compelled to run down Windows... I guess they need to do that to feel secure about their choices? I run Windows because it supports all the software (including games) natively that I want to buy, and I've never had to run down another OS to make me feel better about it. (Although it's certainly possible to do that, of course...) Win10 is on a ventilator atm, and Win11 is very close to being free, and I finally got to stop running StartAllBack as I moved to the Experimental/Dev channel and my 26300.8553 build supports the moveable taskbar and it's running fine at the top of the screen! Finally, my last major dislike of Win11 is being rectified! So, I'm not at all surprised to see Win11's share of the Steam survey hitting 70%.
    • I can answer about the Linux bit. I only used AMD GPUs. I currently have a 9060XT (8GB) that fits my needs, I'm not a gamer, so I don't need that much GDDR. But lately, NVIDIA has grown a lot in the recent years. Oh, the horrors of NVIDIA drivers not working. But they have been getting better. I know a lot of members onm here that are running cachyOS and other distros, and are fine with a 4090/5090 variants. Really, though, I would stick with AMD variants.
    • Everything they say you can already do yourself on the registry by changing some things.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dedicated
      Conjor earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Dedicated
      Mark Spruce earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Collaborator
      conkir earned a badge
      Collaborator
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      479
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      252
    3. 3
      Steven P.
      71
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      69
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      68
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!