Barclays Premier League Season 2010/2011


  

334 members have voted

  1. 1. Who will take the title this year?

    • Arsenal
      17
    • Aston Villa
      2
    • Birmingham
      0
    • Blackburn
      0
    • Blackpool
      4
    • Chelsea
      33
    • Everton
      3
    • Fulham
      0
    • Liverpool
      7
    • Manchester City
      0
    • Manchester United
      57
    • Newcastle
      1
    • Stoke
      0
    • Sunderland
      1
    • Tottenham
      4
    • West Bromwich
      0
    • West Ham
      0
    • Wigan
      1
    • Wolverhampton
      0
  2. 2. Who's getting relegated?

    • Arsenal
      5
    • Aston Villa
      1
    • Birmingham
      2
    • Blackburn
      3
    • Blackpool
      39
    • Chelsea
      5
    • Everton
      4
    • Fulham
      6
    • Liverpool
      15
    • Manchester City
      2
    • Manchester United
      8
    • Newcastle
      15
    • Stoke
      15
    • Sunderland
      9
    • Tottenham
      1
    • West Bromwich
      50
    • West Ham
      45
    • Wigan
      52
    • Wolverhampton
      57
  3. 3. Who will take the scoring title?

    • Drogba (Chelsea)
      34
    • Rooney (Manchester United)
      18
    • Bent (Sunderland)
      1
    • Tevez (Manchester City)
      8
    • Lampard (Chelsea)
      2
    • Dafoe (Tottenham)
      4
    • Torres (Liverpool)
      12
    • Fabregas (Arsenal)
      3
    • Adebayor (Manchester City)
      1
    • Agbonlahor (Aston Villa)
      1
    • Saha (Everton)
      1
    • Berbatov (Manchester United)
      25
    • Malouda (Chelsea)
      1
    • Anelka (Chelsea)
      0
    • Bellamy (Manchester City)
      0
    • Carew (Aston Villa)
      1
    • Carlton Cole (West Ham)
      0
    • Arshavin (Arsenal)
      2
    • Jerome (Birmingham)
      1
    • Other!
      14


Recommended Posts

Either way RBS are going to win, sure they might be in the wrong for the way they've gone about selling it. ?But RBS are only doing it to recoup the money. ?Even if the case goes on longer then RBS can still call in the debt if they want to.

Frankly at this moment I believe having Hermann Goering in charge would be a welcome step up from Hicks and Gillett. As long as this situation is resolved with the minimal amount of damage to the club, and we get new ownership, I am not overly fussed who ends up in ownership.

I like the idea but dont like the idea of a team having unlimited resources it ruins football :unsure:

Likewise, but as the saying goes, if you can't beat em join em

Chelsea started it, Man City continued it. And unless the league do something to clamp down on it, it will continue.

Likewise, but as the saying goes, if you can't beat em join em

Chelsea started it, Man City continued it. And unless the league do something to clamp down on it, it will continue.

Yeah Chelsea did it at first then kinda slowed down when they realised buying players for ?30m didn't always work...and they kept the goodens and bought wisely...but City its working at the moment...until January when Mancini buys more strikers for ?40m :sleep:

Legislation, wage caps, spending caps vs actual income must be enforced, because the Man City & Chelseas of English football totally undermines the competition imo.

Yes I am a bitter Portsmouth supporter, but our troubles started when our owners saw no other option but to overspend in order to achieve anything in that league.

A normal business, if run like some football clubs are right now, would be folded/liquidated in minutes.

Legislation, wage caps, spending caps vs actual income must be enforced, because the Man City & Chelseas of English football totally undermines the competition imo.

Yes I am a bitter Portsmouth supporter, but our troubles started when our owners saw no other option but to overspend in order to achieve anything in that league.

A normal business, if run like some football clubs are right now, would be folded/liquidated in minutes.

I absolutely agree. The problem is, the premier league as it is makes too much money, and that is kind of stifling the charge for reform. In the end I fear we are going to end up with a league similar to Scotland, where if you don't support one or 2 teams, you are in for a pretty boring ride. Like a lot of sports, professional football in this country has had it's soul destroyed by money.

cockblocked again..

Following the successful conclusion of High Court proceedings today, the Boards of Directors of Kop Football and Kop Holdings met tonight and resolved to complete the sale of Liverpool FC to New England Sports Ventures.

Regretably, Thomas Hicks and George Gillett have tonight obtained a Temporary Restraining Order from a Texas District Court against the independent directors, Royal Bank of Scotland PLC and NESV to prevent the transaction being completed.

The independent directors consider the restraining order to be unwarranted and damaging and will move as swiftly as possible to seek to have it removed.

A further statement will be made in due course.

Author: Liverpool FC

Tagged: Liverpool FC , ownership

It's sad and laughable really that Hicks and Gillett are moaning about their personal investments. Well I have news for them, when you take a risk like that, you have no legal right to expect compensation for that unless it's something you specifically write into your contract with the party that lends you the money. They owe RBS the money, and RBS have every legal right to recover their losses. They aren't really going to win this one, so I don't know why they are fighting it, and it's equally troubling to see American courts poking their noses into things that are outside of their jurisdiction and frankly none of their business. To be blunt, I personally wish they would just GTFO of our sport, the fact that both Liverpool and Man United's fans despise their owners speaks volumes in my opinion.

Liverpool Football Club have tonight issued a statement following today's court hearing in London:

The independent Directors of Liverpool Football Club are delighted with the verdict of Mr Justice Floyd in the High Court this afternoon which now requires Mr Hicks and Mr Gillett to withdraw their Texas restraining order by 4pm tomorrow.

We are glad to have taken another important step towards completing the sale process.

Author: Liverpool FC

Tagged: liverpool fc , ownership

so if you cockblock the cockblock does that mean they are crossing swords?

:laugh: :laugh:

International breaks have rarely been so fun.

this is going to drag on for a while, because right now you have one country's legal system blocking another then that one who is getting blocked is then blocking the original blockers...

make sense?

i say take it up with the UN!

Liverpool and the prospective new owners will have to wait until Friday to see an end to the battle with George Gillett and Tom Hicks after the court in Texas was adjourned on Thursday.

Gillett and Hicks obtained a temporary restraining order against Liverpool's prospective sale to New England Spots Ventures (NESV) on Wednesday in Dallas, just hours after the High Court in London ruled the deal was legal.

On Thursday the High Court again ruled in Liverpool's favour, condemning Hicks and Gillett's attempts to prevent the sale.

Indeed the American owners of Liverpool were given until Friday 4pm to comply with their new orders and to withdraw their action in Texas.

Liverpool are now battling against the restraining order obtained by Hicks and Gillett in Dallas, and have hired lawyers in Texas to combat the restraining order, which appears to be the final hurdle the club need to overcome in order to progress finalise the sale.

Details of Hicks and Gillett's motion were also revealed, which asked the Dallas judge to jail and fine club chairman Martin Broughton and other defendants in the case.

In the motion for contempt filed in Dallas, lawyers for Hicks and Gillett said: "Further showing their unlawful intentions and brazen disregard for their obligations, defendants have undisputedly and according to their statements, quite proudly, violated this court's temporary restraining order."

The motion also requested a daily fine of $50,000 be imposed until the contempt of court

Lawyers for the club and their prospective new owners NESV filed a motion of their own asking for the restraining order to be thrown out on Friday as that is the deadline set by the club's financiers Royal Bank of Scotland for repayment of their ?280million debt.

An official for the 160th Civil District Court in Dallas, which issued a temporary restraining order in the matter on Wednesday, said the hearing had been adjourned after about 90 minutes and would resume at 7am local time (1pm BST).

This is really starting to get horribly stupid now. Hicks and Gillett are clinging on when the chances are they know full well they will lose, and the texan courts seem to be just interfering for the sake of it. Again, I repeat GTFO of our game.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Hi all. I have a seven year old Acer laptop which according to Acer website can't receive the new MS updates. This device lives in my bedroom and is purely a consumption device. No gaming, no nothing. I have followed online instructions and turned off secure boot which now gives me a green tick in W11 Security. Now, I have MWB Premium now for several years and I'm reasonably careful with my online activity with this laptop. I'm also not a gamer in any way so I'm not asking much from this laptop. Given that, am I safe to continue using this device given I've turned off secure boot? That's it, that's my question.
    • finally [Taskbar] Taskbar customization just got easier. As we continue to make improvements to the Taskbar experience mentioned last month, we've introduced a dedicated Taskbar Size setting, making it simpler to find, understand, and personalize your ideal taskbar experience.
    • Let me get this straight... It was a web interface for Gmail, so if privacy at Google wasn't concerning enough you'd be going through two companies. And their big feature was the very thing that would make people consider dumping Gmail.
    • Microsoft's fast coding model MAI-Code-1-Flash comes to Copilot Business and Enterprise by Karthik Mudaliar Microsoft’s recently announced MAI-Code-1-Flash model is now generally available to GitHub Copilot Business and Copilot Enterprise customers. With this support, organizations can have more centralized policy controls and billing while finally being able to use Microsoft’s lightweight, first-party coding model. According to GitHub’s announcement, Business and Enterprise plan administrators must enable the MAI-Code-1-Flash policy in Copilot settings before developers can access the model. Microsoft says that MAI-Code-1-Flash is for fast, iterative coding work rather than the most demanding architectural or debugging tasks. GitHub’s official model comparison page says that the model is great for "general-purpose coding and writing," while it excels at fast, accurate code completions and explanations Microsoft introduced MAI-Code-1-Flash on June 2 as part of a broader collection of internally developed MAI models. GitHub subsequently expanded support to Copilot CLI, the Copilot cloud agent, GitHub.com chat, GitHub Mobile, Visual Studio, JetBrains IDEs, Eclipse, and Xcode, but said support for managed Business and Enterprise customers was still on the way. In Microsoft’s own benchmark testing, MAI-Code-1-Flash scored 51.2% on SWE-Bench Pro, compared with 35.2% for Anthropic’s Claude Haiku 4.5. Microsoft also claimed that the model used up to 60% fewer tokens on SWE-Bench Verified. Do note that these are vendor-run results rather than independent measurements. The model is billed at provider list pricing under GitHub’s usage-based system. GitHub currently lists MAI-Code-1-Flash at $0.75 per million input tokens, $0.075 per million cached input tokens, and $4.50 per million output tokens. For organizations, the main incentive to use MAI-Code-1-Flash is likely to be efficiency rather than maximum capability. A smaller model that responds quickly and limits unnecessary output is quite useful for repetitive agent tasks at scale, especially after GitHub Copilot’s move toward usage-based billing. The "Flash" model is recommended for fast work and not necessarily for huge repositories with loads of context. It's better if teams compare their output with other larger models, especially if they're working on security-sensitive changes and complex, multi-file work.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      tuben earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • First Post
      OffsetAbs earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      OffsetAbs earned a badge
      Reacting Well
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      462
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      213
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      157
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      73
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!