Barclays Premier League Season 2010/2011


  

334 members have voted

  1. 1. Who will take the title this year?

    • Arsenal
      17
    • Aston Villa
      2
    • Birmingham
      0
    • Blackburn
      0
    • Blackpool
      4
    • Chelsea
      33
    • Everton
      3
    • Fulham
      0
    • Liverpool
      7
    • Manchester City
      0
    • Manchester United
      57
    • Newcastle
      1
    • Stoke
      0
    • Sunderland
      1
    • Tottenham
      4
    • West Bromwich
      0
    • West Ham
      0
    • Wigan
      1
    • Wolverhampton
      0
  2. 2. Who's getting relegated?

    • Arsenal
      5
    • Aston Villa
      1
    • Birmingham
      2
    • Blackburn
      3
    • Blackpool
      39
    • Chelsea
      5
    • Everton
      4
    • Fulham
      6
    • Liverpool
      15
    • Manchester City
      2
    • Manchester United
      8
    • Newcastle
      15
    • Stoke
      15
    • Sunderland
      9
    • Tottenham
      1
    • West Bromwich
      50
    • West Ham
      45
    • Wigan
      52
    • Wolverhampton
      57
  3. 3. Who will take the scoring title?

    • Drogba (Chelsea)
      34
    • Rooney (Manchester United)
      18
    • Bent (Sunderland)
      1
    • Tevez (Manchester City)
      8
    • Lampard (Chelsea)
      2
    • Dafoe (Tottenham)
      4
    • Torres (Liverpool)
      12
    • Fabregas (Arsenal)
      3
    • Adebayor (Manchester City)
      1
    • Agbonlahor (Aston Villa)
      1
    • Saha (Everton)
      1
    • Berbatov (Manchester United)
      25
    • Malouda (Chelsea)
      1
    • Anelka (Chelsea)
      0
    • Bellamy (Manchester City)
      0
    • Carew (Aston Villa)
      1
    • Carlton Cole (West Ham)
      0
    • Arshavin (Arsenal)
      2
    • Jerome (Birmingham)
      1
    • Other!
      14


Recommended Posts

Either way RBS are going to win, sure they might be in the wrong for the way they've gone about selling it. ?But RBS are only doing it to recoup the money. ?Even if the case goes on longer then RBS can still call in the debt if they want to.

Frankly at this moment I believe having Hermann Goering in charge would be a welcome step up from Hicks and Gillett. As long as this situation is resolved with the minimal amount of damage to the club, and we get new ownership, I am not overly fussed who ends up in ownership.

I like the idea but dont like the idea of a team having unlimited resources it ruins football :unsure:

Likewise, but as the saying goes, if you can't beat em join em

Chelsea started it, Man City continued it. And unless the league do something to clamp down on it, it will continue.

Likewise, but as the saying goes, if you can't beat em join em

Chelsea started it, Man City continued it. And unless the league do something to clamp down on it, it will continue.

Yeah Chelsea did it at first then kinda slowed down when they realised buying players for ?30m didn't always work...and they kept the goodens and bought wisely...but City its working at the moment...until January when Mancini buys more strikers for ?40m :sleep:

Legislation, wage caps, spending caps vs actual income must be enforced, because the Man City & Chelseas of English football totally undermines the competition imo.

Yes I am a bitter Portsmouth supporter, but our troubles started when our owners saw no other option but to overspend in order to achieve anything in that league.

A normal business, if run like some football clubs are right now, would be folded/liquidated in minutes.

Legislation, wage caps, spending caps vs actual income must be enforced, because the Man City & Chelseas of English football totally undermines the competition imo.

Yes I am a bitter Portsmouth supporter, but our troubles started when our owners saw no other option but to overspend in order to achieve anything in that league.

A normal business, if run like some football clubs are right now, would be folded/liquidated in minutes.

I absolutely agree. The problem is, the premier league as it is makes too much money, and that is kind of stifling the charge for reform. In the end I fear we are going to end up with a league similar to Scotland, where if you don't support one or 2 teams, you are in for a pretty boring ride. Like a lot of sports, professional football in this country has had it's soul destroyed by money.

cockblocked again..

Following the successful conclusion of High Court proceedings today, the Boards of Directors of Kop Football and Kop Holdings met tonight and resolved to complete the sale of Liverpool FC to New England Sports Ventures.

Regretably, Thomas Hicks and George Gillett have tonight obtained a Temporary Restraining Order from a Texas District Court against the independent directors, Royal Bank of Scotland PLC and NESV to prevent the transaction being completed.

The independent directors consider the restraining order to be unwarranted and damaging and will move as swiftly as possible to seek to have it removed.

A further statement will be made in due course.

Author: Liverpool FC

Tagged: Liverpool FC , ownership

It's sad and laughable really that Hicks and Gillett are moaning about their personal investments. Well I have news for them, when you take a risk like that, you have no legal right to expect compensation for that unless it's something you specifically write into your contract with the party that lends you the money. They owe RBS the money, and RBS have every legal right to recover their losses. They aren't really going to win this one, so I don't know why they are fighting it, and it's equally troubling to see American courts poking their noses into things that are outside of their jurisdiction and frankly none of their business. To be blunt, I personally wish they would just GTFO of our sport, the fact that both Liverpool and Man United's fans despise their owners speaks volumes in my opinion.

Liverpool Football Club have tonight issued a statement following today's court hearing in London:

The independent Directors of Liverpool Football Club are delighted with the verdict of Mr Justice Floyd in the High Court this afternoon which now requires Mr Hicks and Mr Gillett to withdraw their Texas restraining order by 4pm tomorrow.

We are glad to have taken another important step towards completing the sale process.

Author: Liverpool FC

Tagged: liverpool fc , ownership

so if you cockblock the cockblock does that mean they are crossing swords?

:laugh: :laugh:

International breaks have rarely been so fun.

this is going to drag on for a while, because right now you have one country's legal system blocking another then that one who is getting blocked is then blocking the original blockers...

make sense?

i say take it up with the UN!

Liverpool and the prospective new owners will have to wait until Friday to see an end to the battle with George Gillett and Tom Hicks after the court in Texas was adjourned on Thursday.

Gillett and Hicks obtained a temporary restraining order against Liverpool's prospective sale to New England Spots Ventures (NESV) on Wednesday in Dallas, just hours after the High Court in London ruled the deal was legal.

On Thursday the High Court again ruled in Liverpool's favour, condemning Hicks and Gillett's attempts to prevent the sale.

Indeed the American owners of Liverpool were given until Friday 4pm to comply with their new orders and to withdraw their action in Texas.

Liverpool are now battling against the restraining order obtained by Hicks and Gillett in Dallas, and have hired lawyers in Texas to combat the restraining order, which appears to be the final hurdle the club need to overcome in order to progress finalise the sale.

Details of Hicks and Gillett's motion were also revealed, which asked the Dallas judge to jail and fine club chairman Martin Broughton and other defendants in the case.

In the motion for contempt filed in Dallas, lawyers for Hicks and Gillett said: "Further showing their unlawful intentions and brazen disregard for their obligations, defendants have undisputedly and according to their statements, quite proudly, violated this court's temporary restraining order."

The motion also requested a daily fine of $50,000 be imposed until the contempt of court

Lawyers for the club and their prospective new owners NESV filed a motion of their own asking for the restraining order to be thrown out on Friday as that is the deadline set by the club's financiers Royal Bank of Scotland for repayment of their ?280million debt.

An official for the 160th Civil District Court in Dallas, which issued a temporary restraining order in the matter on Wednesday, said the hearing had been adjourned after about 90 minutes and would resume at 7am local time (1pm BST).

This is really starting to get horribly stupid now. Hicks and Gillett are clinging on when the chances are they know full well they will lose, and the texan courts seem to be just interfering for the sake of it. Again, I repeat GTFO of our game.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Removed the blue and underline as you did not post a link. This would also  be considered spamming.
    • Why it's almost impossible to produce a smartphone in the United States by Hamid Ganji If you look at the back of some Apple products, you can see the famous phrase “Designed by Apple in California, Assembled in China.” This phrase appears on products from one of the largest smartphone brands in the United States. These products are designed in the U.S., but their manufacturing takes place in China, India, Vietnam, or even Brazil. But why can’t Apple, as one of the largest American tech companies, produce its iPhones on U.S. soil? The idea for this topic came to me after the Trump Foundation launched a smartphone called the T1 and claimed that it was designed and built with American values in mind. However, this claim did not last long, as it was revealed that Trump’s phone was actually a rebranded HTC U24 Pro, with only a gold case and minor internal component changes. You see? Even a phone that is supposed to represent American values is manufactured in China. With a gross domestic product (GDP) exceeding $32 trillion, the United States is currently the world’s largest economy, while China ranks second with around $20 trillion. On the other hand, the United States is by a wide margin the global leader in various technological fields, and American companies spend hundreds of billions of dollars annually on research and development. From Apple and Google to Microsoft, Lockheed Martin, Boeing, and others, American tech and industrial giants lead their foreign competitors in many sectors. The United States also has no shortage of smartphone brands. Apple, Google, and Motorola are among the major brands in the smartphone market, collectively holding a significant share. However, the vast majority of their products are manufactured outside the United States. So why is it that the world’s largest economy, home to the most advanced technology companies and industrial powers, cannot produce a smartphone on its own soil? Let’s explore this question together. Even threats to impose tariffs won’t work After Trump entered the White House as the 47th President of the United States, his administration adopted strict tariff policies. One of these policies was the imposition of a 25% tariff on smartphones manufactured outside the United States. Trump said he “had a little problem” with Apple CEO Tim Cook over producing smartphones outside the U.S. So he thought that threatening a 25% tax on imported phones might force Apple to bring manufacturing back to the United States. “I have long ago informed Tim Cook of Apple that I expect their iPhones that will be sold in the United States of America will be manufactured and built in the United States, not India, or anyplace else,” Trump wrote on Truth Social. Image via The White House Although Apple currently manufactures some of the iPhone’s chips in the United States with TSMC's help, it still shows no willingness to shift full iPhone production to the country. At the time, renowned Apple supply chain analyst Ming-Chi Kuo wrote on X, “In terms of profitability, it’s way better for Apple to take the hit of a 25% tariff on iPhones sold in the US market than to move iPhone assembly lines back to the US.” However, manufacturing a smartphone in the United States is not as easy as it might seem, and many technical and economic barriers are involved. The lack of necessary manufacturing hubs There is a clear reason why many companies prefer to manufacture their products in China. China has established itself as the main global manufacturing hub for international companies, and over the past few decades, large contract manufacturers have emerged there, allowing companies like Apple to outsource production. One such example is Foxconn, which also manufactures some Apple products in India. Building the infrastructure required to produce smartphones in the United States would require tens of billions of dollars in new investment. Factories would need to be built, essential manufacturing equipment would have to be installed, and, most importantly, a skilled workforce capable of operating these systems would need to be recruited and trained. The United States currently lacks the core infrastructure needed to manufacture smartphones, and for this reason, many companies prefer to outsource production to Chinese contractors rather than spend tens of billions of dollars to build that infrastructure, which is significantly more economically efficient. Additionally, building such infrastructure in the United States could take up to a decade, ultimately leading to a significant increase in the product's final price for consumers. Shortage of trained labor in the U.S. compared to China Decades of serving as a global manufacturing hub have allowed China to build a massive talent pool in the production sector that is almost unmatched worldwide. Today, if a company chooses to manufacture its products in China, it can be confident that the workers involved in production have years of experience in their respective roles and are capable of producing high-quality goods with minimal errors. Even if we assume that tens of billions of dollars were invested in building smartphone manufacturing infrastructure in the United States, finding skilled workers would remain highly challenging. Apple CEO Tim Cook visiting the iPhone 6 assembly line in China in 2014. Image: Tim Cook on X In a 2015 interview on CBS’s 60 Minutes, Tim Cook said the main reason Apple isn’t producing in the US is a lack of skills. "China put an enormous focus on manufacturing, in what you and I would call vocational kind of skills. The US over time began to stop having as many vocational kinds of skills. I mean you could take every tool and die maker in the United States and probably put them in the room that we're currently sitting in. In China you would have to have multiple football fields,” Cook said. Also, in 2017, at the Fortune Global Forum in Guangzhou, Cook once again emphasized the importance of highly skilled Chinese workers. “China has moved into very advanced manufacturing, so you find in China the intersection of craftsman kind of skill, and sophisticated robotics and the computer science world. That intersection, which is very rare to find anywhere, that kind of skill, is very important to our business because of the precision and quality level that we like. The thing that most people focus on if they’re a foreigner coming to China is the size of the market, and obviously, it’s the biggest market in the world in so many areas. But for us, the number one attraction is the quality of the people,” Apple CEO said. Higher labor costs in the United States Producing almost any product in the United States is more expensive than in many other countries, and one of the main reasons is the higher cost of labor in the U.S. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, median weekly earnings of full-time workers in the United States were $1,235 in the first quarter of 2026. Meanwhile, the average annual salary in China's private sector in 2025 was RMB 71,590 (US$9,961). In many parts of the world, the weekly wage of an American worker is equivalent to several months of income. Another important factor to consider is that in the United States, the workforce capable of working on a smartphone assembly line is highly specialized and therefore commands higher-than-average wages. According to an estimate by Bank of America, producing an iPhone in the U.S. is technically possible, but “iPhone cost can increase 25% purely on higher labor cost in the U.S.” However, this 25% increase applies only if final assembly is performed in the United States while components are still sourced from China or elsewhere. In this case, the price of a base iPhone would rise from $799 to around $1,000. But in another scenario, if Apple were to produce the required components for the iPhone within the United States, production costs could increase by more than 90%. Trump’s dream for a “Made in the USA” iPhone might never come true In a free-market capitalist economy, one of the primary responsibilities of any CEO is to maximize profit. Using Apple as an example, Tim Cook’s role is to maximize the company’s profits so that it can fund research and development for new products and invest in areas such as artificial intelligence, while also keeping shareholders satisfied. Therefore, it is entirely understandable that Apple would choose not to bring its manufacturing back to the United States and instead keep production in countries where labor is cheaper, and products can be manufactured at a lower cost, thereby maximizing its profit margins. What is your opinion about manufacturing smartphones in the United States? If you are an American citizen, would you be willing to pay hundreds of dollars more for a smartphone made domestically in the USA? Let us know in the comments.
    • Cheers everyone for the replies. It's been very useful. 👍
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      jessse3334 earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Reacting Well
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      506
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      196
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      153
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      72
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!