Barclays Premier League Season 2010/2011


  

334 members have voted

  1. 1. Who will take the title this year?

    • Arsenal
      17
    • Aston Villa
      2
    • Birmingham
      0
    • Blackburn
      0
    • Blackpool
      4
    • Chelsea
      33
    • Everton
      3
    • Fulham
      0
    • Liverpool
      7
    • Manchester City
      0
    • Manchester United
      57
    • Newcastle
      1
    • Stoke
      0
    • Sunderland
      1
    • Tottenham
      4
    • West Bromwich
      0
    • West Ham
      0
    • Wigan
      1
    • Wolverhampton
      0
  2. 2. Who's getting relegated?

    • Arsenal
      5
    • Aston Villa
      1
    • Birmingham
      2
    • Blackburn
      3
    • Blackpool
      39
    • Chelsea
      5
    • Everton
      4
    • Fulham
      6
    • Liverpool
      15
    • Manchester City
      2
    • Manchester United
      8
    • Newcastle
      15
    • Stoke
      15
    • Sunderland
      9
    • Tottenham
      1
    • West Bromwich
      50
    • West Ham
      45
    • Wigan
      52
    • Wolverhampton
      57
  3. 3. Who will take the scoring title?

    • Drogba (Chelsea)
      34
    • Rooney (Manchester United)
      18
    • Bent (Sunderland)
      1
    • Tevez (Manchester City)
      8
    • Lampard (Chelsea)
      2
    • Dafoe (Tottenham)
      4
    • Torres (Liverpool)
      12
    • Fabregas (Arsenal)
      3
    • Adebayor (Manchester City)
      1
    • Agbonlahor (Aston Villa)
      1
    • Saha (Everton)
      1
    • Berbatov (Manchester United)
      25
    • Malouda (Chelsea)
      1
    • Anelka (Chelsea)
      0
    • Bellamy (Manchester City)
      0
    • Carew (Aston Villa)
      1
    • Carlton Cole (West Ham)
      0
    • Arshavin (Arsenal)
      2
    • Jerome (Birmingham)
      1
    • Other!
      14


Recommended Posts

I think this is going to be really close and we might get the announcement of LFC going into administration some time today if RBS doesn't show some more patience.. I doubt everything could be wrapped up this fast.. judgement is expected mid-day today.. is that midday in the US or the UK?

Liverpool co-owners Tom Hicks and George Gillett have removed the restraining order preventing the club's sale to New England Sports Ventures.

However, the move is not designed to help NESV seal its ?300m deal, but to aid Hicks in his attempt to sell his stake to US hedge fund Mill Financial.

The club is hoping to tie up a deal with NESV on Friday, but Hicks believes he can still scupper its plan.

Mill could then pay off the ?237m debt owed to Royal Bank of Scotland (RBS).

NESV's deal was being held up by the restraining order, which was issued by a court in Texas. The court is set to resume its hearing at 1300 BST on Friday, when it is expected that the order will be officially lifted.

BBC Sport understands the overnight adjournment in proceedings in the US was to enable Hicks to have more time in his attempt to strike a deal with Mill Financial.

BBC Sports editor David Bond said: "The restraining order prevents any other buyer - such as Mill - from paying off the ?237m loan to Royal Bank of Scotland, due on Friday, because it binds RBS as well as the board of Liverpool and its parent companies based in the UK. "

Now it appears as though Mill - who already own co-owner George Gillett's stake in the club - and NESV are vying for control of the Anfield club, with Reds chairman Martin Broughton and managing director Christian Purslow both saying on Friday they are "confident" a deal with NESV will go through.

they give up...for now!

Liverpool's co-owners Tom Hicks and George Gillett accept defeat in their attempts to block the club's sale, but say they will pursue damages of ?1bn.

They removed the restraining order preventing the club's sale in a Dallas court on Friday, paving the way for the sale to New England Sports Ventures.

NESV, the board's choice as Liverpool's new owners, now look set to complete their ?300m purchase of the club.

It is rather disappointing however that the club's board don't appear to be considering the offer from Mr Lim.

because they probably don't want some dumbass billionaire who doesn't know **** (like hicks and gillette) promising a bunch of **** and never pulling through. Instead they have an experienced corp in terms of sports franchise wanting to take over the team who they probably have a lot more faith in. I don't really think the board memnber's concern at this point is money. RBS for sure, not the board, they need to recover the team and finding stability is the first step. As much as I would love to have chelski/man city money, rappy is right, it's completely ruining the game and just going on a spending binge like all the other top teams in Europe (who are all pretty much broke anyways) obviously isn't something they want to get themselves into.

New England Sports Ventures has completed its takeover of Liverpool Football Club, BBC Sport understands.

The move comes after former owners Tom Hicks and George Gillett removed the temporary restraining order blocking any sale on Friday morning.

That allowed NESV, owners of the American baseball side Boston Red Sox, to complete its ?300m purchase.

Hicks and Gillett, however, have vowed to pursue ?1bn in damages from the club, arguing the deal is "illegal".

The American pair say they will "pursue every legal avenue" to claim damages for what they believe is an "extraordinary swindle".

Still, there was an air of relief as news of NESV's completed purchase emerged - a move that will allow major creditors Royal Bank of Scotland to be paid the ?237m they are owed on Friday.

That, in turn, means Liverpool's holding company are unlikely now to be put into administration, a move which could have resulted in a nine-point penalty in the Premier League.

Good news. I'm not a Liverpool fan (if anything I dislike them), but had Hicks etc been able to make a mockery of this, then it would have set a dangerous example for football IMO.

While we are here though, spare a thought for Dundee, who have sacked their manager, assistant manager and quite a lot of players after going into administration owing around £2m. Nothing compared to the figures talked about here.

Good news. I'm not a Liverpool fan (if anything I dislike them), but had Hicks etc been able to make a mockery of this, then it would have set a dangerous example for football IMO.

While we are here though, spare a thought for Dundee, who have sacked their manager, assistant manager and quite a lot of players after going into administration owing around ?2m. Nothing compared to the figures talked about here.

Yeah it would be nice if someone rich would help rescue small clubs I mean recently Ilkeston went out of business with debts on ?47k, that's chump change to nearly all EPL players :no:

So i may be in england in march and i'm going to try my ass off to get liverpool vs man u tickets at anfield (i don't care if i have to paid a grand for them) but then i was thinking if i waited until next year tickets will be dirt cheap cause they'll be relegated. (oh that hurts...)

Yeah it would be nice if someone rich would help rescue small clubs I mean recently Ilkeston went out of business with debts on ?47k, that's chump change to nearly all EPL players :no:

Football is business nowadays, and if you don't hit your targets you go down the crapper. It's sad, but it's gonna keep happening.

Football is business nowadays, and if you don't hit your targets you go down the crapper. It's sad, but it's gonna keep happening.

business is an understatement, they are public run companies on the stock market, nothing like that happens over here. The thought of that is crazy.

Football is business nowadays, and if you don't hit your targets you go down the crapper. It's sad, but it's gonna keep happening.

yeah :( clubs like Liverpool and West Ham will always be rescued due to their fanbase but its just sad the lower league clubs go...my local town club nearly went out of business with small debts.

yeah :( clubs like Liverpool and West Ham will always be rescued due to their fanbase but its just sad the lower league clubs go...my local town club nearly went out of business with small debts.

I guess that just like a lot of small businesses that go bust, very few people bar the local proprietors actually care, sad but again inevitable. It's a shame what money has turned sport into these days.

EPIC SWINDLE :laugh:

I'm quite glad it is all over, although something tells me there will be a few more court dates from desperate Hicks.

It brings a huge sigh of relief that Hicks and Gillett have now gone. Hopefully we can now just concentrate on the footballing aspects - which is what 'football' is all about.

I have never wanted a billionaire owner in the Chelsea of Man City mould. I don't want to spend hundreds of millions of pounds on players in ONE summer. I'd much prefer to belong to a well run club that only spends what it generates - something which Man Utd did before the Glazers took over.

We should all be together in this, we should all be against modern football.

Still... part of me feels like the damage to Liverpool Football Club is too much, I don't feel like I really *belong* to the club anymore. Hopefully this feeling will return...

Is it because England's saviour has been **** since summer?

pretty much, but fergy going out lieing saying it's due to injury isn't helping the situation when clearly he is being sat because he's playing like **** right now.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • For a guy who claims to hate Farage and the ignorant, gullible, rightwing racist skinheads sponsored by Putin that his lies represent, you sure are quoting them time and time and time again, mate. Denial isn't just a river in Egypt.
    • Do you live in the U.K? Do any of the people here that are against the UK leaving the E.U, live in the U.K? If not then why are you bothered? If you do live here then it is a different thing . Brexit was a good idea, should have done it years before, it was done badly, but the idea was good. You are saying the same thing as remainers do, oh we did what Putin wanted, we listened to the lies and Farage. I hate Farage and never believed most of what he said, certainly did not believe the £350m a week for the NHS. But we did pay a lot of money to the E.U and yes some of it came back, but what is the point of paying it out for only some of it to come back? Get out of the E.U, no money to them and in theory we can use the money to do things in the country. I said in theory, but our governments are a total and complete waste of space. No matter what colour rosette they wear. You and others say it was a mistake and yet the two main parties in the U.K are not looking at rejoining the EU, I wonder why that is? I was not tricked by anyone. Makes no odds now, we are out and have been for 10 years, what we need is a decent government to run the country. All they do is shout at each other like a load of kids and seems to do nothing and make this country more into a police and nanny state. Getting more like China all the time.
    • 4TB TEAMGROUP MP44Q, 2TB T-Force G50, and 2TB WD My Passport SSDs drop to great prices by Fiza Ali Prime Day may be over, but there are still worthwhile storage deals available, including discounts on SSDs for shoppers who missed the event or are looking to upgrade their storage solution. Particularly, 2TB Western Digital My Passport, 2TB TEAMGROUP T-Force G50, and 4TB TEAMGROUP MP44Q SSD are selling at great prices with up to 23% off. The 2TB TEAMGROUP T-Force G50 is an M.2 2280 PCIe 4.0 x4 NVMe SSD with sequential read speeds of up to 5,000MB/s and sequential write speeds of up to 4,500MB/s. The drive has an endurance rating of 1,300 TBW (terabytes written) and features a DRAM-less design. The company specifies a mean time between failures (MTBF) of 3 million hours. The drive includes an "ultra-thin" graphene heat spreader that helps dissipate heat without significantly increasing the drive's thickness. It also supports S.M.A.R.T. monitoring, allowing compatible software to monitor drive health and operating status. The SSD is rated for operating temperatures from 0°C to 70°C, with a storage temperature range of -40°C to 85°C. The drive is backed by a five-year limited warranty as well. 2TB TEAMGROUP T-Force G50 SSD: $269.99 (Amazon US) The TEAMGROUP MP44Q is an M.2 2280 PCIe 4.0 x4 NVMe SSD that delivers sequential read speeds of up to 7,000MB/s and sequential write speeds of up to 5,900MB/s. It uses 3D QLC NAND flash memory to provide 4TB of storage capacity for games, applications, media files, and other data. The drive has an endurance rating of 2,000 TBW and an MTBF of 1.6 million hours. The SSD features a DRAM-less design and supports TEAMGROUP's S.M.A.R.T. monitoring software, allowing users to monitor drive health, temperature, and remaining lifespan. For thermal management, the MP44Q also includes an "ultra-thin" graphene heat spreader. It is designed to operate at temperatures between 0°C and 70°C and can be stored at temperatures ranging from -40°C to 85°C. The SSD is also backed by a five-year limited warranty. 4TB TEAMGROUP MP44Q SSD: $478.99 (Amazon US) The 2TB WD My Passport SSD connects via a USB-C port using the USB 3.2 Gen 2 interface. It delivers sequential read speeds of up to 1,050MB/s and sequential write speeds of up to 1,000MB/s through NVMe technology. In terms of security features, the drive includes password protection with 256-bit AES hardware encryption. The SSD is also designed to resist shock and vibration and is rated to withstand drops from heights of up to 6.5 feet. The recommended operating temperature range is 5°C to 35°C, while the non-operating temperature range is -20°C to 65°C. This drive is also backed by a five-year limited warranty. 2TB Western Digital My Passport SSD: $279.99 (Amazon US) Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • Yeah... The root of my comment, ostensibly, is how to spin the story via the actual technical merits of the solution! * Decentralized (aka federated) solution with built-in encrypted ephemeral message transport, * Transport via Relays (intermediary servers) with no message archival, * Second configurable pathway are actual email servers (if DNS records are programmed accordingly) via IMAP protocols carriage, * "Chat-over-Email" is the design pattern adopted; it can either leverage full-blown Email Server (must use the INBOX folder) to exchange all received messages/edits/reactions (so be weary of notifications overloads) [best practice is creating a separate email acct used explicitly for federated chat purposes!] or leverage its built-in Relay Server mechanism which actually resides on-device (by default but can be configured otherwise), * By virtue of be a decentralized/federated model, all other intermediary servers who may pass-along messages (while the recipient's final relay/device is inaccessible) cannot snoop on the messages due to the encrypted nature of contents. The intermediaries may, however, analyze the metadata due to the simple fact that routing mechanisms require hints for relay destinations. Unfortunately, whomever is posting about DeltaChat across socials are misleading with "zero metadata" claims -- especially when the Relays (according to their own technical documents) mandate the addition of chat-version metadata and other decorations in order to actually transport any message. -- Based on this summary, I'd prefer if they'd better dual-path message transport (email server add-in, federated relay engine) rather than patch-on email protocols to existing federated social media frameworks. They're frankensteining something rather than extending widely-deployed technology stacks.
    • Decentralized search result anonymization...
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Woland13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Woland13 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      493
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      225
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      148
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      75
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!