PS3 outsold 360 by 4 million in past 12 months


Recommended Posts

what? where did I say anything that refers to PSP?

Referencing to your 'too little, too late' comment. which i feel is the case with the psp.

Ps3 hardly equates to the 360 repurchase numbers.

Not quite the same when 360 owners are replacing their out of warranty RRoD units by purchasing new units.

Then there are the tons of people that never take a glance at a warranty and just assume buy a new unit altogether at first glance of an issue.

Not quite the same when 360 owners are replacing their out of warranty RRoD units by purchasing new units.

Then there are the tons of people that never take a glance at a warranty and just assume buy a new unit altogether at first glance of an issue.

RRoD is covered for up to 3 years... YLOD is not.

Not sure how I didn't see this post earlier but Sony can chalk a ton of that up to the Slim. Look at how many millions of consoles Sony has sold due to console revisions and the Slim is no different. Microsoft finally caught onto the strategy so it will be interesting to see how many revisions we have in the future.

Why should people replace their older version with the newer ones? People say PS3 is expensive, but damn, if you have to replace your hardware during the same generation, you know something's wrong. None of my friends has replaced their 'fat' PS3 when the slim was released. They still work.

https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/910812-microsoft-announces-the-all-new-xbox-360/

http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showthread.php?t=398249

http://slickdeals.net/forums/showthread.php?sduid=229036&t=2082834

Look through those topics and see how many people are getting rid of the old X360's for the new one. The Gamestop deal also REALLY helped with this.

https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/910812-microsoft-announces-the-all-new-xbox-360/

http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showthread.php?t=398249

http://slickdeals.net/forums/showthread.php?sduid=229036&t=2082834

Look through those topics and see how many people are getting rid of the old X360's for the new one. The Gamestop deal also REALLY helped with this.

Only reason I got it was because of the Gamestop deal. However Gamestop also has plenty of good PS3 deals here and there. The main reason people don't tradein their fat ps3 for the slim is because in most case the fat is better. I have a launch 60gig and there's no way in hell I'm giving that up for a slim, ultra slim, bj machine whatever. Sony has made huge changes to their console whereas Microsoft hasn't really changed much at all.

Referencing to your 'too little, too late' comment. which i feel is the case with the psp.

Ps3 hardly equates to the 360 repurchase numbers.

Not quite the same when 360 owners are replacing their out of warranty RRoD units by purchasing new units.

Then there are the tons of people that never take a glance at a warranty and just assume buy a new unit altogether at first glance of an issue.

that doesn't make any sense. I implied it's too late as Wii has the market share and Xbox has the mind share. Even if 100% of xbox owners have bought at least 2 xbox 360s that you claim, how does that explain Wii beating the **** out of PS3 (and 360 but that's besides the point) in sales? Last gen video gaming = Playstation in pop culture. This gen it is video gaming = xbox. In other words, PS3 lost the mindshare to Xbox 360.

sleeping.gif

Who's talking about the Wii. That's a totally different market if you ask me. Why bring it into the equation unless you're reaching...

And yes, sony lost most of its fan-base due to showing up a year late. The extreme price-tag didn't help.

So as I said, being they've said all along that the ps3 was going to be handled as being a 10yr project, the recent slim and pricedrops, and continuous flow of games appear to be winning back alot of those long lost fans.

Too late? Again, no. Thing's are just getting interesting.

Thing's are just getting interesting.

No they aren't. Things are going along the way anyone with half a brain would've predicted. Anyone with a whole brain probably figured Sony would've (and should've) caught up by now, four years down the road, but that's not true and not going to be true until next summer at the earliest, so...yeah. There's nothing particularly special about this story except maybe to cement the fact that it took Microsoft all of half a decade to go from a minute player to a power at least as big as Sony in the videogame market.

No they aren't. Things are going along the way anyone with half a brain would've predicted. Anyone with a whole brain probably figured Sony would've (and should've) caught up by now, four years down the road, but that's not true and not going to be true until next summer at the earliest, so...yeah. There's nothing particularly special about this story except maybe to cement the fact that it took Microsoft all of half a decade to go from a minute player to a power at least as big as Sony in the videogame market.

I expected the current situation. I hoped for a change by no later than one year ago. Still waiting on that hope. And, MS did so even with the RROD.

So you guys predicted MS to lay practically dormant for over a year, allowing Sony to gain ground?

Sounds like they're even now eh? Sony started a year late while MS later takes a year off themselves.

Yea, totally saw his coming..

So you guys predicted MS to lay practically dormant for over a year, allowing Sony to gain ground?

Sounds like they're even now eh? Sony started a year late while MS later takes a year off themselves.

Yea, totally saw his coming..

You have the most skewed outlook on MS I think I've ever read

Is anyone really going to lose sleep if their favored console isn't quite as popular as the competitor?

I couldn't give a monkeys. they both clearly have enough of a userbase to bring all the main publishers games to. Do we care if either are dead level or even 10 million behind the other, nope not really. I made my decision and so far this generation I've not been disappointed. This is without GT5 hitting yet. Same could probably be said for the 360 players with regards to Reach, which looks pretty awesome. If I was a FPS player I'd be pretty gutted at not having a 360 and missing out on it. As it is, Killzone 2 and Uncharted 2 blew all my expectations of what the machine was capable of last year and GT5/LBP2 look to do the same this year.

Who cares if people are buying more ps3's than xbox's.

The only people who would prefer a ps3 is people who preferred the ps2 to the first xbox. I had a ps1 and then bought a ps2, but I got an xbox shortly after it came out and it was a lot better overall and this has continued with the 360.

The main reason is xbox live, if your pair up ps3 online and xbox live, live wins everytime. I've used my mates ps3 and online is horrible.

1. No party chat.

2. Lots of disconnected games on cod4 etc.

3. lack of people with mics.

Also the new xbox will really boost sales.

So you guys predicted MS to lay practically dormant for over a year, allowing Sony to gain ground?

Sounds like they're even now eh? Sony started a year late while MS later takes a year off themselves.

Yea, totally saw his coming..

Are you serious?

The 360 has continued to sell well, the PS3 is just chipping away at it and will probably equal, if not surpass it, in a short time. Plus with Sony's dominance in the Asian market, it wasn't really hard to see this coming, as others have said. I'm not using that as a cop-out or anything -- Sony has rightfully crushed Microsoft in Japan, and Microsoft hasn't done a very good job there at all, even if it is an American company. Meanwhile, Microsoft is doing well in America and decent in Europe, while Sony's doing well in both.

Again, though, this doesn't really affect anyone here on Neowin. Both companies are having good sales so far, and it's worked out well. Competition is good. Microsoft has pushed Sony, Sony has pushed Microsoft, and Nintendo's pushed them both. Works out well for us consumers, don't you think?

Nice now that the whole get-along gang got the APB and done patting each other on the back...

Yes, it is "sad". When the best thing on the 360 in 09 was an xbla game Shadow Complex, Forza and multiconsole releases such as AC2 and MW2, not to mention Batman:AA which one best 360 title , another multiconsole rls.

Sad, indeed.

I don't think MS has pushed Sony as much as they've gotten too comfortable with the lead they established. It's the Turtle vs Rabbit race... MS dropped the ball in 09. Sony simply capitalized.?

Just pointing out my original argument, These numbers don't surprises me after witnessing the drastic decrease in MS' performance in 09.?

Nice now that the whole get-along gang got the APB and done patting each other on the back...

Patting each other on the back? Get-along gang? WTF are you smoking?

I'm not sticking up for anyone. I'm stating my opinion. You don't like it, tough cookies. :p :laugh:

Patting each other on the back? Get-along gang? WTF are you smoking?

I'm not sticking up for anyone. I'm stating my opinion. You don't like it, tough cookies. :p :laugh:

Relax buddy, I wasn't waiting on you to reply nor was it directed specifically at you. But if you want to include yourself, that's also fine.

I respect your opinion. As well as agree with most of it.

5 years in and the PS3 is still behind the Xbox 360.

The new xbox will drive sales in the next few months, just as the slim helped sony out.

Lets not forget that Microsoft can afford to aggressively cut the price of their console. Sony is not in the same position mainly due to the blu-ray drive.

Once Microsoft feel the heat they will bring down the price even more...

Kinda pointless looking at the numbers though, neither of them will ever catch up with the wii.

5 years for PS3 and 6 years for xbox... catching up a year of sale is hard and ps3 is doing good now so i hope it will catch up soon.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Again, this is an irrelevant attempt to attack the messenger. The truth does not require any justification.
    • Removed the blue and underline as you did not post a link. This would also  be considered spamming.
    • Why it's almost impossible to produce a smartphone in the United States by Hamid Ganji If you look at the back of some Apple products, you can see the famous phrase “Designed by Apple in California, Assembled in China.” This phrase appears on products from one of the largest smartphone brands in the United States. These products are designed in the U.S., but their manufacturing takes place in China, India, Vietnam, or even Brazil. But why can’t Apple, as one of the largest American tech companies, produce its iPhones on U.S. soil? The idea for this topic came to me after the Trump Foundation launched a smartphone called the T1 and claimed that it was designed and built with American values in mind. However, this claim did not last long, as it was revealed that Trump’s phone was actually a rebranded HTC U24 Pro, with only a gold case and minor internal component changes. You see? Even a phone that is supposed to represent American values is manufactured in China. With a gross domestic product (GDP) exceeding $32 trillion, the United States is currently the world’s largest economy, while China ranks second with around $20 trillion. On the other hand, the United States is by a wide margin the global leader in various technological fields, and American companies spend hundreds of billions of dollars annually on research and development. From Apple and Google to Microsoft, Lockheed Martin, Boeing, and others, American tech and industrial giants lead their foreign competitors in many sectors. The United States also has no shortage of smartphone brands. Apple, Google, and Motorola are among the major brands in the smartphone market, collectively holding a significant share. However, the vast majority of their products are manufactured outside the United States. So why is it that the world’s largest economy, home to the most advanced technology companies and industrial powers, cannot produce a smartphone on its own soil? Let’s explore this question together. Even threats to impose tariffs won’t work After Trump entered the White House as the 47th President of the United States, his administration adopted strict tariff policies. One of these policies was the imposition of a 25% tariff on smartphones manufactured outside the United States. Trump said he “had a little problem” with Apple CEO Tim Cook over producing smartphones outside the U.S. So he thought that threatening a 25% tax on imported phones might force Apple to bring manufacturing back to the United States. “I have long ago informed Tim Cook of Apple that I expect their iPhones that will be sold in the United States of America will be manufactured and built in the United States, not India, or anyplace else,” Trump wrote on Truth Social. Image via The White House Although Apple currently manufactures some of the iPhone’s chips in the United States with TSMC's help, it still shows no willingness to shift full iPhone production to the country. At the time, renowned Apple supply chain analyst Ming-Chi Kuo wrote on X, “In terms of profitability, it’s way better for Apple to take the hit of a 25% tariff on iPhones sold in the US market than to move iPhone assembly lines back to the US.” However, manufacturing a smartphone in the United States is not as easy as it might seem, and many technical and economic barriers are involved. The lack of necessary manufacturing hubs There is a clear reason why many companies prefer to manufacture their products in China. China has established itself as the main global manufacturing hub for international companies, and over the past few decades, large contract manufacturers have emerged there, allowing companies like Apple to outsource production. One such example is Foxconn, which also manufactures some Apple products in India. Building the infrastructure required to produce smartphones in the United States would require tens of billions of dollars in new investment. Factories would need to be built, essential manufacturing equipment would have to be installed, and, most importantly, a skilled workforce capable of operating these systems would need to be recruited and trained. The United States currently lacks the core infrastructure needed to manufacture smartphones, and for this reason, many companies prefer to outsource production to Chinese contractors rather than spend tens of billions of dollars to build that infrastructure, which is significantly more economically efficient. Additionally, building such infrastructure in the United States could take up to a decade, ultimately leading to a significant increase in the product's final price for consumers. Shortage of trained labor in the U.S. compared to China Decades of serving as a global manufacturing hub have allowed China to build a massive talent pool in the production sector that is almost unmatched worldwide. Today, if a company chooses to manufacture its products in China, it can be confident that the workers involved in production have years of experience in their respective roles and are capable of producing high-quality goods with minimal errors. Even if we assume that tens of billions of dollars were invested in building smartphone manufacturing infrastructure in the United States, finding skilled workers would remain highly challenging. Apple CEO Tim Cook visiting the iPhone 6 assembly line in China in 2014. Image: Tim Cook on X In a 2015 interview on CBS’s 60 Minutes, Tim Cook said the main reason Apple isn’t producing in the US is a lack of skills. "China put an enormous focus on manufacturing, in what you and I would call vocational kind of skills. The US over time began to stop having as many vocational kinds of skills. I mean you could take every tool and die maker in the United States and probably put them in the room that we're currently sitting in. In China you would have to have multiple football fields,” Cook said. Also, in 2017, at the Fortune Global Forum in Guangzhou, Cook once again emphasized the importance of highly skilled Chinese workers. “China has moved into very advanced manufacturing, so you find in China the intersection of craftsman kind of skill, and sophisticated robotics and the computer science world. That intersection, which is very rare to find anywhere, that kind of skill, is very important to our business because of the precision and quality level that we like. The thing that most people focus on if they’re a foreigner coming to China is the size of the market, and obviously, it’s the biggest market in the world in so many areas. But for us, the number one attraction is the quality of the people,” Apple CEO said. Higher labor costs in the United States Producing almost any product in the United States is more expensive than in many other countries, and one of the main reasons is the higher cost of labor in the U.S. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, median weekly earnings of full-time workers in the United States were $1,235 in the first quarter of 2026. Meanwhile, the average annual salary in China's private sector in 2025 was RMB 71,590 (US$9,961). In many parts of the world, the weekly wage of an American worker is equivalent to several months of income. Another important factor to consider is that in the United States, the workforce capable of working on a smartphone assembly line is highly specialized and therefore commands higher-than-average wages. According to an estimate by Bank of America, producing an iPhone in the U.S. is technically possible, but “iPhone cost can increase 25% purely on higher labor cost in the U.S.” However, this 25% increase applies only if final assembly is performed in the United States while components are still sourced from China or elsewhere. In this case, the price of a base iPhone would rise from $799 to around $1,000. But in another scenario, if Apple were to produce the required components for the iPhone within the United States, production costs could increase by more than 90%. Trump’s dream for a “Made in the USA” iPhone might never come true In a free-market capitalist economy, one of the primary responsibilities of any CEO is to maximize profit. Using Apple as an example, Tim Cook’s role is to maximize the company’s profits so that it can fund research and development for new products and invest in areas such as artificial intelligence, while also keeping shareholders satisfied. Therefore, it is entirely understandable that Apple would choose not to bring its manufacturing back to the United States and instead keep production in countries where labor is cheaper, and products can be manufactured at a lower cost, thereby maximizing its profit margins. What is your opinion about manufacturing smartphones in the United States? If you are an American citizen, would you be willing to pay hundreds of dollars more for a smartphone made domestically in the USA? Let us know in the comments.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      jessse3334 earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Reacting Well
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      506
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      196
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      153
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      72
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      65
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!