pre-employment fitness tests?


Recommended Posts

okay so on friday i was offered a really good job where i live here in michigan. i was told they would be sending me an email that i needed to read the terms of my employment contract and accept them and then fill out my formal application + background info for checks. i did all of it this morning the minute i received the email today. i also went in today to do my drug screening. i was told my start date was next monday at 9am. so here i am all excited and then i get another email from human resources saying i need to complete a fitness test before i start work. now ive never had a fitness test for employment before but ive read alot of horrid things online where these companies are looking to save on health care and can be super picky with who they hire based on your overall health and lifestyle.

im a 35 male in decent shape, i do smoke and have for 15 years. im not fat but have gained a few pounds from being out of work since april. i do take care of myself though and i think im in decent health other than having acid reflux which is a pre-existing condition ive had for years. i don't get sick alot...maybe twice a year from what my kids bring home from school. well you get the point. but yes im worried about this fitness test, this is a maintenance job, not rocket science here. what if i don't meet their criteria of being overall fit?

i wrote human resources back and they tell me that my start date could be moved back if the test results do not come in by monday. so basically i was offered the job and have written confirmation but now they can not only push my start date back but deny me the job if i do not meet there criteria. is this legal? i mean ive never had a company offer a job before they do all of the screening first hand. im a bit worried here to be honest as i just passed up two other job opportunities today based on the job current offer. now im sorta regretting turning them down.

should i keep looking for work again until im for sure starting this job? im really confused & frustrated here. :blink:

this is also a very large nationwide company here, not a mom and pop outfit. deep down i think this is how these employers are taking advantage of the unemployed in the US. no wonder soo many people are leaving michigan.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/928206-pre-employment-fitness-tests/
Share on other sites

If you were offered a conditional offer, than yes you could be disqualified. I've not heard of the public sector doing fitness tests though.

If it was a conditional offer than yes always continue to actively search for work.

Did they say what the test would be?

If you were offered a conditional offer, than yes you could be disqualified. I've not heard of the public sector doing this though, my experience is with LE positions.

see to my knowledge this was not a "conditional" job offer. i even read the fine print. ive never seen anything like this before. talked to a few friends and my dad and they too are shocked. just something seems fishy to me.

edit: just read the email i got this morning again and all it stated was my job title, pay scale, benefits and my start date. i had to review it and submit my acceptance to them via email.

see to my knowledge this was not a "conditional" job offer. i even read the fine print. ive never seen anything like this before. talked to a few friends and my dad and they too are shocked. just something seems fishy to me.

edit: just read the email i got this morning again and all it stated was my job title, pay scale, benefits and my start date. i had to review it and submit my acceptance to them via email.

Yea, if it was a conditional offer you would know. It's a part of the ADA, and is done to protect the rights of people with disabilities. Check some of your earlier paper work as well, just in case.

Did they mention at all what the test would include? It could just be a simple drug screen and to ensure you can lift a set amount of weight. And from what you've said it should be a non-issue

Just read you did the drug screen, I find it odd that they would send you out for another medical after you have already been in for a drug screen. That strikes me as odd. Typically they roll all of the medical into one shot. Perhaps someone messed up, IDK

Yea, if it was a conditional offer you would know. It's a part of the ADA, and is done to protect the rights of people with disabilities. Check some of your earlier paper work as well, just in case.

Did they mention at all what the test would include? It could just be a simple drug screen and to ensure you can lift a set amount of weight. And from what you've said it should be a non-issue

i already did the drug test today. im not sure what the fitness test involves. but from what ive read online some of these employers can be very picky in today's market on who they hire based on your health. the problem is i do not know what is considered acceptable health standards to get this job. i just don't like the fact they say im hired but in reality im not. just because i think im in good shape does not mean im what they consider in good shape, know what i mean here?

heres an email i just received from human resources.

"Hi Mark,

I completely understand your questions and worry over this. But, this is all normal. We don?t conduct the background, drug, and fitness test until you accept the job offer. Assuming that all three tests come back fine, then you will start. So, yes, you do have the job on the basis that you pass the pre-employment screenings. Every job we have goes through this process.

When do you have your fitness test?"

so basically i don't have the job yet but they gave me a start date? ive never seen such a backwards company in my life. maybe i should reconsider this job. :pinch:

Just do the fitness test? The worst that could happen is that you are not fit enough to their standards. Why should you even reconsider taking the job just because they are asking for a fiteness test?

i am going to take the test. my issue is they said i had the job and gave me a firm start date. now i find out it is conditional, when they should of said that from the get go. i possibly passed up two other opportunities today based on their ignorance. just because i think im healthy doesn't mean i meet their standards. maybe you work man but i do not and i have a family to support. in case you haven't noticed it's almost impossible to get a job anymore. i mean people with bachelors degrees are applying for burger king, that's how bad it is.

for example i smoke and i have gerd. they may find that to be a risk in hiring me. get my point? i actually just called back one of the jobs that called me today for an interview. i apologized and asked if i could come in to meet with them anyways. just to be safe here.

How is it their ignorance? I'm confused I guess!

you don't tell someone their hired and give them a start date and give me wage info and what not and then neglect to tell me that it was all contingent upon me meeting their standards. i can understand the background check and drug test but not the fitness test. if i was told this from the get go i could understand and id still be looking for work. my acceptance letter specifically stated for me to report to work next monday at 9am. it didn't say do not go in until we say it's ok to do so!

heres a bit of what the job offer letter stated:

Thank you for taking the time to complete the new hire paperwork. Below is a list of the other documents needed on your first day. Please review in order to expedite this process. Your orientation contact will review and print out these documents for your signature. Please bring required identification. Welcome to the team. We look forward to working with you in the future.

The time and location of your New Hire Orientation is listed in the first paragraph of your offer letter. Business casual attire is appropriate. During this session, you will learn more about the company's history, benefit programs and have the opportunity to address any questions regarding your new hire paper work.

Edited by Growled

We look for to working with you in the future? That is one clue, but who knows!

no that means they are welcoming me to the team and look forward to working with me. im just wondering if i should tell them about my stomach issues and my smoking? i hate lying but i need this job. i don't consider having acid reflux a disqualification for work but who knows what standards they have set?

Offering a job and then requiring a series of tests is normal these days

im my experience they give the tests and do the checks before the job offer happens. but then again the way the economy is in the US i think these companies make things up as they go along.

i actually just called back one of the jobs that called me today for an interview. i apologized and asked if i could come in to meet with them anyways. just to be safe here.

That's actually smart of your part.

I get what you are trying to say though. You didn't accept the other jobs because you accepted that one thinking you already had it (and I suppose it's a better pay than the other). Your solution right now is to make the fitness test and well, hope for the best.

You should never cancel job interviews or anything like that before you are already in your desk working, or doing whatever you do. :p

now ive never had a fitness test for employment before but ive read alot of horrid things online where these companies are looking to save on health care and can be super picky with who they hire based on your overall health and lifestyle.

Glad I don't live in the US if that's true!

Glad I don't live in the US if that's true!

we can thank obama for this. they could deny me solely based on me smoking. that's why im worried ya know. and they wonder why soo many people are on unemployment for years. i know ill pass the background & drug part but the fitness test i have no clue.

It certainly sounds like they offered you a conditional offer, however like I said, I'm pretty sure they are legally required to disclose that information to you. I'm not an equal rights lawyer nor educated in any regard to this.

But, as far as falsifying information in order to obtain employment, that is a big no-no. If you do see a doctor and it turns out you lied you can kiss that job goodbye (let alone the moral implications).

I would go ahead and continue in the process, just because you have no other alternative at this point. But I would also continue to search for additional employment opportunities. Also, check their website for any information that you can pertaining to the 'fitness test' to see what they are weeding out. I would suspect that you have the right to know.

Perhaps someone on here is educated on this manner. Especially if they did not disclose the fact that your offer was contingent on other factors.

It certainly sounds like they offered you a conditional offer, however like I said, I'm pretty sure they are legally required to disclose that information to you. I'm not an equal rights lawyer nor educated in any regard to this.

But, as far as falsifying information in order to obtain employment, that is a big no-no. If you do see a doctor and it turns out you lied you can kiss that job goodbye (let alone the moral implications).

I would go ahead and continue in the process, just because you have no other alternative at this point. But I would also continue to search for additional employment opportunities. Also, check their website for any information that you can pertaining to the 'fitness test' to see what they are weeding out. I would suspect that you have the right to know.

Perhaps someone on here is educated on this manner. Especially if they did not disclose the fact that your offer was contingent on other factors.

yeah im not going to lie but i guess ill have to start looking again to be safe. ive read the full acceptance letter 5x and it doesn't state anywhere that this job was conditional at all. i mean this is a maintenance tech job, ive never seen anything like this before.

another reason i think this is fishy is because they sent me all of my tax forms and even the employee handbook with contact numbers. you don't do that on a contingent job offer.

Then why you worry so much? It's probably just a routine check or something. I don't think you need to be physically fit to be accepted on the job.

a regular exam at a doctors office is much different than doing a full blown fitness test. and yes i agree i shouldn't need this for the job i was offered. maybe because i think i could be in better shape? i never expected this.

They are just checking for pre existing condition for health care costs..they don't want you to 'get everything fixed' when you get health care. I bet you will find once the test is over they will say they won't cover this or that or worse they withdraw their offer due to your health. example you said you smoked and if you had problems they may back out. I'm way overweight so if I had to do this I might not get the job because of weight...But I hope it just a nuisance and you get the job and do well

They (employers) often do it this way so they don't have to pay for testing everyone who applies, they pick a #1 guy and he goes and gets tested if he passed it's all good, if not #2 goes and gets tested.

Coke did this to me, no biggie, if the job has lifting requirements that's what they will focus on. Let us know how it goes, being out of work sucks!

Good Luck!

They are just checking for pre existing condition for health care costs..they don't want you to 'get everything fixed' when you get health care. I bet you will find once the test is over they will say they won't cover this or that or worse they withdraw their offer due to your health. example you said you smoked and if you had problems they may back out. I'm way overweight so if I had to do this I might not get the job because of weight...But I hope it just a nuisance and you get the job and do well

exactly my point and im thinking this as well.

Yeah dude, according to your description you are more than fit for that position. They are just making sure they aren't hiring a 380lb guy that can't walk and has cancer to be their maintenance tech. You'll be fine, don't worry about the test, and also I've found that employers will and can do almost anything conditionally depending on how their HR policies and such are written, so there's no point in trying to get upset about that. Hope that helps clear it up, although I'm no expert, but I think that's what the company is essentially doing and you should pass through with flying colors! ;)

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • A coalition of publishers sued OpenAI and Microsoft over scraping content without consent by Hamid Ganji Image via Depositphotos.com AI companies often rely on readily available internet content to train their chatbots and provide users with instant answers. This method of AI training is fast and relatively inexpensive, but using a website’s content without permission or compensation is not something publishers like to see, and this is exactly why Microsoft and OpenAI are now being sued. As reported by Bloomberg, a group of publishers that collectively own nearly 400 newspapers has filed a lawsuit against OpenAI and Microsoft. The coalition argues that the two companies scraped their content to build AI chatbots like ChatGPT and Copilot without paying any compensation. The complaint, filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, argues that while AI products have generated billions of dollars in market value using publishers’ work, none of that value has been shared with the publishers. The plaintiffs are seeking statutory damages and injunctive relief for alleged copyright infringement and violations of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act. “Defendants systematically and secretly crawled the Publishers’ websites—including content behind paywalls and other access restrictions—and copied the Publishers’ articles, stories, and other original works onto their own servers without authorization,” the complaint states. The publishers also described the AI boom as a “death knell for local journalism” if AI companies that scrape content for free are not held accountable. Former New Jersey Attorney General Matthew Platkin and his law firm, Platkin LLP, are representing the publishers. “Our models empower innovation, are trained on publicly available data, and are grounded in fair use,” OpenAI spokesperson Drew Pusateri told Bloomberg. This is not the first lawsuit involving the unauthorized use of publishers’ content by AI firms, but it is one of the largest coalitions ever formed against the free use of content by AI chatbots. In 2024, OpenAI and Microsoft also faced a similar lawsuit from eight newspapers that claimed AI products were benefiting from their content without permission.
    • Rufus alternative Ventoy now supports Windows 11's mandatory update, fixes major boot bug by Sayan Sen While Microsoft has its own official Media Creation Tool used for making bootable USB media, there are some popular third-party utilities as well which offer additional options like bypassing system requirements, Microsoft Account creation, and more. One of these is Ventoy, and the software has received its latest update today. In fact, the app actually got a slew of updates over the last couple of days, three version releases in total, to be specific. The first release, version 1.1.13, was pulled as there was some unspecified error in the update, and as such, the corrected version 1.1.14 was pushed out. Following that on very short notice, 1.1.15 was published as well. For those unfamiliar, Ventoy is an open-source utility that lets users create a bootable USB drive once and then simply copy ISO, WIM, IMG, VHD, or EFI files onto it without repeatedly formatting the drive. It supports both legacy BIOS and UEFI boot modes, Secure Boot, and a wide range of operating systems, making it one of the most versatile tools in the category. The biggest change in version 1.1.14 is an updated Secure Boot shim file aimed at resolving the UEFI CA 2023 issue, which is basically a compatibility problem that has affected Secure Boot environments on some systems. If you recall, we reported about severe boot issues on HP devices following the release of updated Secure Boot 2023 keys. For anyone who may not be aware, back in early 2024, Microsoft announced that it was updating Secure Boot keys as they were going to become 15 years old in 2026, which is also when they are set to expire. As such, the new 2023 certificates have been rolling out with the newest Windows 11 updates. Updated boot manager and Secure Boot certificates are crucial for protection against malware like bootkits. These are mandatory updates. Alongside that, the VentoyPlugson graphical plugin configurator was updated in sync with the release. The update also introduces a new VTOY_SECURE_BOOT_POLICY option within the Global Control plugin, giving users more flexibility in managing Secure Boot behavior. Ventoy has also received a fix for a startup issue when Secure Boot was disabled. Microsoft does officially allow users to boot systems without Secure Boot as long as the PC is Secure Boot capable. The full changelog is given below: Update secure boot shim file to solve the UEFI CA 2023 issue. The new release use a new CA, so you need to enroll the new key for the first boot time. VentoyPlugson update synchronously. Global control plugin add a VTOY_SECURE_BOOT_POLICY option. Fix the boot issue when Secure Boot is disabled in the UEFI firmware. You can download the latest version of the app here on Ventoy's official GitHub repo or from Neowin software stories.
    • Windows 11 is fine, no issues on any of the machines I've run it on since release. The stricter security requirements are a good thing, sometimes the baseline needs to change and people will winge, but it is what it is. Happened with the move from 9x to NT - broke compatability Happened with XP SP2 when security started to become a serious consideration Certainly happend with Vista that brought in UAC, the concept of not running as admin (something that has been the norm in Linux/Unix from pretty much the start) and a completely new driver stack. Windows 11 will probably get looked back at as the point where even consumer and SMB IT was dragged kicking and screaming into a somewhat secure by default configuration.
    • Bluestacks has been emulating Android on Windows for fifteen years. It's janky and riddled with ads though, so WSA looked like it was going to be a huge improvement over the emulator experience. Too bad Microsoft dropped the ball on that.
    • Classic. China would be nothing without Western, Japanese, and South Korean technology.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Rookie
      krychek57 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Grand Master
      Jaybonaut went up a rank
      Grand Master
    • One Year In
      Philsl earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      441
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      172
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      134
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      78
    5. 5
      Xenon
      77
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!