Recommended Posts

I'm not sure they have full optimization going just yet. Also, I'm willing to bet we'll see continued improvements once AMD/nVidia release drivers optimized for it too.

What kind of system are you running though?

Personally, I just upgraded my processor to an AMD Phenom II X4 and the game runs like very well on mostly high settings @ 1680x1050. Did it mostly for GW2 but also because my computer needed it. Haven't bought hardware for a game since I bought a PS2 just to play GTA3. :laugh:

Intel Q6600 (the defining quad-core of that generation, despite the dual-dual design) on the CPU side, and the AMD HD5450 (fanless 512MB DDR3 configuration) - both stock, naturally.

The CPU is fine - however, I'm quite aware that the GPU is showing its lack of oomph. (The mere 512MB of DDR3 does NOT help.)

I have three GPUs under consideration for an upgrade - all within the same price range - HIS HD7770 iCooler 1GB GDDR5 (MicroCenter) and XFX HD6770 1GB GDDR5 and XFX HD7770 UOC Edition (both at Best Buy).

All three have the same power requirements, and the first two are the same price (the factory-overclocked XFX is $40 more thna the other two). All three cards are dual-slot (while the XFX HD6770 is physically a single-slot design, the cooler pokes out a half-slot beyond the frame). Best Buy is closer (MicroCenter does not stock either XFX GPU currently), and the fuel costs make the comaprison between the two HD7770s a wash in terms of price.

After reading some of the negative feedback i no longer feel bad that i didn't get into the beta lol thanks :)

So you let other people decide things for you regularly? There are only 2 people who have posted they disliked the game in this thread and they did not even provide any reasons why they didn't like it. Everyone else seems to enjoy it quite a bit. The overwhelming majority think GW2 is awesome.

As I said earlier, you're free to not like whatever you want, but at least post some reasons why you're weary if the game instead of just saying you hate it without backing up your opinion. There is no way we can possibly have a constructive conversation with posts like that.

  • Like 2
After reading some of the negative feedback i no longer feel bad that i didn't get into the beta lol thanks :)

Actually, it should be the opposite. If you feel unsure about the game, it would be nice to test it yourself for free. Like Deranged did and found the game wasn't for him. In my opinion, wait for a post-release opportunity to try the game for free (it usually shows up, but can't be sure of course).

I like the game myself, already got into a nice Swedish guild for beta and release.

Saw a post on the offical forums that had a link to Star Trek Online, where they compare DX9 vs DX11 performance.

http://www.hardocp.c...rmance_review/4

Here is a quote

We found some interesting performance results in our testing. Though the DX11 support is not finalized for this game, and it is just in Beta form, we found that the GeForce GTX 580 performs significantly faster under DX11 compared to DX9. Simply by switching from the DX9 API to the new DX11 API has yielded a free performance upgrade, by up to 20% on the GTX 580.

Note, while this is comparing performance in a different game, it is to show that there could be a nice performance boost possible in Guild Wars 2 by just using DX11. But engines are not the same of course, so nothing is set in stone.

My experience with dx11 comes from games like Crysis 2 and Metro: 2033. In those games the performance hit was not worth the added eye candy. On the other hand, Dirt 2 didn't seem to have any performance hits for me when using dx11. :wacko:

Can't really compare the dx level like that based off comparing games. There's loads of factors that come into play for game performance (texture size, number of shaders, tesselation, etc).

Can't really compare the dx level like that based off comparing games. There's loads of factors that come into play for game performance (texture size, number of shaders, tesselation, etc).

I know and that's why I was generalizing.

Anyways, I'm all for dx11 and more graphic options and added performance and whatever else but my entire point was that if the game does or doesn't have dx11 shouldn't be a selling point (in my opinion). Perhaps I could have worded my posts better.

The way I see it if you have fun with a game, buy it. If you don't, don't. But dx11? Nonfactor in the decision making process.

The Star Trek Online comparison is apples to apples. It compares a game where the only thing that differs is the DX9 vs DX11 API renderer. In other words, the DX11 graphics look exactly the same as the DX9 version, as no eye candy effects where added. As it's also a MMO, the comparison is not without merit. Especially seeing how GW2 do have some complaints about performance.

Anyways... do we want to pick an official neowin server for us/eu so we can maybe all try to get on together? The only preferences I have as far as servers go is that I want one with high population so it will have a strong presence in WvWvW.

Are these going to be server names on live?

Are these going to be server names on live?

I would assume so, although there may be more or less when it releases. I just looked at the server list and every server for US is either full or high in capacity.

They will probably release a full world list once we get closer to the 28th, though so maybe it's a bit to early to start talking about specific servers.

I guess it was ok, I was just playing PvE and there are some really annoying issues such as ridiculous respawn rates for monsters. Melee also feels pretty clunky, I don't understand why triggering a skill while having an enemy targeted doesn't automatically move you within the range.. it's really annoying having to manually move closer when in the middle of a huge melee fight.

I guess it was ok, I was just playing PvE and there are some really annoying issues such as ridiculous respawn rates for monsters. Melee also feels pretty clunky, I don't understand why triggering a skill while having an enemy targeted doesn't automatically move you within the range.. it's really annoying having to manually move closer when in the middle of a huge melee fight.

Well it shouldn't move your character for you, but it also shouldn't trigger the CD either. I have found that really annoying when I'm right outside of melee range.

I think the short guys are stupid so I doubt I will be playing as them. Enjoyed elementalist and Warrior as well as the Norn and slyvari races. Gonna try Charr last with some random class. Will most likely be getting the game.

The Asura are FAR from stupid - they are *technomancers*. (Yes - the Asura look like they would lose to the Smurfs in a height contest; however, they make up for that in sheer brainpower. My own Asuran character is an engineer - the human equivalent is an Elementalist/Necromancer. While necromancers build zombies, Asuran engineers build robots - golems in steampunk terms. Just as you don't want to find yourself crossways with a Necromancer, finding yourself crossways with an Asuran engineer is just as dangerous to your health.)

Even more worrying then the general conflicts among worlds and races is one within the Asura - the Inquest vs. the College of Statics. (Let me put it this way - the Inquest makes the White Mantle look like the von Trapp family.)

Just as I was involved with that conflict (the one with the WM) in the original GW, here I am dealing with the Inquest as an Asuran engineer in GW2 - and loving every bit of it.

I guess it was ok, I was just playing PvE and there are some really annoying issues such as ridiculous respawn rates for monsters. Melee also feels pretty clunky, I don't understand why triggering a skill while having an enemy targeted doesn't automatically move you within the range.. it's really annoying having to manually move closer when in the middle of a huge melee fight.

Design decision. If they made you auto move to targets to use melee skills then people would complain that they got auto moved into ground aoe.

The Asura are FAR from stupid - they are *technomancers*. (Yes - the Asura look like they would lose to the Smurfs in a height contest; however, they make up for that in sheer brainpower. My own Asuran character is an engineer - the human equivalent is an Elementalist/Necromancer. While necromancers build zombies, Asuran engineers build robots - golems in steampunk terms. Just as you don't want to find yourself crossways with a Necromancer, finding yourself crossways with an Asuran engineer is just as dangerous to your health.)

Even more worrying then the general conflicts among worlds and races is one within the Asura - the Inquest vs. the College of Statics. (Let me put it this way - the Inquest makes the White Mantle look like the von Trapp family.)

Just as I was involved with that conflict (the one with the WM) in the original GW, here I am dealing with the Inquest as an Asuran engineer in GW2 - and loving every bit of it.

I don't get what you mean...the human equivalent to an asuran engineer would be a human engineer. :s

Design decision. If they made you auto move to targets to use melee skills then people would complain that they got auto moved into ground aoe.

I don't get what you mean...the human equivalent to an asuran engineer would be a human engineer. :s

I was referring to in the game - besides, the Asurans have Mesmers, as the humans do, but not Necromancers - hence their place being taken by the Asuran engineer.

I was referring to in the game - besides, the Asurans have Mesmers, as the humans do, but not Necromancers - hence their place being taken by the Asuran engineer.

Uhm...what..as Athernar said any race can be any profession. I'm not sure how you came to the conclusion that the asurans didn't have necromancers and that humans didn't have engineers.

Anyways... do we want to pick an official neowin server for us/eu so we can maybe all try to get on together? The only preferences I have as far as servers go is that I want one with high population so it will have a strong presence in WvWvW.

It should be noted that only those who want to WvWvW alot with neowinians need to worry about being on the neowin guild home server. Just like how you're not completely bound to your home server, your choice of guild is not either.

Also, incase some don't know, you're also not bound to a single guild in gw2. So you could be in a neowin guild + others on the same character.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Microsoft Teams is getting a controversial location tracking feature that users may hate by Usama Jawad Image generated with Microsoft Copilot Earlier this year, Microsoft planned to roll out a controversial location tracking feature in Teams, but following customer feedback, it decided to delay its release. The bad news is that the company has decided to launch it later this year, but it's based on roughly the same design that was shared earlier, which means that many users still have good reason to worry. Basically, Microsoft Places and Teams have received workplace check-ins via Wi-Fi. The idea is that if an employee arrives at the office and connects to their enterprise network, their profile status indicator will show them as being present in the office. For example, if you arrive at work, open Teams on your PC, and connect to the "Studio B" company Wi-Fi network, your Teams profile will indicate that you are present in "Studio B", as shown below: Microsoft says that this feature is basically a replacement for physical workplace check-in peripherals, it reduces the need to manually update your status, and it also enables co-workers to know that you're at work so that they can coordinate in-person meetings with you. IT admins can enable this workplace check-in capability at a tenant level, and users have the ability to control whether they want to enable it or not. Of course, all of that sounds great on paper, but naturally, many Teams customers may still have concerns, as they did before. This is because it enables your reporting manager and other members of the organization to track if you are at the office, when you arrive at the office, and where you are right now. This could be problematic for people who work in what they consider to be flexible work environments or hybrid setups, and this kind of location tracking could be considered an invasion of privacy. Microsoft has tried to alleviate some of these concerns by letting users know that they can manually set their location easily, which essentially overrides workplace check-in if they feel uncomfortable with it. However, that doesn't really solve the problem because your organization could enforce a workplace policy that mandates that this feature remains enabled. The Redmond tech giant has also assured users that this capability does not store historical data and is only a real-time indicator of location. Finally, it only generates a signal when you connect to a corporate network, which means that if you are working from home and connect your PC to your personal Wi-Fi, it won't broadcast your location to your employer; you will simply be shown as "Remote". Microsoft has encouraged IT admins to prepare for this change and begin informing users so they know what to expect once it begins rolling out later this year.
    • Wow, Microsoft IS cooking lately... This only shows that they COULD improve, they just chose not to for whatever reasons. That obsession with AI was destroying them from the inside out.
    • BATorrent 4.1.0 by Razvan Serea BATorrent is a lightweight, open-source BitTorrent client built with modern C++ and Qt 6, offering a clean, fast, and privacy-focused alternative to traditional torrent apps. It supports magnet links, .torrent files, resume data, sequential downloading, per-file priorities, and even imports from qBittorrent. Power users benefit from integrated RSS auto-download with regex filtering, duplicate detection, and automatic tracker lists from Stremio. Streaming is seamless thanks to auto-detected players like VLC and IINA. BATorrent includes robust VPN tools—interface binding, auto-detection for WireGuard-based services like Mullvad and NordLynx, kill switch, proxy support, and IP filtering. A full WebUI enables remote control, while integrations with Plex, Jellyfin, and Emby automate library updates. With themes, speed scheduling, system-tray alerts, and cross-platform support for Windows, Linux, and macOS, BATorrent delivers a polished, high-performance torrenting experience. BATorrent features: Core .torrent file and magnet link support Resume data — picks up where you left off after restart Import torrents from qBittorrent Create .torrent files from any file or folder Sequential download mode Per-file priority control (skip, low, normal, high) Seed ratio limits with auto-pause DHT, PEX, UPnP, NAT-PMP RSS Auto-Download Subscribe to RSS feeds — automatically download new torrents as they appear Regex filters — match only what you want (e.g. 1080p|720p, S01E\d+) Per-feed settings — custom save path, check interval (5–1440 min), enable/disable Auto-download — matched items are downloaded automatically in the background Supports magnet links, .torrent URLs, and tags Tray notifications when items are auto-downloaded Duplicate detection — never downloads the same item twice Stremio Stremio Addon System pre-installed — works out of the box Auto tracker list from ngosang/trackerslist Streaming Play while downloading — stream video files before the download is complete Supports mp4, mkv, avi, mov, wmv, flv, webm, m4v, ts Auto-detects installed players (VLC, IINA, system default) VPN & Privacy Interface binding — lock torrent traffic to a specific network interface (e.g. tun0) Auto VPN detection — identifies VPN interfaces (tun, tap, WireGuard, Mullvad, NordLynx, ProtonVPN) Kill switch — automatically pauses all torrents if the VPN interface drops Auto-resume — resumes only the torrents paused by the kill switch when VPN reconnects Proxy support — SOCKS5 and HTTP proxy with optional authentication IP filtering — load P2P blocklists to block unwanted IP ranges Protocol encryption (enabled / forced / disabled) WebUI Remote management — control torrents from any browser at http://localhost:8080 REST API with JSON responses Add torrents via magnet link or .torrent upload Pause, resume, remove torrents remotely View peers and files per torrent Dark theme matching the desktop app HTTP Basic Auth with SHA-256 password hashing Configurable port and remote access (localhost vs 0.0.0.0) Interface 3 themes: Dark, Light, Midnight (bat/vampire aesthetic) Real-time speed graph Detailed panel with tabs: General, Peers, Files, Trackers Filter bar: search by name, filter by state (Active, Downloading, Seeding, Paused, Finished) Drag & drop .torrent files and magnet links Drag & drop reorder in torrent list System tray with notifications (download complete, kill switch events, RSS auto-downloads) Splash screen with bat animation Bilingual: English and Portuguese (BR), auto-detected from system locale Bandwidth Scheduler Alternative speed limits — set different download/upload limits on a schedule Time range — configure active hours (e.g. 01:00 to 07:00), supports overnight ranges Per-day control — choose which days of the week the schedule applies Automatically switches between normal and alternative speeds Media Server Integration Plex — automatically trigger library scan when a download completes Jellyfin / Emby — same automatic library refresh via API Configure server URL and authentication token/key in Settings System Cross-platform: Windows, Linux, macOS Auto-shutdown — automatically shut down PC when all downloads complete (60s cancellable countdown) Auto-update system (AppImage on Linux, installer on Windows, DMG on macOS) CLI arguments: pass .torrent files or magnet: URIs directly Keyboard shortcuts: Space to toggle pause, Ctrl+A to select all, Ctrl+O to open BATorrent 4.1.0 release notes: A community-driven release: everything here came straight from your reports and requests. It closes the remaining gaps with qBittorrent and fixes the Windows settings/tray/splash issues several of you hit. Fixed Settings now actually save. A whole class of preferences — speed limits (and the alternative limits), max active downloads, seed ratio, listen port, max connections, DHT/uTP/encryption, VPN interface, kill switch and proxy — weren't being persisted and reset to defaults on every launch. They now round-trip correctly. (Thanks to everyone who reported "the upload limit always goes back to 0".) Splash and tray toggles stick on Windows. Turning off the startup animation (or "close to tray") no longer reverts — the Windows registry stored these booleans as integers and the UI was misreading them. Close-to-tray hint. The first time the window hides to the tray you get a one-time notification, so the app doesn't look like it vanished (Windows 11 tucks new tray icons into the overflow). macOS Dock icon size. The icon filled its canvas edge-to-edge and rendered larger than neighbouring apps; it now uses the standard safe-area padding. Native file picker language. The "Torrent file / All files" filter in the open dialog follows the app language instead of being hard-coded. Added — qBittorrent parity Alternative speed limits toggle — a turtle button in the toolbar flips your throttled limits on/off instantly, independent of the scheduler. Follow system theme — switch light/dark automatically with the OS (Settings → Appearance). Pre-allocate disk space — reserve the full file size up front to reduce fragmentation (Settings → Downloads). Recheck data on add — optionally force a hash check when adding a torrent, so existing or partial files on disk are detected. Port status indicator — a 🔴 dot in the status bar shows whether your listen port looks reachable (UPnP/NAT-PMP + listen state; fully local, no external check). Add torrent from URL — File → Add torrent from URL (Ctrl+U) fetches a remote .torrent and routes it through the normal add dialog. Export .torrent — right-click a torrent → Export .torrent to save its metadata file. Already there (in case you missed it) Watch folder — auto-add .torrent files dropped into a monitored directory (Settings → Files). This release just surfaces it. Incomplete files already carry a .!bt suffix until they finish. Under the hood Regression tests for the settings-persistence and Windows boolean bugs. A new Qt Quick Test harness covering the startup splash and the design-system widgets. Download: BATorrent 4.1.0 | 37.5 MB (Open Source) Download: BATorrent Portable | 51.7 MB Links: BATorrent Website | Screenshot | Changelog Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
  • Recent Achievements

    • Very Popular
      AndrewSteel earned a badge
      Very Popular
    • Veteran
      Taliseian went up a rank
      Veteran
    • One Month Later
      Clizby earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      Timaximus earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Timaximus earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      517
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      163
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      162
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      83
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      78
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!