Recommended Posts

One specialisation per class to start with, more added in the future - per Colin Johanson and PCGamer.

 

That's extremely disappointing. It's not a specialization when it's the only choice. Hopefully they give us the option to change them otherwise that's just terrible design choice. I can't see them being that stupid though.

 

But who knows.. they still think the NPE and the trait redesign were good ideas.

That's extremely disappointing. It's not a specialization when it's the only choice. Hopefully they give us the option to change them otherwise that's just terrible design choice. I can't see them being that stupid though.

 

But who knows.. they still think the NPE and the trait redesign were good ideas.

 

Honestly I'd rather they take their time and get good content out incrementally rather than releasing a bulk of lesser content.

 

Personally I've always put GW2's flaws down to the game being forced out before it was really ready by NCsoft. All the reworks of core gameplay systems is just another symptom.

Honestly I'd rather they take their time and get good content out incrementally rather than releasing a bulk of lesser content.

 

Personally I've always put GW2's flaws down to the game being forced out before it was really ready by NCsoft. All the reworks of core gameplay systems is just another symptom.

 

I agree with that but this expac is already long over due. Not to say that I want a badly thought out mess like the NPE and trait redesigns from last year.

 

Calm down, they'll perhaps add more specialisations in future; besides, we need to see these first to judge, complain etc. 

 

I'm perfectly calm. What an odd thing to say.

  • 4 months later...

Pre orders for the Heart of Thorns "expansion" is out now:

 

http://buy.guildwars2.com/store/gw2/en_US/html/pbPage.heartofthorns?_ga=1.151670521.1989305754.1430521160&cid=90:5::::Global:40:::

 

Lots of drama behind this. Apparently Anet, deliberately or otherwise, said that the vanilla version of the game would be required to play the expansion. But now the vanilla version of the game no longer exists and there is only the Heart of Thorns version of the game, which comes with all the vanilla content. So they are essentially making people buy the game twice.

 

And then there is the fact that people who have been long time supporters of Anet and GW2 are getting less for their money comparatively than those who buy the "expansion". The fact that it features a new class and they are not giving away a character slot unless you pay $25 extra is disgraceful at best.

 

1h0wSaL.png

  • 2 months later...

Heart of Thorns finally gets a release date and a new mini site. The release date is October 23.

10 player raids that will reward the items needed to make legendary armor have also been announced. 

And last but not least the core game of Guild Wars 2 is now going to be free to play for everyone. You still have to buy the expansion to get access to the new content though.

I'm not sure how many people actually play GW2 on neowin anymore but if you don't this is probably as good of time as any to check it out. I can probably answer any questions anyone has about the game if they're interested in getting into it. I don't do handouts or carries though. :laugh:

Relevant links:

  • 4 weeks later...

I was reading the boards the other day and people were saying that the Druid is a healer. ArenaNet said that people will need to polish of their tanks. To me, that sounds like trinity is about to enter. *shrug*

In a sense. But there is still not going to be a traditional tank+dps+heal set up we're used to in other mmos. I admit that I haven't been keeping up on the new class specializations but I don't think there are any taunts, for starters. And classes can already be specced to heal if you wanted to, it's just not very efficient because with how enemies are now, if you get hit you're gonna go down and no amount of heals will change that.

I'm either waiting for a decent sale or a DX11/12 renderer....so it'll be a while.

Well the base game is free now so it doesn't get much cheaper than that. You can get literally thousands of hours out of the base game so you'll easily get enough time out of it to decide if you want to spring for the new expansion or not.

Well the base game is free now so it doesn't get much cheaper than that. You can get literally thousands of hours out of the base game so you'll easily get enough time out of it to decide if you want to spring for the new expansion or not.

Got it in a sale, already finished it.  Won't pay full price for the expansion either.

"Finished it"? How can you finish an mmo?
 

I get that some games aren't for everyone but I'm pretty sure it's impossible to finish an mmo. :laugh:

Pretty sure I got through the main story before they added the...whatever it was called.  Even if I didn't, wasn't even remotely interested.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Microsoft explains how it made Teams so much faster in 2026 by Usama Jawad Microsoft Teams is Redmond's flagship online communication and collaboration tool, primarily used in enterprise, government, and school environments. It regularly receives updates, with Microsoft frequently revealing features currently in development as well, such as Efficiency Mode and a dedicated app for meeting recaps. Now, the company has shed some light on the backend enhancements it has made to its popular software in 2026. During the first half of 2026, switching between chats has become 20% faster on desktop and web, which is especially great for less powerful devices or hardware on weak networks. Microsoft explains that it tracks two types of chat switches. The first is a warm switch, which relates to returning to a recent chat, in which case it is most likely already present in memory and should load extremely fast. The other is a cold switch where a chat that hasn't been opened recently is now opened. Naturally, the second type of chat switch was causing the most notable latency spikes. Microsoft realized that this was happening because of three reasons. First, the query to fetch conversation data was being fired too late. Next, queries were being sent sequentially, increasing the overall round-trip time. Finally, there was no handling of response priority, which meant that non-critical responses would sometimes block the main thread. Microsoft solved all of these problems by firing the data query immediately, bundling queries to be sent together so that they wouldn't create a "waterfall" effect, and enabling faster painting of the frame. As a result, warm and cold switches now have almost the same latency, and the only distinguishable difference between them is due to the data layer response time. Next, Microsoft focused on reducing app hangs and freezes on macOS and iOS by 35%. On macOS, the company has a health monitor thread running in the background that does exactly what it says on the tin. The tech firm built a dedicated StackDecoder tool to analyze health monitor's output at scale. Through this combination, it decided to move several error reporting and monitoring threads either to the background or treated them as an asynchronous call so that they wouldn't block the main thread, causing Teams to freeze. On iOS, the same result was accomplished through optimization of computations, caching, offloading operations from the main thread, refactoring database access behaviors, deferring non-critical tasks, and more. On a related note, it also made people search 25% on iOS by optimizing the query pipeline, and efficient database task queuing and scheduling. However, Microsoft has emphasized that improving Teams' performance is an ongoing endeavor, and that it hopes that these efforts will continue to make the software a reliable partner in online communication scenarios. On a related note, Microsoft recently unveiled some upcoming performance upgrades for OneDrive on macOS too, and you can check those out here.
    • Let Apple have its way, as customers will eschew Apple in favor of more open solutions--which is what they should be doing anyway!... I'm not a fan of Apple at all, but when the lawyers in the EUC start dictating to companies how their software should be made, I think the companies should just drop the EU altogether as a market. EUC lawyers make a mint every time they levy a fine on a successful American software company. What a racket. The EU consumer should be the final word on what products he buys and which ones he doesn't, but the EUC seeks to put itself into the position of the EU customer, and make those decisions for him, under the guise of "helping him." Q. What do you do when the person at your door says, "Hi! I'm from the government, and I'm here to help you make intelligent buying decisions!" A. Grab your possessions and run for the hills...
    • Just another show from my childhood ruined by wokeness 'politically correct' BS. They should let some things just die out gracefully.
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      StaticMatrix earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      StaticMatrix earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      lamborghiniv10 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • One Month Later
      pinnclepd earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • First Post
      X-No-file earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      518
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      210
    3. 3
      +Edouard
      147
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      94
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      81
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!