How accurate is Windows Experience Index


Recommended Posts

My SSD in my desktop is getting the same Windows Experience Index score as the HDD in my laptop. Is this an issue with the way Windows is calculating the result or what? :(

What SSD are you using? Also are you comparing the WEI scores on the same operating system? The methods used for calculating the scores in Windows 7 are harsher for HDDs than on Vista.

Getting around a bit tonight Phenom...did I not just see you in general? :p Any recommendations on benchmark app?

Haha I am everywhere

I have never benchmarked an SSD but just from a quick google search I came across this

http://forums.legitreviews.com/about21729.html

Im sure you will be getting much better results in real life tests

I use CrystalDiskMark. Free and does the job (Y)

Yea I used that, really good program - it told me my HDD was knackered just before it ate all my data :laugh:

Gave me just enough time to get the important things off before the innevitable

What SSD are you using? Also are you comparing the WEI scores on the same operating system? The methods used for calculating the scores in Windows 7 are harsher for HDDs than on Vista.

It's an early OCZ 60GB, don't remember the name. And both running 7, Pro on laptop Ultimate on desktop.

Haha I am everywhere

I have never benchmarked an SSD but just from a quick google search I came across this

http://forums.legitr...about21729.html

Im sure you will be getting much better results in real life tests

Thank you, will check it oot.

I use CrystalDiskMark. Free and does the job (Y)

Will also check it out. You may also like to know i've decided not to sleep before my 4AM start. Hardly worth it now!

It's an early OCZ 60GB, don't remember the name. And both running 7, Pro on laptop Ultimate on desktop.

Thank you, will check it oot.

Here's my Intel 80GB G2 for comparison:

post-91323-12818324496036.jpg

You may also like to know i've decided not to sleep before my 4AM start. Hardly worth it now!

:laugh: Don't blame you. Get a pot of coffee on!

Yea I used that, really good program - it told me my HDD was knackered just before it ate all my data :laugh:

Gave me just enough time to get the important things off before the innevitable

CrystalDiskInfo probably told you that, the other one just does benchmarks.

  • 6 months later...

I went from a WD HDD Black (score 4.9) to SSD OCZ Vertex 2 (score 7.7) because I set the SATA controller from IDE to AHCI (I had bsod at first but found out a way to fix this). SSD on IDE was 7.1 then on AHCI it went up to 7.7 and must say it is faster on loading apps.

It seems like the only metric that really matters (for normal human-being users as opposed to benchmark) is the random read/write performance on small files.

Sequential read/write from a good quality SSD isn't any better than a 2-disk RAID-0 set of dirt cheap drives 5400 RPM drives. To that end I think it makes sense to consider the application of the drive: for an application or boot drive or for a database an SSD makes a lot of sense. As a place to handle video editing (where you'll be streaming huge chunks of video to/from disk) it's hard to beat rotating media. Price per gigabyte is and order of magnitude lower for a similar level of performance.

Where you really see a huge jump in performance is in small random read/write where an SSD appears to be 20-100x faster than a hard drive.

For what it's worth, I get 7.9 on that Windows experience index with or without my normal hard drives plugged in - it seems that so long as you have a minimum amount free (say 50gb) on your primary drive it won't care how much storage you have on other drives.

Here's what mine give: left side is my SSD set, Right side is my HDD set. Random read/write is just ridiculously fast when compared to traditional hard drives - sequential read/write is better, but you'd expect that when it costs 2000% more per gigabyte.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • IBM reveals sub-1nm chip technology, production expected in another 5 years by Pradeep Viswanathan TSMC is now leading the chip manufacturing industry with its 2nm-class process node called N2. Samsung Foundry also has a 2nm-class process node called SF2. TSMC says N2 entered volume production in Q4 2025. Samsung says SF2 started mass production in 2025. Today, IBM announced the world’s first sub-1-nanometer chip technology, marking another major semiconductor research milestone. The new technology is based on a 0.7nm, or 7-angstrom, node and uses a new transistor architecture called “nanostack.” The new design vertically stacks and staggers nanosheet-based transistors so that more components can fit into the same chip area while also improving performance and power efficiency. IBM claims that this new sub-1nm chip can pack nearly 100 billion transistors onto a chip the size of a fingernail. This offers almost twice the density, up to 50 percent higher performance, or 70 percent better energy efficiency when compared to IBM's 2nm node design announced back in 2021. Also, IBM mentioned that this new architecture can deliver 40 percent SRAM scaling. It is important to consider that this announcement from IBM is a research milestone rather than a near-term process node launch. Back in 2021, IBM unveiled the world’s first 2nm chip design, claiming 50 billion transistors on a fingernail-sized chip and major performance and efficiency gains. Five years later, IBM’s 2nm technology has still not entered mainstream commercial production. That is because IBM is no longer a major commercial chip manufacturer. It sold its chip manufacturing business to GlobalFoundries years ago and has since then focused only on semiconductor research, IP development, and partnerships. To productize its 2-nm chip technology, IBM partnered with Japan’s Rapidus, but it has not resulted in anything shipping at scale. IBM says that its new sub-1nm technology can reach production as early as within the next five years. If that happens, it will likely depend on manufacturing partners, advanced EUV tooling, and years of yield improvements.
    • It's funny when thieves accuse other thieves of stealing. Ai companies just blatantly siphoned all the knowledge of the internet without consent and are now selling it with their service... so excuse me if I find this a bit ironic.
    • TeraCopy 4.0 Build 27 is out.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Meta Plast earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • First Post
      kinowa earned a badge
      First Post
    • Rookie
      krychek57 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Grand Master
      Jaybonaut went up a rank
      Grand Master
    • One Year In
      Philsl earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      454
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      170
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      135
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      78
    5. 5
      Xenon
      77
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!