Recommended Posts

A very wide question.

I mean, if you have DNS Records for Ads for example pointing to a nonexistent area or localpc then yes you'd save a TINY amount of bandwidth. Otherwise, DNS is just what points google.com to 173.194.36.104.

I am asking as I was having some issues viewing videos from youtube, I googled and some recommended changing the DNS. so, I switched from my ISP DNS to OpenDNS for testing only, and I can see a improvements in viewing the flash videos in youtube. Thats why I was wondering.

Thanks guys for the quick answer.

  On 19/08/2010 at 10:38, deep1234 said:

Hi guys, I am wondering can the DNS limit the bandwidth to a website? lets says for youtube for example?

I think we could all come up with better advice if you stated whether you are trying to achieve limiting bandwidth or trying to overcome it...

answered above as my post was being posted

Please ignore..

  On 19/08/2010 at 10:59, deep1234 said:

I am asking as I was having some issues viewing videos from youtube, I googled and some recommended changing the DNS. so, I switched from my ISP DNS to OpenDNS for testing only, and I can see a improvements in viewing the flash videos in youtube. Thats why I was wondering.

Thanks guys for the quick answer.

Well it depends on what you mean by issues.

A DNS server has one single purpose, and that is to translate a hostname (like google.com) to an IP address. That is all it does. Your browser connects to the DNS server, sends "google.com," gets back "123.123.123.123," then disconnects. That's all the interaction it does with the DNS server. The browser then goes on to connect to 123.123.123.123, which is the actual Google server. These are two separate and unrelated sessions.

Since the browser requires the IP address, this step is necessary. If the DNS server was slow, then this initial step would take longer, but it would not affect the connection to the IP address (which comes after your browser has disconnected from the DNS server.)

Now, there is a theoretical way the DNS server can affect performance. It could have cached information that is out of date, so that the IP address your browser gets back from it points to an old broken server. This is pretty rare.

Another thing is that a hostname can have multiple IP addresses. When your browser connects to google.com, it might get 10 IP addresses back. It then generally tries the IP address that is at the top of the list first. This can be taken advantage of to spread the load over multiple servers by rotating the list. Every time you ask for the IP addresses, the order of the list different. The result is even though the hostname is the same, you're actually connecting to a different server each time. This is known as round-robin DNS.

That's the only ways the DNS server can (indirectly) affect things. The DNS server can't affect the speed the video downloads or streams at, only which servers you end up connecting to and how long it takes to connect to them. Of course if the video was divided into chunks that were downloaded separately, maybe even from different servers, then I suppose it could affect things even after the initial connection, but I don't know if Google does anything like that.

Other unrelated things that can affect Youtube are things like which server you are being served by (some are under more load than others) and which physical route the signal takes you to (the available bandwidth can vary).

well if your dns server is slow to respond, then yes initially getting to a website would be slow and possibly initial load (getting to) a video would be slow. Trying a different dns server would get around the slow to respond issue, but it can not limit your speed, just your initial connection to whatever.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Just hope it will not be as bad as History of the World: Part II...
    • +1 for LibreOffice. At least you should try it. The one from M$ is just a bloated turd at this point.
    • Yeah, I've had a Recycle Bin on my taskbar since XP and till last year when I got a new laptop with Windows 11. It was especially useful for touch workflow - I could drag files into Recycle Bin from anywhere because my Taskbar is always visible, unlike desktop icons.
    • Not after SP1. There was a legitimate file copy issue prior.
    • Microsoft 365 security in the spotlight after Washington Post hack by Paul Hill The Washington Post has come under cyberattack which saw Microsoft email accounts of several journalists get compromised. The attack, which was discovered last Thursday, is believed to have been conducted by a foreign government due to the topics the journalists cover, including national security, economic policy, and China. Following the hack, the passwords on the affected accounts were reset to prevent access. The fact that a Microsoft work email account was potentially hacked strongly suggests The Washington Post utilizes Microsoft 365, which makes us question the security of Microsoft’s widely used enterprise services. Given that Microsoft 365 is very popular, it is a hot target for attackers. Microsoft's enterprise security offerings and challenges As the investigation into the cyberattack is still ongoing, just how attackers gained access to the accounts of the journalists is unknown, however, Microsoft 365 does have multiple layers of protection that ought to keep journalists safe. One of the security tools is Microsoft Defender for Office 365. If the hackers tried to gain access with malicious links, Defender provides protection against any malicious attachments, links, or email-based phishing attempts with the Advanced Threat Protection feature. Defender also helps to protect against malware that could be used to target journalists at The Washington Post. Another security measure in place is Entra ID which helps enterprises defend against identity-based attacks. Some key features of Entra ID include multi-factor authentication which protects accounts even if a password is compromised, and there are granular access policies that help to limit logins from outside certain locations, unknown devices, or limit which apps can be used. While Microsoft does offer plenty of security technologies with M365, hacks can still take place due to misconfiguration, user-error, or through the exploitation of zero-day vulnerabilities. Essentially, it requires efforts from both Microsoft and the customer to maintain security. Lessons for organizations using Microsoft 365 The incident over at The Washington Post serves as a stark reminder that all organizations, not just news organizations, should audit and strengthen their security setups. Some of the most important security measures you can put in place include mandatory multi-factor authentication (MFA) for all users, especially for privileged accounts; strong password rules such as using letters, numbers, and symbols; regular security awareness training; and installing any security updates in a timely manner. Many of the cyberattacks that we learn about from companies like Microsoft involve hackers taking advantage of the human in the equation, such as being tricked into sharing passwords or sharing sensitive information due to trickery on behalf of the hackers. This highlights that employee training is crucial in protecting systems and that Microsoft’s technologies, as advanced as they are, can’t mitigate all attacks 100 percent of the time.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      Jdoe25 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Explorer
      Legend20 went up a rank
      Explorer
    • One Month Later
      jezzzy earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • First Post
      CSpera earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      MIR JOHNNY BLAZE earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      618
    2. 2
      ATLien_0
      277
    3. 3
      +FloatingFatMan
      179
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      151
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      116
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!