My New Twin Lovely Ladies


Recommended Posts

So what motherboard do you have there?

Are they both running in full PCI-X X16?

Truly and sincerely, thanks so much for asking this!! When I saw treemonsters response about it only being 16x/8x, I thought that did not sound right, as I remembered one of the main reasons I purchased this mobo was because of 16x/16x support. So I got out my manual, and SURE ENOUGH I had the cards installed in the wrong slots!!!

word of warning wthe fpb, some people have been having issues with it, such as bsods, etc. not sure what the factors are, but for you withte sc cards it will only unlock fanspeed to 100%(from 80%)

and evga is definitely full of surprises.

if he has the 758(liek mine) one is 16x, one is 8x, which with these cards should not affect performance at all.

So here it is for you, I scanned the page of the manual. I had the cards in Slots 1 & 5, and sure enough that meant I was only getting 16x/8x

PCI-E_SLOTS.jpg

I just moved the second card into Slot 3, and although it was a tad tight, it fit no problem at all!!

Was a bit of weirdness when I restarted the system, but all I had to do was restart a second time, and it is all back to normal.

So yeah treemonster, you may want to look into that, and see if you can install your cards into Slots 1 & 3.

Thanks again wombatt, I truly may have never realized this if you did not ask. (Y)

Nice one DL. I don't care much for Nvidia, but you did alright for yourself. Enjoy (Y)

Thanks. :yes:

Actually EDIT - I do see what they say about for improved airflow use slots 1 & 5, so should I move them back???

So I just checked the temps, and the top card is running 4 degrees hotter then the bottom, so I may live with them for now in Slots 1&3, as I would think it is better to have 16x/16x if one can have it, no?

Actually EDIT - I do see what they say about for improved airflow use slots 1 & 5, so should I move them back???

Just keep an eye on your temps while gaming for a little while. I have my cards in slots 1 and 3 and the top card gets very little air to it since the other card is right up against it. So far it's been alright with just having the fan on the top card set a bit higher than the other. If you do have to use slots 1 and 5, don't worry, you won't really see a decrease in performance (maybe a couple fps). Just try it out for a little bit.

So I googled it, I am moving it back to Slot 5 :laugh: The difference is like 1.1 FPS, would rather have better air flow for sure. Be back in a few. :rofl:

yep i have my cards in slot 1/3 for best air flow. it's a bit trickey for newbies coming to this mobo especially from the nforce days of x16/x16/x16. in the end it really make very little (no) practical

difference.wait... i see what you were tring to say, by that diagram i have my cards in slots 1 and 5. it's been a while since i talked about this particular issue. :p for my purpose 16x8x is fine.

you can also think of it as pcie slots 1/2/3 where it equals 1/3/5 in teh diagram in the manual. basically for pcie slot 1/2 your video cards should be flush. assuming you have the 3x sli (758) board.

i've said this else where, but the difference between 8x and 16x with a 480 is 2% or like 1fps at most(according to real world testing from evga forum posters)

any configuration should be fine for your 460s.

yep i have my cards in slot 1/3 for best air flow. it's a bit trickey for newbies coming to this mobo especially from the nforce days of x16/x16/x16. in the end it really make very little (no) practical

difference.wait... i see what you were tring to say, by that diagram i have my cards in slots 1 and 5. it's been a while since i talked about this particular issue. :p for my purpose 16x8x is fine.

you can also think of it as pcie slots 1/2/3 where it equals 1/3/5 in teh diagram in the manual. basically for pcie slot 1/2 your video cards should be flush. assuming you have the 3x sli (758) board.

i've said this else where, but the difference between 8x and 16x with a 480 is 2% or like 1fps at most(according to real world testing from evga forum posters)

any configuration should be fine for your 460s.

Yep, I should have just listened to you to begin with. :laugh:

Sure enough when I moved it back to Slot 5, I had the damn RAM issue only reading 4GB. I tried resetting it, only 4 GB, finally I reset it again, and it is back up to 6. I am OFFICIALLY DONE moving around components. :laugh:

Because I am an idiot, I have yet to download any of the benchmark stuff, I did install the Performance Boost thing from EVGA and then the SLi update from them as well, but probably will not even get a chance until tomorrow to play around with anything as it is now the nighttime and the wife wants to watch a movie, etc.

Thanks again for all your help, especially since I am totally new to the SLi world, it is truly much appreciated. (Y)

Truly and sincerely, thanks so much for asking this!!

-

Thanks again wombatt, I truly may have never realized this if you did not ask. (Y)

Ahh, no problem. That's why you came here right? :)

I was just interested because my motherboard unfortunately only has 1 full X16 Slot, The other is locked into X2 Mode...

So I can't do a SLI or Crossfire setup! :(

Ahh, no problem. That's why you came here right? :)

I was just interested because my motherboard unfortunately only has 1 full X16 Slot, The other is locked into X2 Mode...

So I can't do a SLI or Crossfire setup! :(

Indeed, it is why I come here! And funny you mention that (why I came here) as this thread got me thinking, my 7 years as a member is this month on the 30th, and the reason I joined is I had built my first custom PC for gaming and I had a ton of questions. So just kind of interesting how things have gone full circle so to speak, and I am back in the Hardware Hangout, where it all began for me. :yes: It reminds me of the good old days. Sorry to hear about you not being about to SLi or Crossfire. I still have not had any time yet to see how good these suckers are.

Awesome purchase, DL. Those two video cards are cheaper (and faster) than a single GeForce GTX 480. (Y)

Thanks man. That is exactly why I got them. (Y) This article from Toms Hardware really, really convinced me.

Clean your turbine homey. :laugh:

:laugh: All these pics were taken before I did any cleaning. Once everything was in, I did a full cleaning, and was amazed at how much that came out as it really was not that bad to begin with.

:laugh: All these pics were taken before I did any cleaning. Once everything was in, I did a full cleaning, and was amazed at how much that came out as it really was not that bad to begin with.

Its ok, we all know you were giddy like a school girl to get them in.

I got 1x of the same evga you have, and I was too :laugh:

congrats I guess. How does it feel to know they will be outdated by next year?

that's pretty much true of any pc hardware more or less.

but my 8800 gts 512 was playing dx9 games(the vast majority of releases in that time) at max settings and very good fps right up until i upgraded my new pc.

the only future proof risk is if dx11 really takes off and we see alot of demanding games like metro2033 come out, that raise the stakes even further.

but if history repeats these cards will be great for the next 2-3+ years easily.

hell if you look at the steam hardware survey, iirc there are still tonnes of people using 7900s or even 6800s or their ati equivalents.

for the last few years hardware performance has for the most part really outstripped software(games) demands.

Just out of interest, if one of the ports was running in X2, would he notice performance loss then?

yup

he would

there was a thread on ocfourms.com a while ago where someone tested xfire 4870s on like P35, P45 and think it was X58 mobos

P35 runs xfire in x4/x8, P45 does x8/x8 and X58 does x16/x16

and there was a noticeable drop in the FPS on the P35

congrats I guess. How does it feel to know they will be outdated by next year?

:rofl: It feels great if you could not tell by the 5 pages in this thread. And next year? They were outdated when they were released, everyone knows that about technology, but I guess you felt the need to remind me to make yourself feel better? So sorry about that, but hey if it floats your boat, keep it up. :laugh:

that's pretty much true of any pc hardware more or less.

but my 8800 gts 512 was playing dx9 games(the vast majority of releases in that time) at max settings and very good fps right up until i upgraded my new pc.

the only future proof risk is if dx11 really takes off and we see alot of demanding games like metro2033 come out, that raise the stakes even further.

but if history repeats these cards will be great for the next 2-3+ years easily.

hell if you look at the steam hardware survey, iirc there are still tonnes of people using 7900s or even 6800s or their ati equivalents.

for the last few years hardware performance has for the most part really outstripped software(games) demands.

Well said. Although I am usually against it, in this case this is extremely good food for the troll. (Y)

So I have not gotten to run any benchmarks yet, but I was able to do my first informal "real world" game test, and all I can say is DAMN. Really happy with the results.

I fired up BFBC2. I used to run it at all settings Medium, 4x AA, and 4x AF, and HBAO completely turned off. At 1920 x 1080. I ran these settings because in an online FPS, I always preferred a bit more FPS. So at these mostly medium settings, I used to average around 70 FPS, but it didnt look all that great. Not bad, but not great.

So just for fun, as soon as I opened up the Advance graphic settings, i set everything as High is it could be. AA at 32x, AF at 16x, and for the first time ever, HBAO on. Whenever I put HBAO on with my older card, it would cause such significant frame loss it was not even funny. It literally was not even an option. So maxing out everything, I thought for sure I was gonna then have to scale a few settings back, and lo and behold, I did not have to touch a single setting. I was getting anywhere between 60-85 FPS, all was really dependent on the action going on screen. The lowest I saw it go was 45 FPS, and that was in the tank and a ton going on, and even still, 45 FPS for everything literrally maxed out, is more than liveable, especially when the average was around 70. This was just me watching the FPS while having FRAPS running, but I will do a more formal test and have FRAPS do an actual benchmark, but this is the exact reason I got these cards, so I could not be any happier. It literally looked like the screenshots you see for promotion, but it was playing beautifully. That is absolutely a beautiful thing. :yes:

very nice, i was looking @ getting 2 of those puppies. But i wanna know if i should get the a x16 or x8 PCIe Slot board. @ the moment im still on 775 CPU and planning i5/i7 CPU for xmas...

Grab a x16, then you'll be future proofed, and wont feel as sad as I do :(

ahh I'm just a little jaded with pc gaming. Gave it up for pure console fun. Never no need to worry about upgrading my hardware to play the latest and greatest. Best decision I ever made.

Fair enough, your are entitled to your opinion, just could have gone about it a little better IMO. And just an FYI, I also own all 3 consoles, I really am just someone who likes to game on all systems, and being a bit older with a decent career, I am able to afford myself the luxury to do so. With that said, the first custom gaming PC I built, I ran with the 6800 Ultra GPU I had for almost 4 years. I did not even build a PCI-E based computer until February of last year, and PCI-E was out for quite some time, I just made due with my AGP system the best I could. My point being is, I can somewhat relate to the sentiment about computer hardware and having to keep up, but that simply does not deter me from enjoying it when I can, and the truth is I definitely do not always need the latest and greatest, it just turns out I purchased relatively new cards right now, but I do definitely plan on extending the life of these 2 cards for as long as humanly possible. So I am not one that continues to purchase new tech as it comes out. I would be absolutely broke if that was the case, so I try to make a good decision when I am able to acquire something along these lines.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • And the fact that the majority of people from Poland are white European Christians while the people you are complaining about in post after post are not is just a coincidence... Every sentence in your post I am replying to is racist nonsense. None of it is actually based on any facts whatsoever. All immigrants are seeking a better life too. It's literally the only reason they would risk everything and leave their homes, families, and homeland. They are working and contributing to the economy too, as you even admit. They get the same benefits your partner did AND that YOU are eligible for as well. That is one of the key things of the EU and a mark of a civilization. That is the definition of a society where everyone is given a chance, treated equally and fairly, and is judged by the content of their character, not their different skin color or which version of ignorant superstitious nonsense their parents lied about as children. Racists around the world said the same things about the Irish and Jews and Poles (like your partner) and...every other immigrant movement over the centuries. What's your family's heritage, by the way? Were your ancestors lied about with racist fearmongering crapola by self-entitled locals the same way as you are now? If someone like that said the same things about all people from Poland, like your partner, would they be right? Or would you want them to judge your partner based on who they actually were, not where they just happened to come from?
    • Again, this is an irrelevant attempt to attack the messenger. The truth does not require any justification.
    • Removed the blue and underline as you did not post a link. This would also  be considered spamming.
    • Why it's almost impossible to produce a smartphone in the United States by Hamid Ganji If you look at the back of some Apple products, you can see the famous phrase “Designed by Apple in California, Assembled in China.” This phrase appears on products from one of the largest smartphone brands in the United States. These products are designed in the U.S., but their manufacturing takes place in China, India, Vietnam, or even Brazil. But why can’t Apple, as one of the largest American tech companies, produce its iPhones on U.S. soil? The idea for this topic came to me after the Trump Foundation launched a smartphone called the T1 and claimed that it was designed and built with American values in mind. However, this claim did not last long, as it was revealed that Trump’s phone was actually a rebranded HTC U24 Pro, with only a gold case and minor internal component changes. You see? Even a phone that is supposed to represent American values is manufactured in China. With a gross domestic product (GDP) exceeding $32 trillion, the United States is currently the world’s largest economy, while China ranks second with around $20 trillion. On the other hand, the United States is by a wide margin the global leader in various technological fields, and American companies spend hundreds of billions of dollars annually on research and development. From Apple and Google to Microsoft, Lockheed Martin, Boeing, and others, American tech and industrial giants lead their foreign competitors in many sectors. The United States also has no shortage of smartphone brands. Apple, Google, and Motorola are among the major brands in the smartphone market, collectively holding a significant share. However, the vast majority of their products are manufactured outside the United States. So why is it that the world’s largest economy, home to the most advanced technology companies and industrial powers, cannot produce a smartphone on its own soil? Let’s explore this question together. Even threats to impose tariffs won’t work After Trump entered the White House as the 47th President of the United States, his administration adopted strict tariff policies. One of these policies was the imposition of a 25% tariff on smartphones manufactured outside the United States. Trump said he “had a little problem” with Apple CEO Tim Cook over producing smartphones outside the U.S. So he thought that threatening a 25% tax on imported phones might force Apple to bring manufacturing back to the United States. “I have long ago informed Tim Cook of Apple that I expect their iPhones that will be sold in the United States of America will be manufactured and built in the United States, not India, or anyplace else,” Trump wrote on Truth Social. Image via The White House Although Apple currently manufactures some of the iPhone’s chips in the United States with TSMC's help, it still shows no willingness to shift full iPhone production to the country. At the time, renowned Apple supply chain analyst Ming-Chi Kuo wrote on X, “In terms of profitability, it’s way better for Apple to take the hit of a 25% tariff on iPhones sold in the US market than to move iPhone assembly lines back to the US.” However, manufacturing a smartphone in the United States is not as easy as it might seem, and many technical and economic barriers are involved. The lack of necessary manufacturing hubs There is a clear reason why many companies prefer to manufacture their products in China. China has established itself as the main global manufacturing hub for international companies, and over the past few decades, large contract manufacturers have emerged there, allowing companies like Apple to outsource production. One such example is Foxconn, which also manufactures some Apple products in India. Building the infrastructure required to produce smartphones in the United States would require tens of billions of dollars in new investment. Factories would need to be built, essential manufacturing equipment would have to be installed, and, most importantly, a skilled workforce capable of operating these systems would need to be recruited and trained. The United States currently lacks the core infrastructure needed to manufacture smartphones, and for this reason, many companies prefer to outsource production to Chinese contractors rather than spend tens of billions of dollars to build that infrastructure, which is significantly more economically efficient. Additionally, building such infrastructure in the United States could take up to a decade, ultimately leading to a significant increase in the product's final price for consumers. Shortage of trained labor in the U.S. compared to China Decades of serving as a global manufacturing hub have allowed China to build a massive talent pool in the production sector that is almost unmatched worldwide. Today, if a company chooses to manufacture its products in China, it can be confident that the workers involved in production have years of experience in their respective roles and are capable of producing high-quality goods with minimal errors. Even if we assume that tens of billions of dollars were invested in building smartphone manufacturing infrastructure in the United States, finding skilled workers would remain highly challenging. Apple CEO Tim Cook visiting the iPhone 6 assembly line in China in 2014. Image: Tim Cook on X In a 2015 interview on CBS’s 60 Minutes, Tim Cook said the main reason Apple isn’t producing in the US is a lack of skills. "China put an enormous focus on manufacturing, in what you and I would call vocational kind of skills. The US over time began to stop having as many vocational kinds of skills. I mean you could take every tool and die maker in the United States and probably put them in the room that we're currently sitting in. In China you would have to have multiple football fields,” Cook said. Also, in 2017, at the Fortune Global Forum in Guangzhou, Cook once again emphasized the importance of highly skilled Chinese workers. “China has moved into very advanced manufacturing, so you find in China the intersection of craftsman kind of skill, and sophisticated robotics and the computer science world. That intersection, which is very rare to find anywhere, that kind of skill, is very important to our business because of the precision and quality level that we like. The thing that most people focus on if they’re a foreigner coming to China is the size of the market, and obviously, it’s the biggest market in the world in so many areas. But for us, the number one attraction is the quality of the people,” Apple CEO said. Higher labor costs in the United States Producing almost any product in the United States is more expensive than in many other countries, and one of the main reasons is the higher cost of labor in the U.S. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, median weekly earnings of full-time workers in the United States were $1,235 in the first quarter of 2026. Meanwhile, the average annual salary in China's private sector in 2025 was RMB 71,590 (US$9,961). In many parts of the world, the weekly wage of an American worker is equivalent to several months of income. Another important factor to consider is that in the United States, the workforce capable of working on a smartphone assembly line is highly specialized and therefore commands higher-than-average wages. According to an estimate by Bank of America, producing an iPhone in the U.S. is technically possible, but “iPhone cost can increase 25% purely on higher labor cost in the U.S.” However, this 25% increase applies only if final assembly is performed in the United States while components are still sourced from China or elsewhere. In this case, the price of a base iPhone would rise from $799 to around $1,000. But in another scenario, if Apple were to produce the required components for the iPhone within the United States, production costs could increase by more than 90%. Trump’s dream for a “Made in the USA” iPhone might never come true In a free-market capitalist economy, one of the primary responsibilities of any CEO is to maximize profit. Using Apple as an example, Tim Cook’s role is to maximize the company’s profits so that it can fund research and development for new products and invest in areas such as artificial intelligence, while also keeping shareholders satisfied. Therefore, it is entirely understandable that Apple would choose not to bring its manufacturing back to the United States and instead keep production in countries where labor is cheaper, and products can be manufactured at a lower cost, thereby maximizing its profit margins. What is your opinion about manufacturing smartphones in the United States? If you are an American citizen, would you be willing to pay hundreds of dollars more for a smartphone made domestically in the USA? Let us know in the comments.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      jessse3334 earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Reacting Well
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      506
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      196
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      153
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      72
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      65
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!